All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Tests  >  Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI)  >  Test: Syllogism - 2 - CAT MCQ

Test: Syllogism - 2 - CAT MCQ


Test Description

10 Questions MCQ Test Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) - Test: Syllogism - 2

Test: Syllogism - 2 for CAT 2024 is part of Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) preparation. The Test: Syllogism - 2 questions and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus.The Test: Syllogism - 2 MCQs are made for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Syllogism - 2 below.
Solutions of Test: Syllogism - 2 questions in English are available as part of our Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) for CAT & Test: Syllogism - 2 solutions in Hindi for Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Syllogism - 2 | 10 questions in 10 minutes | Mock test for CAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI) for CAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 1
Save

Statements: All green are blue. All blue are white.

Conclusions:

  1. Some blue are green.
  2. Some white are green.
  3. Some green are not white.
  4. All white are blue.

Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 1

 

So Option A is correct

Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 2
Save

Statements: All men are vertebrates. Some mammals are vertebrates.

Conclusions:

  1. All men are mammals.
  2. All mammals are men.
  3. Some vertebrates are mammals.
  4. All vertebrates are men.

Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 2

So Option C is correct

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 3
Save

Statements: All the phones are scales. All the scales are calculators.

Conclusions:

  1. All the calculators are scales.
  2. All the phones are calculators
  3. All the scales are phones.
  4. Some calculators are phones.

Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 3

So Option C is correct

Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 4
Save

Statements: Some pens are books. Some books are pencils.

Conclusions:

  1. Some pens are pencils.
  2. Some pencils are pens.
  3. All pencils are pens.
  4. All books are pens.
Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 4

So Option E is correct

Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 5
Save

Statements: All the goats are tigers. All the tigers are lions.

Conclusions:

  1. All the goats are lions.
  2. All the lions are goats.
  3. Some lions are goats.
  4. Some tigers are goats.
Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 5

So Option B is correct

Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 6
Save

Statements: All the books are pencils. No pencil is eraser.

Conclusions:

  1. All the pencils are books.
  2. Some erasers are books.
  3. No book is eraser.
  4. Some books are erasers.
Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 6

So Option A is correct

Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 7
Save

Statements: All the research scholars are psychologists. Some psychologists are scientists.

Conclusions:

  1. All the research scholars are scientists.
  2. Some research scholars are scientists.
  3. Some scientists are psychologists.
  4. Some psychologists are research scholars.
Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 7

So Option A is correct

Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 8
Save

Statements:
Some fruits are mangos.
All mangos are guavas.
No guava is a banana.
Conclusions:
I. All guavas are fruits.
II. Some guavas are fruits
Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 8

Some fruits are mangos.
All mangos are guavas.
I + A => I - type of conclusion
"Some fruits are guavas".
Conclusion II is Converse of it.
All mangos are guavas
No guava is a banana.
A + E => E - type of conclusion
"No mango is a banana

So Option B is correct

Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 9
Save

Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.

A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.
B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.
C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide.
E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 9

BAC is the correct option choice

TC = Instances of traffic congestion
ICM = Instances of increase in carbon monoxide in the environment
HH = Instances that are hazardous to health.
The premises state that increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health and traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment. Therefore, traffic congestion is hazardous to health.

(a) CBA is invalid, because if TC and ICM are both separately hazardous to health (HH), no definite relationship between TC and ICM necessarily follows.
(b) BDE is invalid, because the some TC that are not ICM need not necessarily be free of any hazard to health (HH); they could possibly pollute the environment with other noxious gases.

The shaded portion shows those some TC that are not ICM, but could possibly be hazardous to health (HH).

(c) CDE is invalid, because the conclusion E is a negation of one of the premises C. Another check reveals the TC is the middle term, which appears in both the premises C and D, and E, therefore, should not appear in the conclusion E, as per the basic definition of a syllogism.

Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 10
Save

Directions: Each question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.

A. All software companies employ knowledge workers.
B. Tara Tech employs knowledge workers.
C. Tara Tech is a software company.
D. Some software companies employ knowledge workers.
E. Tara Tech employs only knowledge workers.
Detailed Solution for Test: Syllogism - 2 - Question 10

ACB is the correct answer choice, as it forms a valid syllogism.

CEKW = Companies that employ knowledge workers
SC = Software companies
TT = Tara Tech

The premises state that all software companies employ knowledge workers and Tara Tech is a software company. Therefore, Tara Tech employs knowledge workers.

(a) ABC is invalid because if Tara Tech employs knowledge workers, it cannot definitely be concluded that it is a software company.
(b) CDB is invalid because if only some software companies employ knowledge workers, Tara Tech may not be among them.
(c) ACE introduces a fourth term, 'Companies that employ only knowledge workers,' and therefore violates the very definition of a syllogism, which must have 3 and only 3 terms.

88 videos|119 docs|91 tests
Join Course
Information about Test: Syllogism - 2 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Syllogism - 2 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Syllogism - 2, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for CAT

Download as PDF

Top Courses for CAT

Important Questions for Syllogism - 2

Find all the important questions for Syllogism - 2 at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Syllogism - 2 with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Syllogism - 2 syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Syllogism - 2 resources.

Syllogism - 2 MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Syllogism - 2 within the CAT exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Syllogism - 2 Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI)

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Syllogism - 2 with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup