CAT Exam  >  CAT Tests  >  Daily Test for CAT Preparation  >  CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - CAT MCQ

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - CAT MCQ


Test Description

30 Questions MCQ Test Daily Test for CAT Preparation - CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10)

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) for CAT 2024 is part of Daily Test for CAT Preparation preparation. The CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) questions and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus.The CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) MCQs are made for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) below.
Solutions of CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) questions in English are available as part of our Daily Test for CAT Preparation for CAT & CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) solutions in Hindi for Daily Test for CAT Preparation course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) | 66 questions in 120 minutes | Mock test for CAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Daily Test for CAT Preparation for CAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 1

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

The word “bias” commonly appears in conversations about mistaken judgments and unfortunate decisions. We use it when there is discrimination, for instance against women or in favor of Ivy League graduates. But the meaning of the word is broader: A bias is any predictable error that inclines your judgment in a particular direction. For instance, we speak of bias when forecasts of sales are consistently optimistic or investment decisions overly cautious.

Society has devoted a lot of attention to the problem of bias — and rightly so. But when it comes to mistaken judgments and unfortunate decisions, there is another type of error that attracts far less attention: noise. To see the difference between bias and noise, consider your bathroom scale. If on average the readings it gives are too high (or too low), the scale is biased. If it shows different readings when you step on it several times in quick succession, the scale is noisy. While bias is the average of errors, noise is their variability.

Although it is often ignored, noise is a large source of malfunction in society. In a 1981 study, for example, 208 federal judges were asked to determine the appropriate sentences for the same 16 cases. The cases were described by the characteristics of the offense (robbery or fraud, violent or not) and of the defendant (young or old, repeat or first-time offender, accomplice or principal). The average difference between the sentences that two randomly chosen judges gave for the same crime was more than 3.5 years. Considering that the mean sentence was seven years, that was a disconcerting amount of noise. Noise in real courtrooms is surely only worse, as actual cases are more complex and difficult to judge than stylized vignettes. It is hard to escape the conclusion that sentencing is in part a lottery, because the punishment can vary by many years depending on which judge is assigned to the case and on the judge’s state of mind on that day. The judicial system is unacceptably noisy.

Noise causes error, as does bias, but the two kinds of error are separate and independent. A company’s hiring decisions could be unbiased overall if some of its recruiters favor men and others favor women. However, its hiring decisions would be noisy, and the company would make many bad choices. Where does noise come from? There is much evidence that irrelevant circumstances can affect judgments. In the case of criminal sentencing, for instance, a judge’s mood, fatigue and even the weather can all have modest but detectable effects on judicial decisions. Another source of noise is that people can have different general tendencies. Judges often vary in the severity of the sentences they mete out: There are “hanging” judges and lenient ones.

A third source of noise is less intuitive, although it is usually the largest: People can have not only different general tendencies (say, whether they are harsh or lenient) but also different patterns of assessment (say, which types of cases they believe merit being harsh or lenient about). Underwriters differ in their views of what is risky, and doctors in their views of which ailments require treatment. We celebrate the uniqueness of individuals, but we tend to forget that, when we expect consistency, uniqueness becomes a liability.

Q. Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 1

In the second paragraph, the author points out that noise gets far less attention than bias. However, the author does not assert that noise is a more serious error compared to bias. Option A can be eliminated.

{We celebrate the uniqueness of individuals, but we tend to forget that, when we expect consistency, uniqueness becomes a liability.} The author posits that when expecting consistency, the distinctness of each individual might be undesirable/burdensome. Option B echoes this view. 

{In the case of criminal sentencing, for instance, a judge’s mood, fatigue and even the weather can all have modest but detectable effects on judicial decisions} The author mentions that even small factors can have a "modest, but a detectable influence" on decisions. The author would have agreed if the option read that small factors influence decision making. But he does not say that the influence is huge/substantial, as mentioned in Option C. Hence, it is a distortion and can be eliminated.

{ Noise in real courtrooms is surely only worse, as actual cases are more complex and difficult to judge than stylized vignettes. It is hard to escape the conclusion that sentencing is in part a lottery, because the punishment can vary by many years depending on which judge is assigned to the case and on the judge’s state of mind on that day. The judicial system is unacceptably noisy.} While the author does discuss the complexity of courtroom cases causing noise in judgments (or punishments meted out), there is no mention of bias. Hence, Option D is a distortion.

Therefore, of the given choices, Option B is the correct answer.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 2

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

The word “bias” commonly appears in conversations about mistaken judgments and unfortunate decisions. We use it when there is discrimination, for instance against women or in favor of Ivy League graduates. But the meaning of the word is broader: A bias is any predictable error that inclines your judgment in a particular direction. For instance, we speak of bias when forecasts of sales are consistently optimistic or investment decisions overly cautious.

Society has devoted a lot of attention to the problem of bias — and rightly so. But when it comes to mistaken judgments and unfortunate decisions, there is another type of error that attracts far less attention: noise. To see the difference between bias and noise, consider your bathroom scale. If on average the readings it gives are too high (or too low), the scale is biased. If it shows different readings when you step on it several times in quick succession, the scale is noisy. While bias is the average of errors, noise is their variability.

Although it is often ignored, noise is a large source of malfunction in society. In a 1981 study, for example, 208 federal judges were asked to determine the appropriate sentences for the same 16 cases. The cases were described by the characteristics of the offense (robbery or fraud, violent or not) and of the defendant (young or old, repeat or first-time offender, accomplice or principal). The average difference between the sentences that two randomly chosen judges gave for the same crime was more than 3.5 years. Considering that the mean sentence was seven years, that was a disconcerting amount of noise. Noise in real courtrooms is surely only worse, as actual cases are more complex and difficult to judge than stylized vignettes. It is hard to escape the conclusion that sentencing is in part a lottery, because the punishment can vary by many years depending on which judge is assigned to the case and on the judge’s state of mind on that day. The judicial system is unacceptably noisy.

Noise causes error, as does bias, but the two kinds of error are separate and independent. A company’s hiring decisions could be unbiased overall if some of its recruiters favor men and others favor women. However, its hiring decisions would be noisy, and the company would make many bad choices. Where does noise come from? There is much evidence that irrelevant circumstances can affect judgments. In the case of criminal sentencing, for instance, a judge’s mood, fatigue and even the weather can all have modest but detectable effects on judicial decisions. Another source of noise is that people can have different general tendencies. Judges often vary in the severity of the sentences they mete out: There are “hanging” judges and lenient ones.

A third source of noise is less intuitive, although it is usually the largest: People can have not only different general tendencies (say, whether they are harsh or lenient) but also different patterns of assessment (say, which types of cases they believe merit being harsh or lenient about). Underwriters differ in their views of what is risky, and doctors in their views of which ailments require treatment. We celebrate the uniqueness of individuals, but we tend to forget that, when we expect consistency, uniqueness becomes a liability.

Q. Which of the following can serve as an example of 'noise' as per the the passage?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 2

{While bias is the average of errors, noise is their variability.} Noise, hence, refers to variability in the outcomes predicted for the same event/case. The judicial system example exemplifies this.
Option A is a valid example, as it highlights the variance in judgements of people analysing the same risk. Hence it is our answer
The surgical decisions may have been taken in completely different circumstances, and the patients may have presented with distinct issues. Hence, it is not the same event/situation. Option B can be eliminated.
Option C is an incorrect example. The revisions may have been forced due to changing economic conditions. Hence there is a change in the situation.
Option D talks about the discrimination against a particular group of people, and it is not varied from person to person. This would be better classified as bias, as a mean error of judgement is being talked about. Hence D can be eliminated too.

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 3

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

The word “bias” commonly appears in conversations about mistaken judgments and unfortunate decisions. We use it when there is discrimination, for instance against women or in favor of Ivy League graduates. But the meaning of the word is broader: A bias is any predictable error that inclines your judgment in a particular direction. For instance, we speak of bias when forecasts of sales are consistently optimistic or investment decisions overly cautious.

Society has devoted a lot of attention to the problem of bias — and rightly so. But when it comes to mistaken judgments and unfortunate decisions, there is another type of error that attracts far less attention: noise. To see the difference between bias and noise, consider your bathroom scale. If on average the readings it gives are too high (or too low), the scale is biased. If it shows different readings when you step on it several times in quick succession, the scale is noisy. While bias is the average of errors, noise is their variability.

Although it is often ignored, noise is a large source of malfunction in society. In a 1981 study, for example, 208 federal judges were asked to determine the appropriate sentences for the same 16 cases. The cases were described by the characteristics of the offense (robbery or fraud, violent or not) and of the defendant (young or old, repeat or first-time offender, accomplice or principal). The average difference between the sentences that two randomly chosen judges gave for the same crime was more than 3.5 years. Considering that the mean sentence was seven years, that was a disconcerting amount of noise. Noise in real courtrooms is surely only worse, as actual cases are more complex and difficult to judge than stylized vignettes. It is hard to escape the conclusion that sentencing is in part a lottery, because the punishment can vary by many years depending on which judge is assigned to the case and on the judge’s state of mind on that day. The judicial system is unacceptably noisy.

Noise causes error, as does bias, but the two kinds of error are separate and independent. A company’s hiring decisions could be unbiased overall if some of its recruiters favor men and others favor women. However, its hiring decisions would be noisy, and the company would make many bad choices. Where does noise come from? There is much evidence that irrelevant circumstances can affect judgments. In the case of criminal sentencing, for instance, a judge’s mood, fatigue and even the weather can all have modest but detectable effects on judicial decisions. Another source of noise is that people can have different general tendencies. Judges often vary in the severity of the sentences they mete out: There are “hanging” judges and lenient ones.

A third source of noise is less intuitive, although it is usually the largest: People can have not only different general tendencies (say, whether they are harsh or lenient) but also different patterns of assessment (say, which types of cases they believe merit being harsh or lenient about). Underwriters differ in their views of what is risky, and doctors in their views of which ailments require treatment. We celebrate the uniqueness of individuals, but we tend to forget that, when we expect consistency, uniqueness becomes a liability.

Q. According to the passage, noise in a judicial system could lead to which of the following consequences?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 3

In the third paragraph, the author discusses the pervasiveness of noise in the judicial system and how it may cause the judges the dish out different sentences for a similar crime. ("...because the punishment can vary by many years depending on which judge is assigned to the case and on the judge’s state of mind on that day")
Option A can be safely eliminated. The author discusses the difference in sentences of convicted persons, not wrongful convictions.
Option B is out of scope. The length of judicial proceedings has not been expanded upon in the passage.
Option C is in line with the idea elucidated above. When different sentences are meted out for the same offence, we can discern that the judgments are noisy.  

Option D is too extreme. The author gives an example where noise error leads to a difference of a few years of his sentence. This does not mean that an irrelevant factor like mood will lead to the complete overturn of a verdict. It can only increase/decrease the sentence to an extent. Hence Option D can be eliminated too.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 4

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

Information has never been more accessible or less reliable. So we are advised to check our sources carefully. There is so much talk of “fake news” that the term has entirely lost meaning. At school, we are taught to avoid Wikipedia, or at the very least never admit to using it in our citations. And most sources on the world wide web have been built without the standardized attributions that scaffold other forms of knowledge dissemination; they are therefore seen as degraded, even as they illuminate.

But it was only relatively recently that academic disciplines designed rigid systems for categorizing and organizing source material at all. Historian Anthony Grafton traces the genealogy of the footnote in an excellent book, which reveals many origin stories. It turns out that footnotes are related to early systems of marginalia, glosses, and annotation that existed in theology, early histories, and Medieval law. The footnote in something like its modern form seems to have been devised in the seventeenth century, and has proliferated since, with increasing standardization and rigor. And yet, Grafton writes, “appearances of uniformity are deceptive. To the inexpert, footnotes look like deep root systems, solid and fixed; to the connoisseur, however, they reveal themselves as anthills, swarming with constructive and combative activity.”

The purpose of citation, broadly speaking, is to give others credit, but it does much more than that. Famously, citations can be the sources of great enmity — a quick dismissal of a rival argument with a “cf.” They can serve a social purpose, as sly thank-yous to friends and mentors. They can perform a kind of box-checking of requisite major works. (As Grafton points out, the omission of these works can itself be a statement.) Attribution, significantly, allows others to check your work, or at least gives the illusion that they could, following a web of sources back to the origins. But perhaps above all else, citations serve a dual purpose that seems at once complementary and conflicting; they acknowledge a debt to a larger body of work while also conferring on oneself a certain kind of erudition and expertise.

Like many systems that appear meticulous, the writing of citations is a subjective art. Never more so than in fiction, where citation is an entirely other kind of animal, not required or even expected, except in the “acknowledgments” page, which is often a who’s who of the publishing world. But in the last two decades, bibliographies and sources cited pages have increasingly cropped up in the backs of novels. “It’s terribly off-putting,” James Wood said of this fad in 2006. “It would be very odd if Thomas Hardy had put at the end of all his books, ‘I’m thankful to the Dorset County Chronicle for dialect books from the 18th century.’ We expect authors to do that work, and I don’t see why we should praise them for that work.” Wood has a point, or had one — at their worst, citations in fiction are annoying, driven by an author’s anxiety to show off what he has read, to check the right boxes.

Q. Which of the following is a reason why citation is done?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 4

The author does not mention the improvement in the credibility of the author's work. Citations merely allow others to check the work and decide for themselves whether the work has any weight. Hence, Option A is beyond the scope of the passage and can be eliminated.
"They can perform a kind of box-checking of requisite major works." 
Option B can be inferred from this line. By citing major works, the author alludes to his erudition and familiarity on the topic, which means that he has referred to the mandatory amount of previous works in the field.
Famously, citations can be the sources of great enmity — a quick dismissal of a rival argument with a “cf.” 
Here, the author talks about negating an argument that is contrary to the author's. But the option reads 'rival's argument' which means argument put forward by his rival, which may not be contrary to the author's. Hence, Option C is a distortion and can be eliminated.
Attribution, significantly, allows others to check your work or at least gives the illusion that they could, following a web of sources back to the origins.
Option D talks about a significant increase in the visibility of the author's work. Whereas, in the passage, the adverb significantly talks about a significant role of attribution being allowing others to check the author's work. This means that the people who are viewing the author's work can check the credibility (or have an illusion of the same) through the attributions. This is different from more people checking out the work, as suggested in the option. Hence Option D can be eliminated.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 5

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

Information has never been more accessible or less reliable. So we are advised to check our sources carefully. There is so much talk of “fake news” that the term has entirely lost meaning. At school, we are taught to avoid Wikipedia, or at the very least never admit to using it in our citations. And most sources on the world wide web have been built without the standardized attributions that scaffold other forms of knowledge dissemination; they are therefore seen as degraded, even as they illuminate.

But it was only relatively recently that academic disciplines designed rigid systems for categorizing and organizing source material at all. Historian Anthony Grafton traces the genealogy of the footnote in an excellent book, which reveals many origin stories. It turns out that footnotes are related to early systems of marginalia, glosses, and annotation that existed in theology, early histories, and Medieval law. The footnote in something like its modern form seems to have been devised in the seventeenth century, and has proliferated since, with increasing standardization and rigor. And yet, Grafton writes, “appearances of uniformity are deceptive. To the inexpert, footnotes look like deep root systems, solid and fixed; to the connoisseur, however, they reveal themselves as anthills, swarming with constructive and combative activity.”

The purpose of citation, broadly speaking, is to give others credit, but it does much more than that. Famously, citations can be the sources of great enmity — a quick dismissal of a rival argument with a “cf.” They can serve a social purpose, as sly thank-yous to friends and mentors. They can perform a kind of box-checking of requisite major works. (As Grafton points out, the omission of these works can itself be a statement.) Attribution, significantly, allows others to check your work, or at least gives the illusion that they could, following a web of sources back to the origins. But perhaps above all else, citations serve a dual purpose that seems at once complementary and conflicting; they acknowledge a debt to a larger body of work while also conferring on oneself a certain kind of erudition and expertise.

Like many systems that appear meticulous, the writing of citations is a subjective art. Never more so than in fiction, where citation is an entirely other kind of animal, not required or even expected, except in the “acknowledgments” page, which is often a who’s who of the publishing world. But in the last two decades, bibliographies and sources cited pages have increasingly cropped up in the backs of novels. “It’s terribly off-putting,” James Wood said of this fad in 2006. “It would be very odd if Thomas Hardy had put at the end of all his books, ‘I’m thankful to the Dorset County Chronicle for dialect books from the 18th century.’ We expect authors to do that work, and I don’t see why we should praise them for that work.” Wood has a point, or had one — at their worst, citations in fiction are annoying, driven by an author’s anxiety to show off what he has read, to check the right boxes.

Q. What can be inferred about the author's stance on including citations in works of fiction from the passage?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 5

The author mentions in the last paragraph that citations are not required or expected outside of the acknowledgements page. Overall, their purpose seems to be self-aggrandisement and showing that they have done some research, which is already expected of them.
Option A does not reflect the author's view, because the author has taken a complaining tone while mentioning the checking of boxes, which means that he does not approve of the same. Hence, A cannot be the answer.
Option B is covered above and can be the answer.
The term 'off-putting' has been introduced by James Wood and not necessarily defines the author's stance. Hence, Option C can be eliminated too.
The author mentions that citations are subjective to allow himself to criticize their usage in some areas. Though he calls it a 'different kind of animal', he clarifies his stance in the subsequent line indicating that this metaphor has a negative connotation, and he does not approve of the use. Option D defines the use as uniquely appealing, which is contrary in spirit to what the author is arguing. Hence it can be eliminated.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 6

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

Information has never been more accessible or less reliable. So we are advised to check our sources carefully. There is so much talk of “fake news” that the term has entirely lost meaning. At school, we are taught to avoid Wikipedia, or at the very least never admit to using it in our citations. And most sources on the world wide web have been built without the standardized attributions that scaffold other forms of knowledge dissemination; they are therefore seen as degraded, even as they illuminate.

But it was only relatively recently that academic disciplines designed rigid systems for categorizing and organizing source material at all. Historian Anthony Grafton traces the genealogy of the footnote in an excellent book, which reveals many origin stories. It turns out that footnotes are related to early systems of marginalia, glosses, and annotation that existed in theology, early histories, and Medieval law. The footnote in something like its modern form seems to have been devised in the seventeenth century, and has proliferated since, with increasing standardization and rigor. And yet, Grafton writes, “appearances of uniformity are deceptive. To the inexpert, footnotes look like deep root systems, solid and fixed; to the connoisseur, however, they reveal themselves as anthills, swarming with constructive and combative activity.”

The purpose of citation, broadly speaking, is to give others credit, but it does much more than that. Famously, citations can be the sources of great enmity — a quick dismissal of a rival argument with a “cf.” They can serve a social purpose, as sly thank-yous to friends and mentors. They can perform a kind of box-checking of requisite major works. (As Grafton points out, the omission of these works can itself be a statement.) Attribution, significantly, allows others to check your work, or at least gives the illusion that they could, following a web of sources back to the origins. But perhaps above all else, citations serve a dual purpose that seems at once complementary and conflicting; they acknowledge a debt to a larger body of work while also conferring on oneself a certain kind of erudition and expertise.

Like many systems that appear meticulous, the writing of citations is a subjective art. Never more so than in fiction, where citation is an entirely other kind of animal, not required or even expected, except in the “acknowledgments” page, which is often a who’s who of the publishing world. But in the last two decades, bibliographies and sources cited pages have increasingly cropped up in the backs of novels. “It’s terribly off-putting,” James Wood said of this fad in 2006. “It would be very odd if Thomas Hardy had put at the end of all his books, ‘I’m thankful to the Dorset County Chronicle for dialect books from the 18th century.’ We expect authors to do that work, and I don’t see why we should praise them for that work.” Wood has a point, or had one — at their worst, citations in fiction are annoying, driven by an author’s anxiety to show off what he has read, to check the right boxes.

Q. "Citations serve a dual purpose that seems at once complementary and conflicting." Which of the following best captures the reason why the author makes this statement?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 6

"But perhaps above all else, citations serve a dual purpose that seems at once complementary and conflicting; they acknowledge a debt to a larger body of work while also conferring on oneself a certain kind of erudition and expertise."
Citations are complementary and conflicting because they acknowledge all the work that has been done by others, and at the same time. they indirectly imply that the author has knowledge that is additional to the existing work. So, citations, help acknowledge a debt to a larger body of work and the influence it has had on the author. But these citations also, in a way, convey the fact that the author has improved upon the credited body of work through his effort. 
Option A captures this viewpoint of the author correctly. Option A is the answer.
Option B, about promoting a superior image vis-a-vis peers is out of the scope of the passage.
Option D completely misses the point being made in the passage through those lines. Hence, it can be eliminated.
Option C has not been implied in the passage and can be safely eliminated.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 7

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

Humiliation is more than an individual and subjective feeling. It is an instrument of political power, wielded with intent. In the late 1930s, Soviet show trials used every means to degrade anyone whom Stalin considered a potentially dangerous opponent. National Socialism copied this practice whenever it put ‘enemies of the people’ on trial. On the streets of Vienna in 1938, officials forced Jews to kneel on the pavement and scrub off anti-Nazi graffiti to the laughter of non-Jewish men, women and children. During the Cultural Revolution in China, young activists went out of their way to relentlessly humiliate senior functionaries - a common practice that, to this day, hasn’t been officially reprimanded or rectified.

Liberal democracies, especially after the Second World War, have taken issue with these practices. We like to believe that we have largely eradicated such politics from our societies. Compared with totalitarian regimes of the 20th century, this belief might seem justified. Yet we’re still a far cry from being ‘decent societies’ whose members and institutions, in the philosopher Avishai Margalit’s terms, ‘do not humiliate people’, but respect their dignity. Although construction of the road to decency began as early as around 1800, it was - and remains - paved with obstacles and exceptions.

