All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Doctrine of Severability - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Doctrine of Severability - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

20 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Doctrine of Severability

Test: Doctrine of Severability for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Doctrine of Severability questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Doctrine of Severability MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Doctrine of Severability below.
Solutions of Test: Doctrine of Severability questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Doctrine of Severability solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Doctrine of Severability | 20 questions in 20 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 1
Save

What does the doctrine of severability primarily address in relation to laws?

Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 1
The doctrine of severability primarily addresses the constitutionality of laws when some provisions conflict with Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution. It ensures that even if certain parts of a law violate constitutional rights, courts can selectively strike down those specific sections while leaving the rest of the statute intact. This legal principle allows for the preservation of valid laws while removing unconstitutional elements, thus maintaining a balance between citizen rights and legislative functionality.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 2
Save

How do courts typically handle laws containing both valid and invalid provisions under the doctrine of severability?

Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 2
When faced with laws containing both valid and invalid provisions, courts apply the doctrine of severability by selectively striking down only the unconstitutional parts while keeping the rest of the statute intact. This approach allows courts to uphold the valid aspects of legislation while removing those that conflict with constitutional rights. It showcases the careful consideration given to preserving the functionality of laws while ensuring compliance with constitutional norms.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 3
Save

In the scenario where a law restricts certain types of speech but also provides funding for public schools, how would the court likely apply the doctrine of severability?

Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 3
In a situation where a law restricts certain speech while also providing funding for public schools, the court would likely apply the doctrine of severability by upholding the funding provision while striking down the speech restrictions. This approach demonstrates how courts can carefully separate and address conflicting provisions within a law, ensuring that valid elements are preserved while unconstitutional aspects are removed. It highlights the nuanced application of legal principles to uphold citizens' rights while maintaining the functionality of legislation.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 4
Save
What is the primary role of the doctrine of severability in the Indian legal system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 4
The primary role of the doctrine of severability in the Indian legal system is to uphold the supremacy of the Constitution. This legal concept ensures that when a law violates Fundamental Rights, only the offending portions are considered inconsistent with the Constitution. By separating the unconstitutional elements from the rest of the law, the valid components are preserved. This process helps maintain the integrity of the Constitution while ensuring that legal frameworks remain functional and just.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 5
Save
Why is the doctrine of severability considered crucial for the Indian legal system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 5
The doctrine of severability is considered crucial for the Indian legal system because it allows for the protection of citizens' rights and the upholding of the rule of law. By employing this doctrine, the legal system can strike a balance between safeguarding constitutional principles and ensuring that laws remain just and functional.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 6
Save
How does the doctrine of severability impact laws that contain both valid and invalid parts?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 6
When a law contains both valid and invalid parts that are so intertwined they cannot be separated, the doctrine of severability ensures that the valid components are preserved while the unconstitutional elements are removed. This process allows the legal system to maintain functionality and justice by upholding the rule of law while protecting citizens' rights.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 7
Save
In the context of the doctrine of severability, what happens if a law's valid and invalid parts are so intertwined that they cannot be separated?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 7
In cases where the valid and invalid parts of a law are so interconnected that they cannot be separated, the entire law may be declared void. This ensures that the integrity of the Constitution is maintained, even if it means that the entire law must be struck down. This process is essential for upholding the rule of law while preserving the constitutional framework.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 8
Save
Which landmark case illustrated the application of the doctrine of severability by removing a specific unconstitutional section while leaving the rest of the law intact and effective?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 8
The case of A.K Gopalan vs State of Madras demonstrated the doctrine of severability in action. In this instance, the court ruled that a particular section of a law (section 14) was unconstitutional and could be removed while preserving the validity of the remaining sections. This landmark case serves as a significant example of how the legal system distinguishes between valid and invalid components of laws.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 9
Save
How does the doctrine of severability help in balancing the protection of citizens' rights with upholding the rule of law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 9
The doctrine of severability plays a crucial role in striking a balance between protecting citizens' rights and upholding the rule of law by allowing courts to remove unconstitutional elements from laws while preserving the valid portions. This approach ensures that laws remain functional and just, safeguarding both the integrity of the Constitution and citizens' rights.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 10
Save
In the legal case of D.S. Nakara vs Union of India, what action did the Court take regarding conflicting portions of the law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 10
In the case of D.S. Nakara vs Union of India, the Court identified and nullified the conflicting portion of the law, ensuring that the valid parts could operate independently without being affected by the invalid section. This legal approach allows the functioning of the valid sections while removing those that contradict the constitution, ensuring a balanced legal framework.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 11
Save
What was the outcome in the legal case of State of Bombay vs F.N. Balsara regarding the law's provisions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 11
In the case of State of Bombay vs F.N. Balsara, the entire law was declared void due to a specific provision being found unconstitutional. However, the other parts of the legal framework remained unaffected and continued to be in force. This legal decision showcases the court's ability to strike down specific provisions while preserving the validity of the remaining legal framework.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 12
Save
How does the Court handle conflicting portions of a law in the context of judicial review, based on the examples provided?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 12
When faced with conflicting portions of a law, as illustrated in the examples given, the Court's approach involves identifying and nullifying the conflicting part while allowing the valid sections to remain operational. This method ensures that the legal framework can continue to function effectively by eliminating unconstitutional components while preserving the parts that align with the constitution.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 13
Save
How does the Indian judiciary handle a situation where the valid and invalid sections of a law are inseparable?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 13
When the Indian judiciary determines that the valid and invalid sections of a law are inseparable, the entire law is deemed invalid. This means that if the unconstitutional part of a law cannot be separated from the valid portions, the law as a whole is considered unconstitutional and unenforceable. This underscores the judiciary's role in upholding the constitution and ensuring that laws comply with its provisions.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 14
Save
In the context of judicial review in India, what does the concept of severability primarily refer to?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 14
In the context of judicial review in India, the concept of severability primarily refers to the assessment of whether the unconstitutional part of a law can be separated from the valid portion. This is crucial in cases where a specific provision of a law is deemed unconstitutional, and the court must decide whether the remaining parts of the law can still stand. Severability allows the court to preserve the valid portions of a law while striking down the unconstitutional parts, ensuring that the legal framework remains intact and functional.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 15
Save
What distinguishes the judiciary's power in nullifying unconstitutional acts from that of the legislature in India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 15
A key distinction between the judiciary's power in nullifying unconstitutional acts and that of the legislature in India is that the judiciary can nullify acts based on their compliance with the Indian Constitution, a power not held by the legislature. This means that the judiciary has the authority to declare laws unconstitutional if they violate the provisions of the Constitution, ensuring that the legal framework aligns with the supreme law of the land. This underscores the judiciary's role as a guardian of the constitutionality of laws in India.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 16
Save
When the judiciary determines if the unconstitutional part of a law can be separated from the valid portion, what action is taken if the valid and invalid sections are deemed inseparable?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 16
If the valid and invalid sections of a law are found to be inseparable, the entire law is deemed invalid. This is because the unconstitutional parts cannot be separated from the valid portions, resulting in the law as a whole being considered invalid.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 17
Save
In the context of the burden of proof related to laws conflicting with Fundamental Rights, what is the responsibility of the individual claiming a violation?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 17
When claiming that a law violates Fundamental Rights, individuals bear the burden of proving that their specific rights have been infringed upon by the law in question. This burden of proof requires them to provide evidence and arguments demonstrating how the law directly impacts their Fundamental Rights, highlighting the necessity to protect these rights within the legal framework.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 18
Save
What happens if a disputed provision conflicts with Fundamental Rights but separating it renders the entire law ineffective?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 18
If a disputed provision conflicts with Fundamental Rights, and separating it from the rest of the law renders the entire statute ineffective, the courts have the authority to invalidate the entire statute. This decision is made to ensure that the law as a whole upholds the constitution and does not violate Fundamental Rights, even if it means striking down the entire statute to maintain legal integrity and protect individual rights effectively.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 19
Save
When the Supreme Court of India declares a law unconstitutional, what is the legal implication according to Article 141 of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 19
According to Article 141 of the Indian Constitution, when the Supreme Court deems a law unconstitutional, its decision is binding on all courts across India. This establishes a precedent that must be adhered to by all other courts in the nation. This legal implication ensures uniformity in the interpretation and application of laws throughout the country.
Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 20
Save
What is the significance of a Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of a law being considered a "Judgment in rem"?
Detailed Solution for Test: Doctrine of Severability - Question 20
When the Supreme Court's ruling on the constitutionality of a law is termed a "Judgment in rem," it means that the decision applies universally to all individuals in the country, not just those directly involved in the case. This sets a standard for future cases related to the same law, ensuring consistency and predictability in legal outcomes.
207 docs|219 tests
Join Course
Information about Test: Doctrine of Severability Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Doctrine of Severability solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Doctrine of Severability, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Doctrine of Severability

Find all the important questions for Doctrine of Severability at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Doctrine of Severability with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Doctrine of Severability syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Doctrine of Severability resources.

Doctrine of Severability MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Doctrine of Severability within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Doctrine of Severability Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Doctrine of Severability with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup