All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook?

Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? below.
Solutions of Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 1
Save

What is the definition of contempt of court according to Black's Law Dictionary?

Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 1
Contempt of court, as defined by Black's Law Dictionary, refers to a willful disregard of the authority of a court of justice or legislative body or disobedience to its lawful orders. This definition emphasizes the seriousness of actions that go against the court's authority, highlighting the importance of upholding judicial fairness and respect for legal processes.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 2
Save

In contempt proceedings, what role does mens rea (guilty mind) play in determining the culpability of an accused in criminal cases?

Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 2
In contempt proceedings, particularly in criminal contempt cases, mens rea or the guilty mind behind the action is considered irrelevant. Unlike in typical criminal cases where intent plays a significant role, contempt of court focuses more on the actions that disrespect the court's authority, regardless of the individual's intentions.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 3
Save

What was the outcome in the case of Re: Vijay Kumar, where the Chief Minister of Bengal was held in contempt?

Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 3
In the case of Re: Vijay Kumar, the Chief Minister of Bengal was held in contempt for criticizing the court's functioning for public benefit. This case highlights the complexities surrounding contempt of court and how actions perceived as undermining the court's authority can lead to legal consequences, irrespective of the individual's position or intentions.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 4
Save
What do Article 129 and Article 215 of the Indian Constitution designate the Supreme Court and High Courts as, respectively?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 4
Article 129 and Article 215 of the Indian Constitution designate the Supreme Court and High Courts as courts of records. This designation means that these courts maintain judicial proceedings and records with evidentiary value, which are binding on all other courts. Additionally, being courts of records empowers them to punish for contempt of court.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 5
Save
What do Articles 121 and 211 of the Indian Constitution prohibit the legislature and parliament from doing with respect to judges of the Supreme Court or High Court?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 5
Articles 121 and 211 of the Indian Constitution prohibit the legislature and parliament from making allegations against judges of the Supreme Court or High Court in the discharge of their duties. Only the President, under Article 124(4) and The Judges Inquiry Act, 1968, has the authority to accuse a judge of misconduct. This restriction raises questions about the maintainability of such discretionary power.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 6
Save
What is the primary authority responsible for accusing a judge of misconduct according to the Indian Constitution and The Judges Inquiry Act, 1968?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 6
Only the President, under Article 124(4) of the Indian Constitution and The Judges Inquiry Act, 1968, has the authority to accuse a judge of misconduct. This provision ensures that accusations of misconduct against judges are handled with appropriate authority and oversight.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 7
Save
What did Justice P.N. Bhagwati emphasize regarding the significance of free debate in a democracy, as highlighted in the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 7
Justice P.N. Bhagwati, in the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, underscored the importance of free debate in a democracy as a means to ensure government accountability and promote informed decision-making. This emphasis reflects the critical role that open dialogue and diverse viewpoints play in maintaining a healthy and responsive democratic framework.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 8
Save
What was the original purpose of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 8
The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, was initially designed to safeguard fair judiciary practices and foster public confidence in the judicial system. It aimed to ensure that the judiciary's integrity and authority were respected and upheld. This act was meant to protect the dignity and effectiveness of the courts, thereby maintaining the rule of law in society.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 9
Save
What legal distinction sets contempt proceedings apart from typical criminal cases?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 9
Contempt proceedings are unique in nature and are considered quasi-criminal because they are tried through a summary process without a fixed procedure, unlike criminal trials. This distinction underlines the specialized approach taken in handling contempt of court cases, emphasizing efficiency and immediate action over a lengthy judicial process.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 10
Save
How does the Contempt of Court Act differ from criminal proceedings regarding the accused individuals?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 10
Individuals facing contempt are not considered accused under Article 20(3) of the constitution, setting them apart from how accused individuals are treated in typical criminal proceedings. This distinction highlights the unique legal status of individuals involved in contempt cases, showcasing a deviation from the standard criminal justice framework.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 11
Save
What potential consequence arises from the use of summary procedures in contempt cases?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 11
The use of summary procedures in contempt cases, which bypass the rules of evidence, can sometimes lead to the misuse of contempt law. This loophole in the trial process may create opportunities for abuse or misinterpretation, emphasizing the importance of carefully balancing efficiency with fairness in legal proceedings.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 12
Save
What key aspect did the Supreme Court emphasize in the case of InPrinters Mysore Ltd. v. Asst. Commercial Tax Officer regarding the freedom of the press?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 12
In the case of InPrinters Mysore Ltd. v. Asst. Commercial Tax Officer, the Supreme Court highlighted the critical role of the press in informing the public and ensuring government accountability. This underscores the fundamental importance of press freedom in democratic societies, where the media serves as a crucial watchdog, promoting transparency and accountability within the government.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 13
Save
How did the constitutional bench describe the contempt law in the case of Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 13
In the case of Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India, the constitutional bench characterized the contempt law as a unique combination of roles, incorporating elements of judge, jury, and executioner. This depiction illustrates the multifaceted nature of contempt law within the judicial system, highlighting its complex and nuanced functions in upholding the integrity and authority of the courts.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 14
Save
What is the main emphasis of Lord President Clyde, Phillimore Committee, and Justice Frankfurter regarding the Contempt of Courts Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 14
Lord President Clyde, Phillimore Committee, and Justice Frankfurter primarily emphasize that the Contempt of Courts Act upholds the fundamental supremacy of law. This perspective underscores the critical role of the law in maintaining order and justice within a legal framework.
Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 15
Save
According to the views of Justice Tek Chand, V.G. Ramachandran, and the Allahabad High Court, what is the purpose behind the Contempt of Courts Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? - Question 15
Justice Tek Chand, V.G. Ramachandran, and the Allahabad High Court argue that the purpose of the Contempt of Courts Act is to maintain the supremacy of courts and the flow of justice. This perspective highlights the significance of preserving the authority and integrity of the judicial system.
207 docs|219 tests
Join Course
Information about Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook?, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook?

Find all the important questions for Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? resources.

Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Contempt of Court Vis A Vis Freedom of Speech: A Need to Relook? with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup