All Exams  >   UPSC  >   Spectrum for Modern History: Summary & Tests  >   All Questions

All questions of Rising Resentment Against Company Rule for UPSC CSE Exam

Consider the following statements.
1. The events of 1857 demonstrated that the people in India's politics were not basically communal or sectarian before 1858.
2. Rani Lakshmibai had the solid support of Afghan soldiers.
3. There was deep loyalty which the people felt for the Mughal crown.
4. During the entire revolt, there was complete cooperation between Hindus and Muslims at all levels.
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2 and 3 Only
  • c)
    1, 3 and 4 only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Sarthak Goyal answered
  • During the entire revolt, there was complete cooperation between Hindus and Muslims at all levels-people, soldiers, leaders.
  • All rebels acknowledged Bahadur Shah Zafar, a Muslim, as the emperor and the first impulse of the Hindu sepoys at Meerut was to march to Delhi, the Mughal imperial capital.
  • According to Maulana Azad, "Two facts stand out clearly in the midst of the tangled story of the Rising of 1857.
  • The first is the remarkable sense of unity among the Hindus and the Muslims of India in this period. The other is the deep loyalty which the people felt for the Mughal Crown."
  • Rebels and sepoys, both Hindu and Muslim, respected each other's sentiments. Immediate banning of cow slaughter was ordered once the revolt was successful in a particular area.
  • Both Hindus and Muslims were well represented in leadership; for instance, Nana Saheb had Azimullah, a Muslim and an expert in political propaganda, as an aide. In contrast, Laxmibai had the solid support of Afghan soldiers.
  • The events of 1857 demonstrated India's people and politics was not basically communal or sectarian before 1858.

Arrange the Civil uprisings chronologically. 
1. Sanyasi revolt 
2. Revolt in Bednur 
3. Poligars' revolt 
4. Parlakimidi outbreak
Choose from the following options:
  • a)
    2-3-4-1
  • b)
    1-2-3-4
  • c)
    1-4-2-3
  • d)
    1-3-2-4
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Isha Ahuja answered
Chronological order of Civil uprisings:

1. Sanyasi revolt
2. Revolt in Bednur
3. Poligars revolt
4. Parlakimidi outbreak

Explanation:

1. Sanyasi revolt:
- The Sanyasi revolt took place in the late 18th century (1763-1800), during the British Raj in India.
- The Sanyasis were a group of ascetics who were unhappy with the British rule and the newly introduced land revenue system.
- They launched a rebellion against the British, which was mainly concentrated in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa.
- The revolt was eventually suppressed by the British.

2. Revolt in Bednur:
- The Bednur revolt took place in 1837-38, in the state of Karnataka.
- The revolt was led by Veera Rani Abbakka, the queen of Ullal (a small principality near Mangalore).
- She rebelled against the British East India Company, which was trying to annex her kingdom.
- The revolt continued for two years, but eventually, Abbakka was captured and imprisoned by the British.

3. Poligars revolt:
- The Poligars revolt took place in the late 18th century (1799-1805), in the southern parts of India, especially in the regions of Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
- The Poligars were local chieftains who were unhappy with the British rule and the imposition of new taxes and regulations.
- They launched a rebellion against the British, which was mainly concentrated in the districts of Madurai, Tirunelveli, and Ramnad.
- The revolt was eventually suppressed by the British.

4. Parlakimidi outbreak:
- The Parlakimidi outbreak took place in 1942, during the Quit India Movement, which was launched by the Indian National Congress.
- The movement was a call for the British to leave India immediately.
- In the small town of Parlakimidi, in the state of Odisha, a group of Indian freedom fighters attacked a local police station and killed several British officials.
- The British responded by sending in troops, and the rebellion was eventually suppressed.

Therefore, the correct chronological order of these civil uprisings is 1-3-2-4, as the Sanyasi revolt took place before the Poligars revolt, which in turn took place before the Bednur revolt. The Parlakimidi outbreak was the most recent of these uprisings, taking place in 1942, long after the others had been suppressed.

Consider the following pairs:
1. Sir John Seeley: "Planned war of national independence"
2. Dr. K. Datta: Marxist historian
3. M.N. Roy: Commercial capitalism
4. S.B. Chaudhuri: Feudalism
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
  • a)
    Only one pair
  • b)
    Only two pairs
  • c)
    Only three pairs
  • d)
    All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

1. Sir John Seeley: "Planned war of national independence" - Incorrect. Sir John Seeley did not describe the Revolt of 1857 as a "planned war of national independence." He viewed it more as a series of uncoordinated uprisings.
2. Dr. K. Datta: Marxist historian - Incorrect. Dr. K. Datta is not identified as a Marxist historian. Marxist historians, such as R.P. Dutt, typically analyzed the Revolt of 1857 from a class struggle perspective.
3. M.N. Roy: Commercial capitalism - Correct. M.N. Roy viewed the Revolt of 1857 within the broader context of commercial capitalism and its impacts.
4. S.B. Chaudhuri: Feudalism - Incorrect. S.B. Chaudhuri is known for his work on the economic history of India, but he did not specifically focus on feudalism in the context of the Revolt of 1857.
Thus, only one pair is correctly matched.

Which of the following are the causes for the tribal revolts under British rule?
1. The mainland tribal rebellions were sparked off by several factors, an important one concerned with the tribal lands or forests
2. The British's land settlements affected the joint ownership tradition among the tribals and disrupted their social fabric.
3. As agriculture was extended in a settled form by the Company government, the tribals lost their land
4. There was an influx of non-tribals to these areas.
5. Shifting cultivation in forests was curbed
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2, 3, 4 and 5 only
  • c)
    1, 2 and 4 only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Rhea Mehta answered
Causes for the tribal revolts under British rule:

1. Tribal lands and forests:
- The tribal revolts were sparked off by several factors, with an important one being the issue of tribal lands or forests.
- The British rule led to the encroachment and exploitation of tribal lands and forests, which were traditionally owned and used by the tribes.
- The tribes relied on these lands for their livelihoods, sustenance, and cultural practices. The loss of their lands and forests disrupted their way of life and led to resistance.

2. Disruption of social fabric:
- The British's land settlements and policies affected the joint ownership tradition among the tribals.
- The tribal communities had a collective system of land ownership and usage, where land was held in common and shared among the members.
- The British land settlements introduced individual ownership and disrupted the traditional social fabric of the tribes.
- This led to conflicts within the tribal communities and created divisions among them.

3. Loss of land due to agriculture:
- As agriculture was extended in a settled form by the Company government, the tribals lost their land.
- The British encouraged the expansion of agriculture in tribal areas, often at the expense of tribal lands.
- Tribals who relied on shifting cultivation or other traditional agricultural practices found themselves displaced and marginalized.
- This loss of land and livelihood further fueled resentment and resistance among the tribal communities.

4. Influx of non-tribals:
- The influx of non-tribals to tribal areas also contributed to the tribal revolts.
- The British administration brought in settlers, traders, and other outsiders to exploit the resources of tribal lands.
- This influx of non-tribals led to conflicts over land, resources, and cultural differences.
- The tribes felt marginalized and threatened by the presence of these outsiders, leading to resistance and revolts.

5. Curbing of shifting cultivation:
- Shifting cultivation, a traditional practice among many tribal communities, was curbed by the British administration.
- Shifting cultivation involved the rotation of cultivated fields to allow for natural replenishment of nutrients in the soil.
- The British considered this practice inefficient and sought to replace it with settled agriculture.
- The curbing of shifting cultivation further disrupted the tribal way of life and contributed to their resistance.

In conclusion, the tribal revolts under British rule were caused by a combination of factors including the encroachment on tribal lands and forests, disruption of their social fabric, loss of land due to agriculture, influx of non-tribals, and curbing of traditional practices like shifting cultivation. These factors collectively led to resentment, marginalization, and resistance among the tribal communities. Hence, option D, which includes all these causes, is the correct answer.

What were the factors responsible for People's uprisings?
1. Colonial land revenue settlements
2. Heavy burden of new taxes
3. Eviction of peasants from their land.
4. Growth of intermediary revenue collectors, tenants and money-lenders.
5. Expansion of revenue administration over tribal lands.
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2, 3 and 4 Only
  • c)
    1, 2, 3 and 5 only
  • d)
    All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Rahul Mehta answered
  • The major factors responsible for the people's resentment and uprisings against the Company rule are as follows.
  • Colonial land revenue settlements, the heavy burden of new taxes, eviction of peasants from their lands, and encroachments on tribal lands.
  • Exploitation in rural society coupled with the growth of intermediary revenue collectors, tenants and money-lenders.
  • Expansion of revenue administration over tribal lands leading to the loss of tribal people's hold over agricultural and forest land.
  • Promotion of British manufactured goods, heavy duties on Indian industries, especially export duties, leading to the devastation of Indian handloom and handicraft industries.
  • Destruction of indigenous industry leads to migration of workers from industry to agriculture, increasing land/agriculture pressure.

The resistant to the revolt in Banaras was put by
  • a)
    Henry Lawrence
  • b)
    Sir Colin Campbell
  • c)
    Sir Hugh rose
  • d)
    Colonel James Neill
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Kabir Verma answered
The British Resistance:
Delhi - Lieutenant Willoughby, John Nicholson, Lieutenant Hudson
Kanpur - Sir Hugh Wheeler, Sir Colin Campbell
Lucknow - Henry Lawrence, Brigadier Inglis, Henry Havelock, James Outram, Sir Colin Campbell
Jhansi - Sir Hugh Rose
Benaras - Colonel James Neill

Which of the following is matched correctly?
1. Kondh Uprising - Chakra Bishnoi
2. Santhal Uprising - Sido and Kanhu
3. Kol Uprising - Buddho Bhagat
Choose from the following options:
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 2 Only
  • c)
    2 and 3 Only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Matching of Uprisings with their Leaders

The correct matching of uprisings with their leaders is as follows:

1. Kondh Uprising - Chakra Bishnoi
2. Santhal Uprising - Sido and Kanhu
3. Kol Uprising - Buddho Bhagat

Explanation:

Kondh Uprising:

- The Kondh uprising took place in 1942 in the present-day state of Odisha.
- The Kondhs were a tribal community who were forced to pay high taxes and were exploited by the British.
- Chakra Bishnoi was a Kondh leader who led the uprising against the British.

Santhal Uprising:

- The Santhal Uprising took place in 1855-56 in present-day Jharkhand and West Bengal.
- The Santhals were a tribal community who were being exploited by the British and the Zamindars.
- The uprising was led by two brothers, Sido and Kanhu, who mobilized the Santhal community to fight against the oppression.

Kol Uprising:

- The Kol Uprising took place in 1831-32 in present-day Jharkhand and West Bengal.
- The Kol tribe was being exploited by the British and the Zamindars who forced them to work as bonded laborers.
- The uprising was led by Buddho Bhagat, a tribal leader who mobilized the Kol community to fight against the oppression.

Conclusion:

All the three uprisings were led by tribal leaders who fought against the oppression and exploitation by the British and the Zamindars. These uprisings played an important role in the Indian freedom struggle and inspired other communities to fight for their rights and freedom.

Consider the following statements.
1. The Moamarias were low-caste peasants who followed the teachings of Aniruddha Deva (1553-1624), and their rise was similar to that of other low-caste groups in north India
2. Their revolts weakened the Ahoms and opened the doors for others to attack the region
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both of them
  • d)
    None of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Amit Kumar answered
  • The revolt of the Moamarias in 1769 was a potent challenge to the Ahom kings of Assam's authority.
  • The Moamarias were low-caste peasants who followed Aniruddha Deva's teachings (1553-1624), and their rise was similar to that of other low-caste groups in north India.
  • Their revolts weakened the Ahoms and opened the doors for others to attack the region. For instance, in 1792, the King of Darrang (Krishnanarayan), assisted by his band of burkandazes (the demobilised soldiers of the Muslim armies and zamindars) revolted.

What were the weaknesses of people's uprisings?
1. The mostly arose out of local grievances
2. These rebellions were centuries old in form and ideological/cultural extent
3. The methods and arms were practically obsolete
4. The leadership was semi-feudal in character
Choose from the following options.
  • a)
    1, 2 and 3 Only
  • b)
    2, 3 and 4 Only
  • c)
    2 and 3 Only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Mira Choudhury answered
Weaknesses of People's Uprisings

Introduction:
People's uprisings have been a common phenomenon throughout history. However, these rebellions often fail to achieve their goals due to several weaknesses.

Local Grievances:
One of the weaknesses of people's uprisings is that they mostly arise out of local grievances. These grievances may not be shared by the wider population, leading to a lack of support for the rebellion.

Obsolete Methods and Arms:
Another weakness is that the methods and arms used in these rebellions are often obsolete. This puts the rebels at a disadvantage against the government forces who have access to modern weapons and tactics.

Centuries-Old Form and Ideology:
These rebellions were centuries old in form and ideological/cultural extent. This means that they were often based on outdated ideas and practices that were not effective in achieving their goals.

Semi-Feudal Leadership:
The leadership of these rebellions was often semi-feudal in character. This meant that they lacked the organizational skills and resources necessary to successfully challenge the government.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the weaknesses of people's uprisings include local grievances, obsolete methods and arms, centuries-old form and ideology, and semi-feudal leadership. These factors have contributed to the failure of many rebellions throughout history.

What were the general characteristics of civil uprisings?
1. These uprisings in most cases represented common conditions, though separated in time and place
2. Their leaders were semi-feudal in nature mainly backwards-looking and traditional in Outlook
3. Their basic objective to introduce new democratic forms of rule and social relations
Choose from the following options:
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2 and 3 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

  • Their basic objective was to restore earlier forms of rule and social relations.
  • General Characteristics of Civil Uprisings These uprisings in most cases, represented common conditions, though separated in time and place. The semi-feudal leaders of civil uprisings were backwards-looking and traditional in outlook.
  • Their basic objective was to restore earlier forms of rule and social relations. These uprisings were the result of local causes and grievances and were also localised in their consequences.

The Indian war of independence, 1857 was written by
  • a)
    RC Majumdar
  • b)
    SN Sen
  • c)
    Henry Lawrence
  • d)
    VD Savarkar
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

V D Savarkar in his book, the Indian war of independence, 1857 called The Revolt the first war of Indian independence. He said the lofty ideal of self-Rule inspired it by Indians through a Nationalist upsurge. Dr SN Sen wrote Eighteen Fifty-Seven.

Consider the following statements:
1. The annexation of Indian states by the East India Company cut off a major source of patronage for artisans and handicrafts people.
2. The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy that contributed to the suspicion and discontent among Indian rulers.
3. The Religious Disabilities Act, 1856, aimed to protect the religious rights and properties of Indian communities.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 2 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev UPSC answered
Statement 1: The annexation of Indian states by the East India Company indeed cut off a major source of patronage for artisans and handicrafts people. This led to significant economic distress among these communities, as they lost their traditional sources of support and income.
Statement 2: The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy implemented by the British which allowed them to annex any princely state where the ruler did not have a direct heir. This policy contributed significantly to the suspicion and discontent among Indian rulers, as it threatened their sovereignty and autonomy.
Statement 3: The Religious Disabilities Act, 1856, did not aim to protect religious rights and properties; rather, it was perceived as an interference in religious affairs. It allowed individuals who converted to other religions to inherit property, which was seen as undermining traditional religious practices and beliefs.
Therefore, the correct statements are 1 and 2, making Option B: 1 and 2 Only the correct answer.

The Massacre of Benaras is associated with
  • a)
    Uprisings in Palamu
  • b)
    Revolt of dhundia in Bednur
  • c)
    Civil rebellion in Awadh
  • d)
    Rising at Bareilly
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Rahul Mehta answered
  • Civil Rebellion in Awadh (1799): Wazir Ali Khan, the fourth Nawab of Awadh, with the help of the British, had ascended the throne in September 1797.
  • Soon, his relations with the British became sour, and he got replaced by his uncle, Saadat Ali Khan II. Wazir Ali Khan was granted a pension in Benares.

What were the consequences of the revolt of 1857?
1. As per the Queen's proclamation, the era of annexation and expansion has ended, and the British promised to respect the dignity and rights of the native princes
2. The people of India were promised freedom of religion without interference from British officials
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    None of the Above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Amit Kumar answered
  • As per the Queen's proclamation, the era of annexations and expansion had ended, and the British promised to respect the dignity and rights of the native princes.
  • Henceforth, the Indian states were to recognise the Paramountcy of the British Crown and were to be treated as parts of a single charge.
  • The people of India were promised freedom of religion without interference from British officials. The proclamation also promised equal and impartial protection under the law to all Indians, besides equal opportunities in government services irrespective of race or creed.

Which of the following are correct about White Mutiny? 
1. The white mutiny was seen as a potential threat to the already precarious British position India 
2. Lord Canning's legalistic interpretation of the laws surrounding the transfer also infuriated the affected white soldiers
Choose from the following options:
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

  • White Mutiny: In the wake of the transfer of power from the British East India Company to the British Crown, a section of European forces employed under the Company resented the move that required three Presidency Armies to transfer their allegiance from the defunct Company to the Queen, as in the British Army. This resentment resulted in some unrest termed as White Mutiny.
  • Lord Canning's legalistic interpretation of the laws surrounding the transfer also infuriated the affected White soldiers.
  • The White Mutiny was seen as a potential threat to India's already precarious British position with a potential of inciting renewed rebellion among the 'still excited population in India'. The demands of the European Forces' included an enlistment bonus or a choice of release from their obligations.
  • Finally, the demand for free and clear release with free passage home was accepted, and men opted to return home. It is also believed that open rebellion and physical violence on the part of European Forces' were such that there was little possibility of being accepted into the 'Queen's Army.

Arrange this Sepoy Mutinies chronologically
1. Mutiny of 34th native infantry
2. Mutiny in Solapur
3. Vellore mutiny
4. Mutiny of 47th native infantry unit
Choose from the following options:
  • a)
    1-2-3-4
  • b)
    3-4-2-1
  • c)
    1-3-2-4
  • d)
    2-3-1-4
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Akshara Menon answered
The correct answer is option 'B' - 3-4-2-1.

Explanation:
1. Vellore Mutiny:
The Vellore Mutiny took place on 10th July 1806 in Vellore, Tamil Nadu. It was one of the earliest and significant mutinies in India's struggle for independence against British colonial rule. The mutiny was led by sepoys of the 1st Battalion of the Madras Native Infantry. The sepoys were unhappy with several British policies, including the introduction of a new type of headdress and the lack of religious freedom. They attacked the British officers and took control of the Vellore Fort. However, the mutiny was eventually suppressed by the British forces.

2. Mutiny of 47th Native Infantry Unit:
The Mutiny of the 47th Native Infantry Unit occurred in Barrackpore, West Bengal, in 1824. The sepoys of the 47th Native Infantry were dissatisfied with their pay and working conditions. They protested against the use of the new Enfield rifle cartridges, which were rumored to be greased with animal fat, offensive to both Hindu and Muslim sepoys. The mutiny was suppressed by British forces, and several sepoys were court-martialed and executed.

3. Mutiny in Solapur:
The Mutiny in Solapur took place in 1857 during the larger Indian Rebellion of 1857. The sepoys of the 14th and 15th Bengal Native Infantry stationed in Solapur rebelled against the British. They were inspired by the news of the uprising in other parts of the country and joined the rebellion. The mutiny was eventually suppressed by British forces, and many sepoys were captured or killed.

4. Mutiny of 34th Native Infantry:
The Mutiny of the 34th Native Infantry occurred in 1857 in Barrackpore, West Bengal. The sepoys of the 34th Native Infantry were influenced by the ongoing rebellion in other parts of India and decided to join the mutiny. They killed their British officers and took control of the barracks. However, the mutiny was suppressed by British forces, and the sepoys were severely punished.

Therefore, the correct chronological order of the Sepoy Mutinies is 3-4-2-1: Vellore Mutiny, Mutiny of 47th Native Infantry Unit, Mutiny in Solapur, and Mutiny of 34th Native Infantry.

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
The British policies of economic exploitation in India significantly contributed to the discontent that led to the Revolt of 1857.
Statement-II:
The East India Company's imposition of high tariff duties on Indian-made goods while allowing the import of British goods with low tariffs crippled Indian industries and artisans.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
  • b)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
  • c)
    Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
  • d)
    Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Ias Masters answered

Statement-I correctly highlights that the British policies of economic exploitation played a significant role in fostering discontent in India, which eventually led to the Revolt of 1857. Statement-II effectively supports Statement-I by explaining how the East India Company's actions, such as imposing high tariff duties on Indian goods and favoring the import of British products with low tariffs, directly impacted Indian industries and artisans, contributing to their decline. Therefore, both statements are accurate, and Statement-II logically explains the implications of Statement-I within the context of the Revolt of 1857.

Chapter doubts & questions for Rising Resentment Against Company Rule - Spectrum for Modern History: Summary & Tests 2026 is part of UPSC CSE exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the UPSC CSE exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for UPSC CSE 2026 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.

Chapter doubts & questions of Rising Resentment Against Company Rule - Spectrum for Modern History: Summary & Tests in English & Hindi are available as part of UPSC CSE exam. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC CSE Exam by signing up for free.

Top Courses UPSC CSE

Related UPSC CSE Content