CAT  >  Test: Logical Deductions - 2

# Test: Logical Deductions - 2

Test Description

## 10 Questions MCQ Test Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) | Test: Logical Deductions - 2

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 for CAT 2023 is part of Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) preparation. The Test: Logical Deductions - 2 questions and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus.The Test: Logical Deductions - 2 MCQs are made for CAT 2023 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 below.
Solutions of Test: Logical Deductions - 2 questions in English are available as part of our Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) for CAT & Test: Logical Deductions - 2 solutions in Hindi for Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Logical Deductions - 2 | 10 questions in 10 minutes | Mock test for CAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) for CAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
 1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you?
Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 1

### Direction: In the following question, two statements are given followed by three or four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All branches are flowers. All flowers are leaves. Conclusions: I. All branches are leaves. II. All leaves are branches. III. All flowers are branches. IV. Some leaves are branches.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 1

Since both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'All branches are leaves'. Thus, I follows. IV is the converse of this conclusion and so it also holds.

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 2

### Direction: In the following question, two statements are given followed by three or four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All aeroplanes are trains. Some trains are chairs. Conclusions: I. Some aeroplanes are chairs. II. Some chairs are aeroplanes. III. Some chairs are trains. IV. Some trains are aeroplanes.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 2

Since the middle term 'trains' is not distributed even once in the/premises, no definite conclusion follows. However, III is the converse of the second premise while IV is the converse of the first premise. So, both of them hold.

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 3

### Direction: In the following question, two statements are given followed by three or four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All politicians are honest. All honest are fair. Conclusions: I. Some honest are politicians. II. No honest is politician. III. Some fair are politicians. IV. All fair are politicians.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 3

Clearly, it follows that 'All politicians are fair'. I is the converse of the first premise, while III is the converse of the above conclusion. So, both I and III hold.

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 4

Direction: In the following question, two statements are given followed by three or four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: Some clothes are marbles. Some marbles are bags.

Conclusions:
I. No cloth is a bag.
II. All marbles are bags.
III. Some bags are clothes.
IV. No marble is a cloth.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 4

Since both the premises are particular, no definite conclusion follows. However, I and III involve only the extreme terms and form a complementary pair. Thus, either I or III follows.

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 5

Direction: In the following question, two statements are given followed by three or four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: Some tables are TVs. Some TVs are radios.

Conclusions:
I.
IV. All TVs are tables.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 5

Since both the premises are particular, no definite conclusion follows.

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 6

Direction: In the following question, two statements are given followed by three or four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: All terrorists are guilty. All terrorists are criminals.

Conclusions:
I.
Either all criminals are guilty or all guilty are criminals.
II. Some guilty persons are criminals.
III. Generally criminals are guilty.
IV. Crime and guilt go together.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 6

Since the middle term 'terrorists' is distributed twice in the premises, the conclusion cannot be universal. So, it follows that 'Some guilty persons are criminals'. Thus, II holds.

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 7

Direction: In the following question, two statements are given followed by three or four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: Some books are pens. No pen is pencil.

Conclusions:
I.
Some pens are books.
II. Some pencils are books.
III. Some books are not pencils.
IV. All pencils are books.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 7

Since one premise is particular and the other negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term. Thus, III follows. I is the converse of the first premise and so it also holds.

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 8

Direction: In the following question, two statements are given followed by three or four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: Some houses are offices. Some offices are schools.

Conclusions:
I.
Some schools are houses.
II. Some offices are houses.
III. No house is school.
IV. Some schools are offices.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 8

Since both the premises are particular, no definite conclusion follows. However, I and III involve only the extreme terms and form a complementary pair. So, either I or III follows. II is the converse of the first premise while IV is the converse of the second premise. Thus, both of them hold.

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 9

Direction: In the following question, three statements are given followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and TV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: All buildings are windows. No toys is building. Some tigers are toys.

Conclusions:
I.
Some tigers are buildings.
II. Some windows are tigers.
III. All toys are tigers.
IV. Some windows are toys.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 9

No toy is building. All buildings are windows.

Since the middle term 'buildings' is distributed twice and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term.

So, it follows that 'Some windows are not toys'.

Some tigers are toys. No toy is building.

Since one premise is particular and the other premise is negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some tigers are not buildings'.

Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 10

Direction: In the following question, three statements are given followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and TV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: Some papers are cats. All cats are bats. No bat is horse.

Conclusions:
I. Some papers are horses.
II. No horse is cat.
III. Some bats are papers.
IV. All papers are bats.

Detailed Solution for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 - Question 10

Some papers are cats. All cats are bats.

Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some papers are bats'. III is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds.

All cats are bats. No bat is horse.

Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'No cat is horse'. II is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds.

Some papers are bats. No bat is horse.

Since one premise is particular and the other negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some papers are not horses'.

## Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI)

96 videos|90 docs|119 tests
 Use Code STAYHOME200 and get INR 200 additional OFF Use Coupon Code
Information about Test: Logical Deductions - 2 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Logical Deductions - 2 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Logical Deductions - 2, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

## Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI)

96 videos|90 docs|119 tests

### How to Prepare for CAT

Read our guide to prepare for CAT which is created by Toppers & the best Teachers