UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Tests  >  Indian Polity for UPSC CSE  >  Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - UPSC MCQ

Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - UPSC MCQ


Test Description

10 Questions MCQ Test Indian Polity for UPSC CSE - Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1

Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 for UPSC 2024 is part of Indian Polity for UPSC CSE preparation. The Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 questions and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus.The Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 MCQs are made for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 below.
Solutions of Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 questions in English are available as part of our Indian Polity for UPSC CSE for UPSC & Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 solutions in Hindi for Indian Polity for UPSC CSE course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 | 10 questions in 10 minutes | Mock test for UPSC preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Indian Polity for UPSC CSE for UPSC Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 1

In the case of Machal Lalung of Assam, the justice was made after the intervention of:

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 1

Machal Lalung was 23 when he was arrested and he was released in July 2005 at age of 77. He spent 54 years under custody during which his case never came up for hearing. He was freed when a team appointed by the National Human Rights Commission intervened after an inspection of undertrials in the State.

Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 2

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

i. Article 16(4) allows the State to reserve appointments for backward classes that are underrepresented in government services.

ii. Article 21 ensures that no individual can be deprived of life or personal liberty without following a proper legal procedure.

iii. Article 16(4) applies exclusively to economically weaker sections of society.

iv. Article 21 provides the right to privacy as part of personal liberty.

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 2

- Statement i is correct because Article 16(4) specifically allows the State to make provisions for the reservation of appointments for backward classes who are not adequately represented in State services.

- Statement ii is also correct as Article 21 protects an individual's life and personal liberty, stating that deprivation can only occur through a lawful procedure.

- Statement iii is incorrect because Article 16(4) pertains to backward classes, not exclusively to economically weaker sections.

- Statement iv is correct ; Article 21 has been interpreted to include the right to privacy.

Therefore, the correct statements are i and ii, making Option A the correct answer.

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 3

Assertion (A): The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was established to protect the rights of marginalized sections of society.

Reason (R): The NHRC has the authority to prosecute individuals accused of human rights violations.

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 3
  • The Assertion is true because the NHRC was indeed established to safeguard the rights of marginalized and deprived sections of society.
  • The Reason is false because the NHRC does not have the power to prosecute individuals; it can only make recommendations to the government or courts.
  • Therefore, the Reason does not explain the Assertion, making Option C the correct choice.
Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 4

The constitution of a country provides the basis for

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 4

A constitution is the basic fundamental law of a State. It lays down the objectives of the State which it has to achieve. It provides for the constitutional framework that is,various structures and organs of the governments at different levels. In addition, it describes the rights and duties of the citizens. It is, therefore, considered to be the basis for the governance of the country.

Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 5

Which of the statements given above is/are correct regarding the Directive Principles of State Policy in the Indian Constitution?

i. The Directive Principles are legally enforceable guidelines that citizens can use to compel the government to act.

ii. They include additional rights for citizens beyond those provided in the Fundamental Rights section.

iii. The framers of the Constitution intended these principles to be non-justiciable, relying on the moral obligation of the government to implement them.

iv. The Directive Principles are primarily focused on economic policies and do not address social issues.

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 5

- Statement i is incorrect because the Directive Principles are non-justiciable, meaning they cannot be enforced by the courts.

- Statement ii is correct as the Directive Principles do include additional rights beyond the Fundamental Rights, such as the right to work and the right to education.

- Statement iii is also correct; the framers designed these principles to be non-justiciable, relying on the government's moral obligation.

- Statement iv is incorrect as the Directive Principles address both economic and social issues, aiming for a comprehensive approach to governance.

Thus, the correct statements are ii and iii, making Option A the correct answer.

Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 6

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

i. A writ of habeas corpus can only be issued in cases where an individual is detained with a warrant.

ii. A writ of mandamus compels a public official to perform a duty that they are legally obligated to fulfill.

iii. A writ of prohibition is employed to prevent a higher court from intervening in cases handled by lower courts.

iv. A writ of quo warranto challenges the right of an individual to hold a public office if they do not meet the legal qualifications.

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 6

- Statement i is incorrect because a writ of habeas corpus can be issued regardless of whether there is a warrant. It is designed to protect against unlawful detention, irrespective of the presence of a warrant.

- Statement ii is correct. A writ of mandamus is indeed issued to compel a public official to carry out a duty they are required to perform by law.

- Statement iii is incorrect. A writ of prohibition is used to prevent a lower court from exceeding its jurisdiction, not to prevent a higher court from intervening.

- Statement iv is correct. A writ of quo warranto is utilized to challenge an individual's right to hold a public office, especially if they lack the necessary qualifications.

Thus, the correct statements are ii and iv, making the correct answer Option A.

Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 7

Assertion (A): Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy can coexist to promote societal welfare.

Reason (R): Fundamental Rights are designed to limit government action, whereas Directive Principles encourage government intervention for the common good.

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 7

- Assertion (A) is true: Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles serve different but complementary roles in governance, aiming to balance individual rights with societal needs.

- Reason (R) is also true: Fundamental Rights act as safeguards against government overreach, while Directive Principles guide the government in promoting social and economic justice.

- The Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion because it clarifies how these two frameworks interact to benefit society as a whole. The coexistence of both ensures that individual rights are protected while also encouraging the government to take actions that promote the welfare of the community.

Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 8

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 8

The Right to Life (A) ensures that no person can be deprived of their life or liberty without due process (2). The Right to Equality (B) guarantees equality of opportunity and non-discrimination (1). Habeas Corpus (C) is a writ issued to ensure a detained person is presented before the court (3). Directive Principles (D) are non-justiciable guidelines for government policy aiming at societal well-being (4).

Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 9

Assertion (A): The 42nd amendment of the Constitution introduced Fundamental Duties for citizens.

Reason (R): The Constitution enforces these duties as prerequisites for enjoying fundamental rights.

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 9

The correct answer is:

b) If Assertion is true but Reason is false

Explanation:

  • Assertion (A): The 42nd Amendment of the Constitution of India, enacted in 1976, did indeed introduce Fundamental Duties for citizens. So, this assertion is true.

  • Reason (R): The Constitution does not enforce Fundamental Duties as prerequisites for enjoying Fundamental Rights. While Fundamental Duties are important, they are not legally enforceable, nor are they conditions for enjoying Fundamental Rights. Hence, this reason is false.

  • Therefore, the Assertion is true, but the Reason is false.

Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 10

Given below are two statements:
Statement I: The South African Constitution prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, gender, and other criteria.
Statement II: The Directive Principles of State Policy are legally enforceable by the courts.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Detailed Solution for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 - Question 10

Statement I is true because the South African Constitution prohibits discrimination based on race, gender, and other criteria. Statement II is false because the Directive Principles of State Policy in the Indian Constitution are not legally enforceable by the courts; they serve as guidelines for the government.

144 videos|611 docs|204 tests
Information about Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Rights in The Indian Constitution- 1, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for UPSC

144 videos|611 docs|204 tests
Download as PDF

Top Courses for UPSC