CTET & State TET Exam > CTET & State TET Test > English Language & Pedagogy for CTET & TET Exams > CTET Practice Test: English-5 - CTET & State TET MCQ
English-5 - Free MCQ Practice Test with solutions, CTET English & Pedagogy
MCQ Practice Test & Solutions: CTET Practice Test: English-5 (30 Questions)
You can prepare effectively for CTET & State TET English Language & Pedagogy for CTET & TET Exams with this dedicated MCQ Practice Test (available with solutions) on the important topic of "CTET Practice Test: English-5". These 30 questions have been designed by the experts with the latest curriculum of CTET & State TET 2026, to help you master the concept.
Test Highlights:
- - Format: Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
- - Duration: 30 minutes
- - Number of Questions: 30
Sign up on EduRev for free to attempt this test and track your preparation progress.
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 1
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, in so far as it consists of knowledge, must be regarded as having value but in so far as it consists of technique, the question whether it is to be praised or blamed depends upon the use that is made of the technique. In itself it is neutral, neither good nor bad. Any ultimate view that we may have about what gives value to this or that must come from other sources than science.
Both good and evil, almost everything that distinguishes our age from its predecessors, are due to science. In daily life we have electricity, the radio and cinema. Because of the increased productivity of labour, we are able to devote a far greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars than was formerly possible and we are able to keep the young in school very much longer than we formerly could. Owing to science we are able to disseminate information through the press and the radio to practically everybody. Owing to science, we can make it more enormously difficult than it used to be for people whom the government dislikes, to escape. The opposition to science in past by some was surprising. Men of science affirmed things that were contrary to what everybody had believed, they upset pre-conceived ideas and were thought to be destitute for reverence.
It would not be surprising if in the present day, a powerful antiscientific movement were to arise as a result of the dangers to human life that are resulting from atom bombs and may result from bacteriological warfare. But whatever people may feel about these horrors, they dare not turn against the men of science so long as war is at all probable, because if one side is equipped with scientists and the other not, scientific side would almost certainly win.
What determines whether science is good or bad?
Detailed Solution: Question 1
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 2
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, in so far as it consists of knowledge, must be regarded as having value but in so far as it consists of technique, the question whether it is to be praised or blamed depends upon the use that is made of the technique. In itself it is neutral, neither good nor bad. Any ultimate view that we may have about what gives value to this or that must come from other sources than science.
Both good and evil, almost everything that distinguishes our age from its predecessors, are due to science. In daily life we have electricity, the radio and cinema. Because of the increased productivity of labour, we are able to devote a far greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars than was formerly possible and we are able to keep the young in school very much longer than we formerly could. Owing to science we are able to disseminate information through the press and the radio to practically everybody. Owing to science, we can make it more enormously difficult than it used to be for people whom the government dislikes, to escape. The opposition to science in past by some was surprising. Men of science affirmed things that were contrary to what everybody had believed, they upset pre-conceived ideas and were thought to be destitute for reverence.
It would not be surprising if in the present day, a powerful antiscientific movement were to arise as a result of the dangers to human life that are resulting from atom bombs and may result from bacteriological warfare. But whatever people may feel about these horrors, they dare not turn against the men of science so long as war is at all probable, because if one side is equipped with scientists and the other not, scientific side would almost certainly win.
Which conception of science has the author mentioned in the passage?
Detailed Solution: Question 2
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 3
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, in so far as it consists of knowledge, must be regarded as having value but in so far as it consists of technique, the question whether it is to be praised or blamed depends upon the use that is made of the technique. In itself it is neutral, neither good nor bad. Any ultimate view that we may have about what gives value to this or that must come from other sources than science.
Both good and evil, almost everything that distinguishes our age from its predecessors, are due to science. In daily life we have electricity, the radio and cinema. Because of the increased productivity of labour, we are able to devote a far greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars than was formerly possible and we are able to keep the young in school very much longer than we formerly could. Owing to science we are able to disseminate information through the press and the radio to practically everybody. Owing to science, we can make it more enormously difficult than it used to be for people whom the government dislikes, to escape. The opposition to science in past by some was surprising. Men of science affirmed things that were contrary to what everybody had believed, they upset pre-conceived ideas and were thought to be destitute for reverence.
It would not be surprising if in the present day, a powerful antiscientific movement were to arise as a result of the dangers to human life that are resulting from atom bombs and may result from bacteriological warfare. But whatever people may feel about these horrors, they dare not turn against the men of science so long as war is at all probable, because if one side is equipped with scientists and the other not, scientific side would almost certainly win.
What distinguishes our age from the previous ages?
Detailed Solution: Question 3
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 4
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, in so far as it consists of knowledge, must be regarded as having value but in so far as it consists of technique, the question whether it is to be praised or blamed depends upon the use that is made of the technique. In itself it is neutral, neither good nor bad. Any ultimate view that we may have about what gives value to this or that must come from other sources than science.
Both good and evil, almost everything that distinguishes our age from its predecessors, are due to science. In daily life we have electricity, the radio and cinema. Because of the increased productivity of labour, we are able to devote a far greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars than was formerly possible and we are able to keep the young in school very much longer than we formerly could. Owing to science we are able to disseminate information through the press and the radio to practically everybody. Owing to science, we can make it more enormously difficult than it used to be for people whom the government dislikes, to escape. The opposition to science in past by some was surprising. Men of science affirmed things that were contrary to what everybody had believed, they upset pre-conceived ideas and were thought to be destitute for reverence.
It would not be surprising if in the present day, a powerful antiscientific movement were to arise as a result of the dangers to human life that are resulting from atom bombs and may result from bacteriological warfare. But whatever people may feel about these horrors, they dare not turn against the men of science so long as war is at all probable, because if one side is equipped with scientists and the other not, scientific side would almost certainly win.
What enables us to devote a greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars today than in the past?
Detailed Solution: Question 4
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 5
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, in so far as it consists of knowledge, must be regarded as having value but in so far as it consists of technique, the question whether it is to be praised or blamed depends upon the use that is made of the technique. In itself it is neutral, neither good nor bad. Any ultimate view that we may have about what gives value to this or that must come from other sources than science.
Both good and evil, almost everything that distinguishes our age from its predecessors, are due to science. In daily life we have electricity, the radio and cinema. Because of the increased productivity of labour, we are able to devote a far greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars than was formerly possible and we are able to keep the young in school very much longer than we formerly could. Owing to science we are able to disseminate information through the press and the radio to practically everybody. Owing to science, we can make it more enormously difficult than it used to be for people whom the government dislikes, to escape. The opposition to science in past by some was surprising. Men of science affirmed things that were contrary to what everybody had believed, they upset pre-conceived ideas and were thought to be destitute for reverence.
It would not be surprising if in the present day, a powerful antiscientific movement were to arise as a result of the dangers to human life that are resulting from atom bombs and may result from bacteriological warfare. But whatever people may feel about these horrors, they dare not turn against the men of science so long as war is at all probable, because if one side is equipped with scientists and the other not, scientific side would almost certainly win.
If an anti-scientific movement were to arise in the present day, what factor or factors, according to the author, would be held responsible for it?
Detailed Solution: Question 5
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 6
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, in so far as it consists of knowledge, must be regarded as having value but in so far as it consists of technique, the question whether it is to be praised or blamed depends upon the use that is made of the technique. In itself it is neutral, neither good nor bad. Any ultimate view that we may have about what gives value to this or that must come from other sources than science.
Both good and evil, almost everything that distinguishes our age from its predecessors, are due to science. In daily life we have electricity, the radio and cinema. Because of the increased productivity of labour, we are able to devote a far greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars than was formerly possible and we are able to keep the young in school very much longer than we formerly could. Owing to science we are able to disseminate information through the press and the radio to practically everybody. Owing to science, we can make it more enormously difficult than it used to be for people whom the government dislikes, to escape. The opposition to science in past by some was surprising. Men of science affirmed things that were contrary to what everybody had believed, they upset pre-conceived ideas and were thought to be destitute for reverence.
It would not be surprising if in the present day, a powerful antiscientific movement were to arise as a result of the dangers to human life that are resulting from atom bombs and may result from bacteriological warfare. But whatever people may feel about these horrors, they dare not turn against the men of science so long as war is at all probable, because if one side is equipped with scientists and the other not, scientific side would almost certainly win.
How long are people not likely to turn against scientists?
Detailed Solution: Question 6
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 7
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, in so far as it consists of knowledge, must be regarded as having value but in so far as it consists of technique, the question whether it is to be praised or blamed depends upon the use that is made of the technique. In itself it is neutral, neither good nor bad. Any ultimate view that we may have about what gives value to this or that must come from other sources than science.
Both good and evil, almost everything that distinguishes our age from its predecessors, are due to science. In daily life we have electricity, the radio and cinema. Because of the increased productivity of labour, we are able to devote a far greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars than was formerly possible and we are able to keep the young in school very much longer than we formerly could. Owing to science we are able to disseminate information through the press and the radio to practically everybody. Owing to science, we can make it more enormously difficult than it used to be for people whom the government dislikes, to escape. The opposition to science in past by some was surprising. Men of science affirmed things that were contrary to what everybody had believed, they upset pre-conceived ideas and were thought to be destitute for reverence.
It would not be surprising if in the present day, a powerful antiscientific movement were to arise as a result of the dangers to human life that are resulting from atom bombs and may result from bacteriological warfare. But whatever people may feel about these horrors, they dare not turn against the men of science so long as war is at all probable, because if one side is equipped with scientists and the other not, scientific side would almost certainly win.
How is it most difficult in the present day for men disliked by the government to escape its clutches?
Detailed Solution: Question 7
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 8
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, in so far as it consists of knowledge, must be regarded as having value but in so far as it consists of technique, the question whether it is to be praised or blamed depends upon the use that is made of the technique. In itself it is neutral, neither good nor bad. Any ultimate view that we may have about what gives value to this or that must come from other sources than science.
Both good and evil, almost everything that distinguishes our age from its predecessors, are due to science. In daily life we have electricity, the radio and cinema. Because of the increased productivity of labour, we are able to devote a far greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars than was formerly possible and we are able to keep the young in school very much longer than we formerly could. Owing to science we are able to disseminate information through the press and the radio to practically everybody. Owing to science, we can make it more enormously difficult than it used to be for people whom the government dislikes, to escape. The opposition to science in past by some was surprising. Men of science affirmed things that were contrary to what everybody had believed, they upset pre-conceived ideas and were thought to be destitute for reverence.
It would not be surprising if in the present day, a powerful antiscientific movement were to arise as a result of the dangers to human life that are resulting from atom bombs and may result from bacteriological warfare. But whatever people may feel about these horrors, they dare not turn against the men of science so long as war is at all probable, because if one side is equipped with scientists and the other not, scientific side would almost certainly win.
How is science neutral?
Detailed Solution: Question 8
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 9
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Science, in so far as it consists of knowledge, must be regarded as having value but in so far as it consists of technique, the question whether it is to be praised or blamed depends upon the use that is made of the technique. In itself it is neutral, neither good nor bad. Any ultimate view that we may have about what gives value to this or that must come from other sources than science.
Both good and evil, almost everything that distinguishes our age from its predecessors, are due to science. In daily life we have electricity, the radio and cinema. Because of the increased productivity of labour, we are able to devote a far greater proportion of our energies to wars and preparation for wars than was formerly possible and we are able to keep the young in school very much longer than we formerly could. Owing to science we are able to disseminate information through the press and the radio to practically everybody. Owing to science, we can make it more enormously difficult than it used to be for people whom the government dislikes, to escape. The opposition to science in past by some was surprising. Men of science affirmed things that were contrary to what everybody had believed, they upset pre-conceived ideas and were thought to be destitute for reverence.
It would not be surprising if in the present day, a powerful antiscientific movement were to arise as a result of the dangers to human life that are resulting from atom bombs and may result from bacteriological warfare. But whatever people may feel about these horrors, they dare not turn against the men of science so long as war is at all probable, because if one side is equipped with scientists and the other not, scientific side would almost certainly win.
Which of the following has not been mentioned by the author as one of the uses to which science has been put, either for good or for bad?
Detailed Solution: Question 9
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 10
Directions : Read the poem given below carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither I nor you.
But when the leaves
Hang trembling
The wind is passing through.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither you nor I.
But when the trees bow down their heads,
The wind is passing by.
— Christina Rossetti
‘‘Who has seen the wind?’’ Transform this sentence into an assertive.
Detailed Solution: Question 10
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 11
Directions : Read the poem given below carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither I nor you.
But when the leaves
Hang trembling
The wind is passing through.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither you nor I.
But when the trees bow down their heads,
The wind is passing by.
— Christina Rossetti
The wind can be felt by:
Who has seen the wind?
Neither I nor you.
But when the leaves
Hang trembling
The wind is passing through.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither you nor I.
But when the trees bow down their heads,
The wind is passing by.
— Christina Rossetti
The wind can be felt by:
Detailed Solution: Question 11
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 12
Directions : Read the poem given below carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither I nor you.
But when the leaves
Hang trembling
The wind is passing through.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither you nor I.
But when the trees bow down their heads,
The wind is passing by.
— Christina Rossetti
In the poem, ‘trembling’ means:
Detailed Solution: Question 12
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 13
Directions : Read the poem given below carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither I nor you.
But when the leaves
Hang trembling
The wind is passing through.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither you nor I.
But when the trees bow down their heads,
The wind is passing by.
— Christina Rossetti
‘Neither you nor I’. Here ‘you’ refers to:
Detailed Solution: Question 13
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 14
Directions : Read the poem given below carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither I nor you.
But when the leaves
Hang trembling
The wind is passing through.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither you nor I.
But when the trees bow down their heads,
The wind is passing by.
— Christina Rossetti
In the second last line of the poem, ‘their’ refers to:
Detailed Solution: Question 14
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 15
Directions : Read the poem given below carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither I nor you.
But when the leaves
Hang trembling
The wind is passing through.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither you nor I.
But when the trees bow down their heads,
The wind is passing by.
— Christina Rossetti
‘The wind is passing by’. Here ‘passing by’ is:
Detailed Solution: Question 15
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 16
Point out the error in the following incorrect sentence.
No other man of the world is as richer as Bill Gates.
Detailed Solution: Question 16
Detailed Solution: Question 17
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 18
Point out the correct word to bring out the meaning of the sentence.
The judge ......... him to death.
Detailed Solution: Question 18
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 19
Point out the correct indirect speech of the given sentence.
‘Did they not treat you fairly’? he asked.
Detailed Solution: Question 19
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 20
What kind of adjective has been used in the following sentence?
I made several attempts to succeed but failed miserably.
Detailed Solution: Question 20
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 21
Choose the correct word to complete the following sentence.
I am ready to sacrifice my life at the ........... of my country.
Detailed Solution: Question 21
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 22
Complete the following sentence using the correct option.
I prefer walking .............. swimming.
Detailed Solution: Question 22
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 23
Complete the following sentence with the correct option.
I respect and obey my parents, and you do to ............
Detailed Solution: Question 23
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 24
Identify the correct indirect form of the given sentence.
The teacher said, “The sun sets in the West.”
Detailed Solution: Question 24
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 25
Choose the correct figure of speech in the following sentence.
To calculate the exact estimate of the material is a difficult task.
Detailed Solution: Question 25
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 26
Choose the word opposite in meaning to the given word.
Crescendo
Detailed Solution: Question 26
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 27
Fill in the blank with the suitable form of verb.
No sooner had she said this, she ......... into tears.
Detailed Solution: Question 27
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 28
Point out the word which has been wrongly used in the sentence.
John Milton is an imminent figure in the field of English literature.
Detailed Solution: Question 28
CTET Practice Test: English-5 - Question 29
For introducing a topic in the classroom, what activity should a teacher do first?
Detailed Solution: Question 29
Detailed Solution: Question 30
48 videos|209 docs|50 tests |
Information about CTET Practice Test: English-5 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for CTET Practice Test: English-5 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for CTET Practice Test: English-5, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
48 videos|209 docs|50 tests |
Download as PDF
