Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India]

Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] below.
Solutions of Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 1

What was the date of the judgement in the case of Sri Sankari Prasad Singh Deo vs Union of India [Shankari Prasad Case]?

Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 1
The judgement in the case of Sri Sankari Prasad Singh Deo vs Union of India [Shankari Prasad Case] was delivered on October 5, 1951. This significant legal ruling by the Honorable Supreme Court of India marked a pivotal moment in Indian judicial history, shaping future legal interpretations and implications.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 2

Who was the Chief Justice in the bench that presided over the case of Sri Sankari Prasad Singh Deo vs Union of India [Shankari Prasad Case]?

Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 2
The Chief Justice in the bench that presided over the case of Sri Sankari Prasad Singh Deo vs Union of India [Shankari Prasad Case] was J. Hiralal Kania. His leadership and legal expertise played a crucial role in deliberating and reaching decisions that had far-reaching implications on constitutional matters in India.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 3

What issue led to legal disputes after the Indian government initiated rural reforms post-independence?

Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 3
Legal disputes arose when some individuals contested the rural reforms, citing infringement of their property rights. This issue sparked conflicts and disagreements regarding the redistribution of land among various landowners.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 4
Which high court deemed the Bihar Land Reforms Act of 1950 unconstitutional under Article 13(2) of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 4
The Patna High Court deemed the Bihar Land Reforms Act of 1950 unconstitutional under Article 13(2) of the Indian Constitution. This decision led to political discord and criticism from various quarters, including Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, who expressed disappointment over the perceived misuse of the constitution by lawyers involved in the case.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 5
What was the purpose behind the introduction of the Zamindari Abolition Act by several state legislatures?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 5
The Zamindari Abolition Act introduced by several state legislatures aimed to redistribute land from wealthy zamindars to local residents. This legislative measure was designed to address the inequities and disparities in land ownership, ensuring a more equitable distribution of land among the population.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 6
What legal action did zamindars take in response to the Constitution (First Amendment) Act of 1951?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 6
In response to the Constitution (First Amendment) Act of 1951, zamindars filed petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution, challenging the constitutionality of the Amendment Act before the Supreme Court. This legal action was a significant attempt by the zamindars to contest the validity of the newly enacted laws that impacted their rights and property ownership.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 7
How did the Shankari Prasad Case impact the legal landscape in India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 7
The Shankari Prasad Case's impact on the legal landscape of India was profound as it emphasized the power of the judiciary in upholding legislative interventions. By setting a precedent that supported constitutional amendments aimed at socio-economic reforms, the case highlighted the judiciary's role in ensuring the legality and constitutionality of such interventions. This reaffirmed the importance of legal frameworks in guiding progressive changes and maintaining the delicate balance between individual rights and broader societal interests.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 8
What was the primary significance of the Shankari Prasad Case in post-independence India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 8
The Shankari Prasad Case held significant importance in post-independence India by setting a precedent for legislative interventions. This legal juncture underscored the balance between property rights and the state's authority to implement socio-economic reforms. It highlighted the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional amendments that supported progressive changes, emphasizing the precedence of legislative actions in promoting societal welfare and development.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 9
According to the legal representative in the Shankari Prasad versus the Union of India case, which of the following statements is true regarding the authority to amend the constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 9
The legal representative in the Shankari Prasad versus the Union of India case argued that only the two houses of Parliament held the authority to amend the constitution as designated. This assertion was based on the constitutional provisions regarding the process of amending the constitution. It underscores the significance of parliamentary procedures in making amendments to the fundamental law of the land.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 10
What was the key argument put forward by the legal counsel in the Shankari Prasad Case regarding the Parliament's authority to legislate on issues concerning land?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 10
The legal counsel in the Shankari Prasad Case emphasized that matters related to land specifically fell under List 2 of the seventh schedule, which pertains to State List subjects. This meant that issues concerning land were within the jurisdiction of State Legislatures and not under the direct authority of the Parliament. Such a delineation of powers between the central and state governments is a crucial aspect of India's federal system, ensuring a division of responsibilities and powers among different levels of governance.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 11
According to the attorney representing the respondent in the Shankari Prasad Case, how many types of amendments does the Constitution provide for in its provisions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 11
The Constitution provides for three types of amendments in its provisions, as highlighted by the attorney representing the respondent in the Shankari Prasad Case. These include amendments that can be made with a simple majority, amendments that require a special majority as specified in Article 368, and amendments that need ratification by resolutions passed by at least half of the States listed in parts A and B of the First Schedule, in addition to the special majority mentioned in the second category.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 12
What is the significance of the Shankari Prasad Case in relation to Article 368 of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 12
The Shankari Prasad Case is significant as it argued for the exclusion of the provisional parliament from amending powers under Article 368 of the Indian Constitution. This case underscored the authority granted to the Parliament comprising both houses and the President to make amendments without the inclusion of the provisional parliament.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 13
Why is it important for certain amendments to require ratification by States listed in parts A and B of the First Schedule in addition to a special majority?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 13
It is essential for certain amendments to require ratification by States listed in parts A and B of the First Schedule in addition to a special majority to strengthen federalism and accommodate diverse state interests. This process ensures that states have a say in constitutional changes that may affect their rights and interests, thus promoting a more balanced and inclusive approach to constitutional amendments.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 14
What was clarified in the Shankari Prasad Case regarding the powers granted to Parliament under the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 14
The Shankari Prasad Case clarified that the powers granted to Parliament under the Constitution are not limited to what the provisional Parliament, with a single chamber, can do. This includes the power to amend the Constitution as outlined in Article 368. The case emphasized the expansive authority of Parliament to amend the Constitution within the framework provided by Article 368.
Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 15
What principle did the Shankari Prasad Case establish regarding Parliament's jurisdiction in amending fundamental rights through constitutional amendments?
Detailed Solution for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] - Question 15
The Shankari Prasad Case established the principle that Parliament holds the jurisdiction to amend fundamental rights through constitutional amendments. This ruling emphasized Parliament's authority to modify any aspect of the Constitution, including fundamental rights. It clarified that Parliament has the power to make changes to fundamental rights through the process of constitutional amendments, highlighting the flexibility and authority of the legislative body in shaping the legal framework of the country.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India] solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Shankari Prasad Case [Shankari Prasad vs Union of India], EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams