CUET Exam  >  CUET Tests  >  English Language Preparation for CUET  >  Languages: Mock Test - 9 - CUET MCQ

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - CUET MCQ


Test Description

30 Questions MCQ Test English Language Preparation for CUET - Languages: Mock Test - 9

Languages: Mock Test - 9 for CUET 2025 is part of English Language Preparation for CUET preparation. The Languages: Mock Test - 9 questions and answers have been prepared according to the CUET exam syllabus.The Languages: Mock Test - 9 MCQs are made for CUET 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Languages: Mock Test - 9 below.
Solutions of Languages: Mock Test - 9 questions in English are available as part of our English Language Preparation for CUET for CUET & Languages: Mock Test - 9 solutions in Hindi for English Language Preparation for CUET course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CUET Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Languages: Mock Test - 9 | 50 questions in 45 minutes | Mock test for CUET preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study English Language Preparation for CUET for CUET Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 1

The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers.

TheAct also seeks to bring in e-commerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse.

The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.

Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration.

It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act. Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.

The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to promote, protect and enforce the rights of consumers. It will regulate matters related to violation of consumer rights, unfair trade practices, and misleading advertisements. The CCPA will have an investigation wing, headed by a DirectorGeneral, which may conduct inquiry or investigation into such violations.The CCPA may impose a penalty on a manufacturer or an endorser of up to Rs 10 lakh and imprisonment for up to two years for a false or misleading advertisement. In case of a subsequent offence, the fine may extend to Rs 50 lakh and imprisonment of up to five years.

Q. Suppose a misleading advertisement is shown on 'XY' channel and 'ZA' channel for consecutive two weeks. Who all are liable in this case ?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 1

Correct Answer is (c)

The maker of the misleading advertisement. It is clearly mentioned in the 2nd paragraph that only the advertiser is liable and not the channels on which the advertisement is shown (…The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised).Option (a) and (b) are therefore incorrect.

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.Option (d) is incorrect as nowhere in the passage is it mentioned that a consumer is liable in such cases.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 2

Who adopted the pen-name Premchand?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 2

The correct answer is Option (3). "Dhanpat Rai".

Key Points

  • The passage specifically states that Prem Chand was a pen-name adopted by Dhanpat Rai, which is mentioned in the third paragraph.
  • Dhanpat Rai used the pseudonym Nawab Rai when he began writing short stories as a government servant, also detailed in the third paragraph.

​Therefore, the correct answer is "Dhanpat Rai".

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 3

Match List I with List II to complete the information in the table:

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 3

The correct answer is Option (3) A - II, B - IV, C - I, D - III

Key Points

  • A. Ajaib Lal -(II) Premchand's father (Mentioned in 1st paragraph)
  • B. Nawab Rai- (IV) Pen name used for short stories.(Mentioned in the last paragraph)
  • C. Lamahi - (I) Birth place of Premchand (Mentioned in 1st paragraph)
  • D. Premchand's grandfather - (III) Gur Sahai Lal (Mentioned in 1st paragraph)

Therefore, the correct answer is A - II, B - IV, C - I, D - III.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 4

According to the passage, Anandi is the heroine of ______.

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 4

The correct answer is Option (2)

Key Points

  • According to the passage, Anandi is the heroine of "Barhe Ghar ki Beti."
  • This information is directly mentioned in the first paragraph, where it states, "His mother was Anandi Devi, a good natured and accomplished woman, reminiscent of 'Barhe Ghar ki Beti.' It is to be noted that the heroine of this story is called Anandi."

So, the correct answer is Option (2) Barhe Ghar ki Beti.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 5

One of Premchand's short stories is about a character from real life, named Kazaki who was a _____.

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 5

The correct answer is Option (1).

Key Points

  • The passage highlights Premchand's capability of deriving inspiration from real-life characters for his stories.
  • Kazaki in the story was portrayed as a postal messenger, demonstrating Premchand's talent in bringing everyday characters and their virtues into the literary domain.

Therefore, the correct answer is "Postal messenger".

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 6

According to the passage, who is responsible for Premchand learning Urdu and Persian?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 6

The correct answer is Option (3). "Maulvi Sahib".

Key Points

  • The passage mentions that in his early schooling at Lamahi, Prem Chand picked up some Urdu and Persian.
  • This learning was facilitated by a Maulvi Sahib, indicating that he was Prem Chand's teacher for these languages. (2nd Paragraph)
  • The specific mention of Maulvi Sahib as the source of Prem Chand's learning is highlighted without any reference to the others listed in the options.

Therefore, the correct answer is "Maulvi Sahib".

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 7

Match the List and choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 7

The correct answer is Option (4). i.e. A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4

Key Points

  • Test period — Before we die: Life is viewed as a period of moral testing before death.
  • Recording of actions — Every day and night: All actions are constantly monitored, implying the importance of morality.
  • People's reaction to Paradise — Laugh at the idea: Some people are skeptical or dismissive of the concept of Paradise.
  • Purpose of creation — To enjoy Paradise: The ultimate goal of life, according to certain beliefs, is to attain eternal happiness in Paradise, conditioned by one's earthly actions and morality.

Therefore, the correct answer is A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 8

What issues does Martin Luther King's speech address ?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 8

The correct answer is Option (2).

Key Points

  • The passage explicitly mentions that in his speech, Martin Luther King Jr. calls for "an end to racism in the United States and called for civil and economic rights."
  • This is directly related to Option (2), which encapsulates both components mentioned: ending racism and advocating for civil and economic rights.

Therefore, the correct answer is "End to racism and called for civil and economic rights."

Additional Information

  • Option (1) Continuation of racism: This option is not suitable because MLK's speech was against the continuation of racism, advocating for its end, not its continuation.
  • Option (3) Civil rights: While MLK's speech did address civil rights, this option is slightly less comprehensive than Option (2), which more fully encompasses the speech's key themes including economic rights and the end of racism.
  • Option (4) Civil War: This option is not suitable because MLK's speech did not address the Civil War specifically; it focused on the aftermath and continuing struggle for equality and rights for African Americans.
Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 9

What pushes King to speak: "I have a dream"?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 9

The correct answer is Option (2).

Key Points

  • The passage states that towards the end of the speech, King was prompted by Mahalia Jackson's cry: "Tell them about the dream, Martin!" This directly leads to the famous "I have a dream" segment.
  • It indicates that Mahalia Jackson's encouragement was a key factor in King's decision to speak on his dream, aligning with Option (2).

Therefore, the correct answer is "He is prompted by Mahalia Jackson."

Additional Information

  • Option (1) He reads out the Emancipation Proclamation: This is misleading as the passage mentions the Emancipation Proclamation to highlight the historical context and the continuity of the struggle for freedom, not as the prompt for the "I have a dream" part.
  • Option (3) He is overwhelmed by the crowd: Though King was speaking to a large gathering, there's no direct indication that the size of the crowd was what prompted the "I have a dream" portion of his speech.
  • Option (4) Lincoln had asked him to give the speech: This is factually incorrect as Abraham Lincoln was deceased for nearly a century by that time, and hence could not have asked King to give the speech.
Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 10

From the last paragraph, give one word for "to leave".

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 10

The correct answer is Option (1) Departed.

Key Points

  • In the last paragraph, "departed" as the term that means "to leave."
  • Departed: (प्रस्थान किया) - Left, especially to start a journey.
    • Example: She departed early in the morning.
  • In this context, it refers to leaving or deviating from his originally prepared speech.

Therefore, the correct answer is Departed.

Additional Information

  • Proclamation: (घोषणा) - A public or official announcement, especially one dealing with a matter of great importance.
  • Improvised: (अनौपचारिक) - Created and performed spontaneously or without preparation.
  • Address: (संबोधित करना) - Speak to (a person or an assembly), typically in a formal way.
Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 11

What is the name of Martin Luther King's famed speech?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 11

The correct answer is Option (4).

Key Points

  • The passage explicitly refers to Martin Luther King Jr.'s public speech by its title "I Have a Dream" in the very first sentence.
  • This title is mentioned again as the theme for the speech's most famous part, recognized and celebrated for its powerful message on freedom and equality.

Therefore, the correct answer is "I Have a Dream".

Additional Information

  • Option (1) The Emancipation Proclamation is mentioned in the passage but as a historical reference that King brings up in his speech, not the name of the speech itself.
  • Option (2) An Improvisation relates to how King departed from his prepared text, but it is not the name of the speech.
  • Option (3) A Peroration refers to the concluding part of King's speech where he improvises, not the title of the speech.
Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 12

The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers.

TheAct also seeks to bring in e-commerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse.

The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.

Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration.

It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act. Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.

The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to promote, protect and enforce the rights of consumers. It will regulate matters related to violation of consumer rights, unfair trade practices, and misleading advertisements. The CCPA will have an investigation wing, headed by a DirectorGeneral, which may conduct inquiry or investigation into such violations.The CCPA may impose a penalty on a manufacturer or an endorser of up to Rs 10 lakh and imprisonment for up to two years for a false or misleading advertisement. In case of a subsequent offence, the fine may extend to Rs 50 lakh and imprisonment of up to five years.

Q. Ankit brought 1000 kgs of wheat from Kartik. He grinds the wheat and uses the flour so produced for making bread, which he then sells in the open market.The wheat turns to be infested with pests making it unsuitable for use. What course of action is available to Ankit ?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 12

Correct Answer is (d)

Ankit cannot take action against Kartik under the Consumer Protection Act. In the 3rd paragraph, it is mentioned that only a consumer can file a case under the Act. Ankit is not a consumer as he purchased the wheat for commercial purposes i.e. for making bread to be sold in the market (…Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration.

It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose…Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act).

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.

  •  

    Option (a) is therefore incorrect.

  •  

    Option (b) is legally correct as per Indian Contract Act but since it is not mentioned in the passage, we cannot use this external knowledge. Hence, it cannot be a correct option.

  •  

    Option (c) is not based on information supplied in the passage.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 13

The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers.

TheAct also seeks to bring in e-commerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse.

The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.

Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration.

It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act. Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.

The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to promote, protect and enforce the rights of consumers. It will regulate matters related to violation of consumer rights, unfair trade practices, and misleading advertisements. The CCPA will have an investigation wing, headed by a DirectorGeneral, which may conduct inquiry or investigation into such violations.The CCPA may impose a penalty on a manufacturer or an endorser of up to Rs 10 lakh and imprisonment for up to two years for a false or misleading advertisement. In case of a subsequent offence, the fine may extend to Rs 50 lakh and imprisonment of up to five years.

Q. Ankit brought 1000 kgs of wheat from Kartik. He grinds the wheat and uses the flour so produced for making bread, which he then sells in the open market.The wheat turns to be infested with pests making it unsuitable for use. What course of action is available to Ankit ?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 13

Correct Answer is (b)

Celebrities, e-commerce and product liability. This is mentioned in the 2nd paragraph (…TheAct also seeks to bring in e-commerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable…also provides for product liability action).

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.Options (a), (c) and (d) are therefore incorrect.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 14

The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers.

TheAct also seeks to bring in e-commerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse.

The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.

Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration.

It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act. Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.

The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to promote, protect and enforce the rights of consumers. It will regulate matters related to violation of consumer rights, unfair trade practices, and misleading advertisements. The CCPA will have an investigation wing, headed by a DirectorGeneral, which may conduct inquiry or investigation into such violations.The CCPA may impose a penalty on a manufacturer or an endorser of up to Rs 10 lakh and imprisonment for up to two years for a false or misleading advertisement. In case of a subsequent offence, the fine may extend to Rs 50 lakh and imprisonment of up to five years.

Q. Kanika Sharma, a famous actress endorsed a brand of leggings. In the advertisement, the actress says, "100% cotton leggings to keep you cool during summers." Manasa purchase a pair of the same brand leggings relying on the advertisement. It turns out to be only 20% cotton and the rest is nylon.
Choose the best option.

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 14

Correct Answer is (a)

Kanika Sharma is liable for performing a misleading and false advertisement. In the 2nd paragraph, celebrities have been made liable for endorsing misleading and false advertisements (…and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse).

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.

  •  

    Option (b) is therefore incorrect.

  •  

    Option (c) is incorrect as advertisements are taken to be true by general public and therefore the rationale of making the advertiser and the celebrities liable.

  •  

    Option (d) is incorrect has Kanika Sharma is liable for misleading and false advertisement and not individually to each consumer who purchases such product.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 15

The Parliament passed the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which promises to strengthen the rights of consumers and provides a mechanism for redressal of complaints regarding defects in goods and deficiency in services.Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister stressed that the overall purpose of the legislation was to ease the process of addressing grievances of consumers.

TheAct also seeks to bring in e-commerce under their jurisdiction and hold celebrities accountable for false and misleading advertisements of products that they endorse.

The Act proposed strict action against the advertiser in case of misleading advertisements but not against the media through which the advertisement is being publicised. It also provides for product liability action on account of harm caused to consumers due to defective products or deficient services.Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service.

Under the Act, a consumer is defined as a person who buys any good or avails a service for a consideration.

It does not include a person who obtains a good for resale or a good or service for commercial purpose. It covers transactions through all modes including offline, and online through electronic means, teleshopping, multilevel marketing or direct selling. Only a consumer can bring an action under the Act. Certain consumer rights have been defined in the Act, including the right to: (i) be protected against marketing of goods and services which are hazardous to life and property; (ii) be informed of the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard and price of goods or services; (iii) be assured of access to a variety of goods or services at competitive prices; and (iv) seek redressal against unfair or restrictive trade practices.

The central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to promote, protect and enforce the rights of consumers. It will regulate matters related to violation of consumer rights, unfair trade practices, and misleading advertisements. The CCPA will have an investigation wing, headed by a DirectorGeneral, which may conduct inquiry or investigation into such violations.The CCPA may impose a penalty on a manufacturer or an endorser of up to Rs 10 lakh and imprisonment for up to two years for a false or misleading advertisement. In case of a subsequent offence, the fine may extend to Rs 50 lakh and imprisonment of up to five years.

Q. Garima ordered fried rice at a 3-star restaurant. She found a dead cockroach in it. Decide.

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 15

Correct Answer is (a)

Garima can file a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act. This case falls under deficiency of service by the restaurant. A 3-star restaurant must ensure hygienic food. In the 2nd paragraph, it is mentioned while defining product liability (…Product liability means the liability of a product manufacturer, service provider or seller to compensate a consumer for any harm or injury caused by a defective good or deficient service).

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.

  •  

    Option (d) is therefore incorrect.

  •  

    Option (b) is incorrect as though it is a possible course of action, it is not based on the information supplied in the passage.

  •  

    Option (c) is using external knowledge and therefore cannot be a correct option here.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 16

The unanimous ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), on Thursday, on the prevention of alleged acts of genocide against Rohingya Muslims has finally pinned legal responsibility on Myanmar's government for the military's large-scale excesses of 2017. The court has further emphasised that an estimated 600,000 Rohingya resident in Myanmar still remained highly vulnerable to attacks from the security forces. The ruling vindicates findings by the UN and human rights groups on the prevalence of hate speech, mass atrocities of rape and extra-judicial killings, and torching of villages in Myanmar's Rakhine province, leading to the forced migration of thousands to Bangladesh. The ruling pertains to the Gambia's suit on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), alleging that the brutalities by the defence services amounted to crimes of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arguing the defence in person during the three-day public hearings last month, Ms. Suu Kyi, who was elected in 2016, insisted that the 2017 violence was proportionate to the threat of insurgency. She even questioned the Gambia's standing to bring the suit, saying that there was no bilateral dispute.

Rejecting the ICJ's ruling, Myanmar's Foreign Ministry has accused rights groups of presenting the Court with a distorted picture of the prevailing situation. In a statement, it defended the army's action as a legitimate response to violations of the law by the insurgent Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army. However, the above claim is at odds with the findings this week of an Independent Commission of Enquiry established by the government.

The Commission acknowledged that war crimes had indeed been committed during the military campaign, when about 900 people were killed. But there was nothing to back the assertions of gang-rape, or evidence to presume any intent of genocide, it held. Although it could take years before the court pronounces the final verdict in the genocide case, Thursday's injunction is an important victory for the refugees languishing in Bangladeshi camps. It empowers the UN Security Council to prevail upon Myanmar to take appropriate measures for the rehabilitation and repatriation of displaced communities. As the biggest regional player, China could play a constructive role to ensure a speedy return to normalcy in its neighbourhood. India has its own interests in an amicable resolution of Myanmar's internal dispute. Above all, finding closure to the current dispute would mark the completion of Myanmar's return to civilian rule.

Q. Genocide means killing with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.Serbia was alleged to have attempted to exterminate the Bosniak (Bosnian Muslim) population of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Based on the author's reasoning in the passage above, decide the guilt of Serbia?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 16

Correct Answer is (c)

Serbia is guilty since Bosnian Muslim carries an ethnical identity who are subjected to genocide.

Option (c) is the most appropriate choice consistent with reasoning of the author.

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and definition of genocide.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 17

The unanimous ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), on Thursday, on the prevention of alleged acts of genocide against Rohingya Muslims has finally pinned legal responsibility on Myanmar's government for the military's large-scale excesses of 2017. The court has further emphasised that an estimated 600,000 Rohingya resident in Myanmar still remained highly vulnerable to attacks from the security forces. The ruling vindicates findings by the UN and human rights groups on the prevalence of hate speech, mass atrocities of rape and extra-judicial killings, and torching of villages in Myanmar's Rakhine province, leading to the forced migration of thousands to Bangladesh. The ruling pertains to the Gambia's suit on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), alleging that the brutalities by the defence services amounted to crimes of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arguing the defence in person during the three-day public hearings last month, Ms. Suu Kyi, who was elected in 2016, insisted that the 2017 violence was proportionate to the threat of insurgency. She even questioned the Gambia's standing to bring the suit, saying that there was no bilateral dispute.

Rejecting the ICJ's ruling, Myanmar's Foreign Ministry has accused rights groups of presenting the Court with a distorted picture of the prevailing situation. In a statement, it defended the army's action as a legitimate response to violations of the law by the insurgent Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army. However, the above claim is at odds with the findings this week of an Independent Commission of Enquiry established by the government.

The Commission acknowledged that war crimes had indeed been committed during the military campaign, when about 900 people were killed. But there was nothing to back the assertions of gang-rape, or evidence to presume any intent of genocide, it held. Although it could take years before the court pronounces the final verdict in the genocide case, Thursday's injunction is an important victory for the refugees languishing in Bangladeshi camps. It empowers the UN Security Council to prevail upon Myanmar to take appropriate measures for the rehabilitation and repatriation of displaced communities. As the biggest regional player, China could play a constructive role to ensure a speedy return to normalcy in its neighbourhood. India has its own interests in an amicable resolution of Myanmar's internal dispute. Above all, finding closure to the current dispute would mark the completion of Myanmar's return to civilian rule.

Q. The Armenian Genocide refers to the deliberate and systematic destruction of the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire during and just after World War I. It was implemented through extensive massacres and deportations, with the deportations consisting of forced marches under conditions designed to lead to the death of the deportees. The total number of resulting deaths is generally held to have been between one and one and a half million. If Armenia brings a suit against Ottoman Empire, based only on the author's reasoning in the given passage, would the International Court entertain the suit?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 17

Correct Answer is (a) International Court would entertain the suit since Armenian population is the target of systematic destruction, massacre, deportation etc. Option (a) is the most appropriate choice consistent with reasoning of the author.

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and definition of genocide.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 18

The unanimous ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), on Thursday, on the prevention of alleged acts of genocide against Rohingya Muslims has finally pinned legal responsibility on Myanmar's government for the military's large-scale excesses of 2017. The court has further emphasised that an estimated 600,000 Rohingya resident in Myanmar still remained highly vulnerable to attacks from the security forces. The ruling vindicates findings by the UN and human rights groups on the prevalence of hate speech, mass atrocities of rape and extra-judicial killings, and torching of villages in Myanmar's Rakhine province, leading to the forced migration of thousands to Bangladesh. The ruling pertains to the Gambia's suit on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), alleging that the brutalities by the defence services amounted to crimes of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arguing the defence in person during the three-day public hearings last month, Ms. Suu Kyi, who was elected in 2016, insisted that the 2017 violence was proportionate to the threat of insurgency. She even questioned the Gambia's standing to bring the suit, saying that there was no bilateral dispute.

Rejecting the ICJ's ruling, Myanmar's Foreign Ministry has accused rights groups of presenting the Court with a distorted picture of the prevailing situation. In a statement, it defended the army's action as a legitimate response to violations of the law by the insurgent Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army. However, the above claim is at odds with the findings this week of an Independent Commission of Enquiry established by the government.

The Commission acknowledged that war crimes had indeed been committed during the military campaign, when about 900 people were killed. But there was nothing to back the assertions of gang-rape, or evidence to presume any intent of genocide, it held. Although it could take years before the court pronounces the final verdict in the genocide case, Thursday's injunction is an important victory for the refugees languishing in Bangladeshi camps. It empowers the UN Security Council to prevail upon Myanmar to take appropriate measures for the rehabilitation and repatriation of displaced communities. As the biggest regional player, China could play a constructive role to ensure a speedy return to normalcy in its neighbourhood. India has its own interests in an amicable resolution of Myanmar's internal dispute. Above all, finding closure to the current dispute would mark the completion of Myanmar's return to civilian rule.

Q. Sarabjit, an Indian who was attacked in a prison in Pakistan where he spent 22 years after being convicted of terrorism and died in Pakistan. Sarabjit was an Indian national convicted of terrorism and spying by a Pakistani court. Can India bring a claim of genocide against Pakistan?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 18

Correct Answer is (b) India cannot bring a claim of genocide since Sarabjit died being charged of terrorism and for not being a part of any group. Option (b) is the most appropriate choice consistent with reasoning of the author.

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and definition of genocide.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 19

The unanimous ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), on Thursday, on the prevention of alleged acts of genocide against Rohingya Muslims has finally pinned legal responsibility on Myanmar's government for the military's large-scale excesses of 2017. The court has further emphasised that an estimated 600,000 Rohingya resident in Myanmar still remained highly vulnerable to attacks from the security forces. The ruling vindicates findings by the UN and human rights groups on the prevalence of hate speech, mass atrocities of rape and extra-judicial killings, and torching of villages in Myanmar's Rakhine province, leading to the forced migration of thousands to Bangladesh. The ruling pertains to the Gambia's suit on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), alleging that the brutalities by the defence services amounted to crimes of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arguing the defence in person during the three-day public hearings last month, Ms. Suu Kyi, who was elected in 2016, insisted that the 2017 violence was proportionate to the threat of insurgency. She even questioned the Gambia's standing to bring the suit, saying that there was no bilateral dispute.

Rejecting the ICJ's ruling, Myanmar's Foreign Ministry has accused rights groups of presenting the Court with a distorted picture of the prevailing situation. In a statement, it defended the army's action as a legitimate response to violations of the law by the insurgent Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army. However, the above claim is at odds with the findings this week of an Independent Commission of Enquiry established by the government.

The Commission acknowledged that war crimes had indeed been committed during the military campaign, when about 900 people were killed. But there was nothing to back the assertions of gang-rape, or evidence to presume any intent of genocide, it held. Although it could take years before the court pronounces the final verdict in the genocide case, Thursday's injunction is an important victory for the refugees languishing in Bangladeshi camps. It empowers the UN Security Council to prevail upon Myanmar to take appropriate measures for the rehabilitation and repatriation of displaced communities. As the biggest regional player, China could play a constructive role to ensure a speedy return to normalcy in its neighbourhood. India has its own interests in an amicable resolution of Myanmar's internal dispute. Above all, finding closure to the current dispute would mark the completion of Myanmar's return to civilian rule.

Q. Genocide means killing with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. The Government of Sri Lanka has indulged in gross violations of human rights against the innocent Tamil Community in the War against Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in the year 2009, and during such operation, several civilians were killed, tortured and maimed. In such a situation, based only on the author's reasoning in the given passage, would the Government of Sri Lanka be held liable for Genocide?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 19

Correct Answer is (c)

Government of Sri Lanka be held liable since Tamil Community are ethnical and religious group who are subjected to genocide. Option (c) is the most appropriate choice consistent with reasoning of the author.

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and definition of genocide.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 20

The unanimous ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), on Thursday, on the prevention of alleged acts of genocide against Rohingya Muslims has finally pinned legal responsibility on Myanmar's government for the military's large-scale excesses of 2017. The court has further emphasised that an estimated 600,000 Rohingya resident in Myanmar still remained highly vulnerable to attacks from the security forces. The ruling vindicates findings by the UN and human rights groups on the prevalence of hate speech, mass atrocities of rape and extra-judicial killings, and torching of villages in Myanmar's Rakhine province, leading to the forced migration of thousands to Bangladesh. The ruling pertains to the Gambia's suit on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), alleging that the brutalities by the defence services amounted to crimes of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arguing the defence in person during the three-day public hearings last month, Ms. Suu Kyi, who was elected in 2016, insisted that the 2017 violence was proportionate to the threat of insurgency. She even questioned the Gambia's standing to bring the suit, saying that there was no bilateral dispute.

Rejecting the ICJ's ruling, Myanmar's Foreign Ministry has accused rights groups of presenting the Court with a distorted picture of the prevailing situation. In a statement, it defended the army's action as a legitimate response to violations of the law by the insurgent Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army. However, the above claim is at odds with the findings this week of an Independent Commission of Enquiry established by the government.

The Commission acknowledged that war crimes had indeed been committed during the military campaign, when about 900 people were killed. But there was nothing to back the assertions of gang-rape, or evidence to presume any intent of genocide, it held. Although it could take years before the court pronounces the final verdict in the genocide case, Thursday's injunction is an important victory for the refugees languishing in Bangladeshi camps. It empowers the UN Security Council to prevail upon Myanmar to take appropriate measures for the rehabilitation and repatriation of displaced communities. As the biggest regional player, China could play a constructive role to ensure a speedy return to normalcy in its neighbourhood. India has its own interests in an amicable resolution of Myanmar's internal dispute. Above all, finding closure to the current dispute would mark the completion of Myanmar's return to civilian rule.

Q. Genocide means killing with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.Simele are stateless people which cannot be put strictly into any national, ethnical, racial or religious group. In the 20th century, the Simele massacre was committed by the armed forces of the Kingdom of Iraq during a campaign which systematically targeted the Assyrians of northern Iraq in August 1933. Is Iraq guilty?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 20

Correct Answer is (b)

Simele are stateless people which cannot be put strictly into any national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Therefore they cannot be subjected to genocide. Option (b) is the most appropriate choice consistent with reasoning of the author.

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above and definition of genocide.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 21

The unanimous ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), on Thursday, on the prevention of alleged acts of genocide against Rohingya Muslims has finally pinned legal responsibility on Myanmar's government for the military's large-scale excesses of 2017. The court has further emphasised that an estimated 600,000 Rohingya resident in Myanmar still remained highly vulnerable to attacks from the security forces. The ruling vindicates findings by the UN and human rights groups on the prevalence of hate speech, mass atrocities of rape and extra-judicial killings, and torching of villages in Myanmar's Rakhine province, leading to the forced migration of thousands to Bangladesh. The ruling pertains to the Gambia's suit on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), alleging that the brutalities by the defence services amounted to crimes of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. Arguing the defence in person during the three-day public hearings last month, Ms. Suu Kyi, who was elected in 2016, insisted that the 2017 violence was proportionate to the threat of insurgency. She even questioned the Gambia's standing to bring the suit, saying that there was no bilateral dispute.

Rejecting the ICJ's ruling, Myanmar's Foreign Ministry has accused rights groups of presenting the Court with a distorted picture of the prevailing situation. In a statement, it defended the army's action as a legitimate response to violations of the law by the insurgent Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army. However, the above claim is at odds with the findings this week of an Independent Commission of Enquiry established by the government.

The Commission acknowledged that war crimes had indeed been committed during the military campaign, when about 900 people were killed. But there was nothing to back the assertions of gang-rape, or evidence to presume any intent of genocide, it held. Although it could take years before the court pronounces the final verdict in the genocide case, Thursday's injunction is an important victory for the refugees languishing in Bangladeshi camps. It empowers the UN Security Council to prevail upon Myanmar to take appropriate measures for the rehabilitation and repatriation of displaced communities. As the biggest regional player, China could play a constructive role to ensure a speedy return to normalcy in its neighbourhood. India has its own interests in an amicable resolution of Myanmar's internal dispute. Above all, finding closure to the current dispute would mark the completion of Myanmar's return to civilian rule.

Q. An act which causes death and is done with the intention of causing death, or with the intention of causing such injury as is reasonably likely to lead to death, amounts to murder. Culpable homicide is not murder if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion. A fight breaks out between fans of Calcutta Club Riders (CCR) and Punjab Maharajas Tigers (PMT) to decide which team is the second last in the tournament. A CCR fan smashes a bottle of beer on to a PMT fan's face. The PMT fan, bleeding, takes the broken bottle and stabs the CCR fan, thereby killing him. What offence if any has been committed?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 21

Correct Answer is (c)

The PMT fan killed in the heat of the sudden quarrel.

He was no longer defending himself.

Incorrect Answers

None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 22

This idea to strip citizenship faded away due to the Supreme Court's ruling. President Donald J. Trump revived the idea to strip the citizenship of Americans accused of terrorism and took it much further than the extreme case of a suspected terrorist. He proposed that Americans who protest government policies by burning the flag could lose their citizenship - meaning, among other things, their right to vote - as punishment.

"Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail", wrote the next President of the free world on a social media site.

Trump wrote the post shortly after Fox News aired a segment about a dispute at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, which removed the American flag from its campus flagpole after protests over his election victory; during one demonstration, someone burned a flag.

Even if Mr. Trump were to persuade Congress to enact a criminal statute, a dramatic shift in the balance between government power and individual freedom will occur; anyone convicted and sentenced could point to clear Supreme Court precedents to make the case for a constitutional violation.

The obstacles include the precedent that the Constitution does not allow the government to expatriate Americans against their will, through a landmark 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk. They also include a 1989 decision, Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.

David D. Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who co-wrote the Supreme Court briefs in the flag-burning case and who is about to become national legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he wondered if Mr. Trump's strategy was to goad people into burning flags in order to "marginalize" the protests against him.

But he also called Mr. Trump's proposal "beyond the pale."

"To me it is deeply troubling that the person who is going to become the most powerful government official in the United States doesn't understand the first thing about the First Amendment - which is you can't punish people for expressing dissent - and also doesn't seem to understand that citizenship is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away, period, under any circumstances," he said.

Q. Jinkal is a Joint Managing Director of a public limited company. He being in charge of the factory situated at USA was flying National Flag at the office premises of his factory. He was not allowed to do so by the Government officials on the ground that the same is impermissible under the Flag Code. Will the Right to fly the National Flag freely with respect and dignity saved within the meaning of First Amendment. Based on the author's interpretation which of the following is true.

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 22

Option (b) can be deduced from the last line of the fourth paragraph. Paragraph mentions "They also include a 1989 decision,Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment."

Therefore all the remaining options (a), (c) or (d) aren't even talked of in the passage.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 23

This idea to strip citizenship faded away due to the Supreme Court's ruling. President Donald J. Trump revived the idea to strip the citizenship of Americans accused of terrorism and took it much further than the extreme case of a suspected terrorist. He proposed that Americans who protest government policies by burning the flag could lose their citizenship - meaning, among other things, their right to vote - as punishment.

"Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail", wrote the next President of the free world on a social media site.

Trump wrote the post shortly after Fox News aired a segment about a dispute at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, which removed the American flag from its campus flagpole after protests over his election victory; during one demonstration, someone burned a flag.

Even if Mr. Trump were to persuade Congress to enact a criminal statute, a dramatic shift in the balance between government power and individual freedom will occur; anyone convicted and sentenced could point to clear Supreme Court precedents to make the case for a constitutional violation.

The obstacles include the precedent that the Constitution does not allow the government to expatriate Americans against their will, through a landmark 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk. They also include a 1989 decision, Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.

David D. Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who co-wrote the Supreme Court briefs in the flag-burning case and who is about to become national legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he wondered if Mr. Trump's strategy was to goad people into burning flags in order to "marginalize" the protests against him.

But he also called Mr. Trump's proposal "beyond the pale."

"To me it is deeply troubling that the person who is going to become the most powerful government official in the United States doesn't understand the first thing about the First Amendment - which is you can't punish people for expressing dissent - and also doesn't seem to understand that citizenship is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away, period, under any circumstances," he said.

Q. Johnson, a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade, participated in a political demonstration against the Administration and certain companies. Johnson marched through the streets, shouted chants, destroyed property, broke windows and threw trash, beer cans, soiled diapers and various other items, and held signs outside the offices of several companies. When Johnson reached the City Hall, he poured kerosene on the flag and set it on fire. Trump administration passed an order to strip his citizenship. Johnson challenged the order. In such a case, based on the author's reasoning, what is the most likely outcome of the case:

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 23

Option ( c) is not m entioned i n the passage.
Passage has simply talked about one incident and not the ability of Trump as a whole. Option (b) is consistent with the David D. Cole's opinion mentioned in the last paragraph . Option (b) is clearly supported by the last two paragraphs.

