All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Waman Rao Case - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Waman Rao Case - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Waman Rao Case

Test: Waman Rao Case for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Waman Rao Case questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Waman Rao Case MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Waman Rao Case below.
Solutions of Test: Waman Rao Case questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Waman Rao Case solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Waman Rao Case | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 1
Save

In the case of Waman Rao v. Union of India in 1981, what was the key issue examined by the Supreme Court?

Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 1
The key issue examined by the Supreme Court in the case of Waman Rao v. Union of India in 1981 involved the validity and interpretation of Article 31A of the Indian Constitution. This article was scrutinized in light of the basic structure doctrine established in the Kesavananda Bharati case. The Court's decision had significant implications for the interpretation of constitutional provisions related to property rights and governmental authority.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 2
Save

Why did the Supreme Court emphasize that the basic structure doctrine should not be applied retroactively in the Waman Rao case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 2
The Supreme Court emphasized that the basic structure doctrine should not be applied retroactively in the Waman Rao case to uphold the sanctity of decisions made before its introduction. By maintaining this stance, the Court aimed to ensure stability and continuity in legal interpretations and rulings, preserving the integrity of past judgments and legal frameworks.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 3
Save

During a state of emergency, which articles of the Constitution were suspended?

Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 3
During a state of emergency, Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution were suspended. This suspension allowed for certain rights guaranteed by these articles, such as equality before law and freedom of speech and expression, to be restricted or limited for the duration of the emergency.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 4
Save
What was the outcome when appeals were made against the High Court's judgment during the emergency period?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 4
Appeals against the High Court's judgment were dismissed during the emergency period, resulting in the judgment being upheld. This decision meant that the validity of Articles 31A and 31B, which were contested, was affirmed by the High Court despite the challenges raised against them.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 5
Save
During a state of emergency, which articles of the Constitution had their enforcement suspended?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 5
During a state of emergency, the enforcement of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution was suspended. This temporary suspension aimed to provide the government with necessary powers to address the emergency situation effectively. Article 14 guarantees the right to equality before the law, and Article 19 ensures certain freedoms such as freedom of speech and expression, assembly, association, etc. Suspending these fundamental rights during emergencies raises important questions about balancing individual liberties with the need for crisis management.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 6
Save
In the context of the Waman Rao vs. Union of India case, what event triggered the consideration of a review of the High Court's judgment?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 6
After the state of emergency ended, a petition requesting a review of the High Court's judgment was considered in the Waman Rao vs. Union of India case. This legal process highlighted the significance of post-emergency reviews and the restoration of normal legal procedures following a period of suspended constitutional rights. The case underscored the importance of judicial oversight and the rule of law in ensuring accountability and upholding constitutional principles even in challenging times.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 7
Save
Which provision in the Indian Constitution establishes the Ninth Schedule, leading to concerns about potential infringements on Fundamental Rights?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 7
Article 31B in the Indian Constitution establishes the Ninth Schedule, a provision that has been contentious due to its potential implications for Fundamental Rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution. The inclusion of certain laws in the Ninth Schedule has raised questions about their immunity from challenges based on violations of Fundamental Rights. This has led to legal debates and judicial scrutiny regarding the balance between protecting legislative actions and upholding individual rights.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 8
Save
In the context of the Supreme Court's judgments discussed, what was the primary purpose behind introducing Article 31A through the 1st Constitutional Amendment?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 8
The primary aim of introducing Article 31A through the 1st Constitutional Amendment was to bolster Zamindari Abolition Laws and address future challenges in the agricultural sector. This amendment was specifically targeted at strengthening laws related to land reforms and agricultural practices, aiming to tackle social and economic disparities in agriculture.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 9
Save
What distinction did the Supreme Court make regarding laws placed in the Ninth Schedule before and after the Kesavananda Bharati case in relation to Article 31B?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 9
The Supreme Court ruled that laws placed in the Ninth Schedule before the Kesavananda Bharati case are protected under Article 31B, shielding them from being invalidated for conflicting with Fundamental Rights. However, laws added to the Ninth Schedule after the Kesavananda Bharati case could potentially be subject to scrutiny if they are found to violate the Constitution's basic structure.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 10
Save
What does Article 31B, in conjunction with the Ninth Schedule, primarily aim to achieve in relation to laws conflicting with Fundamental Rights?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 10
Article 31B, in conjunction with the Ninth Schedule, is designed to shield laws from being invalidated for conflicting with Fundamental Rights. This provision provides a protective mechanism for laws included in the Ninth Schedule, ensuring that they are safeguarded from challenges based on Fundamental Rights violations. It serves as a crucial aspect of constitutional law, offering a framework to balance the preservation of laws with the upholding of Fundamental Rights.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 11
Save
What was the key outcome of the Court's ruling on the 40th constitutional Amendment of 1976 in relation to the Lok Sabha's term extension during the emergency period of 1975?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 11
The Court upheld the 40th constitutional Amendment of 1976, which faced scrutiny over the extension of the Lok Sabha's term during the emergency period of 1975. The judiciary deemed the Amendment lawful, considering the necessity of the measures taken during the emergency. This decision underscored the Court's recognition of the exceptional circumstances surrounding the extension and the critical role it played in addressing the challenges faced during the emergency period.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 12
Save
What was the key contention of Justice Bhagwati's dissent in the case discussed?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 12
Justice Bhagwati dissented primarily based on the majority's use of stare decisis to uphold Article 31A. He argued that the majority decision was influenced by precedent rather than a thorough consideration of the merits of Article 31A. This dissent highlights the differing perspectives within the court regarding the application of legal principles in constitutional matters.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 13
Save
In the Shankari Prasad case, what specific issue was addressed by the Court's ruling?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 13
The Shankari Prasad case focused on determining whether constitutional amendments fell within the scope of Article 13(2). The Court's ruling in this case was negative, indicating that constitutional amendments were not subject to the restrictions imposed by Article 13(2). This ruling played a significant role in defining the boundaries of constitutional amendments in India's legal framework.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 14
Save
In the context of the discussed legal cases, which case called for a reconsideration of the Shankari Prasad judgment regarding constitutional amendments?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 14
Sajjan Singh case called for a reconsideration of the Shankari Prasad judgment, questioning whether constitutional amendments fell within the scope of Article 13(2). This case raised important constitutional considerations regarding the interpretation of the law and the scope of constitutional amendments.
Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 15
Save
Which concept did the Supreme Court clarify applies to laws protected by the Constitution, but not to the Articles themselves, influencing subsequent interpretations of the Constitution in the Waman Rao case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Waman Rao Case - Question 15
In the Waman Rao case, the Supreme Court clarified that the doctrine of stare decisis applies to laws protected by the Constitution, not to the Articles themselves. This legal principle emphasizes the importance of precedent and decisions made in previous cases when interpreting and applying the law. Understanding the significance of stare decisis in constitutional matters helps maintain consistency, predictability, and stability in legal interpretations over time.
207 docs|219 tests
Join Course
Information about Test: Waman Rao Case Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Waman Rao Case solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Waman Rao Case, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Waman Rao Case

Find all the important questions for Waman Rao Case at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Waman Rao Case with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Waman Rao Case syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Waman Rao Case resources.

Waman Rao Case MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Waman Rao Case within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Waman Rao Case Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Waman Rao Case with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup