GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Tests  >  Test: Let's Meet Again - GMAT MCQ

Test: Let's Meet Again - GMAT MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Let's Meet Again

Test: Let's Meet Again for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Test: Let's Meet Again questions and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus.The Test: Let's Meet Again MCQs are made for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Let's Meet Again below.
Solutions of Test: Let's Meet Again questions in English are available as part of our course for GMAT & Test: Let's Meet Again solutions in Hindi for GMAT course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Let's Meet Again | 15 questions in 30 minutes | Mock test for GMAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for GMAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 1

Recently, hopes that the European Central Bank will reach a deal to help  Spain and Italy borrow at cheaper rates has nudged financial markets higher.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 1
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: The subject is "hopes" (plural), so the verb must be plural ("have" instead of "has").

  • Parallelism: "Have nudged financial markets to higher levels" is more precise than "higher" (which is comparative but lacks clarity).

  • Why not others?

    • A: Incorrect singular verb "has."

    • C: Same issue as A.

    • D: Incorrect past tense "nudged" (present perfect "have nudged" is needed for recent actions).

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 2

Critical Reasoning, practitioners of which collect data through mathematical and logical approaches, is a field of reasoning which assumes the idea that math and logic are inseparable.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 2
  • Clarity & Conciseness: "Collect data through mathematical and logical approaches" is grammatically correct and concise.

  • Why not others?

    • B: Redundant "to them."

    • C: Changes meaning (implies practitioners are the approaches).

    • D: Incorrect plural verb "are" (subject "Critical Reasoning" is singular).

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 3

James Bond’s action methods and his areas of expertise – the separation into classes by difficulty, the reduction of risks, the completion of state-of-the art action styles – was as radical in his own movies as it is standard for ours.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 3
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: "Methods and areas" (plural) require "were" and "they are."

  • Why not others?

    • A: Incorrect singular "was" and "it."

    • C: Incorrect past perfect "had been" and singular "it."

    • D: Incomplete comparison ("as" is missing).

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 4

Wizius Careers’ range of programmes have been developed to fulfill your needs whether you intend to take the GMAT, GRE, SAT, ACT, or LSAT, and whatever your background.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 4
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: "Range" (singular) requires "has been developed."

  • Why not others?

    • A/C: Incorrect plural "have."

    • B: Incorrect "if" (changes meaning) and "or whatever" (ungrammatical).

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 5

Thinking about a question or working for a solution on the paper leads to oversleeping.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 5
  • Singular Verb: The subject is a singular idea ("Thinking or working"), so "leads" is correct.

  • Why not others?

    • B: Incorrect plural "lead."

    • C: Changes meaning ("and" implies both actions are required).

    • D: Same as C.

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 6

Mathematical analysis of specific problem solving strategies offer limited insight, largely because of the wide variety of types and topics of questions and due to the lack of an objective way to classify them by strategy.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 6
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: "Analysis" (singular) requires "offers."

  • Parallelism: "Because of X and the lack of Y" is cleaner than "due to" redundancy.

  • Why not D? D repeats "due to," breaking parallelism.

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 7

The combination of top ranked schools and future prospects on GMAT relative to its cost are what drive students.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 7
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: "Combination" (singular) requires "is" and "drives."

  • Pronoun Agreement: "Its cost" correctly refers to "combination."

  • Why not others?

    • A/B: Incorrect plural "are."

    • C: Awkward progressive tense ("is driving").

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 8

Starting Monday, Wal-Mart Stores is planning to offer one free test on its website for many tests, including GMAT and GRE. 

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 8
  • Verb Tense: "Is planning" is correct for future plans.

  • Why not others?

    • B: Incorrect plural "plan" (subject is singular "Wal-Mart Stores").

    • C: "Plans" is factual, not future-oriented.

    • D: Redundant "will plan."

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 9

In the next few weeks, both the Wizius Careers and the Procation is planning to release independent, and possibly conflicting, reports about online testing.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 9
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: "Both X and Y" (plural) requires "are planning."

  • Why not others?

    • A: Incorrect singular "is."

    • B: Missing "both."

    • D: Redundant "as well as."

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 10

Among the 2,300 sources of GMAT websites Plank has mapped so far, nothing resembles the GMATclub, that stretches across more than required information on questions and the information on admissions. 

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 10
  • Relative Pronoun: "Which" is correct for non-restrictive clauses (GMATclub is already specified).

  • Parallelism: "From questions to admissions" is clearer.

  • Why not others?

    • A/B: Incorrect "that" (restrictive).

    • C: Wordy ("starting from").

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 11

Critical Reasoning as well as other question types developed by the GMAT tests understanding, checks logical reasoning, create confusion and provide reasoning to students.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 11
  • Parallel Verbs: "Test, check, create, provide" must all be plural to agree with "Critical Reasoning and other types."

  • Why not others?

    • A: Incorrect singular "tests."

    • B: Inconsistent "provides."

    • C: Changes meaning ("in addition to" is not parallel).

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 12

Every Prime minister since the beginning of the 1971 war has opted for a check on the arms deal with Pakistan.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 12
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: "Every Prime minister" (singular) requires "has."

  • Why not others?

    • B: Incorrect plural "have."

    • C: Incorrect future tense.

    • D: "All Prime ministers" would need "have."

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 13

Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures. 

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 13
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: "Experiments" (plural) require "suggest" and "increases" (for "engaging students").

  • Pronoun Agreement: "Their" (students), not "its."

  • Why not others?

    • A: Incorrect singular "suggests" and "its."

    • B/D: Awkward phrasing.

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 14

Like Broccoli, cereals provides a high content of protein and can taste great if it is mixed with mustard and sweet onion creams.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 14
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: "Cereals" (plural) require "provide" and "they are mixed."

  • Comparison: "Like Broccoli" is correct (not "As Broccoli," which implies role).

  • Why not A? A incorrectly uses "it" (singular) for "cereals."

Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 15

Among the emotions on display in the negotiating room were anger for repeatedly raising the issue over and over again and preventing the raw wounds from earlier battles from ever beginning to heal.

Detailed Solution for Test: Let's Meet Again - Question 15
  • Conciseness: "Was anger for repeatedly raising the issue and preventing..." avoids redundancy ("over and over").

  • Why not others?

    • A/C: Redundant "over and over."

    • D: Awkward phrasing ("still raw").

Information about Test: Let's Meet Again Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Let's Meet Again solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Let's Meet Again , EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
Download as PDF