Test: Factual Passages - 2 - Class 11 MCQ

Direction: Read the following passage carefully:

It’s not cool to be fat, but that hasn’t stopped an obesity epidemic from occurring among young Americans. Childhood obesity increased from 5% in 1964 to about 13% in 1994. Today it’s about 20%, and rising. Children, on average, spend five to six hours a day involved in sedentary activities like watching TV, using the computer, and playing video games, which is partly to blame for this rising rate. Maybe it wouldn’t matter if they were active enough at other times, but most of them aren’t.

To make matters worse, children are bombarded with television advertisements for fast food chains and other providers of high-fat, high-sugar meals and snacks. These highly effective advertising campaigns, combined with a physically inactive lifestyle, have produced a generation of children who are at high risk for medical conditions associated with obesity.

The main health threat is the early development of type 2 diabetes (adult onset), particularly in children with a family history of the disease. Doctors report an increase in the number of young adolescents developing type 2 diabetes, which can lead to heart disease, high blood pressure, kidney disease, stroke, limb amputations, and blindness. People who develop diabetes in adolescence face a decreased quality of life and a shorter life expectancy, particularly if the disease progresses without treatment. It’s a scary prospect for our children, but in many cases, obesity and diabetes are preventable.

When kids spend most of their free time sitting in front of TVs and computers, they aren’t outside running, jumping, or participating in team sports that would keep their weight down. Parents should set limits on the time their children spend in passive activities. Pediatricians recommend restricting children to one or two hours a day in front of the TV and computer combined, although older children may need additional time for learning activities.

Parent involvement remains the most important key to healthy diets for our children. Programs to educate parents about nutrition are essential. Fast foods should be eaten only in moderation. Caregivers, who are often busy and in a hurry, must avoid the temptation to take their children to fast food restaurants or buy fast food for dinner at home. Changing eating habits and lifestyles is not easy, but the benefit to our children’s health is a wonderful reward for parents willing to take on the task.

Q. Adolescents who develop diabetes may have ____ if not treated promptly.

Direction: Read the following passage carefully:

It’s not cool to be fat, but that hasn’t stopped an obesity epidemic from occurring among young Americans. Childhood obesity increased from 5% in 1964 to about 13% in 1994. Today it’s about 20%, and rising. Children, on average, spend five to six hours a day involved in sedentary activities like watching TV, using the computer, and playing video games, which is partly to blame for this rising rate. Maybe it wouldn’t matter if they were active enough at other times, but most of them aren’t.

To make matters worse, children are bombarded with television advertisements for fast food chains and other providers of high-fat, high-sugar meals and snacks. These highly effective advertising campaigns, combined with a physically inactive lifestyle, have produced a generation of children who are at high risk for medical conditions associated with obesity.

The main health threat is the early development of type 2 diabetes (adult onset), particularly in children with a family history of the disease. Doctors report an increase in the number of young adolescents developing type 2 diabetes, which can lead to heart disease, high blood pressure, kidney disease, stroke, limb amputations, and blindness. People who develop diabetes in adolescence face a decreased quality of life and a shorter life expectancy, particularly if the disease progresses without treatment. It’s a scary prospect for our children, but in many cases, obesity and diabetes are preventable.

When kids spend most of their free time sitting in front of TVs and computers, they aren’t outside running, jumping, or participating in team sports that would keep their weight down. Parents should set limits on the time their children spend in passive activities. Pediatricians recommend restricting children to one or two hours a day in front of the TV and computer combined, although older children may need additional time for learning activities.

Parent involvement remains the most important key to healthy diets for our children. Programs to educate parents about nutrition are essential. Fast foods should be eaten only in moderation. Caregivers, who are often busy and in a hurry, must avoid the temptation to take their children to fast food restaurants or buy fast food for dinner at home. Changing eating habits and lifestyles is not easy, but the benefit to our children’s health is a wonderful reward for parents willing to take on the task.

Q. The word _____ in para 1 means ‘inactive’.

Direction: Read the following passage carefully:

It’s not cool to be fat, but that hasn’t stopped an obesity epidemic from occurring among young Americans. Childhood obesity increased from 5% in 1964 to about 13% in 1994. Today it’s about 20%, and rising. Children, on average, spend five to six hours a day involved in sedentary activities like watching TV, using the computer, and playing video games, which is partly to blame for this rising rate. Maybe it wouldn’t matter if they were active enough at other times, but most of them aren’t.

To make matters worse, children are bombarded with television advertisements for fast food chains and other providers of high-fat, high-sugar meals and snacks. These highly effective advertising campaigns, combined with a physically inactive lifestyle, have produced a generation of children who are at high risk for medical conditions associated with obesity.

The main health threat is the early development of type 2 diabetes (adult onset), particularly in children with a family history of the disease. Doctors report an increase in the number of young adolescents developing type 2 diabetes, which can lead to heart disease, high blood pressure, kidney disease, stroke, limb amputations, and blindness. People who develop diabetes in adolescence face a decreased quality of life and a shorter life expectancy, particularly if the disease progresses without treatment. It’s a scary prospect for our children, but in many cases, obesity and diabetes are preventable.

When kids spend most of their free time sitting in front of TVs and computers, they aren’t outside running, jumping, or participating in team sports that would keep their weight down. Parents should set limits on the time their children spend in passive activities. Pediatricians recommend restricting children to one or two hours a day in front of the TV and computer combined, although older children may need additional time for learning activities.

Parent involvement remains the most important key to healthy diets for our children. Programs to educate parents about nutrition are essential. Fast foods should be eaten only in moderation. Caregivers, who are often busy and in a hurry, must avoid the temptation to take their children to fast food restaurants or buy fast food for dinner at home. Changing eating habits and lifestyles is not easy, but the benefit to our children’s health is a wonderful reward for parents willing to take on the task.

Q. The word _____ in para 3 means ‘ to become smaller or weaker’.

Direction: Read the following passage carefully:

Delhi tried very hard, but it was not enough. In the run up to D-Day, the sound of firecrackers had not been heard. The Supreme Court’s ban on its sale had made it difficult to acquire, but many people, including schoolchildren, had decided to break tradition for clean air. And until 7 pm on Diwali, most neighborhoods were quiet. Around that time the first sound of firecrackers exploding was heard, slowly building to a crescendo. But it was nowhere near the blitzkrieg of the past, not even half of it. And long before midnight, it was all over.

The bad news broke at dawn. It was a visibly smoggy morning. Air pollution levels peaked on Diwali night and remained dangerously high through Friday afternoon, as reflected in real-time monitoring data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC).

The CPCB, however, pointed to a silver lining. He said this year’s Air Quality Index (AQI) was better than Diwali’s in the past two years despite the harsh weather conditions. At Diwali last year (October 30, 2016), the city’s average AQI was in the “serious” category at 426, while the year before (November 11, 2015), it had been in the “very poor” category. ” at 327. This time, it was marginally lower at 326.

There are so many factors that affect air quality, from wind speed and direction to crop stubble burning in neighboring states, that it’s hard to definitively identify the main culprit. What must be recognized, however, is that at least most people are willing to stick with what may seem like unpleasant decisions for a better quality of life.

However, the data is troubling informed observers, particularly the massive spikes in levels of PM 2.5 (respirable fine particulate matter pollutants) and PM 10 (coarse particulate matter pollutants) on Thursday night after 10 p.m. p.m. Delhi peaked at 656 micrograms per cubic meter around midnight.

However, the data also shows that despite unfavorable weather conditions, the air quality at Diwali this year was better than last year. It hadn’t been as good in the two days before Diwali due to the intrusion of humid air from the southeast, coupled with prevailing calm wind conditions. The average mixing height (the height at which smoke or air rises, mixes and disperses) recorded on October 18 and 19 was 547 meters and 481 meters, respectively, according to the CPCB. It must be at least 1000 meters for a correct dispersion.

Q. In the run-up to D-Day, the sound of firecrackers had not been heard because the

Direction: Read the following passage carefully:

Delhi tried very hard, but it was not enough. In the run up to D-Day, the sound of firecrackers had not been heard. The Supreme Court’s ban on its sale had made it difficult to acquire, but many people, including schoolchildren, had decided to break tradition for clean air. And until 7 pm on Diwali, most neighborhoods were quiet. Around that time the first sound of firecrackers exploding was heard, slowly building to a crescendo. But it was nowhere near the blitzkrieg of the past, not even half of it. And long before midnight, it was all over.

The bad news broke at dawn. It was a visibly smoggy morning. Air pollution levels peaked on Diwali night and remained dangerously high through Friday afternoon, as reflected in real-time monitoring data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC).

The CPCB, however, pointed to a silver lining. He said this year’s Air Quality Index (AQI) was better than Diwali’s in the past two years despite the harsh weather conditions. At Diwali last year (October 30, 2016), the city’s average AQI was in the “serious” category at 426, while the year before (November 11, 2015), it had been in the “very poor” category. ” at 327. This time, it was marginally lower at 326.

There are so many factors that affect air quality, from wind speed and direction to crop stubble burning in neighboring states, that it’s hard to definitively identify the main culprit. What must be recognized, however, is that at least most people are willing to stick with what may seem like unpleasant decisions for a better quality of life.

However, the data is troubling informed observers, particularly the massive spikes in levels of PM 2.5 (respirable fine particulate matter pollutants) and PM 10 (coarse particulate matter pollutants) on Thursday night after 10 p.m. p.m. Delhi peaked at 656 micrograms per cubic meter around midnight.

However, the data also shows that despite unfavorable weather conditions, the air quality at Diwali this year was better than last year. It hadn’t been as good in the two days before Diwali due to the intrusion of humid air from the southeast, coupled with prevailing calm wind conditions. The average mixing height (the height at which smoke or air rises, mixes and disperses) recorded on October 18 and 19 was 547 meters and 481 meters, respectively, according to the CPCB. It must be at least 1000 meters for a correct dispersion.

Q. The ‘bad news’ that broke at dawn was that

Direction: Read the following passage carefully:

Delhi tried very hard, but it was not enough. In the run up to D-Day, the sound of firecrackers had not been heard. The Supreme Court’s ban on its sale had made it difficult to acquire, but many people, including schoolchildren, had decided to break tradition for clean air. And until 7 pm on Diwali, most neighborhoods were quiet. Around that time the first sound of firecrackers exploding was heard, slowly building to a crescendo. But it was nowhere near the blitzkrieg of the past, not even half of it. And long before midnight, it was all over.

The bad news broke at dawn. It was a visibly smoggy morning. Air pollution levels peaked on Diwali night and remained dangerously high through Friday afternoon, as reflected in real-time monitoring data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC).

The CPCB, however, pointed to a silver lining. He said this year’s Air Quality Index (AQI) was better than Diwali’s in the past two years despite the harsh weather conditions. At Diwali last year (October 30, 2016), the city’s average AQI was in the “serious” category at 426, while the year before (November 11, 2015), it had been in the “very poor” category. ” at 327. This time, it was marginally lower at 326.

There are so many factors that affect air quality, from wind speed and direction to crop stubble burning in neighboring states, that it’s hard to definitively identify the main culprit. What must be recognized, however, is that at least most people are willing to stick with what may seem like unpleasant decisions for a better quality of life.

However, the data is troubling informed observers, particularly the massive spikes in levels of PM 2.5 (respirable fine particulate matter pollutants) and PM 10 (coarse particulate matter pollutants) on Thursday night after 10 p.m. p.m. Delhi peaked at 656 micrograms per cubic meter around midnight.

However, the data also shows that despite unfavorable weather conditions, the air quality at Diwali this year was better than last year. It hadn’t been as good in the two days before Diwali due to the intrusion of humid air from the southeast, coupled with prevailing calm wind conditions. The average mixing height (the height at which smoke or air rises, mixes and disperses) recorded on October 18 and 19 was 547 meters and 481 meters, respectively, according to the CPCB. It must be at least 1000 meters for a correct dispersion.

Q. The AQI levels after Diwali this year were

Direction: Read the following passage carefully:

Delhi tried very hard, but it was not enough. In the run up to D-Day, the sound of firecrackers had not been heard. The Supreme Court’s ban on its sale had made it difficult to acquire, but many people, including schoolchildren, had decided to break tradition for clean air. And until 7 pm on Diwali, most neighborhoods were quiet. Around that time the first sound of firecrackers exploding was heard, slowly building to a crescendo. But it was nowhere near the blitzkrieg of the past, not even half of it. And long before midnight, it was all over.

The bad news broke at dawn. It was a visibly smoggy morning. Air pollution levels peaked on Diwali night and remained dangerously high through Friday afternoon, as reflected in real-time monitoring data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC).

The CPCB, however, pointed to a silver lining. He said this year’s Air Quality Index (AQI) was better than Diwali’s in the past two years despite the harsh weather conditions. At Diwali last year (October 30, 2016), the city’s average AQI was in the “serious” category at 426, while the year before (November 11, 2015), it had been in the “very poor” category. ” at 327. This time, it was marginally lower at 326.

There are so many factors that affect air quality, from wind speed and direction to crop stubble burning in neighboring states, that it’s hard to definitively identify the main culprit. What must be recognized, however, is that at least most people are willing to stick with what may seem like unpleasant decisions for a better quality of life.

However, the data is troubling informed observers, particularly the massive spikes in levels of PM 2.5 (respirable fine particulate matter pollutants) and PM 10 (coarse particulate matter pollutants) on Thursday night after 10 p.m. p.m. Delhi peaked at 656 micrograms per cubic meter around midnight.

However, the data also shows that despite unfavorable weather conditions, the air quality at Diwali this year was better than last year. It hadn’t been as good in the two days before Diwali due to the intrusion of humid air from the southeast, coupled with prevailing calm wind conditions. The average mixing height (the height at which smoke or air rises, mixes and disperses) recorded on October 18 and 19 was 547 meters and 481 meters, respectively, according to the CPCB. It must be at least 1000 meters for a correct dispersion.

Q. There will be no air pollution if