All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams  >  OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Judiciary Exams MCQ

OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

20 Questions MCQ Test Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams - OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal

OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal below.
Solutions of OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal questions in English are available as part of our Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal solutions in Hindi for Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal | 20 questions in 20 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 1
Save

What was the primary reason for Dhananjoy's conviction in the case of Hetal Parekh's rape and murder?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 1
Dhananjoy's conviction in the case of Hetal Parekh's rape and murder was primarily based on circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that implies something happened but does not directly prove it. In this case, factors such as Dhananjoy's proximity to the crime scene, his previous behavior towards Hetal, and the lack of a strong alibi contributed to his conviction.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 2
Save

What crucial aspect is being questioned in the case of Dhnanjoy Chaterjee v. State of West Bengal regarding the crime of raping and murdering the young girl?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 2
In the case of Dhnanjoy Chaterjee v. State of West Bengal, the critical issue revolves around the identification of the assailant, specifically determining whether the accused was indeed the person responsible for the heinous acts of raping and murdering the young girl. This raises questions about eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence, and the burden of proof in criminal cases.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 3
Save

What factor played a crucial role in Hetal being alone in the flat on the day of the tragic incident?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 3
Hetal was alone in the flat on the day of the tragic incident because her family members were away for work and studies. This situation left her vulnerable and unprotected, providing an opportunity for the unfortunate events to unfold.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 4
Save
What was the outcome of Dhananjoy's appeals following his conviction in the case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 4
Following his conviction in the case, Dhananjoy's appeals were rejected. This means that the higher courts reviewed his case and decided to uphold the original verdict of guilt. Rejection of appeals typically implies that the conviction stands, and the legal process moves forward towards sentencing.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 5
Save
How did the authorities respond to Hetal's complaints about Dhananjoy's behavior prior to the tragic incident?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 5
In response to Hetal's complaints about Dhananjoy's behavior, steps were taken to transfer Dhananjoy to another location. This action was likely taken to ensure Hetal's safety and to address the concerns raised by her about Dhananjoy's behavior.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 6
Save
What legal concept is under scrutiny when considering whether the accused had a motive for carrying out the alleged offense in the case of Dhnanjoy Chaterjee v. State of West Bengal?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 6
The examination of whether the accused had a motive for committing the alleged offense in the case of Dhnanjoy Chaterjee v. State of West Bengal delves into the legal concept of "mens rea," which refers to the mental state or intention behind a criminal act. Understanding the accused's motive can provide insights into their state of mind and potential reasons for their actions.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 7
Save
What legal precedent does the case of Dhnanjoy Chaterjee v. State of West Bengal set regarding the acceptance of evidence in the court of law?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 7
The case of Dhnanjoy Chaterjee v. State of West Bengal establishes a legal precedent concerning the acceptance of circumstantial evidence in the court of law. This precedent highlights the importance of considering and evaluating circumstantial evidence alongside other types of evidence to establish guilt or innocence in criminal proceedings. Circumstantial evidence can play a crucial role in building a case and drawing inferences about what occurred when direct evidence may be lacking.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 8
Save
What was the primary argument presented by the Prosecution in the case of the appellant accused of raping and murdering the young girl?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 8
The Prosecution's main argument in the case was that the appellant was responsible for raping and murdering the young girl based on circumstantial evidence. This evidence included the appellant following and harassing the deceased, his semen found inside her, and a button from his shirt recovered at the crime scene. Circumstantial evidence plays a significant role in criminal cases where direct evidence may be lacking, and it helps build a case based on inferences rather than direct proof.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 9
Save
What key evidence supported the Prosecution's argument against the appellant in the case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 9
DNA evidence, such as the appellant's semen found inside the victim, was crucial in supporting the Prosecution's argument against the appellant. DNA evidence is often considered highly reliable in criminal cases as it can directly link individuals to a crime scene or a victim. It played a significant role in establishing a connection between the appellant and the crime.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 10
Save
Why did the defense argue that the appellant was not present at the crime scene?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 10
The defense argued that the appellant was not present at the crime scene because he had gone to a cinema hall. Alibis are often used in criminal cases to establish that the accused was elsewhere at the time of the crime, thereby creating reasonable doubt about their involvement. Providing an alibi can be a crucial defense strategy to refute the prosecution's claims.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 11
Save
What incriminating items were found in the appellant's possession after he fled the crime scene?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 11
After fleeing the crime scene, incriminating evidence found in the appellant's possession included a button from his shirt. Physical evidence like this can be significant in linking a suspect to a crime scene or victim. It can provide crucial links that strengthen the case against the accused, especially when combined with other circumstantial or direct evidence.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 12
Save
What was the key argument presented by the Prosecution regarding the appellant's motive in the case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 12
The Prosecution's main argument focused on the appellant's history of harassing the victim, as reported by her family and other witnesses. This was a crucial point in establishing motive and linking the appellant to the crime. The history of harassment was used to demonstrate a potential motive behind the appellant's actions.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 13
Save
What did the defense specifically question regarding certain documents in the case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 13
The defense raised concerns about the timing of certain documents, suggesting that they were fabricated after the fact. By questioning the authenticity of these documents, the defense aimed to cast doubt on the reliability and credibility of the evidence presented by the Prosecution.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 14
Save
What classification did the Prosecution argue for regarding the severity of the case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 14
The Prosecution argued for the case to be categorized as one of the "rarest of the rare cases," advocating for capital punishment for the appellant. This classification was based on the severity of the crime committed and the breach of trust, emphasizing the Prosecution's stance on the appropriate level of punishment for the appellant.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 15
Save
How did the defense counter the Prosecution's argument about the severity of the crime?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 15
The defense disagreed with the Prosecution's classification of the case as one of the "rarest of the rare cases." They contended that such crimes are unfortunately common and do not always warrant the death penalty. This argument aimed to challenge the Prosecution's call for capital punishment by suggesting that the severity of the crime did not necessarily justify such an extreme penalty.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 16
Save
In legal proceedings, what role does circumstantial evidence typically play when direct evidence is lacking?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 16
Circumstantial evidence, also known as indirect evidence, plays a significant role in legal cases where direct evidence is lacking. It helps in establishing intent by drawing inferences from various facts surrounding the case. Unlike direct evidence, circumstantial evidence requires the judge or jury to make deductions and reach conclusions based on the circumstances presented.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 17
Save
How did the defense counter the Prosecution's argument regarding the severity of the crime?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 17
The defense disagreed with the Prosecution's stance by emphasizing that crimes like the one in question are unfortunately common and do not always result in the death penalty. By pointing out the frequency of such crimes, the defense aimed to challenge the notion that this case was an exceptional circumstance deserving of capital punishment.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 18
Save
What is the significance of establishing all incriminating circumstances conclusively in a legal case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 18
Establishing all incriminating circumstances conclusively in a legal case is crucial as it eliminates any room for doubt or alternative explanations. By proving these circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecution can lead to the inevitable conclusion of guilt with no other plausible explanations, strengthening their case against the defendant.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 19
Save
What is one advantage that circumstantial evidence holds over direct evidence in criminal cases?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 19
Circumstantial evidence is often more resistant to suppression or fabrication compared to direct evidence. This quality lends it credibility and reliability in criminal cases. While direct evidence may seem more straightforward, circumstantial evidence can provide a strong basis for conviction due to its inherent difficulty in being manipulated.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 20
Save
How does the resistance to suppression or fabrication of circumstantial evidence contribute to its credibility in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal - Question 20
The resistance of circumstantial evidence to suppression or fabrication enhances its reliability and credibility in legal proceedings. This quality makes it harder to manipulate or discredit, thereby strengthening its value as a substantial basis for conviction or as a key component in building a case based on indirect but interconnected facts.
99 docs|98 tests
Join Course
Information about OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal

Find all the important questions for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal at EduRev.Get fully prepared for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal resources.

OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup