Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India

Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India below.
Solutions of Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 1

What was the type of the legal case presented in the SP Gupta vs Union of India [SP Gupta Case]?

Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 1
In the SP Gupta vs Union of India [SP Gupta Case], the type of legal case presented was a Writ Petition. A writ petition is a formal written order issued by a body with administrative or judicial jurisdiction. In this specific case, the petitioner S.P. Gupta filed a writ petition against the Union of India, which led to a significant legal judgment.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 2

Who was the Chief Justice of India during the SP Gupta vs Union of India case?

Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 2
During the SP Gupta vs Union of India case, the Chief Justice of India was Justice Y.V. Chandrachud. He presided over the bench that consisted of seven judges and played a crucial role in the legal proceedings and final judgment of the case.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 3

What was the pivotal role of SP Gupta in the landmark case of SP Gupta vs Union of India?

Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 3
SP Gupta, a significant legal figure, played a crucial role in shaping the establishment of the collegium system. As a respected pleader in the Allahabad High Court and former Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh, his involvement was pivotal in the SP Gupta vs Union of India case. His contributions were instrumental in the development and implementation of the collegium system for appointing judges in the Supreme Court and High Courts.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 4
What was the primary impact of the series of cases known as the 'Three Judges Cases' (now 'Four Judges Case') on the judiciary in India?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 4
The series of cases known as the 'Three Judges Cases' (now 'Four Judges Case') had a significant impact on the Indian judiciary by establishing a collegium system for judge appointments. This system ensured independent jurisdiction and granted the judiciary sole authority over judge appointments, without interference from other branches of the government. The cases played a crucial role in shaping the process of appointing judges in the Supreme Court and High Courts, emphasizing the importance of judicial independence in the appointment process.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 5
Who specifically challenged the appointment of Justice Murlidhar, Justice A.N. Verma, and Justice N.N. Mittal as additional judges in the case of SP Gupta vs Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 5
In the case of SP Gupta vs Union of India, it was S.P. Gupta, an advocate in the Allahabad High Court, who specifically challenged the appointment of Justice Murlidhar, Justice A.N. Verma, and Justice N.N. Mittal as additional judges. This challenge was a significant aspect of the legal battle that ensued, focusing on the issue of judicial appointments and their temporary or permanent nature.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 6
What was a key concern in the SP Gupta vs Union of India case regarding the judiciary?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 6
In the SP Gupta vs Union of India case, a significant issue raised was the independence of the judiciary and the processes governing the selection and appointment of judges in higher courts. This highlights a crucial aspect of the case where questions were raised about the autonomy and impartiality of the judiciary.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 7
What aspect of the SP Gupta vs Union of India case was related to the disclosure of communications among key legal figures?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 7
One of the issues in the SP Gupta vs Union of India case involved the disclosure of communications between the Minister of Law, the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, and the Chief Justice of India. This brought into question the transparency and accountability in the interactions and discussions among these significant legal authorities.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 8
What was one of the key contentions raised by the petitioners in the SP Gupta v Union of India case regarding the Central Government's order?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 8
One of the key contentions raised by the petitioners in the SP Gupta v Union of India case was the lack of transparency in judge appointments. They argued that the order placed undue pressure on judges to accept additional appointments or risk their professional security. This lack of transparency regarding appointments can raise concerns about judicial independence and the integrity of the judiciary.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 9
What legal argument did the respondents in the SP Gupta v Union of India case primarily use to justify non-disclosure of certain documents?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 9
The respondents in the SP Gupta v Union of India case primarily justified non-disclosure based on Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act. This section prohibits the use of unpublished documents as evidence in court. It is important to understand the legal framework surrounding the disclosure of documents in legal proceedings to maintain the integrity of the judicial process and protect sensitive information.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 10
Why did the respondents argue against the maintainability of the petitions in the SP Gupta v Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 10
The respondents in the SP Gupta v Union of India case contended that the petitions were not maintainable primarily because they argued that the petitioners did not suffer any harm as a result of the government's order. This lack of demonstrable harm was a key point in their defense against the petitions. It is essential in legal proceedings to establish standing and demonstrate harm or a violation of rights to ensure the maintainability of a petition or case before a court.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 11
In the SP Gupta v Union of India case, what legal provision did the respondents cite to justify non-disclosure based on advice given by the Council of Ministers to the President?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 11
The respondents in the SP Gupta v Union of India case cited Article 74(2) as the legal provision that protects advice given by the Council of Ministers to the President. This provision establishes the confidentiality of such advice, safeguarding it from disclosure. Article 74(2) is crucial in maintaining the integrity and privacy of communications between the Council of Ministers and the President, ensuring the smooth functioning of the executive branch.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 12
What was one of the key recommendations made by Justice Bhagwati in the case of SP Gupta vs Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 12
In the case of SP Gupta vs Union of India, Justice Bhagwati suggested forming a collegium to recommend judge appointments. This recommendation aimed to introduce a system where a group of senior judges would be responsible for making recommendations on judicial appointments, emphasizing a more transparent and consultative process in the selection of judges.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 13
According to the judgment in SP Gupta vs Union of India, what factor was deemed crucial in appointments and transfers of judges?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 13
The judgment in SP Gupta vs Union of India emphasized that appointments and transfers of judges must consider factors such as fairness, justice, and public interest. This underlines the importance of ensuring that judicial appointments and transfers are made in a manner that upholds principles of fairness, justice, and serves the public interest, thereby maintaining the integrity and credibility of the judiciary.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 14
What was the central issue in the SP Gupta vs Union of India case (1981)?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 14
The central issue in the SP Gupta vs Union of India case (1981) revolved around the constitutional validity of the Central Government's decisions regarding the non-extension of an additional judge's term and their transfer. This legal milestone in India addressed crucial matters concerning judicial appointments, transparency, and governmental accountability to the public.
Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 15
Who among the following advocated for the establishment of a collegium to recommend judicial appointments to the President in the SP Gupta case?
Detailed Solution for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India - Question 15
Justice Bhagwati advocated for the establishment of a collegium to recommend judicial appointments to the President during the SP Gupta case. This proposal aimed to enhance the transparency and efficiency of the judicial appointment process, ensuring a more rigorous and impartial selection of judges based on merit and qualifications.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: SP Gupta vs Union of India, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams