Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions

Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions below.
Solutions of Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 1

What principle does the doctrine-ultra-vires serve as a foundation for in administrative law?

Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 1
The doctrine-ultra-vires forms the cornerstone of administrative law, specifically enabling judicial review to oversee administrative actions. Judicial review ensures that administrative actions are conducted within the authority granted and do not exceed the legal boundaries. It serves as a check on administrative power, ensuring accountability and adherence to the rule of law.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 2

What was the central issue in the case of Roberts v. Hopwood?

Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 2
In Roberts v. Hopwood, the central issue revolved around the decision to pay above-average wages, which the court deemed unreasonable due to legal obligations. This case highlighted the importance of decisions made by administrative authorities being justifiable and compliant with legal standards.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 3

What criteria did the court outline in the case of Neha Jain v. University of Delhi for reviewing administrative actions?

Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 3
In Neha Jain v. University of Delhi, the court delineated review criteria for administrative actions, including checking for malice, jurisdictional overreach, discrimination, reasonableness, constitutional compliance, and legal support. These criteria ensure that administrative decisions are made fairly and in accordance with the law.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 4
In which case did the court permit random searches on patients without consent for medical research purposes?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 4
In the case of R v. Broadmoor Special Hospital Authority, the court authorized random searches on patients without their consent for medical research purposes. This decision raised ethical considerations regarding the balance between medical research needs and individual rights to privacy and consent.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 5
What does procedural impropriety primarily refer to in administrative actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 5
Procedural impropriety in administrative actions primarily refers to the failure to adhere to proper procedures and regulations, including the principles of natural justice. This failure can result in administrative actions being reviewed for fairness and procedural correctness.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 6
In the case of Bradbury vs Enfield London Borough Council, what led to the court ruling against the council?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 6
The court ruled against the council in the Bradbury vs Enfield London Borough Council case due to their neglect of essential public policy requirements, which resulted in a breach of procedural standards.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 7
What did the court emphasize in the case study of Ridge vs Baldwin regarding administrative actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 7
In the case study of Ridge vs Baldwin, the court emphasized the importance of upholding procedural fairness in all administrative actions, highlighting the mandatory nature of following the principles of natural justice under all circumstances.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 8
How is procedural impropriety significant in reviewing administrative actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 8
Procedural impropriety is significant in reviewing administrative actions as it serves as a basis for assessing procedural standards to ensure that proper procedures and regulations, including the principles of natural justice, are followed.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 9
What consequence did the council face in the Bradbury vs Enfield London Borough Council case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 9
In the Bradbury vs Enfield London Borough Council case, the council faced the consequence of a court ruling against them due to their breach of procedural standards, stemming from neglecting essential public policy requirements.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 10
What fundamental right was established by the Aylesbury Mushroom Case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 10
The Aylesbury Mushroom Case set a precedent by establishing the fundamental right for individuals affected by judicial or administrative decisions to be given a chance to present their case and be heard. This crucial principle ensures that people have the opportunity to voice their concerns and defend their interests when decisions that affect them are being made.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 11
In the context of administrative actions, what does the principle of proportionality entail?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 11
Proportionality in administrative actions involves striking a balance between means and ends, ensuring that the measures taken align appropriately with the intended outcomes. This principle emphasizes the importance of reasonableness and scrutiny by the courts to ensure that decisions made by administrative bodies are fair and just.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 12
Which legal precedent highlighted the evaluation of discretionary powers of the executive branch through the doctrine of proportionality?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 12
In the case of Sardar Singh vs Union of India, the judiciary deemed the military's actions as arbitrary and the penalties as excessively harsh. This case showcased how the doctrine of proportionality aids in evaluating the discretionary powers of the executive branch, emphasizing the importance of keeping such powers in check to ensure fairness and justice.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 13
How does the principle of natural justice relate to individuals affected by judicial or administrative decisions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 13
The principle of natural justice, as established by the Aylesbury Mushroom Case, ensures that individuals affected by judicial or administrative decisions have the right to be heard and present their case. This principle is essential in safeguarding the interests of individuals and upholding fairness and transparency in decision-making processes.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 14
In what scenario may a decision made by a public entity be deemed illegal?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 14
A decision by a public entity may be considered illegal if the decision-maker wrongly exercises a power or uses it for an improper purpose. This highlights the importance of ensuring that powers are utilized appropriately and in alignment with legal frameworks to prevent illegality in administrative actions.
Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 15
Why does illegality serve as a basis for the judicial review of administrative actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions - Question 15
Illegality serves as a foundation for the judicial review of administrative actions to uphold the rule of law and ensure accountability. Judicial review helps maintain the legality and fairness of administrative decisions, promoting transparency and adherence to legal standards within governing bodies.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Grounds for Judicial Review of Administrative Actions, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams