CLAT PG Exam  >  CLAT PG Test  >  Administrative Law  >  Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - CLAT PG MCQ

Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Free MCQ Practice Test


MCQ Practice Test & Solutions: Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law (20 Questions)

You can prepare effectively for CLAT PG Administrative Law with this dedicated MCQ Practice Test (available with solutions) on the important topic of "Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law". These 20 questions have been designed by the experts with the latest curriculum of CLAT PG 2026, to help you master the concept.

Test Highlights:

  • - Format: Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
  • - Duration: 20 minutes
  • - Number of Questions: 20

Sign up on EduRev for free to attempt this test and track your preparation progress.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 1

Right to livelihood was included in Article 21 in:

Detailed Solution: Question 1

Life includes livelihood, shelter, and dignity.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 2

Article 21 after Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India requires that procedure must be:

Detailed Solution: Question 2

The Supreme Court expanded Article 21 and held that a law affecting liberty must be reasonable and non-arbitrary.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 3

What was the defect in Ridge’s dismissal?

Detailed Solution: Question 3

Ridge was removed without being heard, violating audi alteram partem.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 4

Which principle connects Articles 14, 19, and 21?

Detailed Solution: Question 4

The Court held these three Articles together ensure protection against arbitrary state action.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 5

Which constitutional value was endangered by misuse of Article 356?

Detailed Solution: Question 5

Arbitrary dismissal of state governments weakens India’s federal structure.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 6

Colourable exercise of power means:

Detailed Solution: Question 6

Power must be used for the purpose it is given, not for hidden motives.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 7

In Tata Cellular case, courts mainly avoided interfering due to:

Detailed Solution: Question 7

Courts respect administrative discretion in complex economic decisions.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 8

In Ridge v. Baldwin, the dismissal was declared:

Detailed Solution: Question 8

Since natural justice was violated, the order was void ab initio.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 9

What test did the Court make compulsory in S.R. Bommai?

Detailed Solution: Question 9

The Court declared that majority must be tested on the floor of the Assembly.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 10

Which is NOT a ground of judicial review in tender matters?

Detailed Solution: Question 10

Personal financial disadvantage does not justify judicial interference unless law is breached.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 11

Which judgment equated arbitrariness with inequality under Article 14?

Detailed Solution: Question 11

The Court stated "arbitrariness and equality are sworn enemies."

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 12

In Samsher Singh, who exercises real executive power?

Detailed Solution: Question 12

Elected government exercises executive authority; governors act on advice.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 13

Question: Wednesbury unreasonableness refers to decisions that are:

Detailed Solution: Question 13

Only extreme irrationality attracts judicial interference.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 14

In Mohinder Singh Gill, post-hoc justification was held to be:

Detailed Solution: Question 14

New reasons cannot be added later through affidavits.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 15

What is meant by “orders must speak for themselves”?

Detailed Solution: Question 15

The Court held that validity depends on the original reasons, not later explanations.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 16

Silence of statute regarding hearing implies:

Detailed Solution: Question 16

Unless specifically excluded, fairness must be followed.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 17

What does "real likelihood of bias" mean in administrative law?

Detailed Solution: Question 17

Courts do not require proof of actual bias; a reasonable apprehension that bias may exist is enough to invalidate the decision.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 18

In A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969), what was struck down by the Supreme Court?

Detailed Solution: Question 18

The Court quashed the entire selection list because the presence of a candidate on the board vitiated the whole process due to bias.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 19

Which case held post-decisional hearing to be valid?

Detailed Solution: Question 19

Even in emergencies, a hearing must be provided afterwards.

Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law - Question 20

The Wednesbury principle originated from:

Detailed Solution: Question 20

It originated from a British case and was later adopted in Indian law.

46 docs|15 tests
Information about Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Landmark Judgments in Administrative Law, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
Download as PDF