Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others

Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 1

What is the primary legal mechanism through which Tehseen Poonawalla sought redressal for incidents of lynching in Dadri, Jharkhand, and other locations by cow protection groups?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 1
Tehseen Poonawalla filed a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution against the Respondent States to address the incidents of lynching by cow protection groups. Article 32 of the Indian Constitution grants individuals the right to move the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement of their fundamental rights, making it a crucial legal provision for seeking redressal in cases of fundamental rights violations.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 2

Which theme was at the center of the petitions filed with the Supreme Court in the case of Tehseen S. Poonawalla v Union of India and Others?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 2
The theme of Cow Vigilantism and Lynching was central to the petitions filed with the Supreme Court in the case of Tehseen S. Poonawalla v Union of India and Others. This case addressed the pressing issue of mob violence perpetrated by cow protection groups, highlighting the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice in cases of vigilantism and lynching incidents.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 3

Who submitted a second Public Interest Litigation (PIL) related to addressing State responsibility for mob incidents, following the incidents of lynching in various places?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 3
Tushar Gandhi submitted a second PIL to address State responsibility for mob incidents that arose in the aftermath of the incidents of lynching in Dadri, Jharkhand, and other locations. Public Interest Litigations (PILs) play a significant role in addressing issues of public concern by allowing individuals to seek legal remedies for matters affecting society at large.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 4
What is the primary issue being debated regarding the protection of cows in various states in India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 4
The debates surrounding the constitutionality of specific sections within acts aimed at protecting cows highlight a significant legal and ethical discussion. These debates question the validity and compliance of laws such as Section 12 of the Gujarat Animal Prevention Act, Section 13 of the Maharashtra Animal Prevention Act, and Section 15 of the Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Preservation Act. This issue delves into the legal framework and the balance between animal rights, cultural practices, and constitutional principles within the Indian legal system.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 5
What is one of the key considerations regarding the actions to be taken against violent cow protection mobs?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 5
The necessity for immediate collaboration between States and the Centre to develop effective action plans against violent cow protection mobs is crucial in addressing the challenges posed by such groups. This consideration emphasizes the importance of coordinated efforts and prompt strategies to mitigate the impact of violent activities and ensure the safety and well-being of all individuals involved.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 6
Who advocated for prompt registration of FIRs by state law enforcement agencies to prevent incidents?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 6
Ms. Indira Jaising advocated for the prompt registration of FIRs by state law enforcement agencies as a preventive measure to avoid incidents. This emphasizes the proactive role of law enforcement in ensuring timely and effective responses to potential threats.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 7
According to the judgment in Tehseen S. Poonawalla v Union of India and Others, what action was emphasized as a direct violation of the Constitution and the principles of the rule of law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 7
The judgment in Tehseen S. Poonawalla v Union of India and Others emphasized that engaging in vigilante justice was considered a direct violation of the Constitution and the principles of the rule of law. Vigilante justice refers to individuals taking the law into their own hands, bypassing legal procedures and authorities. This action undermines the legal system and can lead to chaos and injustice within society.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 8
What specific directive was issued in the judgment to State Governments to promote values of tolerance and preserve diversity and unity?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 8
In the judgment, State Governments were specifically instructed to investigate the root causes of communal tensions and promote values of tolerance to preserve diversity and unity. This directive highlights the importance of addressing underlying issues that contribute to communal tensions and fostering an environment of tolerance and unity within society.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 9
Which aspect of citizens' rights was emphasized in the judgment in relation to the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 9
The judgment in Tehseen S. Poonawalla v Union of India and Others affirmed that citizens' rights under Article 21 should not be unlawfully infringed upon. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. This provision ensures that individuals are protected from arbitrary actions that may deprive them of their life or personal freedom without due process of law.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 10
What is a key preventive measure recommended in the guidelines to curb vigilantism?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 10
A key preventive measure suggested in the guidelines to curb vigilantism is the appointment of nodal officers by State Governments. These officers are tasked with overseeing vigilante activities and ensuring that appropriate actions are taken to prevent such incidents. By having designated individuals focused on this issue, the hope is to proactively address any potential situations that could lead to vigilantism and maintain law and order effectively.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 11
What is a punitive measure outlined in the guidelines to address non-compliance with prescribed measures in handling vigilante incidents?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 11
A punitive measure highlighted in the guidelines for dealing with non-compliance with prescribed measures in handling vigilante incidents involves taking departmental action against officers who fail to adhere to the recommended procedures. This action is considered a case of misconduct or negligence, emphasizing the importance of accountability and responsibility among law enforcement officials in preventing and addressing incidents of vigilantism effectively.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 12
What punitive measures are recommended for officers who fail to comply with the prescribed actions in response to vigilante incidents?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 12
The recommended punitive measures for officers who do not adhere to the prescribed actions involve taking departmental action, considering the non-compliance as a case of misconduct or negligence. This may include disciplinary proceedings aimed at ensuring accountability and maintaining the integrity of the prescribed measures.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 13
What is the recommended timeline for concluding the disciplinary process against officers who fail to comply with prescribed measures?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 13
The recommended timeline for concluding the disciplinary process against officers who fail to comply with prescribed measures is within six months to ensure accountability. This timeframe is crucial for maintaining transparency and addressing instances of misconduct or negligence effectively.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 14
What action did non-compliant states face during the initial post-judgment hearing regarding the enforcement of guidelines?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 14
During the initial post-judgment hearing regarding the enforcement of guidelines, non-compliant states faced severe consequences. This approach emphasizes the importance of adherence to the guidelines set forth by the Court and underscores the gravity of non-compliance in ensuring effective enforcement.
Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 15
What measure did the Court recommend to combat the social issue of lynching effectively?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others - Question 15
To combat the social issue of lynching effectively, the Court recommended establishing a distinct criminal offense for lynching, accompanied by appropriate penalties. This recommendation is aimed at addressing the severity of the issue and providing a legal framework to deter and prosecute individuals involved in such heinous acts.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Tehseen S. Poonawalla V Union Of India And Others, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams