All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

20 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism

Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism for Judiciary Exams 2025 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism below.
Solutions of Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism | 20 questions in 20 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 1
Save

What is the primary difference between judicial review and judicial activism as highlighted in the comparative analysis?

Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 1
Judicial review primarily involves the review of laws and regulations to ensure they align with the constitution, focusing on the constitutionality of legislative actions. On the other hand, judicial activism goes beyond mere interpretation, with judges actively influencing legal and social change through their decisions. This distinction underscores how judicial review is more about assessing laws against constitutional standards, while judicial activism involves judges actively shaping legal and social policies.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 2
Save

How do judicial review and judicial activism differ in terms of their impact on the legal and political spheres?

Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 2
Judicial review, by focusing on the constitutionality of laws, typically ensures that legislation aligns with the established legal framework, thereby maintaining the status quo. In contrast, judicial activism, characterized by judges taking an active role in shaping policies, can result in more significant and sometimes radical changes to existing laws and legal precedents. This distinction highlights how the two concepts differ in their effects on legal and political landscapes.
Clear all your doubts with EduRev
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 3
Save

What is the primary purpose of judicial review in constitutional law?

Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 3
The primary purpose of judicial review in constitutional law is to protect individual rights, uphold the rule of law, and ensure that laws and government actions align with constitutional principles. This process helps in maintaining the balance of power among different branches of government and safeguards the rights of citizens.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 4
Save
What distinguishes the methodologies of judicial review and judicial activism in the judicial realm?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 4
Judicial review typically involves judges evaluating laws based on legal precedents and constitutional principles, emphasizing consistency with established legal norms. In contrast, judicial activism often prioritizes achieving social justice and addressing perceived societal injustices, which can involve departing from strict adherence to legal precedents. This distinction underscores how the methodologies of judicial review and judicial activism vary in their approaches to legal interpretation and decision-making.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 5
Save
Which of the following best describes the role of legal precedents in judicial review?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 5
Legal precedents play a crucial role in judicial review by providing a basis for evaluating the constitutionality of issues. Judges rely on established legal precedents, including past court decisions and interpretations of the constitution, to make informed decisions regarding the constitutionality of laws and government actions.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 6
Save
How does judicial review contribute to the preservation of a nation's constitutional framework?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 6
Judicial review contributes to the preservation of a nation's constitutional framework by invalidating unconstitutional laws or actions. Through this process, the judiciary ensures that laws and government actions adhere to constitutional principles, maintaining the integrity of the constitution and the balance of power among the branches of government.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 7
Save
What is one of the primary functions of judicial review in the context of governmental powers?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 7
A key function of judicial review is to act as a check on government powers. By reviewing the constitutionality of laws and actions, the judiciary plays a vital role in preventing the legislative and executive branches from overstepping their authority. This process helps maintain the balance of powers among the branches of government and upholds the rule of law, ensuring that governmental actions align with constitutional limitations.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 8
Save
What is a key aspect of judicial activism that is often criticized by its opponents?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 8
Critics of judicial activism often argue that judges may overstep their constitutional roles by engaging in policy-making activities beyond their mandate. This aspect of activism can blur the separation of powers and lead to debates about the appropriate role of the judiciary in governance.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 9
Save
In what way do judges practicing judicial activism differ from those who do not engage in such practices regarding societal issues?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 9
Judges practicing judicial activism are commonly associated with actively addressing critical societal issues such as civil rights, social justice, and individual freedoms. By interpreting laws liberally and expansively, they empower themselves to respond to changing social and political landscapes, ensuring that the legal system evolves to meet the needs of society.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 10
Save
What is the primary purpose of Judicial Review as compared to Judicial Activism?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 10
The primary purpose of Judicial Review is to evaluate the constitutionality of laws and actions to ensure they comply with the constitution, focusing on upholding the rule of law and safeguarding individual rights. This process involves examining laws and actions to ensure they align with the principles set forth in the constitution, thereby maintaining the balance of power and protecting individual liberties.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 11
Save
Which case exemplifies Judicial Activism by showcasing a decision that influenced social change?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 11
Brown v. Board of Education is a prime example of Judicial Activism, where the Supreme Court's decision to desegregate schools in the United States demonstrated a commitment to promoting social change. This landmark case played a significant role in advancing civil rights and equality by ruling that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, thus illustrating the Court's proactive stance in addressing societal issues.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 12
Save
What does judicial review primarily rely on, as exemplified by the case of Marbury v. Madison?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 12
Judicial review primarily relies on established legal precedents, as demonstrated in the case of Marbury v. Madison. This legal principle allows courts to review the actions of the government and determine their constitutionality based on existing legal precedents. In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court asserted its power of judicial review, establishing the precedent that courts can declare laws unconstitutional.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 13
Save
In what context does judicial activism often come into play, as seen in cases like Brown v. Board of Education?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 13
Judicial activism often comes into play when addressing urgent societal issues, as demonstrated in cases like Brown v. Board of Education. This approach involves judges interpreting the law in ways that promote social justice and drive positive change in response to pressing societal concerns. In the context of Brown v. Board of Education, judicial activism played a crucial role in challenging racial segregation and promoting equality in the education system.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 14
Save
Which case exemplifies judicial activism by addressing racial segregation in schools?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 14
The case of Brown v. Board of Education exemplifies judicial activism by addressing racial segregation in schools. This landmark case challenged the constitutionality of racial segregation in public schools, ultimately leading to the Supreme Court's ruling that segregation was unconstitutional. The decision in Brown v. Board of Education marked a significant step towards desegregation and equality in education.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 15
Save
What is a characteristic of Judicial Review as exemplified in the case of McCulloch v. Maryland?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 15
Judicial Review, as demonstrated in the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, relies on legal precedents and established interpretations of the constitution to guide decision-making. In this specific case, the Court's interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause expanded federal powers, highlighting the role of legal precedents in shaping judicial decisions.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 16
Save
Why is Judicial Activism often viewed as controversial, especially in cases like Citizens United v. FEC?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 16
Judicial Activism is often a subject of controversy due to critics arguing that it blurs the separation of powers and leads to judges making policy decisions. Cases like Citizens United v. FEC, where the Court's decision expanded corporate speech rights, are examples of judicial activism that have sparked debates on the role of the judiciary in shaping policy.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 17
Save
How does the involvement of the Supreme Court in the case of Bush v. Gore illustrate the role of Judicial Review in resolving conflicts?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 17
The Supreme Court's involvement in Bush v. Gore showcased the role of Judicial Review in resolving conflicts by upholding the constitution during disputed situations, such as the 2000 presidential election. This case highlighted the importance of the judiciary in interpreting laws and ensuring a fair and constitutional resolution to electoral disputes.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 18
Save
What is the primary focus of judicial review within the legal and judicial framework?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 18
Judicial review primarily focuses on verifying that laws and actions align with the constitution and established legal precedents. This process ensures that governmental actions are within the boundaries set by the constitution, preventing overreach and maintaining the balance of power among branches of government.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 19
Save
How does judicial activism differ from judicial review in the legal system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 19
Judicial activism differs from judicial review by adopting a proactive and policy-oriented stance. Judges engaging in judicial activism often go beyond simply interpreting the law to shape legal and societal policies based on their own beliefs and values. This approach sometimes leads to criticism for overstepping the traditional role of the judiciary.
Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 20
Save
Why is understanding the differences between judicial review and judicial activism essential in a legal system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism - Question 20
Understanding the distinctions between judicial review and judicial activism is crucial in a legal system as it helps individuals comprehend the essential roles each concept plays in shaping the legal and political landscape. Judicial review ensures that laws align with the constitution and precedents, while judicial activism highlights judges' proactive involvement in shaping legal policies, reflecting personal beliefs and values. This understanding is fundamental for analyzing the dynamics of the judiciary within any legal system.
207 docs|219 tests
Join Course
Information about Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
Download as PDF

Important Questions for Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism

Find all the important questions for Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism resources.

Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Differences Between Judicial Review and Judicial Activism with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup