Which of the following is called Bar-Hillel lemma?
In automata theory, the pumping lemma for context free languages, also kmown as the Bar-Hillel lemma, represents a property of all context free languages.
Which of the expressions correctly is an requirement of the pumping lemma for the context free languages?
Let L be a CFL. Then there is an integer n so that for any u that belong to language L satisfying |t| >=n, there are strings u, v, w, x, y and z satisfying
t=uvwxy
|vx|>0
|vwx|<=n For any m>=0, uvnwxny ∈ L
Let L be a CFL. Then there is an integer n so that for any u that belong to language L satisfying
|t|>=n, there are strings u, v, w, x, y and z satisfying
t=uvwxy.
Let p be the number of variables in CNF form of the context free grammar. The value of n in terms of p :
This inequation has been derived from derivation tree for t which must have height at least p+2(It has more than 2p leaf nodes, and therefore its height is >p+1).
Which of the following gives a positive result to the pumping lemma restrictions and requirements?
A positive result to the pumping lemma shows that the language is a CFL and ist contradiction or negative result shows that the given language is not a Context Free language.
Using pumping lemma, which of the following cannot be proved as ‘not a CFL’?
There are few rules in C that are context dependent. For example, declaration of a variable before it can be used.
State true or false:Statement: We cannot use Ogden’s lemma when pumping lemma fails.
Although the pumping lemma provides some information about v and x that are pumped, it says little about the location of these substrings in the string t. It can be used whenever the pumping lemma fails. Example: {apbqcrds|p=0 or q=r=s}, etc.
Which of the following cannot be filled in the blank below?
Statement: There are CFLs L1 nad L2 so that ___________is not a CFL.
A set of context free language is closed under the following operations:
a) Union
b) Concatenation
c) Kleene
The pumping lemma is often used to prove that a language is:
The pumping lemma is often used to prove that a given language L is non-context-free, by showing that arbitrarily long strings s are in L that cannot be “pumped” without producing strings outside L.
What is the pumping length of string of length x?
There exists a property of all strings in the language that are of length p, where p is the constant-called the pumping length .For a finite language L, p is equal to the maximum string length in L plus 1.
Which of the following does not obey pumping lemma for context free languages ?
: Finite languages (which are regular hence context free ) obey pumping lemma where as unrestricted languages like recursive languages do not obey pumping lemma for context free languages.
Video | 08:06 min
Doc | 4 Pages
Doc | 2 Pages
Video | 07:52 min
Test | 10 questions | 10 min
Test | 15 questions | 45 min
Test | 10 questions | 30 min
Test | 10 questions | 10 min
Test | 10 questions | 20 min