Mass opposition to the politics of humiliation began from the early 19th century in Europe, as lower-class people increasingly objected to disrespectful treatment. Servants, journeymen and factory workers alike used the language of honour and concepts of personal and social self-worth - previously monopolised by the nobility and upper-middle classes - to demand that they not be verbally and physically insulted by employers and overseers.

This social change was enabled and supported by a new type of honour that followed the invention of ‘citizens’ (rather than subjects) in democratising societies. Citizens who carried political rights and duties were also seen as possessing civic honour. Traditionally, social honour had been stratified according to status and rank, but now civic honour pertained to each and every citizen, and this helped to raise their self-esteem and self-consciousness. Consequently, humiliation, and other demonstrations of the alleged inferiority of others, was no longer considered a legitimate means by which to exert power over one’s fellow citizens.

Historically then, humiliation could be felt - and objected to - only once the notion of equal citizenship and human dignity entered political discourse and practice. As long as society subscribed to the notion that some individuals are fundamentally superior to others, people had a hard time feeling humiliated. They might feel treated unfairly, and rebel. But they wouldn’t perceive such treatment as humiliating, per se. Humiliation can be experienced only when the victims consider themselves on a par with the perpetrator - not in terms of actual power, but in terms of rights and dignity. This explains the surge of libel suits in Europe during the 19th century: they reflected the democratised sense of honour in societies that had granted and institutionalised equal rights after the French Revolution (even in countries that didn’t have a revolution).

The evolution of the legal system in Western nations serves as both a gauge of, and an active participant in, these developments. From the Middle Ages to the early 19th century, public shaming was used widely as a supplementary punishment for men and women sentenced for unlawful acts.

Q. Which of the following is true based on the passage?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 7

Option A: "...Liberal democracies, especially after the Second World War, have taken issue with these practices. We like to believe that we have largely eradicated such politics from our societies. Compared with totalitarian regimes of the 20th century, this belief might seem justified. Yet we’re still a far cry from being ‘decent societies’ whose members and institutions, in the philosopher Avishai Margalit’s terms, ‘do not humiliate people’, but respect their dignity...". The use of the term 'completely' in the option appears to be extreme; additionally, the author adds that we are a 'far cry' from transforming into a society devoid of any mechanisms involving humiliation. Hence, Option A can be eliminated. 

Option B: "...Mass opposition to the politics of humiliation began from the early 19th century in Europe, as lower-class people increasingly objected to disrespectful treatment. Servants, journeymen and factory workers alike used the language of honour and concepts of personal and social self-worth - previously monopolised by the nobility and upper-middle classes - to demand that they not be verbally and physically insulted by employers and overseers...". The statement here is distorted since the author evidently specifies that the antagonism against the politics of humiliation began from the bottom up - servants, journeymen and factory workers. Thus, Option B can be discarded.

Option C: "...Traditionally, social honour had been stratified according to status and rank, but now civic honour pertained to each and every citizen, and this helped to raise their self-esteem and self-consciousness...". We notice that the statement in C aligns with the information presented in this excerpt and is, therefore, true.

Option D: There is no evidence to substantiate this claim, since the term 'totalitarian' has not been ascribed to the entities mentioned in the passage.

Hence, the correct answer is Option C.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 8

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

Humiliation is more than an individual and subjective feeling. It is an instrument of political power, wielded with intent. In the late 1930s, Soviet show trials used every means to degrade anyone whom Stalin considered a potentially dangerous opponent. National Socialism copied this practice whenever it put ‘enemies of the people’ on trial. On the streets of Vienna in 1938, officials forced Jews to kneel on the pavement and scrub off anti-Nazi graffiti to the laughter of non-Jewish men, women and children. During the Cultural Revolution in China, young activists went out of their way to relentlessly humiliate senior functionaries - a common practice that, to this day, hasn’t been officially reprimanded or rectified.

Liberal democracies, especially after the Second World War, have taken issue with these practices. We like to believe that we have largely eradicated such politics from our societies. Compared with totalitarian regimes of the 20th century, this belief might seem justified. Yet we’re still a far cry from being ‘decent societies’ whose members and institutions, in the philosopher Avishai Margalit’s terms, ‘do not humiliate people’, but respect their dignity. Although construction of the road to decency began as early as around 1800, it was - and remains - paved with obstacles and exceptions.

Mass opposition to the politics of humiliation began from the early 19th century in Europe, as lower-class people increasingly objected to disrespectful treatment. Servants, journeymen and factory workers alike used the language of honour and concepts of personal and social self-worth - previously monopolised by the nobility and upper-middle classes - to demand that they not be verbally and physically insulted by employers and overseers.

This social change was enabled and supported by a new type of honour that followed the invention of ‘citizens’ (rather than subjects) in democratising societies. Citizens who carried political rights and duties were also seen as possessing civic honour. Traditionally, social honour had been stratified according to status and rank, but now civic honour pertained to each and every citizen, and this helped to raise their self-esteem and self-consciousness. Consequently, humiliation, and other demonstrations of the alleged inferiority of others, was no longer considered a legitimate means by which to exert power over one’s fellow citizens.

Historically then, humiliation could be felt - and objected to - only once the notion of equal citizenship and human dignity entered political discourse and practice. As long as society subscribed to the notion that some individuals are fundamentally superior to others, people had a hard time feeling humiliated. They might feel treated unfairly, and rebel. But they wouldn’t perceive such treatment as humiliating, per se. Humiliation can be experienced only when the victims consider themselves on a par with the perpetrator - not in terms of actual power, but in terms of rights and dignity. This explains the surge of libel suits in Europe during the 19th century: they reflected the democratised sense of honour in societies that had granted and institutionalised equal rights after the French Revolution (even in countries that didn’t have a revolution).

The evolution of the legal system in Western nations serves as both a gauge of, and an active participant in, these developments. From the Middle Ages to the early 19th century, public shaming was used widely as a supplementary punishment for men and women sentenced for unlawful acts.

Q. Which of the following topics would be a likely continuation of the given discussion?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 8

Towards the end of the passage, the author delves into how public shaming was used as a 'supplementary punishment'. The next course of discussion should be in line with this and further elucidate what the author intends to convey via this claim. Option D serves as an apt continuation in this regard.
Option A: We notice multiple information skips here - both with regard to time as well as the subject under discussion. The author has not supplemented the claim made towards the end and is yet to steer the discourse towards present-day affairs. Hence, Option A is an unlikely continuation.  
Option B: The information would not continue the chain of thought. Statistics to supplement a tangential claim is of little importance and hence, can be discarded.
Option C: The main themes of the concluding paragraph and the stated option do not coincide. The author has not focused on the social transformation or the removal of societal hierarchies; instead, the perception associated with humiliation is discussed. In this regard, Option C is irrelevant. 
Hence, of the given choices, Option D is the correct answer.

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 9

The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4) below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer:

  1. These observations are informative but do not address fundamental questions about how social-cognitive brain systems develop or why their development might be different for autistic people.
  2. Accordingly, differences in the development and/or transmissions of information across this distributed social-cognitive brain network may contribute to differences in mentalizing among autistic people.
  3. Social-cognitive neuroscience tells us that brain systems of the medial frontal cortex, temporal cortex and parietal cortex, as well as reward centres of the brain, enable mentalizing.
  4. These differences can lead to a range of outcomes, from problems in the capacity to mentalize to alterations in the spontaneous use of mentalizing or the motivation and effort involved in mentalizing during social interactions.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 9

Sentence 3 will be the starting sentence because it is not dependant on any other sentence. Sentence 2 will follow 3 because 3 talks about the different parts of the brain that enable mentalizing, and 2 talks about the differences in transmission of information and signals in this network that contributes to the difference in mentalizing among autistic people. Sentence 4 will follow 2 because the "differences" mentioned in 4 refer to the ones discussed in 2, and 4 tells us what kind of problems do autistic people face because of these differences. Finally, 1 will follow 4 because the "observations" mentioned in 1 refer to the challenges faced by autistic people as mentioned in 4, and it further tells us that those observations do not tell us how and why the developments are different for autistic people. Hence, the sequence 3241.

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 10

The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4) below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer:

  1. As a matter of fact, many of the tools and resources that I used on my missions, such as solar panels and rechargeable storage batteries, are also the answer to our problems here on Earth.
  2. After seeing the Earth dramatically change from this unique perspective, I firmly believe that solving climate change is the moonshot of the 21st century.
  3. On my last mission in 2016, only 17 years later, burning and clear-cutting were clearly evident in the region.
  4. During my first mission, in 1999, to fix the Hubble Space Telescope, I remember passing over South America and being awed by the sheer size of the Amazon rainforest.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 10

Sentence 4 will be the starting sentence as it is not dependant on any other sentence. Sentence 3 will follow 4 because of the reference '17 years later' which is the span between 1999 and 2016. Also, 3 describes the change the author witnessed from space which is also mentioned in 2. So, sentence 2 will follow 3. Sentence 1 will follow 2 because it is where the author discusses some possible solutions to our problems on earth regarding climate change. Hence, the sequence 4321.
We can identify the thought flow here. 4 and 3 make a bloc that talks about the author's experience and perspective. 2 and 1 derive conclusions and solutions from that. Arranging these, we get the correct answer.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 11

The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.

Fossil fuel divestment, a growing movement, urges organizations to withdraw investment from companies involved in extracting fossil fuels. This movement aims to reduce carbon emissions to combat climate change and is a powerful tool for social change. Critics argue that divestment alone won't stop climate change and that it might harm investors’ returns. Proponents, however, see it as a moral and pragmatic stand, forcing the industry to reckon with its role in climate change while paving the way for investment in sustainable energy alternatives.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 11

The passage describes fossil fuel divestment as a strategic and ethical choice to address climate change and influence industry practices. Option B accurately reflects these aspects, acknowledging the movement's purpose and the broader implications for sustainable investment. Other options either present a one-sided view or misrepresent the movement’s goals and effects.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 12

Totalitarianism is not always operated by diktat. It can be insinuated by suggestion and replication. Dissent does not have to be banned if it is countered by orchestrated mass promo rallies and hypnotizing oratory. Despotic establishments do not need to turn Hitlerian; all they need to do is to let the Reich chemistry work. Self-regulation and self-censorship will click in. Then any dissident who wants to retain his intellectual liberty will find himself thwarted by the general drift of society rather than by active persecution.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 12

Option A: Totalitarianism is generally operated by undermining freedom of expression through active persecution and censorship.

The paragraph we have talks of how totalitarianism is insinuated by suggestion and replication to clamp down on dissent, whereas this option talks of a completely different idea. So we rule this option out.

Option B: Hypnotizing oratory and promo rallies can effectively counter dissent and lead to persecution of the masses.

The paragraph we have talks of promo rallies and hypnotizing oratory being used by totalitarian regimes to counter dissent. Option B talks of hypnotizing oratory and promo rallies leading to “persecution of the masses?. Clearly, this is not the idea conveyed in the paragraph and definitely does not summarize it.

Option C: Self-regulation and self-censorship in societies stifle freedom of expression.

Option C conveys one of the main ideas of the paragraph-stifling of intellectual liberty- but does not touch upon the other- how despotic establishments cynically exploit this. So it is good to check if there is a better option to summarize the paragraph.

Option D: Intellectual liberty does not have to be repressed by authority if there are self-appointed vigilantes to bully it into silence.

Clearly, this option summarizes the paragraph best. Dissent does not need to be put down by authority. By clever insinuation, despotic establishments can steer the society towards self-regulation and self-censorship. Any opposing ideas are bullied into silence by these self-appointed vigilantes.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 13

Directions: Read the following information and answer the question below.

There is a square shaped board similar to chessboard which is having eight rows and eight columns. On this board, rows are numbered 1 to 8 (bottom to top) and the columns are labelled a to h (left to right). On the chessboard, the King is placed at e1. The position of a piece is given by the combination of column and row labels. For example, position e4 means that the piece is in the eth column and the 4th row. In the chessboard, Rook placed anywhere can attack another piece if the piece is present in the same row, or in the same column in any possible 4 directions, provided there is no other piece in the path from the Rook to that piece.

Q. Find the minimum number of positions which the Rook can possibly attack irrespective of the placement of other pieces.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 13

As the Rook can attack another piece if the piece is present in the same row, or in the same column in any possible 4 directions, provided there is no other piece in the path from the Rook to that piece.
So, if the Rook is placed at one of the corner, for example Rook is placed at a1 and other pieces are placed at a2 and b1,

then Rook can attack only these two pieces. So, no other pieces are attacked by the Rook.
Hence, option 2 is the correct answer.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 14

Directions: Read the information given below and answer the question:

Exactly five friends – Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah – were playing a racing game which consists of four levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded points of 10, 7.5 and 5 respectively, while the other two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.

It is also known that
(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were same.
(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game.
(3) Richard, who was last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game but he was not first in any level.
(4) one of the five persons was first in more than one level and he did not win the highest points in the game.
(5) Mason was not third in any of the four levels but was first in one of the four levels.
(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earned.

Q. Who can earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels? Key in the value.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 14

It is given that Richard earned a total of 22.5 and he was not first in any level. The only way he could win 22.5 without being first in any level is that if he earned 7.5 in two levels, 5 in one level and 2.5 in another level.
From (2), Connor and Poppy did not win the highest points in the game. From (6), Sarah also did not win the highest points in the game.
From (4), one of the persons was first in two levels and this person did not win the highest points. This person must have earned a minimum of 10 + 10 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 25 points in the game. The person who earned the highest points must have earned more than this. From this, we can infer that Richard also could not be the person who earned the highest points.
Hence, only Mason could be the person who earned the highest points. From (5), Mason was first in one level. He was not third in any level. Also, Richard was second in two levels (since he earned 7.5 in two levels). Hence, maximum points that Mason could win = 10 + 7.5 + 7.5 + 2.5 = 27.5 points.
Since Mason had to win more than 25 points, he must have earned 27.5 points. The person who was first in two levels must have earned 25 points (this is the only way for him to have earned less points than Mason). From (2) and (6), Poppy and Sarah could not be the persons who earned 25 points. Hence, Connor must be the person who earned 25 points. This is possible if he was first in two levels and fourth/fifth in two other levels.
From (2), Poppy must have earned 20 points. This is possible only if Poppy was first in one level, third in another level and fourth/fifth in two levels (Poppy could not be second in any level because Richard and Mason were second in two levels each). Points that Poppy won in this case = 10 + 5 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 20. Sarah must have been third in two levels and fourth/fifth in two levels. Total points that Sarah earned = 5 + 5 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 15.

The following table presents the positions of the five persons in the four levels and the total points earned by them in the game:

Connor earned 2.5 points in two levels. In these two levels, Sarah could have got 2.5 points. Hence, we cannot say that Connor definitely earned more than Sarah in at least three levels.
Richard could have earned 2.5 points in the same level that Sarah earned 2.5. In the level that Richard earned 5, Sarah could have earned only 2.5 (since two persons could not have earned 5 points). In the other two levels that Richard earned 7.5 points, Sarah would have got less points than Richard. Hence, Richard would have definitely earned higher points that Sarah in three levels. Poppy earned 2.5 points in two levels. In these two levels, Sarah could have earned 2.5 points. Hence, we cannot say that Poppy definitely earned more than Sarah in at least three levels. Mason earned 10 points in one level and 7.5 points in two levels. In all the three levels, Mason would have earned higher points than Sarah. 

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 15

Directions: Read the information given below and answer the question:

Exactly five friends – Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah – were playing a racing game which consists of four levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded points of 10, 7.5 and 5 respectively, while the other two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.

It is also known that
(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were same.
(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game.
(3) Richard, who was last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game but he was not first in any level.
(4) one of the five persons was first in more than one level and he did not win the highest points in the game.
(5) Mason was not third in any of the four levels but was first in one of the four levels.
(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earned.

Q. How many of the friends stood first in any of the levels?


Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 15

It is given that Richard earned a total of 22.5 and he was not first in any level. The only way he could win 22.5 without being first in any level is that if he earned 7.5 in two levels, 5 in one level and 2.5 in another level.
From (2), Connor and Poppy did not win the highest points in the game. From (6), Sarah also did not win the highest points in the game.
From (4), one of the persons was first in two levels and this person did not win the highest points. This person must have earned a minimum of 10 + 10 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 25 points in the game. The person who earned the highest points must have earned more than this. From this, we can infer that Richard also could not be the person who earned the highest points.
Hence, only Mason could be the person who earned the highest points. From (5), Mason was first in one level. He was not third in any level. Also, Richard was second in two levels (since he earned 7.5 in two levels). Hence, maximum points that Mason could win = 10 + 7.5 + 7.5 + 2.5 = 27.5 points.
Since Mason had to win more than 25 points, he must have earned 27.5 points. The person who was first in two levels must have earned 25 points (this is the only way for him to have earned less points than Mason). From (2) and (6), Poppy and Sarah could not be the persons who earned 25 points. Hence, Connor must be the person who earned 25 points. This is possible if he was first in two levels and fourth/fifth in two other levels.
From (2), Poppy must have earned 20 points. This is possible only if Poppy was first in one level, third in another level and fourth/fifth in two levels (Poppy could not be second in any level because Richard and Mason were second in two levels each). Points that Poppy won in this case = 10 + 5 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 20. Sarah must have been third in two levels and fourth/fifth in two levels. Total points that Sarah earned = 5 + 5 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 15.

The following table presents the positions of the five persons in the four levels and the total points earned by them in the game:

Three of the friends - Connor, Poppy and Mason stood first in 2, 1 and 1 levels, respectively.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 16

Directions: Study the given information and answer the following question.

On a particular day, exactly twelve aircraft visited a certain airport and each aircraft availed of exactly one type of maintenance at the airport. Of the twelve aircraft, four needed preventive maintenance, four needed corrective maintenance and four needed predictive maintenance. The twelve aircraft landed at the airport at the same time and each aircraft took off immediately after it had availed respective maintenance schedule. At the airport, each of the three types of maintenance was provided in different hangars - Hangar-1 for preventive maintenance, Hangar-2 for corrective maintenance and Hangar-3 for predictive maintenance. Each hangar can hold only one aircraft at any time. The time taken by Hangar-1, Hangar-2 and Hangar-3 to maintain and repair one aircraft is from 11 hours to 15 hours (both inclusive), from 16 hours to 20 hours (both inclusive), and from 21 hours to 25 hours (both inclusive), respectively.
Engineers in hangars always start servicing an aircraft waiting to avail of their maintenance schedule without delay, unless they are already servicing another aircraft. The time spent by any aircraft at the airport is the sum of the time spent by it waiting to be maintained and the time spent by the corresponding engineers in hangars in servicing it.

Given below is the total time spent by each of the twelve aircraft at the airport (in alphabetical order of their names).

Q. Which of the following aircraft was maintained in Hangar-2?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 16

Among the four aircraft which required preventive maintenance, the aircraft which spent the least time would have been maintained first. Since Hangar-1 takes from 11 hours to 15 hours to do one aircraft's preventive maintenance, A1 must have been the first to be maintained in Hangar-1.
Similarly, A6 must have been maintained in Hangar-2. Either A8 or A5 would have been maintained in Hangar-3.
Since A1 was maintained in Hangar-1, the next aircraft to have been maintained in hangar-1 would have spent at least 13 + 11 = 24 hours and at most 13 + 15 = 28 hours at the airport.
From the table, A8 must be the second aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-1.
Hence, A5 was the first aircraft maintained in Hangar-3.
The second aircraft that was maintained in Hangar-2 waited for at least 17 + 16 = 33 hours and at most 17 + 20 = 37 hours. Either A11 or A3 can be this aircraft. The third aircraft maintained in Hangar-1 would have spent at least 24 + 11 = 35 hours and at most 24 + 15 = 39 hours. From the table, we can see that only A3 can be this aircraft. The fourth aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-1 must have spent at least 47 hours and at most 51 hours. A9 has to be the fourth aircraft.
The second aircraft maintained in Hangar-3 must have spent at least 43 hours and at most 47 hours. From the table, A7 was the second aircraft maintained in Hangar-3.
The third aircraft maintained in Hangar-3 must have spent at least 64 hours and at most 68 hours. A4 must be the third aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-3. The last aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-3 must have spent at least 88 hours and at most 92 hours. A12 has to be the fourth aircraft maintained in Hangar-3.
Since A3 was maintained in Hangar-1, A11 must be the second aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-2. The third aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-2 must be A2 and the fourth aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-2 must be A10.
The following table provides the order in which the engineers in three hangars maintained the aircraft and the time taken by them to service each aircraft:

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 17

Directions: Study the given information and answer the following question.

On a particular day, exactly twelve aircraft visited a certain airport and each aircraft availed of exactly one type of maintenance at the airport. Of the twelve aircraft, four needed preventive maintenance, four needed corrective maintenance and four needed predictive maintenance. The twelve aircraft landed at the airport at the same time and each aircraft took off immediately after it had availed respective maintenance schedule. At the airport, each of the three types of maintenance was provided in different hangars - Hangar-1 for preventive maintenance, Hangar-2 for corrective maintenance and Hangar-3 for predictive maintenance. Each hangar can hold only one aircraft at any time. The time taken by Hangar-1, Hangar-2 and Hangar-3 to maintain and repair one aircraft is from 11 hours to 15 hours (both inclusive), from 16 hours to 20 hours (both inclusive), and from 21 hours to 25 hours (both inclusive), respectively.
Engineers in hangars always start servicing an aircraft waiting to avail of their maintenance schedule without delay, unless they are already servicing another aircraft. The time spent by any aircraft at the airport is the sum of the time spent by it waiting to be maintained and the time spent by the corresponding engineers in hangars in servicing it.

Given below is the total time spent by each of the twelve aircraft at the airport (in alphabetical order of their names).

Q. Which of the following aircraft was not maintained in Hangar-1?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 17

Among the four aircraft which required preventive maintenance, the aircraft which spent the least time would have been maintained first. Since Hangar-1 takes from 11 hours to 15 hours to do one aircraft's preventive maintenance, A1 must have been the first to be maintained in Hangar-1.
Similarly, A6 must have been maintained in Hangar-2. Either A8 or A5 would have been maintained in Hangar-3.
Since A1 was maintained in Hangar-1, the next aircraft to have been maintained in hangar-1 would have spent at least 13 + 11 = 24 hours and at most 13 + 15 = 28 hours at the airport.
From the table, A8 must be the second aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-1.
Hence, A5 was the first aircraft maintained in Hangar-3.
The second aircraft that was maintained in Hangar-2 waited for at least 17 + 16 = 33 hours and at most 17 + 20 = 37 hours. Either A11 or A3 can be this aircraft. The third aircraft maintained in Hangar-1 would have spent at least 24 + 11 = 35 hours and at most 24 + 15 = 39 hours. From the table, we can see that only A3 can be this aircraft. The fourth aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-1 must have spent at least 47 hours and at most 51 hours. A9 has to be the fourth aircraft.
The second aircraft maintained in Hangar-3 must have spent at least 43 hours and at most 47 hours. From the table, A7 was the second aircraft maintained in Hangar-3.
The third aircraft maintained in Hangar-3 must have spent at least 64 hours and at most 68 hours. A4 must be the third aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-3. The last aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-3 must have spent at least 88 hours and at most 92 hours. A12 has to be the fourth aircraft maintained in Hangar-3.
Since A3 was maintained in Hangar-1, A11 must be the second aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-2. The third aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-2 must be A2 and the fourth aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-2 must be A10.
The following table provides the order in which the engineers in three hangars maintained the aircraft and the time taken by them to service each aircraft:

A11 was not maintained in Hangar-1.

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 18

Directions: Study the given information and answer the following question.

On a particular day, exactly twelve aircraft visited a certain airport and each aircraft availed of exactly one type of maintenance at the airport. Of the twelve aircraft, four needed preventive maintenance, four needed corrective maintenance and four needed predictive maintenance. The twelve aircraft landed at the airport at the same time and each aircraft took off immediately after it had availed respective maintenance schedule. At the airport, each of the three types of maintenance was provided in different hangars - Hangar-1 for preventive maintenance, Hangar-2 for corrective maintenance and Hangar-3 for predictive maintenance. Each hangar can hold only one aircraft at any time. The time taken by Hangar-1, Hangar-2 and Hangar-3 to maintain and repair one aircraft is from 11 hours to 15 hours (both inclusive), from 16 hours to 20 hours (both inclusive), and from 21 hours to 25 hours (both inclusive), respectively.
Engineers in hangars always start servicing an aircraft waiting to avail of their maintenance schedule without delay, unless they are already servicing another aircraft. The time spent by any aircraft at the airport is the sum of the time spent by it waiting to be maintained and the time spent by the corresponding engineers in hangars in servicing it.

Given below is the total time spent by each of the twelve aircraft at the airport (in alphabetical order of their names).

Q. For what more time was Hangar-3 busier than Hangar-1? Key in the value in hours.


Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 18

Among the four aircraft which required preventive maintenance, the aircraft which spent the least time would have been maintained first. Since Hangar-1 takes from 11 hours to 15 hours to do one aircraft's preventive maintenance, A1 must have been the first to be maintained in Hangar-1.
Similarly, A6 must have been maintained in Hangar-2. Either A8 or A5 would have been maintained in Hangar-3.
Since A1 was maintained in Hangar-1, the next aircraft to have been maintained in hangar-1 would have spent at least 13 + 11 = 24 hours and at most 13 + 15 = 28 hours at the airport.
From the table, A8 must be the second aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-1.
Hence, A5 was the first aircraft maintained in Hangar-3.
The second aircraft that was maintained in Hangar-2 waited for at least 17 + 16 = 33 hours and at most 17 + 20 = 37 hours. Either A11 or A3 can be this aircraft. The third aircraft maintained in Hangar-1 would have spent at least 24 + 11 = 35 hours and at most 24 + 15 = 39 hours. From the table, we can see that only A3 can be this aircraft. The fourth aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-1 must have spent at least 47 hours and at most 51 hours. A9 has to be the fourth aircraft.
The second aircraft maintained in Hangar-3 must have spent at least 43 hours and at most 47 hours. From the table, A7 was the second aircraft maintained in Hangar-3.
The third aircraft maintained in Hangar-3 must have spent at least 64 hours and at most 68 hours. A4 must be the third aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-3. The last aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-3 must have spent at least 88 hours and at most 92 hours. A12 has to be the fourth aircraft maintained in Hangar-3.
Since A3 was maintained in Hangar-1, A11 must be the second aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-2. The third aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-2 must be A2 and the fourth aircraft to be maintained in Hangar-2 must be A10.
The following table provides the order in which the engineers in three hangars maintained the aircraft and the time taken by them to service each aircraft:

Hangar-3 remained busy for 22 + 21 + 24 + 23 = 90 hours.
Hangar-1 remained busy for 13 + 11 +12 + 14 = 50 hours.
Thus, Hangar-3 was busier than Hangar-1 by 40 more hours.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 19

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the following question.

A survey was conducted by EPFO to find out the number of people working in three different sectors, viz. banking, education and transport, across three metro cities of India - Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata. The table below represents the collected sector-wise data:

The survey results were also divided into two groups on the basis of whether the people are working in the government sector (G) or the private sector (P).
It is also known that:
1. The total number of people surveyed in Delhi was equal to the total number of people surveyed in Kolkata, which was 1500 less than the number of people surveyed in Mumbai.
2. The ratio of the number of people working in G and the number of people working in P was 10 : 7, respectively.
3. In transport sector, the number of people working in G was equal to the number of people working in P.
4. In G, the number of people working in the education sector in Mumbai was equal to the number of people working in the transport sector in Kolkata.
5. In G, the number of people working in the education sector in Kolkata was twice that of the number of people in the banking sector in Kolkata.
6. In P, the total number of people working in the education sector was 8500.
7. In P, the ratio of the number people working in the transport sector in Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata was 12 : 11 : 4, respectively.
8. In G, the ratio of the number of people working in banking sector from Mumbai and Kolkata was 10 : 7, respectively.
9. In P, the number of people working in the banking sector in Delhi was 2500.
10. In G, the number of people working in the education sector was 25% greater than the number of people working in the banking sector.

Q. What was the respective ratio of the number of people working in the education sector in Mumbai, Kolkata and Delhi in P?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 19

By tabulating all the given data and summing the values, we get the following table:

It is given that, in P, the ratio of the number of people from Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata in the transport sector was 12 : 11: 4, respectively and their sum was 13,500.
So, the numbers are 6000, 5500 and 2000.
⇒ 8000 - X = 2000
Or, X = 6000
Also, (10Y/7) + 5500 + Y = 14,000
On solving, we get Y = 3500

Thus, we get all the values as:

From that table, we can see the ratio of the people working in the education sector in Mumbai, Kolkata and Delhi in P = 2000: 2500 : 4000 = 4 : 5 : 8, respectively.
Hence, option C is the correct answer.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 20

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the following question.

A survey was conducted by EPFO to find out the number of people working in three different sectors, viz. banking, education and transport, across three metro cities of India - Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata. The table below represents the collected sector-wise data:

The survey results were also divided into two groups on the basis of whether the people are working in the government sector (G) or the private sector (P).
It is also known that:
1. The total number of people surveyed in Delhi was equal to the total number of people surveyed in Kolkata, which was 1500 less than the number of people surveyed in Mumbai.
2. The ratio of the number of people working in G and the number of people working in P was 10 : 7, respectively.
3. In transport sector, the number of people working in G was equal to the number of people working in P.
4. In G, the number of people working in the education sector in Mumbai was equal to the number of people working in the transport sector in Kolkata.
5. In G, the number of people working in the education sector in Kolkata was twice that of the number of people in the banking sector in Kolkata.
6. In P, the total number of people working in the education sector was 8500.
7. In P, the ratio of the number people working in the transport sector in Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata was 12 : 11 : 4, respectively.
8. In G, the ratio of the number of people working in banking sector from Mumbai and Kolkata was 10 : 7, respectively.
9. In P, the number of people working in the banking sector in Delhi was 2500.
10. In G, the number of people working in the education sector was 25% greater than the number of people working in the banking sector.

Q. In which of the following sectors was the number of people working in the government sector at least 50% more than that working in the private sector?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 20

By tabulating all the given data and summing the values, we get the following table:

It is given that, in P, the ratio of the number of people from Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata in the transport sector was 12 : 11: 4, respectively and their sum was 13,500.
So, the numbers are 6000, 5500 and 2000.
⇒ 8000 - X = 2000
Or, X = 6000
Also, (10Y/7) + 5500 + Y = 14,000
On solving, we get Y = 3500

Thus, we get all the values as:

Banking sector:
Total number of people in the government sector = 14000
Total number of people in the private sector = 9500
Since 14000/9500 = 1.47, people in government sectors are only 45% more than people in private sector.
Education sector:
Total number of people in the government sector = 17,500
Total number of people in the private sector = 8500
Since 14000/9500 = 2.05, people in government sectors are only 105% more than people in private sector.
Transport sector:
Total number of people in the government sector = 13,500
Total number of people in the private sector = 13,500
Both are equal.

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 21

Find the sum of integer values of x (|x| <10) satisfying the following inequality:


Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 21


Factorising these terms we get,


 

Hence, possible values are -3, -2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
Sum = 30.

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 22

A right angled triangle has an inradius of length 3 cm and a circumradius of length 12.5 cm. What is the area of the triangle in square cms?


Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 22

We know that circumradius, R = half of hypotenuse.
∴ Hypotenuse H = 25 cm.
Also, inradius  where a and b are the perpendicular sides of the right angled triangle.


⇒ a + b = 31. ....(1)

Also, a+ b2 = H2  
⇒ a2 + b2 = 625 .....(2)
Squaring (1) and subtracting (2) from it, we get:
a2 + b2 + 2ab - a- b2 = 961 - 625
⇒ 2ab = 336
ab = 168
Area of a right angled triangle = ab/2 = 168/2 = 84 sq. cms

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 23

Find the area of the square inscribed inside a circle, which is in turn is inscribed inside an equilateral triangle of side 3√3 cm.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 23


Given, the side length of the triangle = 3√3 cm.


So, the circle inside the triangle has a radius of length 3/2 cm.
The diameter of the circle is the diagonal of the square = 3 cm.
∴ Side length of the square becomes 3/√2 cm.
∴ Area of the square = (3/√2)2 = 9/2 sq. cms. 

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 24

Find the range of values of x satisfying the following inequation:

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 24

|x| + 5 is always greater than zero.
Hence the denominator should be greater than zero for the inequality to hold true.
∣x∣2 + ∣x∣ − 6 > 0
Let |x| be t.
t+ t - 6 > 0
(t + 3) (t - 2) > 0
Hence, t > 2 or t < -3
Since, t = |x|, it cannot be less than -3.
Hence, |x| > 2,
x < -2, x > 2

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 25

Find the value of [log2 100]+[log3 99]+[log4 98]+[log5 97]+....+[log100 2] where [X] equals the largest integer less than or equal to X.


Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 25

[log2 100] = 6 since 26 = 64
Similarly,
[log3 99] = 4
[log4 98] = 3
From [log5 97] to [log9 93], we get 2 each.
From [log10 92] to [log51 51], we get 1. For the rest we get 0.
Hence, sum = 6 + 4 + 3 + 5 x 2 + 42 x 1 = 65

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 26

In a biased dice with numbers from 1 to 6, each prime number has an equal chance of showing up and each non-prime number has an equal chance of showing up on a roll of the dice. If the probability that an odd number is rolled is 4/9, what is the probability that 6 is rolled in ane throw of the dice?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 26

Let P(2) = P(3) = P(5) = x
and let P(1) = P(4) = P(6) = y
Now, we know the probability of an odd number is 4/9.
2x + y = 4/9 or 18x + 9y = 4
Also, total probability is 1.
Hence, 3x+3y = 1
x + y = 1/3
Solving the 2 equations, we get x = 1/9 and y = 2/9.
Hence, probability of getting a six = 2/9

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 27

Solve for x: log10 [log10 (2+log2 (x+2))] = 0 


Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 27

log10 [log10 (2+log2 (x+2))] = 0 
∵ RHS = 0, [log(2 + log2 (x+2))] = 1, which means:
2 + log2 (x + 2) = 10
⇒ log2 (x + 2) = 8
⇒ (x + 2) = 28
∴ x = 256 - 2 = 254

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 28

Out of a certain number of students in the college, square root of one-third the total students were selected to represent in a sports tournament. 4 more students were selected as extras for the squad. The remaining 26/27 of the total students failed to be selected for the tournament. How many students did the college have in total?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 28

Let the total number of students be x. Students selected = √x/3.
Extras selected = 4.
And the remaining students formed 26/27 of the total students.
So, the students selected including the extras for the tournament 


When x = 27, total students selected

∵ 7/27 ≠ 1/27, we reject this solution.
When x = 432, total students selected 

∵ 16/432 = 1/27, this is our answer.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 29

A milk seller buys milk at Rs 50/L and then mixes some water into it, after which he marks up the price of the solution by 20% and gives a discount of 20% on the marked price. If he earns a profit of 20% in the entire transaction, what is the amount of water(in mL) mixed for every 2L of pure milk? Assume that the cost of water is negligible.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 29

The SP of 1 L of milk-water solution = 50 x 1.2 x 0.8 = 48
Now, he is earning a profit of 20%.
Hence,
1.2CP = 48
CP = 40
So, the CP of 1L solution is Rs 40.
Since the cost of water is 0, the entire Rs 40 constitutes milk only
Rs 50 is the CP of 1000mL of milk.
Hence, Rs 40 is the CP of 800mL of milk.
Hence, in every 800mL of pure milk, 200mL of water is mixed.
Hence in every 4mL of pure milk, 1 mL of water is mixed.
Hence, in 2L, 500mL of water is mixed.

CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 30

How many terms are common in the following series?
S1 = 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, ....... (up to 1000 terms)
S2 = 16, 27, 38, 49, 60, 71, ....... (up to 1000 terms)

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) - Question 30

The m th term of Series 1 can be written as 9m.
The n th term of series 2 can be written as 5 + 11n.
The first term of both series is 27.
The common difference = LCM(9,11) = 99
The last term of the first series = 9000, which is less than the last term of the second series.
Hence,
27 + (t-1)99 <= 9000
3 + (t-1)11 <= 1000
t - 1 <= 90.xx
t - 1 = 90
t = 91.

View more questions
152 docs|327 tests
Information about CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10) solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for CAT Mock Test- 8 (November 10), EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for CAT

Download as PDF

Top Courses for CAT