Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra

Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra questions in English are available as part of our Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra solutions in Hindi for Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 1

What were the circumstances surrounding the assault on Mathura in the Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 1
In the Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra case, Mathura was sexually assaulted at a police station by two policemen, Appellant No.1 Tukaram and Appellant No. 2 Ganpat. The case involved allegations of Ganpat raping Mathura while Tukaram fondled her. This incident led to charges under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. This case brought to light issues of sexual assault and the challenges faced by victims seeking justice in such situations.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 2

What were the specific charges brought against the accused individuals in the Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 2
The accused individuals in the Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra case faced charges under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. This section pertains to the crime of rape in the Indian legal system. The case highlighted the serious nature of the offense and raised important discussions around the handling of sexual assault cases.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 3

What actions were attributed to each of the accused individuals in the assault on Mathura?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 3
The allegations in the Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra case indicated that Ganpat was accused of raping Mathura while Tukaram was involved in fondling her. This distinction in their actions during the assault is crucial in understanding the roles played by each of the accused individuals in the tragic incident.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 4
What was the outcome of the trial at the Sessions Court for the appellants?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 4
The outcome of the trial at the Sessions Court resulted in the appellants being acquitted due to a lack of evidence. This decision was made based on the court's assessment of the situation as consensual, leading to the acquittal of the accused individuals.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 5
What was the basis for the High Court overturning the acquittal of the appellants?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 5
The High Court overturned the acquittal of the appellants primarily due to emphasizing Mathura's lack of consent in the incident. The court also highlighted the abuse of authority by the policemen involved, leading to a different legal interpretation and subsequent conviction of the accused individuals.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 6
What was Tukaram ultimately convicted of in the legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 6
Tukaram was ultimately convicted of outraging the modesty of a woman in the legal proceedings. This conviction was based on the specific details and evidence presented during the trial, leading to this particular legal outcome for Tukaram.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 7
What was Ganpat convicted of in the legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 7
Ganpat was convicted of rape under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in the legal proceedings. This conviction was a result of the court's assessment of the evidence and the specific charges brought against Ganpat, leading to this serious legal outcome for his involvement in the case.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 8
What was the significant outcome of the court's decision in the Tuka Ram and Anr v State of Maharashtra case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 8
The court's decision in the Tuka Ram and Anr v State of Maharashtra case resulted in the introduction of new sections, specifically Sections 376 (A), (B), (C), and (D) in the Indian Penal Code. These new sections addressed issues like custodial rape and shifted the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defense in certain circumstances.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 9
What was the key implication of the legal presumption established by the court in cases where the accused holds power over the victim?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 9
The key implication of the legal presumption established by the court in cases where the accused holds power over the victim is that the court presumes rape unless proven otherwise by the defendant. This means that under certain circumstances, if the victim alleges non-consensual intercourse with an accused in a position of power, the court will presume rape unless the defendant can prove otherwise.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 10
What major legal change occurred as a result of the 1978 judgment in the Tuka Ram and Anr v State of Maharashtra case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 10
One major legal change resulting from the 1978 judgment in the Tuka Ram and Anr v State of Maharashtra case was the introduction of Sections 376 (A), (B), (C), and (D) in the Indian Penal Code. These sections specifically addressed custodial rape, making it punishable under the newly established legal framework. This reform aimed to provide better protection for victims of such crimes and ensure that perpetrators face appropriate legal consequences.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 11
What legal changes were introduced in the Indian Penal Code regarding custodial rape?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 11
The legal changes introduced in the Indian Penal Code regarding custodial rape involved the introduction of Sections 114 (A), (B), (C), and (D). These sections aim to address and provide legal recourse in cases of custodial rape, further enhancing the legal framework to protect victims in such situations.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 12
What is the implication of the shift in burden of proof from prosecution to defense as per the changes in the Evidence Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 12
The implication of shifting the burden of proof from prosecution to defense in the Evidence Act means that the defendant must prove their innocence by rebutting the presumption of rape. This change places the onus on the accused to demonstrate their innocence in cases where the victim alleges non-consensual intercourse, particularly when the accused holds a position of power over the victim.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 13
What protective measure was introduced to safeguard the privacy of victims in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 13
Protective measures such as provisions for in-camera trials were introduced to protect the victim's privacy during legal proceedings. In-camera trials ensure that the identity of the victim is not disclosed, maintaining confidentiality and safeguarding the privacy of individuals involved in sensitive cases.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 14
What was a major critique raised by legal experts like Upendra Baxi regarding the Mathura case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 14
Legal experts like Upendra Baxi criticized the unrealistic expectation placed on a 14-16-year-old girl to resist two policemen in a locked room, pointing out that lack of resistance does not imply consent. This highlights the power dynamics at play in the case and questions the assumptions made by the court regarding the victim's behavior.
Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 15
What was a significant misconception highlighted by legal experts in the Mathura case regarding lack of resistance by the victim?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra - Question 15
Legal experts in the Mathura case emphasized the misconception surrounding the lack of resistance by the victim. They pointed out the unrealistic expectation placed on a young girl to resist two authority figures, shedding light on the complexities of power dynamics and consent in such situations.
99 docs|98 tests
Information about Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Tuka Ram And Anr v State of Maharashtra, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams