Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan

Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan below.
Solutions of Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 1

What did the case of Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan establish in relation to the Indian Constitution?

Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 1
The case of Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan is significant for establishing the concept of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution. This doctrine outlines certain elements that are beyond the reach of parliamentary amendments, emphasizing the core features essential for upholding democracy and protecting individual rights.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 2

What was the impact of Justice Khanna's ruling in the case of Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan?

Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 2
Justice Khanna's ruling in the case of Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan underscored the significance of safeguarding certain core features of the Constitution that are crucial for upholding democracy and protecting individual rights. This emphasized the immutability of these fundamental elements within the constitutional framework of India.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 3

What was the purpose of introducing Articles 31A and 31B through the Constitution (First Amendment) Act 1951 in relation to State legislative measures?

Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 3
The introduction of Articles 31A and 31B through the Constitution (First Amendment) Act 1951 aimed to assist State Legislatures in implementing their reform policies. These articles were designed to safeguard Acts related to agrarian reform in the Ninth Schedule from being deemed void or retroactively voided, thereby supporting the states in executing their reform initiatives.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 4
What was the significance of the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act 1964 in addressing challenges faced by State legislative measures related to agrarian reform?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 4
The Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act 1964 was crucial in addressing challenges encountered by State legislative measures concerning agrarian reform. This amendment aimed to safeguard the validity of Acts facing legal challenges, particularly those related to agrarian reform. By passing this amendment, Parliament sought to provide a legal framework that would protect and uphold the integrity of these Acts amidst ongoing legal disputes and uncertainties.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 5
What was the purpose of introducing Articles 31A and 31B through the Constitution (First Amendment) Act 1951?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 5
The introduction of Articles 31A and 31B through the Constitution (First Amendment) Act 1951 aimed to provide legal support to State Legislatures in implementing their agrarian reform policies. These articles were crucial in assisting State Legislatures and ensuring that Acts related to agrarian reform in the Ninth Schedule would not be void or retroactively voided. This legislative support was a significant step towards safeguarding the validity of agrarian reform measures and addressing legal challenges faced by State legislative measures.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 6
What was the purpose of adding 44 Acts to the Ninth Schedule through the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act 1964?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 6
The addition of 44 Acts to the Ninth Schedule through the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act 1964 aimed to address the ongoing legal challenges faced by State legislative measures related to agrarian reform. By adding these Acts to the Ninth Schedule, the amendment sought to safeguard the validity of these Acts and provide a legal framework to protect them from being challenged or voided retroactively. This amendment was instrumental in reinforcing the legislative support for agrarian reform measures and ensuring their continued implementation.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 7
According to the Constitution of India, can altering a fundamental right under Article 368 be classified as "law" as per Article 13(2)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 7
In the Constitution of India, Article 368 empowers Parliament to amend the Constitution. Any changes made under this article are considered as law. This provision grants Parliament the authority to make amendments to various provisions, including fundamental rights. Therefore, altering a fundamental right under Article 368 is legally classified as "law," as per the constitutional framework of India.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 8
Under the Constitution of India, is Parliament permitted to amend fundamental rights in Part III through Article 368?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 8
As per the Constitution of India, Parliament is allowed to make amendments to fundamental rights enshrined in Part III through Article 368. This article outlines the procedure for amending various provisions of the Constitution, including fundamental rights. Therefore, Parliament possesses the constitutional authority to amend fundamental rights in Part III by following the prescribed process under Article 368.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 9
What does the Ninth Schedule of the Indian Constitution primarily aim to achieve?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 9
The Ninth Schedule of the Indian Constitution serves to safeguard certain Acts and Regulations listed within it from being invalidated, even if they contradict or restrict rights in the Constitution. This provision ensures that these laws remain valid unless a competent legislature decides otherwise, thereby providing a level of protection to specific legislations.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 10
What is the significance of Article 32(1) in the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 10
Article 32(1) of the Indian Constitution guarantees that every individual has the right to directly approach the Supreme Court to enforce their fundamental rights as enshrined in the Constitution. This provision acts as a vital recourse for citizens to seek legal remedies and protection for their constitutional rights, ensuring access to justice and upholding the principles of the rule of law.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 11
What was one of the key arguments presented by the petitioners challenging the validity of the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act in the case of Sajjan Singh versus the State of Rajasthan?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 11
One of the key arguments presented by the petitioners challenging the validity of the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act was that the special procedure outlined in the proviso to Article 368, requiring ratification by a specific number of States for certain constitutional amendments, should have been followed. This contention highlighted a procedural issue related to the enactment of the amendment, emphasizing the importance of adhering to constitutional processes.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 12
What key authority does Parliament possess under Article 368 in relation to the Constitution, as highlighted in the Supreme Court's ruling discussed?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 12
Parliament, under Article 368, holds the authority to modify or change all provisions of the Constitution, including fundamental rights in Part III. This power allows Parliament to exercise control over the Constitution's provisions, ensuring flexibility for amendments while upholding the integrity of the legal framework. It's a significant aspect of constitutional law that empowers the legislative body to adapt the Constitution to evolving societal needs.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 13
What is the primary emphasis of the Supreme Court's ruling in Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan regarding Article 368 and its proviso?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 13
The Supreme Court's ruling in Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan underscored the significance of harmonizing the main part of Article 368 and its proviso to prevent either from being excessively restricted or expanded. This balance is crucial to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the constitutional amending process.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 14
What power does Parliament possess under Article 368 in relation to the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 14
Parliament, under Article 368, holds the authority to modify or change all provisions of the Constitution, encompassing fundamental rights delineated in Part III. This broad power allows Parliament to make necessary adjustments to various constitutional provisions, ensuring the adaptability and relevance of the Constitution to changing societal needs and circumstances.
Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 15
What did the Court emphasize regarding fundamental rights in Part III of the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan - Question 15
The Court emphasized that fundamental rights in Part III of the Constitution are not immutable and can be subject to future amendments. This stance highlights the Court's recognition that while fundamental rights are crucial, they are not beyond the scope of potential modifications. The Court's emphasis on this aspect signifies the evolving nature of constitutional rights within the legal framework.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams