CAT Exam  >  CAT Tests  >  CAT Mock Test Series 2024  >  CAT Mock Test - 20 - CAT MCQ

CAT Mock Test - 20 - CAT MCQ


Test Description

30 Questions MCQ Test CAT Mock Test Series 2024 - CAT Mock Test - 20

CAT Mock Test - 20 for CAT 2024 is part of CAT Mock Test Series 2024 preparation. The CAT Mock Test - 20 questions and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus.The CAT Mock Test - 20 MCQs are made for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for CAT Mock Test - 20 below.
Solutions of CAT Mock Test - 20 questions in English are available as part of our CAT Mock Test Series 2024 for CAT & CAT Mock Test - 20 solutions in Hindi for CAT Mock Test Series 2024 course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt CAT Mock Test - 20 | 66 questions in 120 minutes | Mock test for CAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study CAT Mock Test Series 2024 for CAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 1

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Private philanthropists have helped propel some of the most important social-impact success stories of the past century: Virtually eradicating polio globally. Providing free and reduced-price lunches for all needy schoolchildren in the United States. Establishing a universal 911 service. Securing the right for same-sex couples to marry in the U.S. These efforts have transformed or saved hundreds of millions of lives. That we now take them for granted makes them no less astonishing: They were the inconceivable moon shots of their day before they were inevitable success stories in retrospect. Many of today's emerging large-scale philanthropists aspire to similarly audacious successes. They don't want to fund homeless shelters and food pantries; they want to end homelessness and hunger. Steady, linear progress isn't enough; they demand disruptive, catalytic, systemic change - and in short order. Even as society grapples with important questions about today's concentrations of wealth, many of the largest philanthropists feel the weight of responsibility that comes with their privilege. And the scale of their ambition, along with the wealth they are willing to give back to society, is breath taking.

But a growing number of these donors privately express great frustration. Despite having written big checks for years, they aren't seeing transformative successes for society: Think of philanthropic interventions to arrest climate change or improve U.S. public education, to cite just two examples. When faced with setbacks and public criticism, the best philanthropists re-examine their goals and approaches, including how they engage the communities they aspire to help in the decision-making process. But some retreat to seemingly safer donations to universities or art museums, while others withdraw from public giving altogether.

Audacious social change is incredibly challenging. Yet history shows that it can succeed. Unfortunately, success never results from a silver bullet; it takes collaboration, government engagement, and persistence over decades, among other things. The role of philanthropists in the historical success stories vary. By and large they underwrote the efforts of others. The hands-on work fell, as it does today, to NGO leaders, service providers, activists, and many others on the front lines of social change. The common thread in these success stories was that philanthropists acted as sources of flexible capital, identifying gaps left by others and directing their resources accordingly. Sometimes only minor support was enough to tip the scales. This framework does not constitute a simple or linear recipe.

Real change is highly complex and driven by many forces, luck and timing play important roles, and causality is impossible to prove. Still, we believe that if ambitious philanthropists apply the framework over the arc of a campaign, they may substantially increase the odds of achieving transformative change. There are some high-level reasons as to why so many efforts wither on the vine. Most of the these share four important patterns: Success took a long time - nearly 90% of the efforts spanned more than 20 years. It frequently entailed government cooperation - 80% required changes to government funding, policies, or actions. It often necessitated collaboration - nearly 75% involved active coordination among key actors across sectors. And at least 66% featured donors who made one or more philanthropic big bets - gifts of $10 million or more.

Unfortunately, these patterns go against the grain of much philanthropic practice today. Donors know conceptually that achieving widespread change can take a long time, even for the most important and straightforward ideas. The basic lifesaving practice of hand washing and sterilizing surgical instruments and facilities took 30 years to gain acceptance even after a leading medical journal published ironclad evidence in support of it. Yet philanthropists often fund grantees with the expectation that much more complex change can be achieved in just a handful of years. Wary of red tape and of being perceived as "too political," many donors have been unwilling to fund work that meaningfully engages with the U.S. government, despite the central role it plays and the trillions of dollars it spends addressing society's toughest problems. Furthermore, collaboration of any type can be difficult and costly, so few philanthropists meaningfully support or engage in it, even though most are frustrated with the inefficient proliferation of siloed change efforts. And finally, only a small fraction of donor gifts for social change are large enough to make a dent - although philanthropists routinely commit $20 million or more to infinitely simpler challenges, such as building a university library or a museum wing.

Q. What is the tone of the author in the last para of the passage?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 1
In the said para, the author is both stating some facts and giving his own opinions. And the tone can only be that which can suffice both the things aptly. Belligerent = hostile, aggressive, and the author is not at all being aggressive in his tone here. Condescending = patronising, but the author is not humiliating the philanthropists here. Facetious = inappropriate does not bear any relevance. Subjective = descriptive, which is the correct answer, is aptly sufficing both the facts and opinions context.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 2

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Private philanthropists have helped propel some of the most important social-impact success stories of the past century: Virtually eradicating polio globally. Providing free and reduced-price lunches for all needy schoolchildren in the United States. Establishing a universal 911 service. Securing the right for same-sex couples to marry in the U.S. These efforts have transformed or saved hundreds of millions of lives. That we now take them for granted makes them no less astonishing: They were the inconceivable moon shots of their day before they were inevitable success stories in retrospect. Many of today's emerging large-scale philanthropists aspire to similarly audacious successes. They don't want to fund homeless shelters and food pantries; they want to end homelessness and hunger. Steady, linear progress isn't enough; they demand disruptive, catalytic, systemic change - and in short order. Even as society grapples with important questions about today's concentrations of wealth, many of the largest philanthropists feel the weight of responsibility that comes with their privilege. And the scale of their ambition, along with the wealth they are willing to give back to society, is breath taking.

But a growing number of these donors privately express great frustration. Despite having written big checks for years, they aren't seeing transformative successes for society: Think of philanthropic interventions to arrest climate change or improve U.S. public education, to cite just two examples. When faced with setbacks and public criticism, the best philanthropists re-examine their goals and approaches, including how they engage the communities they aspire to help in the decision-making process. But some retreat to seemingly safer donations to universities or art museums, while others withdraw from public giving altogether.

Audacious social change is incredibly challenging. Yet history shows that it can succeed. Unfortunately, success never results from a silver bullet; it takes collaboration, government engagement, and persistence over decades, among other things. The role of philanthropists in the historical success stories vary. By and large they underwrote the efforts of others. The hands-on work fell, as it does today, to NGO leaders, service providers, activists, and many others on the front lines of social change. The common thread in these success stories was that philanthropists acted as sources of flexible capital, identifying gaps left by others and directing their resources accordingly. Sometimes only minor support was enough to tip the scales. This framework does not constitute a simple or linear recipe.

Real change is highly complex and driven by many forces, luck and timing play important roles, and causality is impossible to prove. Still, we believe that if ambitious philanthropists apply the framework over the arc of a campaign, they may substantially increase the odds of achieving transformative change. There are some high-level reasons as to why so many efforts wither on the vine. Most of the these share four important patterns: Success took a long time - nearly 90% of the efforts spanned more than 20 years. It frequently entailed government cooperation - 80% required changes to government funding, policies, or actions. It often necessitated collaboration - nearly 75% involved active coordination among key actors across sectors. And at least 66% featured donors who made one or more philanthropic big bets - gifts of $10 million or more.

Unfortunately, these patterns go against the grain of much philanthropic practice today. Donors know conceptually that achieving widespread change can take a long time, even for the most important and straightforward ideas. The basic lifesaving practice of hand washing and sterilizing surgical instruments and facilities took 30 years to gain acceptance even after a leading medical journal published ironclad evidence in support of it. Yet philanthropists often fund grantees with the expectation that much more complex change can be achieved in just a handful of years. Wary of red tape and of being perceived as "too political," many donors have been unwilling to fund work that meaningfully engages with the U.S. government, despite the central role it plays and the trillions of dollars it spends addressing society's toughest problems. Furthermore, collaboration of any type can be difficult and costly, so few philanthropists meaningfully support or engage in it, even though most are frustrated with the inefficient proliferation of siloed change efforts. And finally, only a small fraction of donor gifts for social change are large enough to make a dent - although philanthropists routinely commit $20 million or more to infinitely simpler challenges, such as building a university library or a museum wing.

Q. Which of the following instances could comply to the words of the author in the passage where he says that the philanthropists underwrote the efforts of others?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 2
The meaning of the author's words in the passage is that the philanthropists often provide grants to the NGOs, service providers and activists, who actually do the work of taking the needful services to the required grassroots, while these philanthropists get all the name when they not even do the actual work. Both A & C will be true here because the companies (Facebook and Walmart) are reaching the grassroot levels themselves and not just giving grants to others, in turn, not doing the real work. B will not follow because it clearly shows that Pepsi just gives grants and does not engage in actually doing the work. Hence, D will be the correct answer.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 3

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Private philanthropists have helped propel some of the most important social-impact success stories of the past century: Virtually eradicating polio globally. Providing free and reduced-price lunches for all needy schoolchildren in the United States. Establishing a universal 911 service. Securing the right for same-sex couples to marry in the U.S. These efforts have transformed or saved hundreds of millions of lives. That we now take them for granted makes them no less astonishing: They were the inconceivable moon shots of their day before they were inevitable success stories in retrospect. Many of today's emerging large-scale philanthropists aspire to similarly audacious successes. They don't want to fund homeless shelters and food pantries; they want to end homelessness and hunger. Steady, linear progress isn't enough; they demand disruptive, catalytic, systemic change - and in short order. Even as society grapples with important questions about today's concentrations of wealth, many of the largest philanthropists feel the weight of responsibility that comes with their privilege. And the scale of their ambition, along with the wealth they are willing to give back to society, is breath taking.

But a growing number of these donors privately express great frustration. Despite having written big checks for years, they aren't seeing transformative successes for society: Think of philanthropic interventions to arrest climate change or improve U.S. public education, to cite just two examples. When faced with setbacks and public criticism, the best philanthropists re-examine their goals and approaches, including how they engage the communities they aspire to help in the decision-making process. But some retreat to seemingly safer donations to universities or art museums, while others withdraw from public giving altogether.

Audacious social change is incredibly challenging. Yet history shows that it can succeed. Unfortunately, success never results from a silver bullet; it takes collaboration, government engagement, and persistence over decades, among other things. The role of philanthropists in the historical success stories vary. By and large they underwrote the efforts of others. The hands-on work fell, as it does today, to NGO leaders, service providers, activists, and many others on the front lines of social change. The common thread in these success stories was that philanthropists acted as sources of flexible capital, identifying gaps left by others and directing their resources accordingly. Sometimes only minor support was enough to tip the scales. This framework does not constitute a simple or linear recipe.

Real change is highly complex and driven by many forces, luck and timing play important roles, and causality is impossible to prove. Still, we believe that if ambitious philanthropists apply the framework over the arc of a campaign, they may substantially increase the odds of achieving transformative change. There are some high-level reasons as to why so many efforts wither on the vine. Most of the these share four important patterns: Success took a long time - nearly 90% of the efforts spanned more than 20 years. It frequently entailed government cooperation - 80% required changes to government funding, policies, or actions. It often necessitated collaboration - nearly 75% involved active coordination among key actors across sectors. And at least 66% featured donors who made one or more philanthropic big bets - gifts of $10 million or more.

Unfortunately, these patterns go against the grain of much philanthropic practice today. Donors know conceptually that achieving widespread change can take a long time, even for the most important and straightforward ideas. The basic lifesaving practice of hand washing and sterilizing surgical instruments and facilities took 30 years to gain acceptance even after a leading medical journal published ironclad evidence in support of it. Yet philanthropists often fund grantees with the expectation that much more complex change can be achieved in just a handful of years. Wary of red tape and of being perceived as "too political," many donors have been unwilling to fund work that meaningfully engages with the U.S. government, despite the central role it plays and the trillions of dollars it spends addressing society's toughest problems. Furthermore, collaboration of any type can be difficult and costly, so few philanthropists meaningfully support or engage in it, even though most are frustrated with the inefficient proliferation of siloed change efforts. And finally, only a small fraction of donor gifts for social change are large enough to make a dent - although philanthropists routinely commit $20 million or more to infinitely simpler challenges, such as building a university library or a museum wing.

Q. Which of the following could be the reason(s) for the basic lifesaving practice of hand washing and sterilizing surgical instruments and facilities taking 30 years to gain acceptance even after the leading medical journal published strong evidence in support of it?

I. Even though evidence was given, the journal was not able to actively preach the importance of hand washing and sterilizing surgical instruments and facilities.

II. It was a substantial change in the normal practices that were being followed till the time, and so, acceptance of something this different and of this scale took time.

III. Some of the researches previously published in the said journal were later deemed false upon further investigations; hence, people were sceptical about adopting one of its advices again - the reason it took so much time.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 3
The underlying theme of (II) is the exact context on which the last para, which contains the question, starts; hence, we can clearly say that (II) will follow. Neither we know anything about the preaching, nor about any false reports for either of (I) or (III) to be the correct answer here. Hence, B will be the answer.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 4

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Private philanthropists have helped propel some of the most important social-impact success stories of the past century: Virtually eradicating polio globally. Providing free and reduced-price lunches for all needy schoolchildren in the United States. Establishing a universal 911 service. Securing the right for same-sex couples to marry in the U.S. These efforts have transformed or saved hundreds of millions of lives. That we now take them for granted makes them no less astonishing: They were the inconceivable moon shots of their day before they were inevitable success stories in retrospect. Many of today's emerging large-scale philanthropists aspire to similarly audacious successes. They don't want to fund homeless shelters and food pantries; they want to end homelessness and hunger. Steady, linear progress isn't enough; they demand disruptive, catalytic, systemic change - and in short order. Even as society grapples with important questions about today's concentrations of wealth, many of the largest philanthropists feel the weight of responsibility that comes with their privilege. And the scale of their ambition, along with the wealth they are willing to give back to society, is breath taking.

But a growing number of these donors privately express great frustration. Despite having written big checks for years, they aren't seeing transformative successes for society: Think of philanthropic interventions to arrest climate change or improve U.S. public education, to cite just two examples. When faced with setbacks and public criticism, the best philanthropists re-examine their goals and approaches, including how they engage the communities they aspire to help in the decision-making process. But some retreat to seemingly safer donations to universities or art museums, while others withdraw from public giving altogether.

Audacious social change is incredibly challenging. Yet history shows that it can succeed. Unfortunately, success never results from a silver bullet; it takes collaboration, government engagement, and persistence over decades, among other things. The role of philanthropists in the historical success stories vary. By and large they underwrote the efforts of others. The hands-on work fell, as it does today, to NGO leaders, service providers, activists, and many others on the front lines of social change. The common thread in these success stories was that philanthropists acted as sources of flexible capital, identifying gaps left by others and directing their resources accordingly. Sometimes only minor support was enough to tip the scales. This framework does not constitute a simple or linear recipe.

Real change is highly complex and driven by many forces, luck and timing play important roles, and causality is impossible to prove. Still, we believe that if ambitious philanthropists apply the framework over the arc of a campaign, they may substantially increase the odds of achieving transformative change. There are some high-level reasons as to why so many efforts wither on the vine. Most of the these share four important patterns: Success took a long time - nearly 90% of the efforts spanned more than 20 years. It frequently entailed government cooperation - 80% required changes to government funding, policies, or actions. It often necessitated collaboration - nearly 75% involved active coordination among key actors across sectors. And at least 66% featured donors who made one or more philanthropic big bets - gifts of $10 million or more.

Unfortunately, these patterns go against the grain of much philanthropic practice today. Donors know conceptually that achieving widespread change can take a long time, even for the most important and straightforward ideas. The basic lifesaving practice of hand washing and sterilizing surgical instruments and facilities took 30 years to gain acceptance even after a leading medical journal published ironclad evidence in support of it. Yet philanthropists often fund grantees with the expectation that much more complex change can be achieved in just a handful of years. Wary of red tape and of being perceived as "too political," many donors have been unwilling to fund work that meaningfully engages with the U.S. government, despite the central role it plays and the trillions of dollars it spends addressing society's toughest problems. Furthermore, collaboration of any type can be difficult and costly, so few philanthropists meaningfully support or engage in it, even though most are frustrated with the inefficient proliferation of siloed change efforts. And finally, only a small fraction of donor gifts for social change are large enough to make a dent - although philanthropists routinely commit $20 million or more to infinitely simpler challenges, such as building a university library or a museum wing.

Q. Which of the following could be the underlying idea(s) that the author wants to reflect from the passage?

I. The issues most deserving of investment today are different from those of past decades; what remains constant is the need for shared and dynamic problem definition, clear and winnable milestones, solutions built for scale, robust investments to drive and serve demand, and adaptive capacity among philanthropists and grantees alike.

II. At the highest level, the successful strategies that should be practiced run counter to prevailing funding practices. They included decades-long persistence, even when the pace of change felt slow; financial support for collaboration among key actors, even when it meant giving up some control; engagement with governments to influence funding and action, even in uncertain times; and big philanthropic bets that shifted power from the donor to the doers and beneficiaries.

III. For the types of social challenges targeted by audacious philanthropists and other change makers, adaptation informed by robust measurement is key and to fuel progress, funders need to make sure that both their attitudes and their funding reflect that reality.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 4
It should be noted that in the passage, the author just discusses about the mindset and the common practices of audacious philanthropists. At places, he has included things about have should have been the perspective, but overall, it's just the mindset, their aspirations and practices followed generally, and the differences between "what should have been done" and "what is normally done". He has not talked about the solution part, for us to consider (III) because that's what it focuses on. Both (I) & (II) will follow because they're both able to talk on the same context as discussed above.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 5

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Children begin to learn values when they are very young, before they can reason effectively. Young children behave in ways that we would never accept in adults: they scream, throw food, take off their clothes in public, hit, scratch, bite, and generally make a ruckus. Moral education begins from the start, as parents correct these antisocial behaviours, and they usually do so by conditioning children's emotions. Parents threaten physical punishment ("Do you want a spanking?"), they withdraw love ("I'm not going to play with you anymore!"), ostracize ("Go to your room!"), deprive ("No dessert for you!"), and induce vicarious distress ("Look at the pain you've caused!"). Each of these methods causes the misbehaved child to experience a negative emotion and associate it with the punished behaviour. Children also learn by emotional osmosis. They see their parents' reactions to news broadcasts and storybooks. They hear hours of judgmental gossip about inconsiderate neighbours, unethical co-workers, disloyal friends, and the black sheep in the family.

Emotional conditioning and osmosis are not merely convenient tools for acquiring values: they are essential. Parents sometimes try to reason with their children, but moral reasoning only works by drawing attention to values that the child has already internalized through emotional conditioning. No amount of reasoning can engender a moral value, because all values are, at bottom, emotional attitudes. Recent research in psychology supports this conjecture. It seems that we decide whether something is wrong by introspecting our feelings: if an action makes us feel bad, we conclude that it is wrong. Consistent with this, people's moral judgments can be shifted by simply altering their emotional states.

Psychologist Jonathan Haidt and colleagues have shown that people make moral judgments even when they cannot provide any justification for them. For example, 80% of the American college students in Haidt's study said it's wrong for two adult siblings to have consensual sex with each other even if they use contraception and no one is harmed. And, in a study I ran, 100% of people agreed it would be wrong to sexually fondle an infant even if the infant was not physically harmed or traumatized. Our emotions confirm that such acts are wrong even if our usual justification for that conclusion (harm to the victim) is inapplicable.

If morals are emotionally based, then people who lack strong emotions should be blind to the moral domain. This prediction is borne out by psychopaths, who, it turns out, suffer from profound emotional deficits. Psychologist James Blair has shown that psychopaths treat moral rules as mere conventions. This suggests that emotions are necessary for making moral judgments. The judgment that something is morally wrong is an emotional response.

It doesn't follow that every emotional response is a moral judgment. Morality involves specific emotions. Research suggests that the main moral emotions are anger and disgust when an action is performed by another person, and guilt and shame when an action is performed by oneself. Arguably, one doesn't harbour a moral attitude towards something unless one is disposed to have both these self- and other-directed emotions. You may be disgusted by eating cow tongue, but unless you are a moral vegetarian, you wouldn't be ashamed of eating it.

In some cases, the moral emotions that get conditioned in childhood can be re-conditioned later in life. Someone who feels ashamed of a homosexual desire may subsequently feel ashamed about feeling ashamed. This person can be said to have an inculcated tendency to view homosexuality as immoral, but also a conviction that homosexuality is permissible, and the latter serves to curb the former over time.

In summary, moral judgments are based on emotions, and reasoning normally contributes only by helping us extrapolate from our basic values to novel cases. Reasoning can also lead us to discover that our basic values are culturally inculcated, and that might impel us to search for alternative values, but reason alone cannot tell us which values to adopt, nor can it instil new values.

Q. It can be understood that in the first paragraph, which of the following is the main purpose of the author?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 5
What B is saying is an important aspect of the said para (how parents educate) and so the para is actually talking about it to emphasize a point and not just throwing light. C is incorrect as this presumes that we believe that it is reasoning which helps in inculcation of morals rather than emotions, which is not so. D is incorrect as the author does not talk about the importance of anything, rather he only provides info about the role emotions play in childhood in inculcating morals. A is the right answer as the author seeks to explain how inducing emotions in a child can play a role in moral education.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 6

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Children begin to learn values when they are very young, before they can reason effectively. Young children behave in ways that we would never accept in adults: they scream, throw food, take off their clothes in public, hit, scratch, bite, and generally make a ruckus. Moral education begins from the start, as parents correct these antisocial behaviours, and they usually do so by conditioning children's emotions. Parents threaten physical punishment ("Do you want a spanking?"), they withdraw love ("I'm not going to play with you anymore!"), ostracize ("Go to your room!"), deprive ("No dessert for you!"), and induce vicarious distress ("Look at the pain you've caused!"). Each of these methods causes the misbehaved child to experience a negative emotion and associate it with the punished behaviour. Children also learn by emotional osmosis. They see their parents' reactions to news broadcasts and storybooks. They hear hours of judgmental gossip about inconsiderate neighbours, unethical co-workers, disloyal friends, and the black sheep in the family.

Emotional conditioning and osmosis are not merely convenient tools for acquiring values: they are essential. Parents sometimes try to reason with their children, but moral reasoning only works by drawing attention to values that the child has already internalized through emotional conditioning. No amount of reasoning can engender a moral value, because all values are, at bottom, emotional attitudes. Recent research in psychology supports this conjecture. It seems that we decide whether something is wrong by introspecting our feelings: if an action makes us feel bad, we conclude that it is wrong. Consistent with this, people's moral judgments can be shifted by simply altering their emotional states.

Psychologist Jonathan Haidt and colleagues have shown that people make moral judgments even when they cannot provide any justification for them. For example, 80% of the American college students in Haidt's study said it's wrong for two adult siblings to have consensual sex with each other even if they use contraception and no one is harmed. And, in a study I ran, 100% of people agreed it would be wrong to sexually fondle an infant even if the infant was not physically harmed or traumatized. Our emotions confirm that such acts are wrong even if our usual justification for that conclusion (harm to the victim) is inapplicable.

If morals are emotionally based, then people who lack strong emotions should be blind to the moral domain. This prediction is borne out by psychopaths, who, it turns out, suffer from profound emotional deficits. Psychologist James Blair has shown that psychopaths treat moral rules as mere conventions. This suggests that emotions are necessary for making moral judgments. The judgment that something is morally wrong is an emotional response.

It doesn't follow that every emotional response is a moral judgment. Morality involves specific emotions. Research suggests that the main moral emotions are anger and disgust when an action is performed by another person, and guilt and shame when an action is performed by oneself. Arguably, one doesn't harbour a moral attitude towards something unless one is disposed to have both these self- and other-directed emotions. You may be disgusted by eating cow tongue, but unless you are a moral vegetarian, you wouldn't be ashamed of eating it.

In some cases, the moral emotions that get conditioned in childhood can be re-conditioned later in life. Someone who feels ashamed of a homosexual desire may subsequently feel ashamed about feeling ashamed. This person can be said to have an inculcated tendency to view homosexuality as immoral, but also a conviction that homosexuality is permissible, and the latter serves to curb the former over time.

In summary, moral judgments are based on emotions, and reasoning normally contributes only by helping us extrapolate from our basic values to novel cases. Reasoning can also lead us to discover that our basic values are culturally inculcated, and that might impel us to search for alternative values, but reason alone cannot tell us which values to adopt, nor can it instil new values.

Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the author has used which of the following examples to strengthen his argument that emotional reactions are crucial for the forming of moral judgements?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 6
A has been given by the author emphasize that moral judgements are sometimes made even when the person cannot provide a justification for them. B is incorrect as it has been given as an example to prove that one only harbours a moral judgement if he is directed by self and other emotions. C is incorrect as it has been given as an example to prove that moral emotions which are conditioned in childhood can be reconditioned in adult life. D is the right answer as it has been given as an example to emphasize that emotions are essential for forming moral judgements.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 7

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Children begin to learn values when they are very young, before they can reason effectively. Young children behave in ways that we would never accept in adults: they scream, throw food, take off their clothes in public, hit, scratch, bite, and generally make a ruckus. Moral education begins from the start, as parents correct these antisocial behaviours, and they usually do so by conditioning children's emotions. Parents threaten physical punishment ("Do you want a spanking?"), they withdraw love ("I'm not going to play with you anymore!"), ostracize ("Go to your room!"), deprive ("No dessert for you!"), and induce vicarious distress ("Look at the pain you've caused!"). Each of these methods causes the misbehaved child to experience a negative emotion and associate it with the punished behaviour. Children also learn by emotional osmosis. They see their parents' reactions to news broadcasts and storybooks. They hear hours of judgmental gossip about inconsiderate neighbours, unethical co-workers, disloyal friends, and the black sheep in the family.

Emotional conditioning and osmosis are not merely convenient tools for acquiring values: they are essential. Parents sometimes try to reason with their children, but moral reasoning only works by drawing attention to values that the child has already internalized through emotional conditioning. No amount of reasoning can engender a moral value, because all values are, at bottom, emotional attitudes. Recent research in psychology supports this conjecture. It seems that we decide whether something is wrong by introspecting our feelings: if an action makes us feel bad, we conclude that it is wrong. Consistent with this, people's moral judgments can be shifted by simply altering their emotional states.

Psychologist Jonathan Haidt and colleagues have shown that people make moral judgments even when they cannot provide any justification for them. For example, 80% of the American college students in Haidt's study said it's wrong for two adult siblings to have consensual sex with each other even if they use contraception and no one is harmed. And, in a study I ran, 100% of people agreed it would be wrong to sexually fondle an infant even if the infant was not physically harmed or traumatized. Our emotions confirm that such acts are wrong even if our usual justification for that conclusion (harm to the victim) is inapplicable.

If morals are emotionally based, then people who lack strong emotions should be blind to the moral domain. This prediction is borne out by psychopaths, who, it turns out, suffer from profound emotional deficits. Psychologist James Blair has shown that psychopaths treat moral rules as mere conventions. This suggests that emotions are necessary for making moral judgments. The judgment that something is morally wrong is an emotional response.

It doesn't follow that every emotional response is a moral judgment. Morality involves specific emotions. Research suggests that the main moral emotions are anger and disgust when an action is performed by another person, and guilt and shame when an action is performed by oneself. Arguably, one doesn't harbour a moral attitude towards something unless one is disposed to have both these self- and other-directed emotions. You may be disgusted by eating cow tongue, but unless you are a moral vegetarian, you wouldn't be ashamed of eating it.

In some cases, the moral emotions that get conditioned in childhood can be re-conditioned later in life. Someone who feels ashamed of a homosexual desire may subsequently feel ashamed about feeling ashamed. This person can be said to have an inculcated tendency to view homosexuality as immoral, but also a conviction that homosexuality is permissible, and the latter serves to curb the former over time.

In summary, moral judgments are based on emotions, and reasoning normally contributes only by helping us extrapolate from our basic values to novel cases. Reasoning can also lead us to discover that our basic values are culturally inculcated, and that might impel us to search for alternative values, but reason alone cannot tell us which values to adopt, nor can it instil new values.

Q. Which of the following statements best sum up the note on which the author ends the passage?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 7
B is incorrect as the author makes it clear that only emotions play a role in instilling values in us, and reasoning plays no role in this. So, the use of the term 'greater' is incorrect here. C is incorrect as the author makes it clear that only emotions are necessary to develop moral judgements. D is incorrect as although the author does say that reasoning does not play a role in inculcating or developing moral judgements, but it does play a role in understanding them. A is the right answer as it sums up the note on which the author ends the passage.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 8

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Children begin to learn values when they are very young, before they can reason effectively. Young children behave in ways that we would never accept in adults: they scream, throw food, take off their clothes in public, hit, scratch, bite, and generally make a ruckus. Moral education begins from the start, as parents correct these antisocial behaviours, and they usually do so by conditioning children's emotions. Parents threaten physical punishment ("Do you want a spanking?"), they withdraw love ("I'm not going to play with you anymore!"), ostracize ("Go to your room!"), deprive ("No dessert for you!"), and induce vicarious distress ("Look at the pain you've caused!"). Each of these methods causes the misbehaved child to experience a negative emotion and associate it with the punished behaviour. Children also learn by emotional osmosis. They see their parents' reactions to news broadcasts and storybooks. They hear hours of judgmental gossip about inconsiderate neighbours, unethical co-workers, disloyal friends, and the black sheep in the family.

Emotional conditioning and osmosis are not merely convenient tools for acquiring values: they are essential. Parents sometimes try to reason with their children, but moral reasoning only works by drawing attention to values that the child has already internalized through emotional conditioning. No amount of reasoning can engender a moral value, because all values are, at bottom, emotional attitudes. Recent research in psychology supports this conjecture. It seems that we decide whether something is wrong by introspecting our feelings: if an action makes us feel bad, we conclude that it is wrong. Consistent with this, people's moral judgments can be shifted by simply altering their emotional states.

Psychologist Jonathan Haidt and colleagues have shown that people make moral judgments even when they cannot provide any justification for them. For example, 80% of the American college students in Haidt's study said it's wrong for two adult siblings to have consensual sex with each other even if they use contraception and no one is harmed. And, in a study I ran, 100% of people agreed it would be wrong to sexually fondle an infant even if the infant was not physically harmed or traumatized. Our emotions confirm that such acts are wrong even if our usual justification for that conclusion (harm to the victim) is inapplicable.

If morals are emotionally based, then people who lack strong emotions should be blind to the moral domain. This prediction is borne out by psychopaths, who, it turns out, suffer from profound emotional deficits. Psychologist James Blair has shown that psychopaths treat moral rules as mere conventions. This suggests that emotions are necessary for making moral judgments. The judgment that something is morally wrong is an emotional response.

It doesn't follow that every emotional response is a moral judgment. Morality involves specific emotions. Research suggests that the main moral emotions are anger and disgust when an action is performed by another person, and guilt and shame when an action is performed by oneself. Arguably, one doesn't harbour a moral attitude towards something unless one is disposed to have both these self- and other-directed emotions. You may be disgusted by eating cow tongue, but unless you are a moral vegetarian, you wouldn't be ashamed of eating it.

In some cases, the moral emotions that get conditioned in childhood can be re-conditioned later in life. Someone who feels ashamed of a homosexual desire may subsequently feel ashamed about feeling ashamed. This person can be said to have an inculcated tendency to view homosexuality as immoral, but also a conviction that homosexuality is permissible, and the latter serves to curb the former over time.

In summary, moral judgments are based on emotions, and reasoning normally contributes only by helping us extrapolate from our basic values to novel cases. Reasoning can also lead us to discover that our basic values are culturally inculcated, and that might impel us to search for alternative values, but reason alone cannot tell us which values to adopt, nor can it instil new values.

Q. Which of the following best sums up the central idea of the passage?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 8
The passage talks about the role of emotions shaping morals and not vice versa. So, A is incorrect. C is incorrect as the last paragraph of the passage makes it clear that reasoning only helps in applying already existing moral values to special cases, but they do not shape morals in themselves. D is incorrect as it only talks mainly of the role of emotions in helping morals to take form; it only talks briefly about all possible origins of moral judgements. B is the right answer.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 9

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Kumaon, the northernmost region of Uttarakhand (a state in India), shines under the Himalayan sun and snow and gushes with water shared with the nation of Nepal. This bond runs thousands of years old, and has only in modern times been obscured by a 225 km border. The traditions of trade and migration - where Kumaoni goods spanned out to Tibet and Central Asia through Nepal, or where Nepalese people dwelling in mountain villages came down to the warmer and more inhabited Kumaon - made the Himalayan range seem less of a geographical barrier and more a home to transnational cultures and incredible religious tolerance.

Though the geographical isolation that the Himalayas brought about could have very easily caused distinction between ethnic and cultural groups and raised barriers to cultural diffusion, the economic and social conditions led to greater tolerance of intermarriage. Parents blessed marriages of couples whose origins were often hundreds of kilometres apart. As a result, love marriages, though not so common, were also accepted in this region, where arranged marriages were usually the norm.

In short, intermarriage and cultural diffusion fuelled each other across the Indo-Nepalese border. The traditions of both regions, which are neither "purely" from those regions, emphasize this fact. Hindus in Kumaon are less preoccupied with the caste system (though there is still discrimination that exists as a result of this hierarchy.) Buddhists in Nepal retain certain elements of Hinduism that were left with them even as the last of the Kumaoni migrant traders passed by their villages.

However, following British rule in India, the Anglo-Nepalese war, and the creation of geopolitical entities, the 225 km landscape which was once known as an open gate between kingdoms of India and Nepal became an established border. Centuries of open trade and intermarriage became closed off, and those who once lived within an autonomous Kumaon with its own kingdom and culture became, for the first time, to be known as Indians.

Even today, marriages take place across the border, and thus hold together ancient ties between families and different cultural and ethnic groups. For example, Nepalese men leave their homes for Kumaon in search of jobs and even the love of their life. Immigration between Nepal and India has extremely lax regulations - about 18 forms of ID are acceptable for passing through the border. Even if one cannot produce such ID, get permission, or get a fake passport (another common options) many Nepalese can still take advantage of obscure but dangerous pedestrian paths and cross rivers to get to the land that was once bound with theirs.

Once in the Kumaon region, Nepalese migrants usually work menial jobs and, in glaring contrast to their ancestors, are given the short end of the stick in terms of the social hierarchy. Not only are they looked down upon by many modern-day Kumaonis who consider themselves more Indian than Himalayan (though it merits mention that many Kumaonis still venerate the ancient ties with Nepal) but they also face their business often face crushing competitions from larger businesses with backing from Indian financial institutions.

This is further emphasized when one looks at the implications of many Indians immigrating freely into Nepal. The Nepalese government has complained time and again about migrant Indians luring Nepalese women into prostitution with empty promises of Bollywood and glamour. In addition, Indian dacoits (robbers or bandits) often take advantage of the porous border and spill into southern and western Nepal. In short, the tie is there, but it is not what it used to be.

Q. Which of the following options best sums up the central idea of the passage?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 9
A is incorrect as the passage talks of cultural and social relations of the two countries rather than political ones. B is incorrect as the passage is not entirely about how intermarriage strengthened the bond; it also talks about the weakening of the bond in recent times due to several factors. C is incorrect as the passage does not entirely focus on the barriers that threaten the bond between the two countries; rather it talks about the bond in past and in present, and focuses in some part on the barriers that have emerged in recent times. D is the right answer, as it best sums up the central idea of the changing cultural relations between India and Nepal in the light of intermarriage and diffusion of identities as key facets.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 10

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Kumaon, the northernmost region of Uttarakhand (a state in India), shines under the Himalayan sun and snow and gushes with water shared with the nation of Nepal. This bond runs thousands of years old, and has only in modern times been obscured by a 225 km border. The traditions of trade and migration - where Kumaoni goods spanned out to Tibet and Central Asia through Nepal, or where Nepalese people dwelling in mountain villages came down to the warmer and more inhabited Kumaon - made the Himalayan range seem less of a geographical barrier and more a home to transnational cultures and incredible religious tolerance.

Though the geographical isolation that the Himalayas brought about could have very easily caused distinction between ethnic and cultural groups and raised barriers to cultural diffusion, the economic and social conditions led to greater tolerance of intermarriage. Parents blessed marriages of couples whose origins were often hundreds of kilometres apart. As a result, love marriages, though not so common, were also accepted in this region, where arranged marriages were usually the norm.

In short, intermarriage and cultural diffusion fuelled each other across the Indo-Nepalese border. The traditions of both regions, which are neither "purely" from those regions, emphasize this fact. Hindus in Kumaon are less preoccupied with the caste system (though there is still discrimination that exists as a result of this hierarchy.) Buddhists in Nepal retain certain elements of Hinduism that were left with them even as the last of the Kumaoni migrant traders passed by their villages.

However, following British rule in India, the Anglo-Nepalese war, and the creation of geopolitical entities, the 225 km landscape which was once known as an open gate between kingdoms of India and Nepal became an established border. Centuries of open trade and intermarriage became closed off, and those who once lived within an autonomous Kumaon with its own kingdom and culture became, for the first time, to be known as Indians.

Even today, marriages take place across the border, and thus hold together ancient ties between families and different cultural and ethnic groups. For example, Nepalese men leave their homes for Kumaon in search of jobs and even the love of their life. Immigration between Nepal and India has extremely lax regulations - about 18 forms of ID are acceptable for passing through the border. Even if one cannot produce such ID, get permission, or get a fake passport (another common options) many Nepalese can still take advantage of obscure but dangerous pedestrian paths and cross rivers to get to the land that was once bound with theirs.

Once in the Kumaon region, Nepalese migrants usually work menial jobs and, in glaring contrast to their ancestors, are given the short end of the stick in terms of the social hierarchy. Not only are they looked down upon by many modern-day Kumaonis who consider themselves more Indian than Himalayan (though it merits mention that many Kumaonis still venerate the ancient ties with Nepal) but they also face their business often face crushing competitions from larger businesses with backing from Indian financial institutions.

This is further emphasized when one looks at the implications of many Indians immigrating freely into Nepal. The Nepalese government has complained time and again about migrant Indians luring Nepalese women into prostitution with empty promises of Bollywood and glamour. In addition, Indian dacoits (robbers or bandits) often take advantage of the porous border and spill into southern and western Nepal. In short, the tie is there, but it is not what it used to be.

Q. It can be understood that in the fourth paragraph, the key purpose of the author is to:

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 10
B is incorrect as the paragraph does not talk about how the mindsets of the people of both these countries was changed due to historical events, rather it talks about social and economic changes. C is incorrect as this forms only a brief mention in the paragraph, but is not the key focus. D is incorrect as the paragraph does not talk about rivalry rather the isolation of the two countries socially and economically. A is the right answer, as the author seeks to introduce factors that led to the straining of relations between the two countries.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 11

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Kumaon, the northernmost region of Uttarakhand (a state in India), shines under the Himalayan sun and snow and gushes with water shared with the nation of Nepal. This bond runs thousands of years old, and has only in modern times been obscured by a 225 km border. The traditions of trade and migration - where Kumaoni goods spanned out to Tibet and Central Asia through Nepal, or where Nepalese people dwelling in mountain villages came down to the warmer and more inhabited Kumaon - made the Himalayan range seem less of a geographical barrier and more a home to transnational cultures and incredible religious tolerance.

Though the geographical isolation that the Himalayas brought about could have very easily caused distinction between ethnic and cultural groups and raised barriers to cultural diffusion, the economic and social conditions led to greater tolerance of intermarriage. Parents blessed marriages of couples whose origins were often hundreds of kilometres apart. As a result, love marriages, though not so common, were also accepted in this region, where arranged marriages were usually the norm.

In short, intermarriage and cultural diffusion fuelled each other across the Indo-Nepalese border. The traditions of both regions, which are neither "purely" from those regions, emphasize this fact. Hindus in Kumaon are less preoccupied with the caste system (though there is still discrimination that exists as a result of this hierarchy.) Buddhists in Nepal retain certain elements of Hinduism that were left with them even as the last of the Kumaoni migrant traders passed by their villages.

However, following British rule in India, the Anglo-Nepalese war, and the creation of geopolitical entities, the 225 km landscape which was once known as an open gate between kingdoms of India and Nepal became an established border. Centuries of open trade and intermarriage became closed off, and those who once lived within an autonomous Kumaon with its own kingdom and culture became, for the first time, to be known as Indians.

Even today, marriages take place across the border, and thus hold together ancient ties between families and different cultural and ethnic groups. For example, Nepalese men leave their homes for Kumaon in search of jobs and even the love of their life. Immigration between Nepal and India has extremely lax regulations - about 18 forms of ID are acceptable for passing through the border. Even if one cannot produce such ID, get permission, or get a fake passport (another common options) many Nepalese can still take advantage of obscure but dangerous pedestrian paths and cross rivers to get to the land that was once bound with theirs.

Once in the Kumaon region, Nepalese migrants usually work menial jobs and, in glaring contrast to their ancestors, are given the short end of the stick in terms of the social hierarchy. Not only are they looked down upon by many modern-day Kumaonis who consider themselves more Indian than Himalayan (though it merits mention that many Kumaonis still venerate the ancient ties with Nepal) but they also face their business often face crushing competitions from larger businesses with backing from Indian financial institutions.

This is further emphasized when one looks at the implications of many Indians immigrating freely into Nepal. The Nepalese government has complained time and again about migrant Indians luring Nepalese women into prostitution with empty promises of Bollywood and glamour. In addition, Indian dacoits (robbers or bandits) often take advantage of the porous border and spill into southern and western Nepal. In short, the tie is there, but it is not what it used to be.

Q. It can be inferred that the passage is most likely to be an excerpt from which of the following sources?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 11
A is incorrect as although historical references are given in the passage, it is not entirely focused on narrating historical events. C is incorrect as the passage does not give insights on travelling. D is incorrect as the passage does not have fictional characters, plot or elements. B is the right answer as the passage gives description of sociological and cultural relationships between two countries, so the passage is most likely to have been taken from a sociology magazine or journal.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 12

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

Kumaon, the northernmost region of Uttarakhand (a state in India), shines under the Himalayan sun and snow and gushes with water shared with the nation of Nepal. This bond runs thousands of years old, and has only in modern times been obscured by a 225 km border. The traditions of trade and migration - where Kumaoni goods spanned out to Tibet and Central Asia through Nepal, or where Nepalese people dwelling in mountain villages came down to the warmer and more inhabited Kumaon - made the Himalayan range seem less of a geographical barrier and more a home to transnational cultures and incredible religious tolerance.

Though the geographical isolation that the Himalayas brought about could have very easily caused distinction between ethnic and cultural groups and raised barriers to cultural diffusion, the economic and social conditions led to greater tolerance of intermarriage. Parents blessed marriages of couples whose origins were often hundreds of kilometres apart. As a result, love marriages, though not so common, were also accepted in this region, where arranged marriages were usually the norm.

In short, intermarriage and cultural diffusion fuelled each other across the Indo-Nepalese border. The traditions of both regions, which are neither "purely" from those regions, emphasize this fact. Hindus in Kumaon are less preoccupied with the caste system (though there is still discrimination that exists as a result of this hierarchy.) Buddhists in Nepal retain certain elements of Hinduism that were left with them even as the last of the Kumaoni migrant traders passed by their villages.

However, following British rule in India, the Anglo-Nepalese war, and the creation of geopolitical entities, the 225 km landscape which was once known as an open gate between kingdoms of India and Nepal became an established border. Centuries of open trade and intermarriage became closed off, and those who once lived within an autonomous Kumaon with its own kingdom and culture became, for the first time, to be known as Indians.

Even today, marriages take place across the border, and thus hold together ancient ties between families and different cultural and ethnic groups. For example, Nepalese men leave their homes for Kumaon in search of jobs and even the love of their life. Immigration between Nepal and India has extremely lax regulations - about 18 forms of ID are acceptable for passing through the border. Even if one cannot produce such ID, get permission, or get a fake passport (another common options) many Nepalese can still take advantage of obscure but dangerous pedestrian paths and cross rivers to get to the land that was once bound with theirs.

Once in the Kumaon region, Nepalese migrants usually work menial jobs and, in glaring contrast to their ancestors, are given the short end of the stick in terms of the social hierarchy. Not only are they looked down upon by many modern-day Kumaonis who consider themselves more Indian than Himalayan (though it merits mention that many Kumaonis still venerate the ancient ties with Nepal) but they also face their business often face crushing competitions from larger businesses with backing from Indian financial institutions.

This is further emphasized when one looks at the implications of many Indians immigrating freely into Nepal. The Nepalese government has complained time and again about migrant Indians luring Nepalese women into prostitution with empty promises of Bollywood and glamour. In addition, Indian dacoits (robbers or bandits) often take advantage of the porous border and spill into southern and western Nepal. In short, the tie is there, but it is not what it used to be.

Q. It can be understood from the context of the passage that which of the following would seamlessly follow the last paragraph?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 12
Note that the last paragraph ends with saying 'in short the tie is there but not what it used to be'. The paragraph describes the problems taking place to the free movement of people between the two nations. A does not establish continuity with any of these problems. B is incorrect as it only talks of the role of trade bringing together the two countries which does not follow the last paragraph. D is incorrect as it talks of the distant past and how the structure of governing influenced the tie between the two nations; this is not discussed in the paragraph. C is the right answer as it talks about how culture used to freely flow at first, but now it has somewhat weakened and new problems which have emerged need to be solved. These problems have been discussed in the last para of the passage. This makes it clear that C will follow.
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 13

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

The higher education system is a unique type of organisation with its own way of motivating productivity in its scholarly workforce. It doesn’t need to compel professors to produce scholarship because they choose to do it on their own. This is in contrast to the standard structure for motivating employees in bureaucratic organisations, which relies on manipulating two incentives: fear and greed. Fear works by holding the threat of firing over the heads of workers in order to ensure that they stay in line: Do it my way, or you’re out of here. Greed works by holding the prospect of pay increases and promotions in front of workers in order to encourage them to exhibit the work behaviours that will bring these rewards: Do it my way and you’ll get what’s yours.

Yes, in the United States contingent faculty can be fired at any time, and permanent faculty can be fired at the point of tenure. But, once tenured, there’s little other than criminal conduct or gross negligence that can threaten your job. And yes, most colleges do have merit pay systems that reward more productive faculty with higher salaries. But the differences are small - between the standard 3 per cent raise and a 4 per cent merit increase. Even though gaining consistent above-average raises can compound annually into substantial differences over time, the immediate rewards are pretty underwhelming. Not the kind of incentive that would motivate a major expenditure of effort in a given year - such as the kind that operates on Wall Street, where earning a million-dollar bonus is a real possibility. Academic administrators - chairs, deans, presidents - just don’t have this kind of power over faculty. It’s why we refer to academic leadership as an exercise in herding cats. Deans can ask you to do something, but they really can’t make you do it.

This situation is the norm for systems of higher education in most liberal democracies around the world. In more authoritarian settings, the incentives for faculty are skewed by particular political priorities, and in part, for these reasons, the institutions in those settings tend to be consigned to the lower tiers of international rankings. Scholarly autonomy is a defining characteristic of universities higher on the list.

If the usual extrinsic incentives of fear and greed don’t apply to academics, then what does motivate them to be productive scholars? One factor, of course, is that this population is highly self-selected. People don’t become professors in order to gain power and money. They enter the role primarily because of a deep passion for a particular field of study. They find that scholarship is a mode of work that is intrinsically satisfying. It’s more a vocation than a job. And these elements tend to be pervasive in most of the world’s universities. But I want to focus on an additional powerful motivation that drives academics, one that we don’t talk about very much. Once launched into an academic career, faculty members find their scholarly efforts spurred on by more than a love of the work. We in academia are motivated by a lust for glory.

We want to be recognised for our academic accomplishments by earning our own little pieces of fame. So we work assiduously to accumulate a set of merit badges over the course of our careers, which we then proudly display on our CVs. This situation is particularly pervasive in the US system of higher education, which is organised more by the market than by the state. Market systems are especially prone to the accumulation of distinctions that define your position in the hierarchy. But European and other scholars are also engaged in a race to pick up honours and add lines to their CVs. It’s the universal obsession of the scholarly profession.

Q. According to the passage, more than any other factor, academics are motivated by:

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 13

According to the passage, faculty members find their scholarly efforts spurred on by more than a love of the work. Those in academia are motivated by a lust for glory.
Option B: While job satisfaction is a motivation for academics as compared to those working elsewhere, it is overshadowed by their desire for glory.
Option C: The use of the words "obsessive need" distorts this option. The author does not use an extremely negative tone while describing academics need for recognition and fame. Hence, this option is incorrect.
Option D: The passage does not say that academics collect accolades to be higher up in the academic hierarchy. Hence, this option is incorrect. 
Option A: This is the correct answer as according to the passage, the lust for glory is the factor that motivates academics more than anything else once they are launched into an academic career.
Hence the correct answer is Option A.

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 14

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

The higher education system is a unique type of organisation with its own way of motivating productivity in its scholarly workforce. It doesn’t need to compel professors to produce scholarship because they choose to do it on their own. This is in contrast to the standard structure for motivating employees in bureaucratic organisations, which relies on manipulating two incentives: fear and greed. Fear works by holding the threat of firing over the heads of workers in order to ensure that they stay in line: Do it my way, or you’re out of here. Greed works by holding the prospect of pay increases and promotions in front of workers in order to encourage them to exhibit the work behaviours that will bring these rewards: Do it my way and you’ll get what’s yours.

Yes, in the United States contingent faculty can be fired at any time, and permanent faculty can be fired at the point of tenure. But, once tenured, there’s little other than criminal conduct or gross negligence that can threaten your job. And yes, most colleges do have merit pay systems that reward more productive faculty with higher salaries. But the differences are small - between the standard 3 per cent raise and a 4 per cent merit increase. Even though gaining consistent above-average raises can compound annually into substantial differences over time, the immediate rewards are pretty underwhelming. Not the kind of incentive that would motivate a major expenditure of effort in a given year - such as the kind that operates on Wall Street, where earning a million-dollar bonus is a real possibility. Academic administrators - chairs, deans, presidents - just don’t have this kind of power over faculty. It’s why we refer to academic leadership as an exercise in herding cats. Deans can ask you to do something, but they really can’t make you do it.

This situation is the norm for systems of higher education in most liberal democracies around the world. In more authoritarian settings, the incentives for faculty are skewed by particular political priorities, and in part, for these reasons, the institutions in those settings tend to be consigned to the lower tiers of international rankings. Scholarly autonomy is a defining characteristic of universities higher on the list.

If the usual extrinsic incentives of fear and greed don’t apply to academics, then what does motivate them to be productive scholars? One factor, of course, is that this population is highly self-selected. People don’t become professors in order to gain power and money. They enter the role primarily because of a deep passion for a particular field of study. They find that scholarship is a mode of work that is intrinsically satisfying. It’s more a vocation than a job. And these elements tend to be pervasive in most of the world’s universities. But I want to focus on an additional powerful motivation that drives academics, one that we don’t talk about very much. Once launched into an academic career, faculty members find their scholarly efforts spurred on by more than a love of the work. We in academia are motivated by a lust for glory.

We want to be recognised for our academic accomplishments by earning our own little pieces of fame. So we work assiduously to accumulate a set of merit badges over the course of our careers, which we then proudly display on our CVs. This situation is particularly pervasive in the US system of higher education, which is organised more by the market than by the state. Market systems are especially prone to the accumulation of distinctions that define your position in the hierarchy. But European and other scholars are also engaged in a race to pick up honours and add lines to their CVs. It’s the universal obsession of the scholarly profession.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would do most to undermine the main point of the second paragraph? 

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 14

The main point of the second paragraph is that in the US, fear and greed do not factor in on tenured professors, and academic administrators have very little power to motivate professors to work.
Option A: The paragraph talks exclusively about the situation in the US. Perhaps the faculty in question is from another country. Moreover, a single case cannot be considered to be adequate evidence against a general trend.
Option C: This is irrelevant to the point being made in the paragraph. Hence, it can be eliminated.
Option D: The passage emphasises on the situation after being tenured. Hence, this does not affect the main point of the paragraph.
Option B: If this were true, then it would undermine the main point of the passage as the administrators now hold power to influence the faculties with lucrative projects, thereby factoring in greed.
Hence the correct answer is Option B.

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 15

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:

The higher education system is a unique type of organisation with its own way of motivating productivity in its scholarly workforce. It doesn’t need to compel professors to produce scholarship because they choose to do it on their own. This is in contrast to the standard structure for motivating employees in bureaucratic organisations, which relies on manipulating two incentives: fear and greed. Fear works by holding the threat of firing over the heads of workers in order to ensure that they stay in line: Do it my way, or you’re out of here. Greed works by holding the prospect of pay increases and promotions in front of workers in order to encourage them to exhibit the work behaviours that will bring these rewards: Do it my way and you’ll get what’s yours.

Yes, in the United States contingent faculty can be fired at any time, and permanent faculty can be fired at the point of tenure. But, once tenured, there’s little other than criminal conduct or gross negligence that can threaten your job. And yes, most colleges do have merit pay systems that reward more productive faculty with higher salaries. But the differences are small - between the standard 3 per cent raise and a 4 per cent merit increase. Even though gaining consistent above-average raises can compound annually into substantial differences over time, the immediate rewards are pretty underwhelming. Not the kind of incentive that would motivate a major expenditure of effort in a given year - such as the kind that operates on Wall Street, where earning a million-dollar bonus is a real possibility. Academic administrators - chairs, deans, presidents - just don’t have this kind of power over faculty. It’s why we refer to academic leadership as an exercise in herding cats. Deans can ask you to do something, but they really can’t make you do it.

This situation is the norm for systems of higher education in most liberal democracies around the world. In more authoritarian settings, the incentives for faculty are skewed by particular political priorities, and in part, for these reasons, the institutions in those settings tend to be consigned to the lower tiers of international rankings. Scholarly autonomy is a defining characteristic of universities higher on the list.

If the usual extrinsic incentives of fear and greed don’t apply to academics, then what does motivate them to be productive scholars? One factor, of course, is that this population is highly self-selected. People don’t become professors in order to gain power and money. They enter the role primarily because of a deep passion for a particular field of study. They find that scholarship is a mode of work that is intrinsically satisfying. It’s more a vocation than a job. And these elements tend to be pervasive in most of the world’s universities. But I want to focus on an additional powerful motivation that drives academics, one that we don’t talk about very much. Once launched into an academic career, faculty members find their scholarly efforts spurred on by more than a love of the work. We in academia are motivated by a lust for glory.

We want to be recognised for our academic accomplishments by earning our own little pieces of fame. So we work assiduously to accumulate a set of merit badges over the course of our careers, which we then proudly display on our CVs. This situation is particularly pervasive in the US system of higher education, which is organised more by the market than by the state. Market systems are especially prone to the accumulation of distinctions that define your position in the hierarchy. But European and other scholars are also engaged in a race to pick up honours and add lines to their CVs. It’s the universal obsession of the scholarly profession.

Q. Which of the following statements would the author agree with?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 15

Let's take a look at the options one by one.

Option A: The author says that unless there is a major monetary bonus for good performance, it makes very little sense to work hard out of greed. However, this does not mean that there is no reason to work hard in such a case. The author only indicates that Greed won't be a driving factor in cases with very little monetary reward. Hence, the author will not agree with this statement as he feels that there are other reasons why someone would work hard.

Option B: The author explicitly refutes this by saying that collecting accolades have become a universal obsession. Hence, he will definitely not agree with this statement.

Option C: This is not true as per the passage. As contingent faculty can be fired, the leadership can exercise a lot of control over it. Hence, option C is untrue and can be eliminated.

Option D: From the lines "for these reasons, the institutions in those settings tend to be consigned to the lower tiers of international rankings. Scholarly autonomy is a defining characteristic of universities higher on the list.", we can infer that any University that restricts scholarly autonomy will not be highly ranked. Hence, top-ranked universities will not restrict autonomy in order to keep their higher ranks. Thus, the author would agree with this option.

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 16

Read the passage and answer the following questions.

Publishing the Quran and making it available in translation was a dangerous enterprise in the 16th century, apt to confuse or seduce the faithful Christian. This, at least, was the opinion of the Protestant city councillors of Basel in 1542, when they briefly jailed a local printer for planning to publish a Latin translation of the Muslim holy book. The Protestant reformer Martin Luther intervened to salvage the project: there was no better way to combat the Turk, he wrote, than to expose the ‘lies of Muhammad’ for all to see.

The resulting publication in 1543 made the Quran available to European intellectuals, most of whom studied it in order to better understand and combat Islam. There were others, however, who used their reading of the Quran to question Christian doctrine. The Catalonian polymath and theologian Michael Servetus found numerous Quranic arguments to employ in his anti-Trinitarian tract, Christianismi Restitutio (1553), in which he called Muhammad a true reformer who preached a return to the pure monotheism that Christian theologians had corrupted by inventing the perverse and irrational doctrine of the Trinity. After publishing these heretical ideas, Servetus was condemned by the Catholic Inquisition in Vienne, and finally burned with his own books in Calvin’s Geneva.

During the European Enlightenment, a number of authors presented Muhammad in a similar vein, as an anticlerical hero; some saw Islam as a pure form of monotheism close to philosophic Deism and the Quran as a rational paean to the Creator. In 1734, George Sale published a new English translation. In his introduction, he traced the early history of Islam and idealised the Prophet as an iconoclastic, anticlerical reformer who had banished the ‘superstitious’ beliefs and practices of early Christians - the cult of the saints, holy relics - and quashed the power of a corrupt and avaricious clergy.

Sale’s translation of the Quran was widely read and appreciated in England: for many of his readers, Muhammad had become a symbol of anticlerical republicanism. It was influential outside England too. The US founding father Thomas Jefferson bought a copy from a bookseller in Williamsburg, Virginia, in 1765, which helped him conceive of a philosophical deism that surpassed confessional boundaries. (Jefferson’s copy, now in the Library of Congress, has been used for the swearing in of Muslim representatives to Congress, starting with Keith Ellison in 2007.) And in Germany, the Romantic Johann Wolfgang von Goethe read a translation of Sale’s version, which helped to colour his evolving notion of Muhammad as an inspired poet and archetypal prophet.

Q. What is the purpose of the penultimate paragraph?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 16

Through the passage, the author traces how the Quran and Mohammed was viewed by the Western World over a period of time. Starting from the point of time when translating Quran was a dangerous endeavour, the author traces how over time the teachings of Quran spread in the Western world and how some thinkers came to hero Mohammed as an iconoclastic, anticlerical reformer. Thus, the purpose of the penultimate paragraph should be in line with that of the overall passage. In the penultimate paragraph, the author gives the examples of several authors who championed Mohammed as an anti-clerical reformer. Thus, option B is the correct answer.

Option A is incorrect because the period of European Enlightenment is not central to the passage. The purpose of the passage is to trace the spread of Quran over a long period of time.

Option C, though true, is not the purpose of the author. Through the examples, the author is trying to make a broader point.

Option D is incorrect because anti-Christianity sentiments are not central to the passage.

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 17

Read the passage and answer the following questions.

Publishing the Quran and making it available in translation was a dangerous enterprise in the 16th century, apt to confuse or seduce the faithful Christian. This, at least, was the opinion of the Protestant city councillors of Basel in 1542, when they briefly jailed a local printer for planning to publish a Latin translation of the Muslim holy book. The Protestant reformer Martin Luther intervened to salvage the project: there was no better way to combat the Turk, he wrote, than to expose the ‘lies of Muhammad’ for all to see.

The resulting publication in 1543 made the Quran available to European intellectuals, most of whom studied it in order to better understand and combat Islam. There were others, however, who used their reading of the Quran to question Christian doctrine. The Catalonian polymath and theologian Michael Servetus found numerous Quranic arguments to employ in his anti-Trinitarian tract, Christianismi Restitutio (1553), in which he called Muhammad a true reformer who preached a return to the pure monotheism that Christian theologians had corrupted by inventing the perverse and irrational doctrine of the Trinity. After publishing these heretical ideas, Servetus was condemned by the Catholic Inquisition in Vienne, and finally burned with his own books in Calvin’s Geneva.

During the European Enlightenment, a number of authors presented Muhammad in a similar vein, as an anticlerical hero; some saw Islam as a pure form of monotheism close to philosophic Deism and the Quran as a rational paean to the Creator. In 1734, George Sale published a new English translation. In his introduction, he traced the early history of Islam and idealised the Prophet as an iconoclastic, anticlerical reformer who had banished the ‘superstitious’ beliefs and practices of early Christians - the cult of the saints, holy relics - and quashed the power of a corrupt and avaricious clergy.

Sale’s translation of the Quran was widely read and appreciated in England: for many of his readers, Muhammad had become a symbol of anticlerical republicanism. It was influential outside England too. The US founding father Thomas Jefferson bought a copy from a bookseller in Williamsburg, Virginia, in 1765, which helped him conceive of a philosophical deism that surpassed confessional boundaries. (Jefferson’s copy, now in the Library of Congress, has been used for the swearing in of Muslim representatives to Congress, starting with Keith Ellison in 2007.) And in Germany, the Romantic Johann Wolfgang von Goethe read a translation of Sale’s version, which helped to colour his evolving notion of Muhammad as an inspired poet and archetypal prophet.

Q. Why does the author cite the examples of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Thomas Jefferson?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 17

Option A is correct. It can be inferred from the lines “Sale’s translation of the Quran was widely read and appreciated in England: for many of his readers, Muhammad had become a symbol of anticlerical republicanism. It was influential outside England too.” 

Option B is incorrect because the author is focusing on Sale’s translation.
Option C is incorrect because the author does not state nor imply that prominent personalities viewed the Quran favourably, he only names two people.
Option D is incorrect because it only speaks of Thomas Jefferson. It is also not the reason either of them is mentioned but just an additional fact.

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 18

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.

In a research study conducted in 2002, a team of scientists embarked on a mission to investigate the impact of air pollution on respiratory health. They carefully selected a diverse group of 1600 participants, comprising 800 males and 800 females, to participate in the study. The study aimed to monitor their respiratory health for a duration of 5 years, tracking death caused by any respiratory-related conditions or ailments that developed during this period. To ensure representation across various age groups, the 800 male participants were categorised into four distinct age brackets: 200 individuals between the ages of 15 and less than 30, 200 between 30 and less than 45, 200 between 45 and less than 60, and another 200 between 60 and less than 75. Similarly, the 800 female participants were equally divided into the same age groups. Over the course of the study, data was collected at specific intervals to analyse the alive participants' respiratory health. Specifically, assessments were conducted in the years 2007, 2012, 2017, and 2022. The findings were visually depicted in graphs.

Q. Find the number of females in the age group 20-35 in 2007 who died between 2012 and 2017.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 18



Number of females in the age group 20-35 in 2007 will be in the age group of 25-40 in 2012 and 30-45 in 2017.
Number of females in the age group of 25-40 in 2012 = 160
Number of females in the age group of 30-45 in 2017 = 110
Number of people died between 2012 and 2017 = 160 - 110 = 50

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 19

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.

In a research study conducted in 2002, a team of scientists embarked on a mission to investigate the impact of air pollution on respiratory health. They carefully selected a diverse group of 1600 participants, comprising 800 males and 800 females, to participate in the study. The study aimed to monitor their respiratory health for a duration of 5 years, tracking death caused by any respiratory-related conditions or ailments that developed during this period. To ensure representation across various age groups, the 800 male participants were categorised into four distinct age brackets: 200 individuals between the ages of 15 and less than 30, 200 between 30 and less than 45, 200 between 45 and less than 60, and another 200 between 60 and less than 75. Similarly, the 800 female participants were equally divided into the same age groups. Over the course of the study, data was collected at specific intervals to analyse the alive participants' respiratory health. Specifically, assessments were conducted in the years 2007, 2012, 2017, and 2022. The findings were visually depicted in graphs.

Q. What is the ratio of the number of dead males to that of dead females in 2012?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 19



In 2012, number of males alive = 130 + 155 + 110 + 50 = 445
Until 2012, number of males dead = 800 - 445 = 355
In 2012, number of females alive = 160 + 115 + 100 + 70 = 445
Until 2012, number of females dead = 800 - 445 = 355
Hence, required ratio = 355 : 355 = 1 : 1

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 20

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.

In a research study conducted in 2002, a team of scientists embarked on a mission to investigate the impact of air pollution on respiratory health. They carefully selected a diverse group of 1600 participants, comprising 800 males and 800 females, to participate in the study. The study aimed to monitor their respiratory health for a duration of 5 years, tracking death caused by any respiratory-related conditions or ailments that developed during this period. To ensure representation across various age groups, the 800 male participants were categorised into four distinct age brackets: 200 individuals between the ages of 15 and less than 30, 200 between 30 and less than 45, 200 between 45 and less than 60, and another 200 between 60 and less than 75. Similarly, the 800 female participants were equally divided into the same age groups. Over the course of the study, data was collected at specific intervals to analyse the alive participants' respiratory health. Specifically, assessments were conducted in the years 2007, 2012, 2017, and 2022. The findings were visually depicted in graphs.

Q. The number of people in the age group of 60-75 in 2002 survived until 2022 is


Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 20



Number of males in the age group of 60-75 in 2022 = 15
Number of females in the age group of 60-75 in 2022 = 20
Hence, required number of people = 15 + 20 = 35

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 21

Ram borrowed Rs 72000 at 20% p.a compound interest, the interest being compounded annually. He repaid x at the end of the first year and 57600 at the end of the second year and he cleared the loan. The amount he paid at the end of the first year was.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 21
Value of 72000 at the end of 1st year = 86400

The amount to be paid at the end of second year in order to clear the loan

= (86400 - x) + 20/100 x (86400 - x)

Or, 1.2(86400-x) = 57600

Or, x = 38400

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 22

What is the 10's digit of 799?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 22

If we see the increasing powers of 7, we observe that there is a general trend that is being followed by the digits in Tens' Place.

7, 49, 343, 2401, 16807, ..49,....43,.....01 and soon.

Hence the series is repeated every 4 terms.

Hence for 99th term, that is 24 x 4 + 3, the digit at Tens' place would he same as that of 3rd term i.e. '4'.

Hence the correct option is (3)

Alternate method:

This question can also be solved by finding remainder when 799 is divided by 100.

N = 799 = 73[74]24 = 73[2401]24

[N/100J = [{73[2401]24}/100JR = [(73)/100]R = 43

Hence the ten's place digit will be 4.

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 23

In ΔABC, the median from A is perpendicular to the median from B. If AC = 6, BC = 7, what is the length of AB?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 23
Let the medians intersect at G as shown in the figure below.

Consider GD = p, GE = q

We have AG = 2p, BG = 2q

In right ΔAGE, 4p2 + q2 = 9

In right ΔBGD, 4q2 + p2 = 49/4

Adding the 2 equations above gives us 5(p2 + q2) = 85/4

Or p2 + q2 = 17/4

In right ΔGED, DE2 = p2 + q2 = 17/4

Or DE = √17/2

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 24

Let us assume we have an eight face die numbered from 1 to 8. What is the probability that exactly two of the eight numbers appear on the top face in the five throws of an unbiased die?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 24
Total Number of possible outcomes = 85

Selecting any two numbers from 1 to 8 = 8C2

These two numbers should appear in all 5 throws. Let us say, x and y are those two numbers. Thus, first throw should result in either x or y. Similarly for all subsequent throws.

But, all throws should not result in the same number.

Required probability=8C2*(25 - 2)/ 85

= 840/32768.

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 25

Water flows at a speed of 30 km/h through a cylindrical pipe of inner radius 1.5 m into a tank of 100 m  150 m. In what time (in minutes rounded off to the nearest integer) will the water rise by 4 m?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 25

Volume required = (100  150  4) m3
Speed of water in cylindrical pipe = m/min
Volumetric flow of water in cylindrical pipe =  m3/min = 1125 m3/min
Required time =  min
= 17 minutes (approx.)

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 26

A pair of straight lines is expressed as 2x2 - 3 = 0. The straight lines are ____________ to each other. Fill in the blank.

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 26
2x2 - 3 = 0 ⇒ (x- √1.5) (x + √1.5) = 0

Hence the two equations are (x- √1.5) = 0 and (x + √1.5) = 0.

Hence both are parallel.

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 27

Two types of lemonade (lemon syrup and water) X and Y were mixed in the proportion 1 : 4 by volume. Later on, volume of the mixture was tripled by adding lemonade X such that resulting mixture had 60% water. If lemonade X has 50% water, then the percentage of water in lemonade Y is __________ (Key in the percent value up to two decimal places).


Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 27

Suppose the quantity of lemonade X is 1 litre.
Suppose the quantity of lemonade Y is 4 litres.
Total mixture of lemonades X and Y = 5 litres
To triple this mixture, i.e. to make 15 litres, 10 liters of lemonade X needs to be added.
Now, 15 liters of mixture = 11 litres of X + 4 litres of Y
Given: 60% of the resultant mixture is water; this means, 60% of 15 litres = 9 liters is water and the remaining 6 litres is lemon syrup.
Also, it is given that lemonade X has 50% water; this means, 5.5 litres is water and 5.5 litres is lemon syrup.
This means that out of 9 litres of water in the mixture, 5.5 litres is of lemonade X.
Thus, 9 - 5.5 = 3.5 litres of water in the mixture belongs to lemonade Y.
The percentage of this water in lemonade Y is thus (3.5/4) × 100 = 87.50%.
Answer = 87.50 (up to two places of decimal)

*Answer can only contain numeric values
CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 28

A circle of radius 9 cm is inscribed inside a triangle ABC. Side AC touches the circle at P and side BC touches the circle at Q. If the length of AP is 12 cm, what is the length(in cm) of AQ ?


Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 28


We know that AP is a tangent to the circle.
AQ is a secant. We know that the radius of the circle is 9 cm.
Let the distance between A and G be x.
AQ = x + 9 + 9 = (x + 18) cm
By tangent-secant theorem,
AP2 = x(x + 18)
144 = x2 + 18x
x2 + 18x - 144 = 0
(x + 24)(x - 6) = 0
x = 6, -24
Length of AQ = x + 18 = 6 + 18 = 24 cm

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 29

Aruj can fill a large tank from a river with a bucket in 40 minutes, Anik is 25% more efficient than Aruj and Rhitam is 20% more efficient than Anik. Aruj and Anik are allotted for filling up the tank. Rhitam, being a naughty kid, starts emptying the tank. Assuming filling the tank requires equal time and effort as that for emptying, what is the time required to fill the tank?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 29
Given, Aruj can fill the tank in 40 minutes

So Anik can fill the tank in (40 x 100 x 125) minutes = 32 minutes.

So Rhitam can empty (or fill) the tank in (32 x 100)/120 = 80/3 minutes.

Now, the amount of the tank filled in 1 minute = (1/40 + 1/32 - 3/80) part of the tank = 3/160 part of the tank.

Therefore, the tank will be filled in 160/3 minutes or 53.33 minutes.

CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 30

Banta Singh was driving to Lonawala when his truck suddenly stops. He realised that the truck has run out of diesel, He remembered that he has a can holding 'P' liters of diesel and promptly emptied it into the right circular cylindrical diesel tank. He then inserted a straight stick vertically into the tank such that the free end of stick touches the bottom of the tank. He found that E% of stick left dry. After traveling a few kilometers (for which fuel consumption is negligible), he reached a refueling station. Now how many litres of diesel will be needed to fill the diesel tank of Banta's truck?

Detailed Solution for CAT Mock Test - 20 - Question 30
The equation would be P + (E/100) Capacity = Capacity Capacity = 100 P/ ( 100 - E) Hence diesel to be added = E% of capacity =P.E./ (100 - E). Hence answer is option (1).
View more questions
16 videos|27 docs|58 tests
Information about CAT Mock Test - 20 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for CAT Mock Test - 20 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for CAT Mock Test - 20, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for CAT

16 videos|27 docs|58 tests
Download as PDF

Top Courses for CAT