CLAT  >  Sample English Mock Test Download as PDF

Sample English Mock Test


Test Description

40 Questions MCQ Test | Sample English Mock Test

Sample English Mock Test for CLAT 2023 is part of CLAT preparation. The Sample English Mock Test questions and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus.The Sample English Mock Test MCQs are made for CLAT 2023 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Sample English Mock Test below.
Solutions of Sample English Mock Test questions in English are available as part of our course for CLAT & Sample English Mock Test solutions in Hindi for CLAT course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Sample English Mock Test | 40 questions in 30 minutes | Mock test for CLAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for CLAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you?
Sample English Mock Test - Question 1

Directions (Q. 1 - 5): Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases have been given in bold to help locate them while answering some of the questions

Each one has his reasons; for one, art is a flight: for another, a means of conquering. But one can flee into a hermitage, into madness, into death. One can conquer arm. Why does it have to be written, why does one have to manage his escapes and conquests by writing? Because, behind the various aims of the authors, there is a deeper and more immediate choice which is common to all of us. We shall try to elucidate this choice and we shall see whether it is not in the name of this very choice of writing that the engagement of writers must be required.

Each of our perceptions is accompanied by the consciousness that human reality is a ‘revealer’, that is, it is through the human reality that ‘there is’ being, or, to put it differently, that man is the means by which things are manifested. It is our presence in the world which multiples relations. It is we who set up a relationship between this tree and that bit of sky. Thanks to us, that star which has been dead for millennia, that quarter moon, and that dark river are disclosed in the unity of a landscape. It is the speed of our auto and our airplane, which organizes the great masses of the earth. With each of our acts, the world reveals to us a new face. But, if we know that we are the directors of being, we also know that we are not its producers. If we turn away from this landscape, it will sink back into its dark permanence. At least, it will sink back; there is no one made enough to think that it is going to be annihilated. It is we who shall be annihilated, and the earth will remain in its lethargy until another consciousness comes along to awaken it. Thus, to our inner certainty of being ‘revealers’ is added that of being inessential in relation to the thing revealed.

One of the chief motives of artistic creation is certainly the need of feeling that we are essential in relationship to the world. If I fix on canvas or in writing, a certain aspect of the fields or the sea or a look on someone’s face which I have disclosed, I am conscious of having produced them by condensing relationships. By introducing order where there was none, by imposing the unity of mind on the diversity of things. That is, I think myself essential in relation to my creation. But this time, it is the created object which escapes me; I cannot reveal and produce at the same time. The creation becomes inessential in relation to the creative activity. First of all, even if it appears to others as definitive the created object always seems to us in a state of suspension; we can always change this line, that shade, that word. Thus, it never forces itself. A novice painter asked his teacher, ‘When should I consider my painting finished?’ And the teacher answered. ‘When you can look at it in amazement and say to yourself’ “I’m the one who did that!””

Which amounts to saying never. For it is virtually considering one’s work with someone else’s eyes and revealing what has been created. But it is self evident that we are proportionally less conscious of the thing produced and more conscious of our productive activity. When it is a matter of poetry or carpentry, we work according to traditional norms. With tools whose usage is codified, it is Heidegger’s famous hypothesis – they who are working with our hands. In this case, the result can seem to us sufficiently strange to preserve its objectivity in our eyes. But if we ourselves produce the rules of production, the measure, the criteria, and if our creative drive comes from the very depth of our heart, then we never find anything but ourselves in our work. It is we who have invented the laws by which we judge it. It is our history, our love, our gaiety that we recognize in it. Even if we should regard it without touching it any further, we never receive from it that gaiety or love, we put them into it. The results which we have obtained on canvas or paper never seem to us objective. We are too familiar with the processes of which they are  a ruse, and when we seek to perceive our work, we create it again, we repeat mentally the operations which produced each of its aspects that appear as a result. Thus, in the perception, the object is given as the essential thing and the subject as the inessential. The latter seeks essentiality in the creation and obtains it, but then it is the object which becomes the inessential.

The dialectic is nowhere more apparent than in the art of writing, for the literary object is a peculiar top, which exists only in movement. To make it come into view, a concrete act called reading is necessary, and it lasts only as long as this act can last. Beyond that, there are only black marks on paper. Now, the writer cannot read what he writes. Whereas the shoemaker can put on the shoes he has just made if they are his size, and the architect can live in the house he has built. In reading, one foresees; one waits. He foresees the end of the sentence, the following sentence, the next page. He waits for them, to confirm, or disappoint his foresights. The reading is composed of a host of hypotheses, followed by the awakenings of hopes and deceptions. Readers are always ahead of the sentence they are reading in a merely probable future, which partly collapses and partly comes together in proportion as they progress, which withdraws from one page to the next and forms the moving horizon of the literary object. Without waiting, without a future, without ignorance, there is no objectivity.

Q. The author holds that:

Sample English Mock Test - Question 2

Each one has his reasons; for one, art is a flight: for another, a means of conquering. But one can flee into a hermitage, into madness, into death. One can conquer arm. Why does it have to be written, why does one have to manage his escapes and conquests by writing? Because, behind the various aims of the authors, there is a deeper and more immediate choice which is common to all of us. We shall try to elucidate this choice and we shall see whether it is not in the name of this very choice of writing that the engagement of writers must be required.

Each of our perceptions is accompanied by the consciousness that human reality is a ‘revealer’, that is, it is through the human reality that ‘there is’ being, or, to put it differently, that man is the means by which things are manifested. It is our presence in the world which multiples relations. It is we who set up a relationship between this tree and that bit of sky. Thanks to us, that star which has been dead for millennia, that quarter moon, and that dark river are disclosed in the unity of a landscape. It is the speed of our auto and our airplane, which organizes the great masses of the earth. With each of our acts, the world reveals to us a new face. But, if we know that we are the directors of being, we also know that we are not its producers. If we turn away from this landscape, it will sink back into its dark permanence. At least, it will sink back; there is no one made enough to think that it is going to be annihilated. It is we who shall be annihilated, and the earth will remain in its lethargy until another consciousness comes along to awaken it. Thus, to our inner certainty of being ‘revealers’ is added that of being inessential in relation to the thing revealed.

One of the chief motives of artistic creation is certainly the need of feeling that we are essential in relationship to the world. If I fix on canvas or in writing, a certain aspect of the fields or the sea or a look on someone’s face which I have disclosed, I am conscious of having produced them by condensing relationships. By introducing order where there was none, by imposing the unity of mind on the diversity of things. That is, I think myself essential in relation to my creation. But this time, it is the created object which escapes me; I cannot reveal and produce at the same time. The creation becomes inessential in relation to the creative activity. First of all, even if it appears to others as definitive the created object always seems to us in a state of suspension; we can always change this line, that shade, that word. Thus, it never forces itself. A novice painter asked his teacher, 'When should I consider my painting finished?’ And the teacher answered. ‘When you can look at it in amazement and say to yourself’ “I’m the one who did that!””

Which amounts to saying never. For it is virtually considering one’s work with someone else’s eyes and revealing what has been created. But it is self evident that we are proportionally less conscious of the thing produced and more conscious of our productive activity. When it is a matter of poetry or carpentry, we work according to traditional norms. With tools whose usage is codified, it is Heidegger’s famous hypothesis – they who are working with our hands. In this case, the result can seem to us sufficiently strange to preserve its objectivity in our eyes. But if we ourselves produce the rules of production, the measure, the criteria, and if our creative drive comes from the very depth of our heart, then we never find anything but ourselves in our work. It is we who have invented the laws by which we judge it. It is our history, our love, our gaiety that we recognize in it. Even if we should regard it without touching it any further, we never receive from it that gaiety or love, we put them into it. The results which we have obtained on canvas or paper never seem to us objective. We are too familiar with the processes of which they are a ruse, and when we seek to perceive our work, we create it again, we repeat mentally the operations which produced each of its aspects that appear as a result. Thus, in the perception, the object is given as the essential thing and the subject as the inessential. The latter seeks essentiality in the creation and obtains it, but then it is the object which becomes the inessential.

The dialectic is nowhere more apparent than in the art of writing, for the literary object is a peculiar top, which exists only in movement. To make it come into view, a concrete act called reading is necessary, and it lasts only as long as this act can last. Beyond that, there are only black marks on paper. Now, the writer cannot read what he writes. Whereas the shoemaker can put on the shoes he has just made if they are his size, and the architect can live in the house he has built. In reading, one foresees; one waits. He foresees the end of the sentence, the following sentence, the next page. He waits for them, to confirm, or disappoint his foresights. The reading is composed of a host of hypotheses, followed by the awakenings of hopes and deceptions. Readers are always ahead of the sentence they are reading in a merely probable future, which partly collapses and partly comes together in proportion as they progress, which withdraws from one page to the next and forms the moving horizon of the literary object. Without waiting, without a future, without ignorance, there is no objectivity.

Q. 

It is the author’s contention that;

Sample English Mock Test - Question 3

Each one has his reasons; for one, art is a flight: for another, a means of conquering. But one can flee into a hermitage, into madness, into death. One can conquer arm. Why does it have to be written, why does one have to manage his escapes and conquests by writing? Because, behind the various aims of the authors, there is a deeper and more immediate choice which is common to all of us. We shall try to elucidate this choice and we shall see whether it is not in the name of this very choice of writing that the engagement of writers must be required.

Each of our perceptions is accompanied by the consciousness that human reality is a ‘revealer’, that is, it is through the human reality that ‘there is’ being, or, to put it differently, that man is the means by which things are manifested. It is our presence in the world which multiples relations. It is we who set up a relationship between this tree and that bit of sky. Thanks to us, that star which has been dead for millennia, that quarter moon, and that dark river are disclosed in the unity of a landscape. It is the speed of our auto and our airplane, which organizes the great masses of the earth. With each of our acts, the world reveals to us a new face. But, if we know that we are the directors of being, we also know that we are not its producers. If we turn away from this landscape, it will sink back into its dark permanence. At least, it will sink back; there is no one made enough to think that it is going to be annihilated. It is we who shall be annihilated, and the earth will remain in its lethargy until another consciousness comes along to awaken it. Thus, to our inner certainty of being ‘revealers’ is added that of being inessential in relation to the thing revealed.

One of the chief motives of artistic creation is certainly the need of feeling that we are essential in relationship to the world. If I fix on canvas or in writing, a certain aspect of the fields or the sea or a look on someone’s face which I have disclosed, I am conscious of having produced them by condensing relationships. By introducing order where there was none, by imposing the unity of mind on the diversity of things. That is, I think myself essential in relation to my creation. But this time, it is the created object which escapes me; I cannot reveal and produce at the same time. The creation becomes inessential in relation to the creative activity. First of all, even if it appears to others as definitive the created object always seems to us in a state of suspension; we can always change this line, that shade, that word. Thus, it never forces itself. A novice painter asked his teacher, 'When should I consider my painting finished?’ And the teacher answered. ‘When you can look at it in amazement and say to yourself’ “I’m the one who did that!””

Which amounts to saying never. For it is virtually considering one’s work with someone else’s eyes and revealing what has been created. But it is self evident that we are proportionally less conscious of the thing produced and more conscious of our productive activity. When it is a matter of poetry or carpentry, we work according to traditional norms. With tools whose usage is codified, it is Heidegger’s famous hypothesis – they who are working with our hands. In this case, the result can seem to us sufficiently strange to preserve its objectivity in our eyes. But if we ourselves produce the rules of production, the measure, the criteria, and if our creative drive comes from the very depth of our heart, then we never find anything but ourselves in our work. It is we who have invented the laws by which we judge it. It is our history, our love, our gaiety that we recognize in it. Even if we should regard it without touching it any further, we never receive from it that gaiety or love, we put them into it. The results which we have obtained on canvas or paper never seem to us objective. We are too familiar with the processes of which they are a ruse, and when we seek to perceive our work, we create it again, we repeat mentally the operations which produced each of its aspects that appear as a result. Thus, in the perception, the object is given as the essential thing and the subject as the inessential. The latter seeks essentiality in the creation and obtains it, but then it is the object which becomes the inessential.

The dialectic is nowhere more apparent than in the art of writing, for the literary object is a peculiar top, which exists only in movement. To make it come into view, a concrete act called reading is necessary, and it lasts only as long as this act can last. Beyond that, there are only black marks on paper. Now, the writer cannot read what he writes. Whereas the shoemaker can put on the shoes he has just made if they are his size, and the architect can live in the house he has built. In reading, one foresees; one waits. He foresees the end of the sentence, the following sentence, the next page. He waits for them, to confirm, or disappoint his foresights. The reading is composed of a host of hypotheses, followed by the awakenings of hopes and deceptions. Readers are always ahead of the sentence they are reading in a merely probable future, which partly collapses and partly comes together in proportion as they progress, which withdraws from one page to the next and forms the moving horizon of the literary object. Without waiting, without a future, without ignorance, there is no objectivity.

Q. The passage makes a distinction between perception and creation in terms of;

Sample English Mock Test - Question 4

Each one has his reasons; for one, art is a flight: for another, a means of conquering. But one can flee into a hermitage, into madness, into death. One can conquer arm. Why does it have to be written, why does one have to manage his escapes and conquests by writing? Because, behind the various aims of the authors, there is a deeper and more immediate choice which is common to all of us. We shall try to elucidate this choice and we shall see whether it is not in the name of this very choice of writing that the engagement of writers must be required.

Each of our perceptions is accompanied by the consciousness that human reality is a ‘revealer’, that is, it is through the human reality that ‘there is’ being, or, to put it differently, that man is the means by which things are manifested. It is our presence in the world which multiples relations. It is we who set up a relationship between this tree and that bit of sky. Thanks to us, that star which has been dead for millennia, that quarter moon, and that dark river are disclosed in the unity of a landscape. It is the speed of our auto and our airplane, which organizes the great masses of the earth. With each of our acts, the world reveals to us a new face. But, if we know that we are the directors of being, we also know that we are not its producers. If we turn away from this landscape, it will sink back into its dark permanence. At least, it will sink back; there is no one made enough to think that it is going to be annihilated. It is we who shall be annihilated, and the earth will remain in its lethargy until another consciousness comes along to awaken it. Thus, to our inner certainty of being ‘revealers’ is added that of being inessential in relation to the thing revealed.

One of the chief motives of artistic creation is certainly the need of feeling that we are essential in relationship to the world. If I fix on canvas or in writing, a certain aspect of the fields or the sea or a look on someone’s face which I have disclosed, I am conscious of having produced them by condensing relationships. By introducing order where there was none, by imposing the unity of mind on the diversity of things. That is, I think myself essential in relation to my creation. But this time, it is the created object which escapes me; I cannot reveal and produce at the same time. The creation becomes inessential in relation to the creative activity. First of all, even if it appears to others as definitive the created object always seems to us in a state of suspension; we can always change this line, that shade, that word. Thus, it never forces itself. A novice painter asked his teacher, 'When should I consider my painting finished?’ And the teacher answered. ‘When you can look at it in amazement and say to yourself’ “I’m the one who did that!””

Which amounts to saying never. For it is virtually considering one’s work with someone else’s eyes and revealing what has been created. But it is self evident that we are proportionally less conscious of the thing produced and more conscious of our productive activity. When it is a matter of poetry or carpentry, we work according to traditional norms. With tools whose usage is codified, it is Heidegger’s famous hypothesis – they who are working with our hands. In this case, the result can seem to us sufficiently strange to preserve its objectivity in our eyes. But if we ourselves produce the rules of production, the measure, the criteria, and if our creative drive comes from the very depth of our heart, then we never find anything but ourselves in our work. It is we who have invented the laws by which we judge it. It is our history, our love, our gaiety that we recognize in it. Even if we should regard it without touching it any further, we never receive from it that gaiety or love, we put them into it. The results which we have obtained on canvas or paper never seem to us objective. We are too familiar with the processes of which they are a ruse, and when we seek to perceive our work, we create it again, we repeat mentally the operations which produced each of its aspects that appear as a result. Thus, in the perception, the object is given as the essential thing and the subject as the inessential. The latter seeks essentiality in the creation and obtains it, but then it is the object which becomes the inessential.

The dialectic is nowhere more apparent than in the art of writing, for the literary object is a peculiar top, which exists only in movement. To make it come into view, a concrete act called reading is necessary, and it lasts only as long as this act can last. Beyond that, there are only black marks on paper. Now, the writer cannot read what he writes. Whereas the shoemaker can put on the shoes he has just made if they are his size, and the architect can live in the house he has built. In reading, one foresees; one waits. He foresees the end of the sentence, the following sentence, the next page. He waits for them, to confirm, or disappoint his foresights. The reading is composed of a host of hypotheses, followed by the awakenings of hopes and deceptions. Readers are always ahead of the sentence they are reading in a merely probable future, which partly collapses and partly comes together in proportion as they progress, which withdraws from one page to the next and forms the moving horizon of the literary object. Without waiting, without a future, without ignorance, there is no objectivity.

Q. 

The art of writing manifests the dialectic of perception and creation because:

Sample English Mock Test - Question 5

Each one has his reasons; for one, art is a flight: for another, a means of conquering. But one can flee into a hermitage, into madness, into death. One can conquer arm. Why does it have to be written, why does one have to manage his escapes and conquests by writing? Because, behind the various aims of the authors, there is a deeper and more immediate choice which is common to all of us. We shall try to elucidate this choice and we shall see whether it is not in the name of this very choice of writing that the engagement of writers must be required.

Each of our perceptions is accompanied by the consciousness that human reality is a ‘revealer’, that is, it is through the human reality that ‘there is’ being, or, to put it differently, that man is the means by which things are manifested. It is our presence in the world which multiples relations. It is we who set up a relationship between this tree and that bit of sky. Thanks to us, that star which has been dead for millennia, that quarter moon, and that dark river are disclosed in the unity of a landscape. It is the speed of our auto and our airplane, which organizes the great masses of the earth. With each of our acts, the world reveals to us a new face. But, if we know that we are the directors of being, we also know that we are not its producers. If we turn away from this landscape, it will sink back into its dark permanence. At least, it will sink back; there is no one made enough to think that it is going to be annihilated. It is we who shall be annihilated, and the earth will remain in its lethargy until another consciousness comes along to awaken it. Thus, to our inner certainty of being ‘revealers’ is added that of being inessential in relation to the thing revealed.

One of the chief motives of artistic creation is certainly the need of feeling that we are essential in relationship to the world. If I fix on canvas or in writing, a certain aspect of the fields or the sea or a look on someone’s face which I have disclosed, I am conscious of having produced them by condensing relationships. By introducing order where there was none, by imposing the unity of mind on the diversity of things. That is, I think myself essential in relation to my creation. But this time, it is the created object which escapes me; I cannot reveal and produce at the same time. The creation becomes inessential in relation to the creative activity. First of all, even if it appears to others as definitive the created object always seems to us in a state of suspension; we can always change this line, that shade, that word. Thus, it never forces itself. A novice painter asked his teacher, 'When should I consider my painting finished?’ And the teacher answered. ‘When you can look at it in amazement and say to yourself’ “I’m the one who did that!””

Which amounts to saying never. For it is virtually considering one’s work with someone else’s eyes and revealing what has been created. But it is self evident that we are proportionally less conscious of the thing produced and more conscious of our productive activity. When it is a matter of poetry or carpentry, we work according to traditional norms. With tools whose usage is codified, it is Heidegger’s famous hypothesis – they who are working with our hands. In this case, the result can seem to us sufficiently strange to preserve its objectivity in our eyes. But if we ourselves produce the rules of production, the measure, the criteria, and if our creative drive comes from the very depth of our heart, then we never find anything but ourselves in our work. It is we who have invented the laws by which we judge it. It is our history, our love, our gaiety that we recognize in it. Even if we should regard it without touching it any further, we never receive from it that gaiety or love, we put them into it. The results which we have obtained on canvas or paper never seem to us objective. We are too familiar with the processes of which they are a ruse, and when we seek to perceive our work, we create it again, we repeat mentally the operations which produced each of its aspects that appear as a result. Thus, in the perception, the object is given as the essential thing and the subject as the inessential. The latter seeks essentiality in the creation and obtains it, but then it is the object which becomes the inessential.

The dialectic is nowhere more apparent than in the art of writing, for the literary object is a peculiar top, which exists only in movement. To make it come into view, a concrete act called reading is necessary, and it lasts only as long as this act can last. Beyond that, there are only black marks on paper. Now, the writer cannot read what he writes. Whereas the shoemaker can put on the shoes he has just made if they are his size, and the architect can live in the house he has built. In reading, one foresees; one waits. He foresees the end of the sentence, the following sentence, the next page. He waits for them, to confirm, or disappoint his foresights. The reading is composed of a host of hypotheses, followed by the awakenings of hopes and deceptions. Readers are always ahead of the sentence they are reading in a merely probable future, which partly collapses and partly comes together in proportion as they progress, which withdraws from one page to the next and forms the moving horizon of the literary object. Without waiting, without a future, without ignorance, there is no objectivity.

Q

A writer, as an artist,

Sample English Mock Test - Question 6

Directions (Q. 6 - 15): In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 6 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty.

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 6 Because it's the most appropriate term going with the statement. clearly moving won't be an answer. and "sitting fixed" doesn't make sense. and we mostly use static to describe non living objects and motionless for living objects
Sample English Mock Test - Question 7

In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 7 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 8

In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 8 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 9

In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 9 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty

Sample English Mock Test - Question 10

In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 10 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty

Sample English Mock Test - Question 11

In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 11 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty

Sample English Mock Test - Question 12

In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 12 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty

Sample English Mock Test - Question 13

In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 13 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty

Sample English Mock Test - Question 14

In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 14 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty

Sample English Mock Test - Question 15

In the following passage there are blanks, each of which has been numbered. four or five words are suggested, Find one of which fits at number 15 appropriately. 

At the table, a man, unlike ordinary people, was sitting (6). He was a (7) with the skin drawn tight over his bones, with long (8) like a woman’s and a (9) beard. His face was yellow with an (10) tint, in it, his checks were (11) his back long and narrow, and the hand on which his shaggy head was (12) so thin and delicate that it was (13) to look at it. His head was already (14) with silver, and seeing his (15), aged-looking face, no one would have believed that he was only forty

Sample English Mock Test - Question 16

Pick out the most appropriate pair to fill in the blanks in same order. In a world ---- by men for so many years, women are only thought ---- for jobs like typists, receptionists and teachers.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 17

Hence the word sophistry has an unfavourable ………. And means arguing deceitfully, attempting to turn a poor case into a good one by means of clever but …….. reasoning.   

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 17

The first blank can be confused between option A and D, but for the 2nd blank Cogent is the best word as it means clear and logical hence by the process of elimination. 

Sample English Mock Test - Question 18

This partly explains how the Mehta family has been able to ……… its lavish lifestyle in recent times, despite the fact that all its assets have been ……… 

Sample English Mock Test - Question 19

Kautilya was a great political thinker and his strong …….. personality is …….. throughout the thoughts and expressions in the Arthashastra. 

Sample English Mock Test - Question 20

The Minister felt that the ………. made by the Committee was …….. even though similar schemes had worked earlier. 

Sample English Mock Test - Question 21

Directions (Q. 21 - 25): In the following sentences given below, a word or phrase is written in italicized letter. For each italicized part, four words/phrases are listed below each sentence. Choose the word nearest in meaning to the italicized part.

Q. Though long, your essay is vague on the point. 

Sample English Mock Test - Question 22

In the following sentences given below, a word or phrase is written in italicized letter. For each italicized part, four words/phrases are listed below each sentence. Choose the word nearest in meaning to the italicized part.

Q. 

The field was even enough for the joggers to have their practice.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 23

In the following sentences given below, a word or phrase is written in italicized letter. For each italicized part, four words/phrases are listed below each sentence. Choose the word nearest in meaning to the italicized part.

Q. 

On public occasions, she was very punctilious about forms and manners.

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 23

Punctillios means showing great attention to detail or correct behaviour. Careful can be used in place of this word.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 24

In the following sentences given below, a word or phrase is written in italicized letter. For each italicized part, four words/phrases are listed below each sentence. Choose the word nearest in meaning to the italicized part.

Q. 

This library was built with donations from the munificent citizens of the city.

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 24

The correct option is B

Munificent means characterized by or displaying great generosity.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 25

In the following sentences given below, a word or phrase is written in italicized letter. For each italicized part, four words/phrases are listed below each sentence. Choose the word nearest in meaning to the italicized part.

Q. 

The perspicuity of the lawyer’s arguments was remarkable.

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 25

Lucidity is the correct answer as it is the synonym of perspicuity which means clarity, plainness, intelligibility, transparency.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 26

Directions (Q. 26 - 30): Fill in the Blanks

Q. 

You will have to catch the morning flight, so you ……….. better get ready.

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 26

For suggestions, modal ‘should’ is used

Sample English Mock Test - Question 27

Take possession of the records immediately lest they are ………. with. 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 27

‘tampered’ with… is the correct combination

Sample English Mock Test - Question 28

The sun disappeared behind the lacy ………. of the stretched-out mountains. 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 28

‘silhouette’ means ‘shadow’, so option ‘C’ is right

Sample English Mock Test - Question 29

You cannot devise a method which ……. all possibly of error. 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 29

Only ‘Excludes’ makes sense here.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 30

He very successfully ……… all the allegations leveled against him. 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 30

alligations are ‘rebutted’ so option ‘D’

Sample English Mock Test - Question 31

Directions (Q. 31 - 35): In each of the following sentences, four or five options are given. You are, required to identify the best way of writing the sentence in the contest of the correct usage of standard written English, while doing so, you have to ensure that the message being conveyed remains the same in all the cases.

Q. The process by which the community influences the actions of its members is known as social control.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 32

In each of the following sentences, four or five options are given. You are, required to identify the best way of writing the sentence in the contest of the correct usage of standard written English, while doing so, you have to ensure that the message being conveyed remains the same in all the cases.
To be sure, there would be scarcely no time left over for other things if school children would have been expected to have considered all sides of every matter on which they had opinions. 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 32

Option C is the correct answer as it is the best way of expressing the idea. All the other options are awkward. Scarcely is already negative so word ‘no’ will not be used in the same line.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 33

In each of the following sentences, four or five options are given. You are, required to identify the best way of writing the sentence in the contest of the correct usage of standard written English, while doing so, you have to ensure that the message being conveyed remains the same in all the cases.
Depending on skilful suggestions, argument is seldom used in advertising. 

Sample English Mock Test - Question 34

In each of the following sentences, four or five options are given. You are, required to identify the best way of writing the sentence in the contest of the correct usage of standard written English, while doing so, you have to ensure that the message being conveyed remains the same in all the cases.
When this war is over, no kingdom will either be isolated in war or peace. 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 34

Either should precede the two choices offered. This sentence is the case of incorrect usage of Correlative conjunctions.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 35

In each of the following sentences, four or five options are given. You are, required to identify the best way of writing the sentence in the contest of the correct usage of standard written English, while doing so, you have to ensure that the message being conveyed remains the same in all the cases.
The twelve-hour work day not only has been reduced to one of ten hours but also, in some lines of work, to below eight hours. 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 35

The correct option is D.

It is the correct framing of sentences.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 36

Directions (36-40): In these questions, out of the four alternatives choose the one which can be substituted for the given words/sentence.

Q.

A speech made by someone without any rehearsal.

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 36

‘Extempore’ is a speech made without any Rehearsal. It is an unprepared speech.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 37

In these questions, out of the four alternatives choose the one which can be substituted for the given words/sentence.
Murder of a brother 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 37

‘fratricide’ is killing a sibling

Sample English Mock Test - Question 38

In these questions, out of the four alternatives choose the one which can be substituted for the given words/sentence.
A physician who specialises in disease of skin  

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 38

‘Dermatologist’ is a skin doctor.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 39

In these questions, out of the four alternatives choose the one which can be substituted for the given words/sentence.
Mania for stealing articles 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 39

‘Kleptomania’ is a habit of stealing.

Sample English Mock Test - Question 40

In these questions, out of the four alternatives choose the one which can be substituted for the given words/sentence.
To kill someone for political reasons 

Detailed Solution for Sample English Mock Test - Question 40

‘reprisal’ is fighting back.

Use Code STAYHOME200 and get INR 200 additional OFF
Use Coupon Code
Information about Sample English Mock Test Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Sample English Mock Test solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Sample English Mock Test, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice