All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka

Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka below.
Solutions of Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 1
Save

What was the key issue at the center of the legal case of Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka in 1992?

Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 1
The legal case of Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka in 1992 primarily focused on the legality of the additional fees imposed by private educational institutions for admitting students to professional courses. This case highlighted the challenges faced by economically disadvantaged individuals in accessing higher education due to these additional financial burdens. It underscored the significance of addressing the financial barriers to education to ensure equal opportunities for all students.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 2
Save

During the surge of private schools and colleges in India in the early 1990s, what additional fee could institutions levy for professional courses, based on the principles of supply and demand?

Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 2
In the context of the establishment of private educational institutions in India during the early 1990s, the additional fee that institutions could levy for professional courses, based on the principles of supply and demand, was termed as the capitation fee. This fee was distinct from regular tuition fees and could vary depending on the demand for a particular course. It was often a significant financial burden for students and their families, contributing to the issue of affordability and access to education.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 3
Save

What was the annual tuition fee set for students admitted to "Government seats" in private Medical Colleges in Karnataka, as outlined by the notice issued on June 5, 1989?

Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 3
The annual tuition fee set for students admitted to "Government seats" in private Medical Colleges in Karnataka, as outlined by the notice issued on June 5, 1989, was Rs. 2,000 per year. This fee structure aimed to regulate the costs for students admitted to these specific seats, ensuring affordability and access to medical education for deserving candidates.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 4
Save

Why did the college justify charging higher tuition fees from students not admitted under "Government seats"?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 4

The college justified charging higher tuition fees from students not admitted under "Government seats" by stating that these students were perceived to be without merit and less likely to contribute academically. They argued that the higher fees were necessary to cover educational expenses for this specific group of students. This justification aimed to address the financial burden imposed by students who did not qualify for admission under the government seats category.

Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 5
Save
According to the Karnataka Private Medical Colleges Association and the arguments presented, why was the collection of capitation fees deemed necessary for the sustainability of medical colleges?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 5
The Karnataka Private Medical Colleges Association and the intervenor argued that charging capitation fees was essential to sustain the functioning of medical colleges. They emphasized that the financial burden, particularly due to a significant number of government-designated seats with nominal fees, was shifted to management quota students. This allocation of financial responsibility helped in ensuring the colleges' sustainability and quality of education despite the costs incurred during the MBBS course.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 6
Save
What was the key issue addressed in the Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 6
The Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka case primarily dealt with the contentious issue of capitation fees in educational institutions. Capitation fees refer to fees charged for admission to educational institutions, often criticized for being discriminatory and against principles of fairness. In this case, the Court granted the writ petition to abolish the capitation fee, highlighting the significance of this decision in ensuring equitable access to education for all individuals.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 7
Save
What constitutional right was argued to be violated due to the imposition of capitation fees in private educational institutions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 7
The imposition of capitation fees in private educational institutions was argued to violate the fundamental right to education as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. This article ensures the right to education as a crucial element for an individual's holistic development and well-being.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 8
Save
What fundamental right was argued to be violated by charging capitation fees in private educational institutions in the Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka (1992) case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 8
The petitioner in the Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka case argued that charging capitation fees in private educational institutions violates the fundamental right to education as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Education is considered crucial for an individual's holistic development, and the imposition of capitation fees creates barriers based on financial status, thereby infringing upon this fundamental right.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 9
Save
What was the primary argument put forth by the State of Karnataka in the Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka case regarding admissions to medical and dental colleges?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 9
The State of Karnataka, as the respondent in the case, emphasized the significance of admitting students to medical and dental colleges based on merit as essential for upholding educational quality and maintaining the standards of the medical profession. This argument underscores the importance of meritocracy in the admissions process to ensure the quality and integrity of medical education and practice.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 10
Save
According to the State of Karnataka in the Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka case, why did they emphasize admitting students to medical and dental colleges based on merit?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 10
The State of Karnataka emphasized admitting students to medical and dental colleges based on merit to uphold educational quality and maintain professional standards. This approach was considered essential to ensure that students admitted to these institutions demonstrated the necessary merit to meet the standards required in the medical profession. This emphasis on merit-based admissions aimed to guarantee that the quality of education and the standards of the medical field were preserved, reflecting the State's commitment to excellence and professionalism.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 11
Save
What pivotal aspect did the Supreme Court emphasize in the Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 11
The Supreme Court's emphasis on education in the Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka case underscored its vital role in upholding human dignity and the right to life. This case marked a significant departure from viewing Directive Principles as symbolic, emphasizing their practical implications. Education was not explicitly labeled a fundamental right in this context but was deemed crucial under Article 21 of the Constitution. This underscores the critical link between education, individual dignity, and the broader constitutional framework, as highlighted by this landmark case.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 12
Save
What did the Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka judgment emphasize regarding the right to education?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 12
The Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka judgment highlighted that education is integral to the right to life under Article 21. This assertion emphasizes the significance of education as a fundamental right essential for a dignified life, comparable to access to basic necessities like food, water, and health. This judgment underscores the critical role education plays in ensuring individuals can lead dignified lives, thereby linking the right to education with the broader concept of the right to life under the Indian Constitution.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 13
Save
What fundamental aspect does the Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka judgment emphasize regarding education's significance in an individual's life?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 13
The Mohini Jain v State of Karnataka judgment underscores that education is as vital as access to fundamental necessities like food, water, and health for a dignified life. This ruling aligns with the constitutional perspective that education plays a pivotal role in ensuring a dignified existence, emphasizing its critical importance akin to basic needs.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 14
Save
How did the Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka case impact the legal landscape in India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 14
The Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka case had a significant impact on Indian legal history by emphasizing the crucial role of education in upholding an individual's dignity and right to life. This case highlighted the integration of education with fundamental rights and underscored the state's responsibility to ensure access to education, thereby fostering personal growth and reducing social disparities.
Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 15
Save

Why is education considered essential in upholding individual dignity?
Detailed Solution for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka - Question 15

Education is considered essential for personal development and seen as a means to uphold individual dignity. By providing individuals with the necessary knowledge and skills, education empowers them to lead fulfilling lives and participate meaningfully in society. This empowerment contributes to upholding the dignity of individuals by enabling them to make informed choices, engage in critical thinking, and exercise their rights effectively.

207 docs|219 tests
Join Course
Information about Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka

Find all the important questions for Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka resources.

Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup