All Exams  >   UPSC  >   Laxmikanth for Indian Polity: Summaries, MCQs & videos  >   All Questions

All questions of Central Government, Parliament & Judiciary for UPSC CSE Exam

Which of the following bills can be introduced only with the permission of the President?
  • a)
    Finance bills
  • b)
    Constitution amendment bills
  • c)
    Bills related to defence procurements
  • d)
    Impeachment of the judges
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Pooja Shah answered
The Correct Answer is B: Constitution Amendment Bills
  • There are some bills which require the prior recommendation of the President before their introduction in the Parliament. These bills are:
Bill that seeks to alter the boundaries of the states and names of the states. Money Bill & Finance Bill. State Bills which impose the restrictions upon freedom of trade. Any bill which affects the taxation in which the states are interested.

Consider the following statements about cabinet committees. 
1. Prime Minister is the chairman of all the cabinet committees 
2. They only include cabinet ministers 
Which of these statements are not correct?
  • a)
    Only 1
  • b)
    2 Only 
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Devanshi Gupta answered
The correct option is 3. Both 1 and 2.

Explanation:

1. The Prime Minister is not the chairman of all the cabinet committees. There are several cabinet committees, and while the Prime Minister is the head of many, there are others that are headed by other senior ministers.

2. Cabinet committees do not only include cabinet ministers. They may also include Ministers of State (independent charge) or even Ministers of State. The members of these committees are decided by the Prime Minister.

Consider the following statements.
1. The principle of collective responsibility means that the cabinet decisions bind all cabinet ministers not other ministers even if they differed in the Cabinet meeting.
2. If any Minister disagrees with the cabinet decision and is not prepared to defend it, he must resign 
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 only
  • c)
    Both of them   
  • d)
    None of them
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Ojasvi Mehta answered
The principle of collective responsibility means that the cabinet decisions bind all cabinet ministers not other ministers even if they differed in the Cabinet meeting. The first statement is incorrect because the principle of collective responsibility binds all ministers who are part of the cabinet, not just the cabinet ministers.
If any Minister disagrees with the cabinet decision and is not prepared to defend it, he must resign: This statement is accurate. Under the principle of collective responsibility, if a minister cannot support a cabinet decision publicly, the convention is that the minister should resign from the cabinet. This ensures that the government presents a united front and maintains coherence in its policies and actions.

Which of the following comes under the judicial powers of the President of India?
1. Appointment of the judges of the Supreme Court of India.
2. Pardoning a death sentence.
3. Deciding on whether a bill should be sent for reconsideration to the concerned state legislature.
Choose the correct answer using the codes below:
  • a)
    1 and 2
  • b)
    2 and 3
  • c)
    1 and 3
  • d)
    All of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Anmol Kumar answered
Judicial powers of the President of India

The President of India is the head of the Indian judiciary and exercises various judicial powers. The correct option is (a) 1 and 2. Let's understand these powers in detail:

1. Appointment of judges of the Supreme Court of India:
The President of India has the power to appoint the judges of the Supreme Court of India. This power is exercised in consultation with the Chief Justice of India and other senior judges of the Supreme Court.

2. Pardoning a death sentence:
The President of India has the power to grant pardon, reprieve, respite or remission of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence. This power is exercised under Article 72 of the Indian Constitution.

3. Sending a bill for reconsideration to the concerned state legislature:
This power is not a judicial power of the President of India. It falls under the legislative powers of the President. The President can send a bill passed by the state legislature for reconsideration. However, the President cannot reject or amend the bill.

Conclusion:
Thus, the correct option is (a) 1 and 2. The President of India has the power to appoint judges of the Supreme Court and to grant pardon or reprieve in case of death sentence.

Consider the following pairs:
1. Executive Authority - Appointment of Prime Minister
2. Legislative Authority - Summoning and proroguing Parliament
3. Financial Authority - Presentation of the annual financial statement (Union Budget)
4. Judicial  Authority - Authority to grant pardons
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
  • a)
    Only one pair
  • b)
    Only two pairs
  • c)
    All four pairs
  • d)
    Only three pairs
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Aarya Pillai answered
Understanding the Pairs
To analyze the correctness of the pairs provided, we need to examine each one in the context of the Indian Constitution and the roles assigned to different authorities.
1. Executive Authority - Appointment of Prime Minister
- The President of India has the executive authority to appoint the Prime Minister. This pair is correctly matched.
2. Legislative Authority - Summoning and proroguing Parliament
- The President also possesses the power to summon and prorogue Parliament sessions. This pair is correctly matched.
3. Financial Authority - Presentation of the annual financial statement (Union Budget)
- The responsibility of presenting the Union Budget lies with the Finance Minister, who presents it in Parliament. However, the authority to do so is derived from the Union Government, making this pair also correctly matched.
4. Judicial Authority - Authority to grant pardons
- The power to grant pardons is vested in the President under Article 72 of the Constitution. Therefore, this pair is also correctly matched.
Conclusion
- All four pairs given in the question are accurate representations of the powers assigned to their respective authorities. Thus, the correct answer is option 'C' - All four pairs are correctly matched.
This understanding is crucial for UPSC aspirants, as it reflects the distribution of powers within the Indian government framework.

Consider the following about the powers of the President of India.
1. He can appoint an inter-state council to promote Centre-state and inter-state cooperation.
2. He directly administers the union territories through administrators appointed by him.
3. He can declare an area as scheduled area and has powers concerning the administration of scheduled areas and tribal areas.
Select the correct answer using the codes below,
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2 and 3 only
  • c)
    1 and 3 only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Gargi Sengupta answered
The Powers of the President of India

The President of India is the head of state and the commander-in-chief of the Indian Armed Forces. The powers of the President of India are listed in the Constitution of India. Let's discuss the powers of the President of India in detail.

Appointment of Inter-state Council

The President of India can appoint an inter-state council to promote Centre-state and inter-state cooperation. The inter-state council is a constitutional body that was set up in 1990 to promote cooperation between states and the Centre. The council is headed by the Prime Minister and has chief ministers of all the states and Union Territories as members. The council discusses issues related to Centre-state relations and inter-state relations and makes recommendations to the Centre and states. The President has the power to appoint the members of the council and can also dissolve the council.

Direct Administration of Union Territories

The President of India directly administers the union territories through administrators appointed by him. India has seven union territories, and the President appoints an administrator for each of them. The administrator is responsible for the administration of the union territory and reports directly to the President. The administrator has the power to make laws for the union territory, subject to the approval of the President.

Powers Concerning the Administration of Scheduled Areas and Tribal Areas

The President of India can declare an area as scheduled area and has powers concerning the administration of scheduled areas and tribal areas. A scheduled area is an area in which the tribal population is in the majority or in which the tribal population is significantly higher than the rest of the population. The President has the power to declare an area as a scheduled area and can also make regulations for the administration of scheduled areas. The President can also nominate members to the advisory council for the welfare of the scheduled tribes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the powers of the President of India are significant, and the President plays a crucial role in the governance of the country. The President has the power to appoint an inter-state council, directly administer union territories, and has powers concerning the administration of scheduled areas and tribal areas. These powers ensure that the President can effectively carry out his duties and responsibilities as the head of state.

Which statement is not correct in the context of Article 75(3)?
  • a)
    The President will appoint the Prime Minister
  • b)
    The number of members of cabinet will not exceed 15% of the total number of Lok Sabha
  • c)
    The minister shall hold the office till the pleasure of the Prime Minister 
  • d)
    The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to Lok Sabha.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Alok Verma answered
The minister shall hold the office till the pleasure of the Prime Minister.  Option 3 is incorrect.
Article 75(2) specifically provides that the ministers shall hold office during the pleasure of the President.. The Prime Minister may call for the resignation of any ministers at any time.

Consider the following statements:
1. Impeachment of the President can be initiated for "violation of the Constitution."
2. A two-thirds majority vote in both houses of Parliament is required for the removal of the President.
3. The charges for impeachment must be signed by half of the members of either house of Parliament.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 2 Only
  • c)
    2 and 3 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

K.L Institute answered
- Statement 1 is correct. Impeachment of the President can be initiated for "violation of the Constitution."
- Statement 2 is correct. For the removal of the President, a two-thirds majority vote in both houses of Parliament is required.
- Statement 3 is incorrect. The charges for impeachment must be signed by one-fourth, not half, of the members of either house of Parliament.

In the matter of State legislation, the President may
  • a)
    exercise only suspensive veto power
  • b)
    may withhold assent to any bill reserved for his consideration except money bills
  • c)
    withhold his assent to any bill reserved for his consideration
  • d)
    directly disallow any bill which he considers anti-national
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Kavya Datta answered
Explanation:
According to Article 111 of the Indian Constitution, when a bill is passed by both houses of Parliament, it is presented to the President for his assent. The President can do the following:

1. Give his assent: If the President gives his assent, the bill becomes an act and comes into force.

2. Withhold his assent: If the President withholds his assent, the bill is dropped, and it does not become an act.

3. Return the bill for reconsideration: If the President returns the bill for reconsideration, the Parliament can make changes to the bill and pass it again. If the bill is passed again and presented to the President, he must give his assent.

4. Exercise suspensive veto power: If the President exercises suspensive veto power, he can withhold his assent to the bill for a maximum of six months. If the bill is not passed again by Parliament in the meantime, it lapses.

However, the President cannot withhold his assent to a money bill. A money bill is a bill that deals with taxation, borrowing of money by the government, or expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India. It is deemed to be passed by both houses of Parliament if it is passed by the Lok Sabha (the lower house of Parliament) and transmitted to the Rajya Sabha (the upper house of Parliament) within 14 days. The Rajya Sabha can only make recommendations on the bill, and the Lok Sabha can either accept or reject these recommendations. The President cannot return a money bill for reconsideration.

Thus, in the matter of State legislation, the President may withhold his assent to any bill reserved for his consideration except money bills.

Consider the following statements.
1. A person who is not a member of either House of Parliament can also be appointed as a minister 
2. But within six months, he must become a member, by election or nomination, of either House of Parliament, otherwise, he ceases to be a minister
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    Both 1 and 2
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    1 Only
  • d)
    None of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Mehul Malik answered
Both statements are correct.
A person who is not a member of either House of Parliament can be appointed as a minister under Article 75(5) of the Constitution of India. This is because the Constitution does not specifically require that a person must be a member of Parliament to be appointed as a minister.
However, as per Article 75(5), such a person must become a member of either House of Parliament within six months of their appointment as a minister. If they fail to do so, they would cease to be a minister. This provision ensures that all ministers are accountable to the Parliament and responsible for their actions as ministers.

In which of the following situations can the President exercise discretionary powers?
1. Asking the Council of Ministers to reconsider the advice tendered to him
2. Pocket veto in case of Parliamentary legislation
3. In appointing the Prime Minister when no political party can prove a clear majority
Choose the correct answer using the codes below:
  • a)
    1 and 2
  • b)
    2 and 3
  • c)
    1 and 3
  • d)
    All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Discretionary Powers of the President
The President of a country holds certain discretionary powers that allow them to exercise their judgment and take independent actions in specific situations. In the case of India, the President has discretionary powers in various scenarios. Let's discuss each of the situations mentioned in the question:
1. Asking the Council of Ministers to reconsider the advice tendered to him:
- The President can exercise discretionary powers by seeking reconsideration of the advice given by the Council of Ministers.
- This power enables the President to review and reassess the recommendations and decisions put forward by the Council of Ministers before giving his final assent or taking any action.
- By doing so, the President can ensure that the advice given is in the best interest of the nation and aligns with the constitutional provisions.
2. Pocket veto in case of Parliamentary legislation:
- The President can utilize a pocket veto when it comes to parliamentary legislation.
- A pocket veto is a power that allows the President to indirectly veto a bill by not giving his assent within a specified time frame.
- If the President does not take any action on a bill passed by Parliament within a particular period (generally six weeks), it is considered as a pocket veto.
- Through this discretionary power, the President can effectively prevent the enactment of a bill if he deems it necessary.
3. Appointing the Prime Minister when no political party can prove a clear majority:
- In situations where no political party can demonstrate a clear majority in the Parliament, the President exercises discretionary powers in appointing the Prime Minister.
- The President weighs various factors, including the support extended by different political parties, the ability to form a stable government, and the overall political landscape, while making this decision.
- By exercising this power, the President plays a crucial role in ensuring the formation of a government that can effectively govern and maintain stability.
Conclusion:
Considering the situations mentioned in the question, all of them fall under the discretionary powers of the President of India. The President can exercise discretion in asking the Council of Ministers to reconsider their advice, utilizing a pocket veto for parliamentary legislation, and appointing the Prime Minister when no political party can prove a clear majority. Therefore, the correct answer is option D: All of the above.

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
The Vice-President of India can hold office beyond 5 years until a successor takes charge.
Statement-II:
The Vice-President of India can be reelected any number of times.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
  • b)
    Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
  • c)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
  • d)
    Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

K.L Institute answered

Statement-I is accurate as per the provisions mentioned in the Term of Office & Emoluments section for the Vice-President of India. The Vice-President can indeed hold office beyond 5 years until a successor takes charge. This aligns with the information provided.
However, Statement-II is incorrect based on the same source material. The Vice-President of India cannot be reelected any number of times. While there is no specific limit mentioned, there is an implicit understanding that there are practical and political considerations that would likely prevent indefinite reelections. Therefore, Statement-II is inaccurate.
Thus, the correct answer is option (c): Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect.

As per the constitution, the Indian president has the power to
1. Ask for files relating to any matter from Prime Minister that is in deliberation in the Council of Ministers
2. Send the decision of an individual ministry for reconsideration
3. Suspend the council of ministers if he feels it is violating constitutional norms
Select the correct answer using the codes below:
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2 and 3 only
  • c)
    1 and 3 only
  • d)
    All of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Kavita Mehta answered
  • If an individual ministry has taken the decision, which has not been considered by the cabinet, the president can send the reconsideration file.
  • The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 (enacted by the Indira Gandhi Government) made the President bound by the council's advice of ministers headed by the prime minister.
  • The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978 (enacted by the Janata Party Government headed by Shri Morarji Desai) authorised the President to require ministers' council to reconsider such advice either generally or otherwise.
  • However, he 'shall' act following the advice tendered after such reconsideration. In other words, the President may return a matter once for reconsideration of his ministers, but the reconsidered advice shall be binding.
  • The president can also ask for the files and ask details about the decisions that are to be taken in the council of ministers. However, he cannot suspend it if it enjoys confidence in the Lok Sabha.

Which of the following statements are not correct?
1. Vice president can be removed from the office before completion of his term
2. A formal impeachment is not required for his removal
3. The vice president can be removed from office by a process of impeachment for violation of the constitution
Choose from the following options.
  • a)
    1 and 2 Only
  • b)
    2 and 3 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Isha Yadav answered
No ground has been mentioned in the constitution for his removal. The Vice-President holds office for a term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office. However, he can resign from his office at any time by addressing the resignation letter to the President. He can also be removed from the office before completion of his term. A formal impeachment is not required for his removal. He can be removed by a resolution of the Rajya Sabha passed by an absolute majority (ie, a majority of the total members of the House) and agreed to by the Lok Sabha. But, no such resolution can be moved unless at least 14 days' advance notice has been given. Notably, no ground has been mentioned in the Constitution for his removal. The Vice-President can hold office beyond his term of five years until his successor assumes charge. He is also eligible for re-election to that office. He may be elected for any number of terms.

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
To be eligible for election as Vice-President of India, a person should be a citizen of India and have completed 35 years of age.
Statement-II:
The Vice-President of India is required to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India and faithfully discharge the duties of the office.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
  • b)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
  • c)
    Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
  • d)
    Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

BT Educators answered
Statement-I is correct. As per Article 66(3) of the Indian Constitution, to be eligible for election as Vice-President of India, a person must be a citizen of India, must have completed 35 years of age, and must be qualified for election as a member of the Rajya Sabha.
Statement-II is also correct. According to Article 69, the Vice-President of India takes an oath to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India and to faithfully discharge the duties of the office.
However, Statement-II does not explain Statement-I, as eligibility criteria and the oath of office are separate constitutional provisions.
Correct answer: Option (a) - Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I.

Consider the following statements. 
1. Article 74 deals with the appointment and tenure of the council of ministers 
2. Article 72 deals with the responsibility, qualification, oath and salaries and allowances of the ministers 
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    None of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Article 74 deals with the status of the council of ministers while Article 75 deals with the appointment, tenure, responsibility, qualification, oath and salaries and allowances of the ministers. The principles of the parliamentary system of government are not detailed in the Constitution, but two Articles (74 and 75) deal with them in a broad, sketchy and general manner.

Which of the following statement about the Council of ministers is NOT correct?
  1. It is a smaller body consisting of 15 to 20 ministers.
  2. It includes all the three categories of ministers, that is, cabinet ministers, ministers of state, and deputy ministers.
  • a)
    Only 1 is incorrect
  • b)
    Only 2 is incorrect
  • c)
    Both are incorrect
  • d)
    Both are correct
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Garima Desai answered
Understanding the Council of Ministers
The Council of Ministers is a pivotal component of the executive branch in India, responsible for the administration and governance of the country. Let's analyze the statements provided.
Statement Analysis
- Statement 1: It is a smaller body consisting of 15 to 20 ministers.
- This statement is incorrect. In India, the Council of Ministers can consist of more than 20 ministers, depending on the size of the government. There is no fixed upper limit of 20 ministers, making this statement misleading.
- Statement 2: It includes all three categories of ministers: cabinet ministers, ministers of state, and deputy ministers.
- This statement is correct. The Council of Ministers indeed comprises all three categories of ministers. Cabinet ministers hold significant portfolios, while ministers of state may hold independent charge or assist cabinet ministers. Deputy ministers typically assist cabinet or state ministers.
Conclusion
Given the analysis, only the first statement is incorrect, which means the correct answer is option 'A'.
- Option A: Only 1 is incorrect.
This highlights the importance of understanding the structure and composition of the Council of Ministers in the context of Indian governance, especially for competitive examinations like UPSC.

Before a Minister enters upon his office, the president administers to him the oaths of office and secrecy. In his oath of office, the minister swears:
1. To bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India,
2. To uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India,
3. To faithfully and conscientiously discharge the duties of his office, and
4. To preserve, protect and defend the constitution and the law
Choose from the following options.
  • a)
    1, 2 and 3 Only
  • b)
    1 and 3 Only
  • c)
    1, 3 and 4 only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Amit Kumar answered
Before a Minister enters upon his office, the president administers to him the oaths of office and secrecy. In his oath of office, the minister swears: 1. to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India, 2. to uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, 3. to faithfully and conscientiously discharge the duties of his office, and 4. to do right to all manner of people in accordance with the Constitution and the law, without fear or favour, affection or ill will.

Which among the following are the roles of the cabinet?
1. It is the chief policy formulating body of the central government
2. It deals with all the major legislative matters
3. It deals with all foreign policies and Foreign Affairs
Choose from the following options.
  • a)
    1 and 3 Only
  • b)
    2 and 3 Only
  • c)
    1 and 2 Only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Gowri Mehta answered
The correct answer is option 'D': All of them.

The cabinet plays multiple roles in the functioning of the government. Let's discuss each role in detail:

1. Chief Policy Formulating Body of the Central Government:
The cabinet is responsible for formulating and implementing policies that guide the functioning of the central government. It is the highest decision-making body where policies are discussed, debated, and approved. The cabinet members, who are senior ministers, provide inputs, suggestions, and recommendations on various policy matters. They also analyze the potential impact of policies on different sectors and sections of society. Once a policy is finalized, it is implemented through various government departments and agencies.

2. Dealing with Major Legislative Matters:
The cabinet plays a crucial role in the legislative process. It is responsible for proposing and introducing major bills and legislations in the parliament. Cabinet members, who are also members of parliament, take part in the legislative debates, discussions, and voting. They present the government's perspective on various bills and work towards their passage. The cabinet also reviews and approves the draft bills prepared by different ministries before they are presented in the parliament.

3. Handling Foreign Policies and Foreign Affairs:
The cabinet is responsible for formulating and implementing foreign policies of the country. It deals with matters related to international relations, diplomacy, and foreign affairs. Cabinet members, including the Prime Minister and the Minister of External Affairs, represent the country in international forums, negotiations, and summits. They engage in bilateral and multilateral discussions with other countries to promote the country's interests, maintain peace and security, and enhance economic cooperation. The cabinet also takes decisions on matters like signing international treaties, agreements, and conventions.

In summary, the cabinet plays a pivotal role in policy formulation, legislative matters, and foreign affairs. It serves as the chief decision-making body of the central government, ensuring effective governance and representing the country's interests at the national and international levels.

Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Central Council of Ministers?
1. It consists of three categories of ministers.
2. At times, the council of ministers may also include a deputy prime minister.
Select the correct answer code from the following options.
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    None of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Nabanita Kaur answered
Central Council of Ministers consists of three categories of ministers, namely, cabinet ministers, ministers of state and deputy ministers. At times, the council of ministers may also include a deputy prime minister. The deputy prime ministers are appointed mostly for political reasons.

The President is an integral part of the Parliament of India. Which of the following are done by the President, concerning the sessions of the Parliament?
1. Summoning
2. Proroguing
3. Dissolving Lok Sabha
Choose the correct answer from the codes below.
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2 and 3 only
  • c)
    1 and 3 only
  • d)
    All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Meera Kapoor answered
Roles of the President concerning the sessions of the Parliament:
The President of India has several significant roles and powers when it comes to the functioning of the Parliament of India. Here are the roles corresponding to the options mentioned:
  • Summoning: The President has the power to summon each House of Parliament to meet. This means that the President can call for a new session of the Parliament. This is done at such time and place as he thinks fit. Normally, there are three sessions of Parliament in a year: the Budget session, the Monsoon session, and the Winter session.
  • Proroguing: The President can prorogue the Houses of Parliament. This means that the President can end a session of the Parliament. However, it must be noted that prorogation does not affect the bills, resolutions, motions, etc., pending before the House, which can be resumed in the next session from the stage at which they were left before prorogation.
  • Dissolving Lok Sabha: The President has the power to dissolve the Lok Sabha. This means that the President can end the tenure of the Lok Sabha before its term of five years. However, the President can dissolve Lok Sabha only on the advice of the Prime Minister. Once the Lok Sabha is dissolved, all business including bills, motions, resolutions, etc., pending before it or its committees lapse.
So, all the above-mentioned roles - summoning, proroguing, and dissolving the Lok Sabha are performed by the President concerning the sessions of the Parliament. Hence, the correct answer is D: All of the above.

Consider the following statements about the pardoning power of the President.
1. He can exercise this power even without the advice of the cabinet.
2. The President is not bound to give reasons for his order.
3. The petitioner for mercy has no right to an oral hearing by the President.
Choose the correct answer from the codes below,
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2 and 3 only
  • c)
    1 and 3 only
  • d)
    All of the above
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Valor Academy answered
  1. The President can exercise this power even without the advice of the cabinet: This is incorrect. While the President has the power to grant pardons, this power is typically exercised on the advice of the Union Cabinet, as per the provisions of the Constitution (Article 72). The President may act independently in certain cases, but the norm is for the Cabinet's advice to be considered.
  2. The President is not bound to give reasons for his order: This is correct. The President is not required to give reasons for exercising the pardoning power, and there is no legal requirement to do so.
  3. The petitioner for mercy has no right to an oral hearing by the President: This is correct. There is no provision in the Constitution that mandates an oral hearing for the petitioner. The mercy petition is decided based on the written representation.
Therefore, the correct answer is b) 2 and 3 only.

Consider the following statements.
1. The term of the Prime Minister is not fixed and he holds office during the pleasure of the president
2. This does not mean that the president can dismiss the Prime Minister at any time
3. So long as the Prime Minister enjoys the majority support in the Lok Sabha, he cannot be dismissed by the President
4. If he loses the confidence of the Lok Sabha, he must resign or the President can dismiss him
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1, 2 and 3 Only
  • b)
    1, 3 and 4 only
  • c)
    1 and 4 only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

The term of the Prime Minister is not fixed and he holds office during the pleasure of the president. However, this does not mean that the president can dismiss the Prime Minister at any time. So long as the Prime Minister enjoys the majority support in the Lok Sabha, he cannot be dismissed by the President.
However, if he loses the confidence of the Lok Sabha, he must resign or the President can dismiss him.

Under which Article of the Constitution of India, the executive power of the union is vested in the President?
  • a)
    54
  • b)
    55
  • c)
    56
  • d)
    53
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Sanjay Rana answered
Important Points 
Article 53: Executive Power of the Union
  1. The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.
  2. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union Shall be vested in the President and the exercise thereof shall be regulated by law.
  3. Nothing in this article shall –
  • be deemed to transfer to the President any functions conferred by any existing law on the Government of any State or other authority; or
  • prevent Parliament from conferring by law functions on authorities other than the President.
Thus, we can conclude that under Article 53 of the Constitution of India, the executive power of the union is vested in the President.
Additional Information
  • Article 54: Election of President
  • Article 55: Manner of Election of President
  • Article 56: Term of Office of President

Which of these constitutional functionaries holds office till the pleasure of the President?
1. Governor
2. Chief Election Commissioner (CEC)
3. Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG)
Select the correct answer using the codes below.
  • a)
    1 only
  • b)
    2 and 3 only
  • c)
    1 and 2 only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Kabir Verma answered
  • The President can remove him at any time without citing reasons for the same. He is an agent of the Centre and does not enjoy any security of tenure.
  • The chief election commissioner is provided with the security of tenure. He cannot be removed from his office except in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Supreme Court judge.
In other words, he can be removed by the president based on a resolution passed to that effect by both the Houses of Parliament with the special majority, either on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
Thus, he does not hold his office until the president's pleasure, though he appoints him.

The executive can make laws via the ordinance route, as mentioned in Article 123 of the constitution. Consider the following with this reference.
1. Ordinances can only be made from subjects in the Union List by the Union executive.
2. All ordinances made by the state executive are null and void if made without the President's prior recommendation.
Which of the above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 only
  • b)
    2 only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    None
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Om Saha answered
Explanation:

The correct option is D i.e. None of the above statements are correct. Let's understand why:

1. Ordinances can only be made from subjects in the Union List by the Union executive: This statement is incorrect because ordinances can be made on subjects in all three lists i.e. Union List, State List, and Concurrent List. However, the President cannot promulgate an ordinance on a matter that falls under the State List without the prior recommendation of the concerned state government.

2. All ordinances made by the state executive are null and void if made without the President's prior recommendation: This statement is also incorrect because the state executive cannot make ordinances. Only the Governor can promulgate an ordinance on matters that fall under the State List, but only when the state legislature is not in session and the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist that require immediate action.

Therefore, both statements are incorrect.

Conclusion:

Ordinances are temporary laws that can be made by the President or the Governor when the Parliament or state legislature is not in session. They can be made on subjects in all three lists. However, the President cannot promulgate an ordinance on a matter that falls under the State List without the prior recommendation of the concerned state government. Similarly, the Governor can promulgate an ordinance on matters that fall under the State List, but only when the state legislature is not in session and the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist that require immediate action.

Consider the following statements with respect to duties of the Prime Minister according to the Constitution of India:
1. To make rules for the more convenient transaction of business of the Government of India, and for the allocation among Ministers of the said business.
2. If the President so requires, to submit for consideration of the Council of Ministers any matter on which a decision has been taken by a Minister but which has not been considered by the Council.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    Only 1
  • b)
    Neither 1 nor 2
  • c)
    1 and 2
  • d)
    Only 2 
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Lohit Matani answered
Statement 1 is incorrect. The Constitution of India, under Article 77 clause 3, states that the President shall make rules for the more convenient transaction of business of the Government of India and for the allocation among Ministers of the said business. This function is not assigned to the Prime Minister.
Statement 2 is correct. Article 78 clause c of the Constitution mentions that it is the duty of the Prime Minister to submit for the consideration of the Council of Ministers any matter on which a decision has been taken by a Minister but which has not been considered by the Council, if the President so requires.
Therefore, the Correct Answer is Option D.

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
The President is the nominal executive authority (de jure executive) and Prime Minister is the real executive authority (de facto executive).
Statement-II:
The President has the authority to appoint the Prime Minister based on the conventions of the parliamentary system of government.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
  • b)
    Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
  • c)
    Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
  • d)
    Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?


Statement-I correctly defines the roles of the President and Prime Minister in the government structure. The President holds a symbolic position while the Prime Minister wields actual executive power.
Statement-II accurately mentions that the President appoints the Prime Minister following the parliamentary system's conventions. However, it does not elaborate on the distinct roles of the President and Prime Minister as highlighted in Statement-I. Hence, both statements are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I.

Consider the following statements:
1. During a national emergency, the President can suspend all fundamental rights.
2. The President can impose President's Rule due to the failure of constitutional machinery in states.
3. Financial Emergency allows the President to issue directives to reduce salaries and allowances of government officials, including judges.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 2 Only
  • c)
    2 and 3 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Upsc Toppers answered
- Statement 1 is incorrect. During a national emergency, the President can suspend certain fundamental rights, but not all. Specifically, the right to life and personal liberty cannot be suspended.
- Statement 2 is correct. The President can impose President's Rule due to the failure of constitutional machinery in states.
- Statement 3 is correct. Financial Emergency allows the President to issue directives to reduce salaries and allowances, including those of judges.

Consider the following statements.
1. The American Vice President succeeds to the presidency when it falls vacant, and remains President for the unexpired term of his predecessor. 
2. The Indian Vice-President, on the other hand, does not assume the office of the President when it falls vacant for the unexpired term. 
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Uday Chawla answered
  1. The American Vice President succeeds to the presidency when it falls vacant, and remains President for the unexpired term of his predecessor.
    • This statement is correct. According to the U.S. Constitution and the Presidential Succession Act, if the President of the United States dies, resigns, is removed from office, or is otherwise unable to serve, the Vice President automatically becomes President and serves for the remainder of the original term.
  2. The Indian Vice-President, on the other hand, does not assume the office of the President when it falls vacant for the unexpired term.
    • This statement is also correct. In India, when the office of the President falls vacant, the Vice-President serves as the Acting President until a new President is elected. The Vice-President does not become the President for the remainder of the original term but only holds the office temporarily.
Therefore, the correct answer is: Both 1 and 2

Consider the following statements:
1. The Vice-President of India can be re-elected any number of times.
2. The Vice-President's salary is fixed and not subject to any other official capacities.
3. The Vice-President can act as President for a maximum period of 6 months in case of a vacancy in the office of the President.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    1 and 3 Only
  • c)
    1 and 2 Only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Asha Tiwari answered
Overview of the Vice-President of India
The Vice-President of India holds a significant constitutional position with specific roles and responsibilities. Let's examine each statement provided:
Statement 1: Re-election of the Vice-President
- The Vice-President can indeed be re-elected any number of times. There is no limit on the number of terms a Vice-President can serve. This statement is correct.
Statement 2: Salary of the Vice-President
- The Vice-President's salary is fixed by law and does not change based on other official capacities. However, it is worth noting that they may receive allowances related to their role in various capacities. This statement is generally seen as correct but with nuances regarding allowances.
Statement 3: Acting as President
- The Vice-President can act as President in the event of a vacancy in the office of the President, but this is only permitted for a maximum period of 6 months. This statement is also correct.
Conclusion
Considering the accuracy of the statements:
- Statement 1 is correct (Vice-President can be re-elected any number of times).
- Statement 2 has some ambiguity but is mostly correct regarding fixed salary.
- Statement 3 is correct (maximum 6 months acting as President).
However, since the question asks for correctness, option "b" (1 and 3 only) is selected as the best answer because of the precise interpretation of the statements regarding fixed salary and allowances.
Thus, the correct answer is option 'B'.

Article 123 of the Constitution empowers the President to promulgate ordinances. Consider the following in this regard.
1. An ordinance made when both the Houses are in session is valid if approved by the Council of Ministers and Parliament.
2. An ordinance cannot be used to amend the constitution.
Which of the above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 only
  • b)
    2 only
  • c)
    Both 1 and 2
  • d)
    None
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Nilesh Menon answered
Explanation:

Article 123 of the Indian Constitution:
Article 123 of the Indian Constitution grants the President of India the power to promulgate ordinances during the recess of Parliament. An ordinance is a temporary law that has the same effect as an act of Parliament. However, it is temporary in nature and needs to be approved by Parliament within a specified period.

1. An ordinance made when both the Houses are in session is valid if approved by the Council of Ministers and Parliament:
This statement is incorrect. According to Article 123(1) of the Constitution, the President can promulgate an ordinance only when both Houses of Parliament are not in session. If both Houses are in session, the President cannot exercise this power. The purpose of granting this power to the President is to ensure that urgent and immediate action can be taken in situations when Parliament is not in session.

When an ordinance is promulgated, it must be laid before both Houses of Parliament when they reassemble. The ordinance will cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or if disapproved by either House before that period. Therefore, an ordinance made when both Houses are in session is not valid.

2. An ordinance cannot be used to amend the constitution:
This statement is correct. The power to amend the Constitution lies with the Parliament, and not with the President. The President is only empowered to promulgate ordinances on matters that fall within the legislative competence of Parliament. The Constitution can only be amended through the prescribed procedure under Article 368, which involves the introduction and passage of a constitutional amendment bill in both Houses of Parliament, followed by ratification by the states, if required.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - 2 only.

Consider the following statements regarding the Pardoning Power of the President:
Statement I:
The President's pardoning power includes the ability to grant pardons, commutations, remissions, respites, and reprieves.
Statement II:
The President exercises the pardoning power independently without any advice from the Union Cabinet.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
  • a)
    Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II explains Statement I
  • b)
    Both Statement I and Statement II are correct, but Statement II does not explain Statement I
  • c)
    Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect
  • d)
    Statement I is incorrect, but Statement II is correct
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Asha Tiwari answered
Statement Analysis:

Statement I:
- The President's pardoning power includes granting pardons, commutations, remissions, respites, and reprieves.

Statement II:
- The President exercises the pardoning power independently without any advice from the Union Cabinet.

Explanation:

Statement I:
- The pardoning power of the President indeed includes the ability to grant various forms of pardons such as pardons, commutations, remissions, respites, and reprieves. This power is granted under Article 72 of the Indian Constitution, which empowers the President to grant pardons and to suspend, remit, or commute sentences in certain cases.

Statement II:
- However, the President does not exercise the pardoning power independently. In practice, the President is required to act on the advice of the Union Cabinet while exercising the pardoning power. The advice of the Council of Ministers is necessary for the President to make informed decisions regarding pardons and commutations.

Conclusion:
- Therefore, while Statement I is correct in explaining the extent of the President's pardoning power, Statement II is incorrect as the President does not exercise this power independently without the advice of the Union Cabinet.

Consider the following statements.
1. The governor can reserve certain types of bills passed by the state legislature for the President's consideration.
2. Bills on certain matters enumerated in the State List can be introduced in the state legislature only with the president's previous sanction.
3. The President can direct the states to reserve money bills and other financial bills passed by the state legislature for his consideration during a financial emergency.
Select the correct answer using the codes below,
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    1 and 3 only
  • c)
    2 and 3 only
  • d)
    1,2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Valor Academy answered
  1. The governor can reserve certain types of bills passed by the state legislature for the President's consideration:
    This statement is true. The governor of a state has the power to reserve certain bills passed by the state legislature for the consideration of the President. According to Article 200 of the Indian Constitution, the governor can withhold assent to a bill and refer it to the President if the bill:
    • Is against the Constitution,
    • Opposes the Directive Principles of State Policy,
    • Affects the High Court’s powers, or
    • Deals with matters requiring the President’s approval as per the Constitution.
  2. Bills on certain matters enumerated in the State List can be introduced in the state legislature only with the President's previous sanction:
    This statement is also true. According to the Constitution of India, states have the power to make laws on subjects in the State List. However, for certain matters, the President’s prior sanction is required before introducing such a bill.
    • Example: Under Article 304(b), a bill imposing restrictions on trade, commerce, and intercourse in the public interest requires the President’s prior approval before being introduced in the state legislature.
    • Similar provisions apply to bills that may conflict with Union laws or require national-level consideration.
  3. The President can direct the states to reserve money bills and other financial bills passed by the state legislature for his consideration during a financial emergency:
    This statement is true as well. Under Article 360, when a financial emergency is declared, the President can direct states to reserve all money bills and other financial bills passed by the state legislature for his consideration. This allows the President to review and approve these bills before they become law, ensuring financial stability and control over state finances.
Therefore, all three statements are correct, and the correct answer is option D: 1, 2, and 3.

Consider the following pairs:
1. Diplomatic Authority - Negotiation and conclusion of international treaties
2. Military Authority - Appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner
3. Veto Power - Withholding assent to bills passed by Parliament
4. Emergency Authority - Declaration of scheduled areas
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
  • a)
    Only one pair
  • b)
    Only two pairs
  • c)
    Only three pairs
  • d)
    All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

- Pair 1 (Correct): Negotiation and conclusion of international treaties is a Diplomatic Authority of the President.
- Pair 2 (Incorrect): Appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner falls under Executive Authority, not Military Authority.
- Pair 3 (Correct): Withholding assent to bills passed by Parliament is a part of the President's Veto Power.
- Pair 4 (Incorrect): Declaration of scheduled areas is an Executive Authority, not Emergency Authority. Emergency Authority includes powers like declaring a state of emergency.

Every bill passed by the Parliament goes to the President for his assent before it becomes a law. Consider the following concerning it.
1. The President can send the bill back to the Parliament asking it to reconsider the bill.
2. There is no time limit mentioned in the constitution for the President to approve these bills.
3. The President is constitutionally authorised to send and introduce legislative proposals in the Parliament.
Select the correct answer using the codes below.
  • a)
    1 and 2 only
  • b)
    2 only
  • c)
    1 and 3 only
  • d)
    1, 2 and 3 only
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Vikram Kapoor answered
  • In doing so, the President exercises his situational discretion.
  • The President has veto power by which he can withhold or refuse to give assent to Bills (other than Money Bill) passed by the Parliament.
  • The President can send the bill back to the Parliament asking it to reconsider the bill.
  • This 'veto' power is limited because if the Parliament passes the same bill again and sends it back to the President, the President has to give assent to that bill. However, there is no mention in the Constitution about the time limit within which the President must send the bill back for reconsideration.
  • This means that the President can just keep the bill pending with him without any time limit. This gives the President an informal power to use the veto in a very effective manner. This is sometimes referred to as 'pocket veto'.

Consider the following pairs:
1. Neelam Sanjiva Reddy - Appointed Charan Singh as PM in 1979
2. Zail Singh - Appointed Rajiv Gandhi as PM after Indira Gandhi's assassination in 1984
3. Morarji Desai - Appointed by the President in 1977
4. Charan Singh - Appointed by the President in 1980
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
  • a)
    Only one pair
  • b)
    Only three pairs
  • c)
    Only two pairs
  • d)
    All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Geetika Bajaj answered
Understanding the Pairs
To analyze the correctness of the given pairs, let’s review each one in detail:
1. Neelam Sanjiva Reddy - Appointed Charan Singh as PM in 1979
- Correctness: This is correct. Neelam Sanjiva Reddy appointed Charan Singh as Prime Minister in 1979 after the resignation of Morarji Desai.
2. Zail Singh - Appointed Rajiv Gandhi as PM after Indira Gandhi's assassination in 1984
- Correctness: This is correct. Zail Singh was the President who appointed Rajiv Gandhi as Prime Minister following the assassination of Indira Gandhi in 1984.
3. Morarji Desai - Appointed by the President in 1977
- Correctness: This is incorrect. Morarji Desai was appointed as Prime Minister in 1977, but he was appointed by President Giani Zail Singh, who took office later. The correct pairing should reference his appointment after the Emergency.
4. Charan Singh - Appointed by the President in 1980
- Correctness: This is incorrect. Charan Singh became Prime Minister in 1979, and his government lasted until January 1980. He was not appointed in 1980.
Summary of Correct Matches
- The correct pairs are:
- Neelam Sanjiva Reddy - Charan Singh (Correct)
- Zail Singh - Rajiv Gandhi (Correct)
- The incorrect pairs are:
- Morarji Desai (Incorrect)
- Charan Singh (Incorrect)
Final Verdict
- Correctly Matched Pairs: 2 out of 4
- Conclusion: Only two pairs are accurately matched, making the correct answer option 'C' (Only two pairs).
This analysis clarifies that the initial answer of option 'B' (Only three pairs) was incorrect based on the historical appointments.

Consider the following statements about Cabinet Committees:
1. They are not mentioned in the Constitution.
2. They are set up by the Prime Minister according to the exigencies of the time and requirements of the situation.
3. The Cabinet cannot review the decisions taken by Cabinet Committees.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 and 3 only
  • b)
    1 and 2 only
  • c)
    2 and 3 only
  • d)
    1 only
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Arun Khatri answered
The correct answer is 1 and 2 only.
Important Points
CABINET COMMITTEES
The following are the features of Cabinet Committees:
  • They are extra-constitutional in emergence. In other words, they are not mentioned in the ConstitutionHence, statement 1 is correct.
    • However, the Rules of Business provide for their establishment.
  • They are of two types–standing and ad hoc.
    • The former is of a permanent nature while the latter is of a temporary nature.
    • The ad hoc committees are constituted from time to time to deal with special problems. They are disbanded after their task is completed.
They are set up by the Prime Minister according to the exigencies of the time and requirements of the situation. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
Hence, their number, nomenclature, and composition vary from time to time.
  • Their membership varies from three to eight.
    • They usually include only Cabinet Ministers.
    • However, the non-cabinet Ministers are not debarred from their membership.
    • They not only include the Ministers in charge of subjects covered by them but also include other senior Ministers
  • They are mostly headed by the Prime Minister. Some times other Cabinet Ministers, particularly the Home Minister or the Finance Minister, also acts as their Chairman.
    • But, in case the Prime Minister is a member of a committee, he invariably presides over it.
  • They not only sort out issues and formulate proposals for the consideration of the Cabinet but also take decisions.
    • However, the Cabinet can review their decisionsHence, statement 3 is NOT correct.
  • They are an organisational device to reduce the enormous workload of the Cabinet.
  • They also facilitate in-depth examination of policy issues and effective coordination.
  • They are based on the principles of division of labour and effective delegation. 

Which of the following statements is false? 
  • a)
    The post of Vice President of India has been taken from the Constitution of France
  • b)
    The office of vice president is the second-highest constitutional office after the president.
  • c)
    While acting as a caretaker President, the Vice President does not act as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. 
  • d)
    Vice President may be re-elected on his post 
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Vikram Kapoor answered
The false statement among the options given is: The post of Vice President of India has been taken from the Constitution of France.
The office of the Vice President of India is modeled after the American vice presidency. The Vice President of India acts as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and steps in as acting President in the absence of the President. This is different from the French system, where the Senate president assumes the role of the interim head of state when the presidency is vacant. The French system does not have a Vice President.

Chapter doubts & questions for Central Government, Parliament & Judiciary - Laxmikanth for Indian Polity: Summaries, MCQs & videos 2026 is part of UPSC CSE exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the UPSC CSE exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for UPSC CSE 2026 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.

Chapter doubts & questions of Central Government, Parliament & Judiciary - Laxmikanth for Indian Polity: Summaries, MCQs & videos in English & Hindi are available as part of UPSC CSE exam. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC CSE Exam by signing up for free.

Top Courses UPSC CSE

Related UPSC CSE Content