Option (d) is too generic as "the path of any politician" is a broad phrase. Hence, option (b) is the best answer.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 24

This idea to strip citizenship faded away due to the Supreme Court's ruling. President Donald J. Trump revived the idea to strip the citizenship of Americans accused of terrorism and took it much further than the extreme case of a suspected terrorist. He proposed that Americans who protest government policies by burning the flag could lose their citizenship - meaning, among other things, their right to vote - as punishment.

"Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail", wrote the next President of the free world on a social media site.

Trump wrote the post shortly after Fox News aired a segment about a dispute at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, which removed the American flag from its campus flagpole after protests over his election victory; during one demonstration, someone burned a flag.

Even if Mr. Trump were to persuade Congress to enact a criminal statute, a dramatic shift in the balance between government power and individual freedom will occur; anyone convicted and sentenced could point to clear Supreme Court precedents to make the case for a constitutional violation.

The obstacles include the precedent that the Constitution does not allow the government to expatriate Americans against their will, through a landmark 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk. They also include a 1989 decision, Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.

David D. Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who co-wrote the Supreme Court briefs in the flag-burning case and who is about to become national legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he wondered if Mr. Trump's strategy was to goad people into burning flags in order to "marginalize" the protests against him.

But he also called Mr. Trump's proposal "beyond the pale."

"To me it is deeply troubling that the person who is going to become the most powerful government official in the United States doesn't understand the first thing about the First Amendment - which is you can't punish people for expressing dissent - and also doesn't seem to understand that citizenship is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away, period, under any circumstances," he said.

Q. Which of the following views can be correctly attributed to the opinion of Mr. Trump regarding the flag burning

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 24

According to the fourth paragraph, Trump wrote the message after Fox news aired a segment on a college protest in Massachusetts. Option (b) is too generic. Hence, option c is the answer.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 25

This idea to strip citizenship faded away due to the Supreme Court's ruling. President Donald J. Trump revived the idea to strip the citizenship of Americans accused of terrorism and took it much further than the extreme case of a suspected terrorist. He proposed that Americans who protest government policies by burning the flag could lose their citizenship - meaning, among other things, their right to vote - as punishment.

"Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail", wrote the next President of the free world on a social media site.

Trump wrote the post shortly after Fox News aired a segment about a dispute at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, which removed the American flag from its campus flagpole after protests over his election victory; during one demonstration, someone burned a flag.

Even if Mr. Trump were to persuade Congress to enact a criminal statute, a dramatic shift in the balance between government power and individual freedom will occur; anyone convicted and sentenced could point to clear Supreme Court precedents to make the case for a constitutional violation.

The obstacles include the precedent that the Constitution does not allow the government to expatriate Americans against their will, through a landmark 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk. They also include a 1989 decision, Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.

David D. Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who co-wrote the Supreme Court briefs in the flag-burning case and who is about to become national legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he wondered if Mr. Trump's strategy was to goad people into burning flags in order to "marginalize" the protests against him.

But he also called Mr. Trump's proposal "beyond the pale."

"To me it is deeply troubling that the person who is going to become the most powerful government official in the United States doesn't understand the first thing about the First Amendment - which is you can't punish people for expressing dissent - and also doesn't seem to understand that citizenship is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away, period, under any circumstances," he said.

Q. Suppose in the US Congress a bill is introduced to expatriate Americans accused and suspected of terrorism as well as burning the flag. This bill was fiercely opposed by the house during its introduction.Based on the author's reasoning, what can be the justification for the opposition

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 25

Refer to the first paragraph's first line. It clearly mentions option d as the reason.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 26

This idea to strip citizenship faded away due to the Supreme Court's ruling. President Donald J. Trump revived the idea to strip the citizenship of Americans accused of terrorism and took it much further than the extreme case of a suspected terrorist. He proposed that Americans who protest government policies by burning the flag could lose their citizenship - meaning, among other things, their right to vote - as punishment.

"Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail", wrote the next President of the free world on a social media site.

Trump wrote the post shortly after Fox News aired a segment about a dispute at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, which removed the American flag from its campus flagpole after protests over his election victory; during one demonstration, someone burned a flag.

Even if Mr. Trump were to persuade Congress to enact a criminal statute, a dramatic shift in the balance between government power and individual freedom will occur; anyone convicted and sentenced could point to clear Supreme Court precedents to make the case for a constitutional violation.

The obstacles include the precedent that the Constitution does not allow the government to expatriate Americans against their will, through a landmark 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk. They also include a 1989 decision, Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.

David D. Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who co-wrote the Supreme Court briefs in the flag-burning case and who is about to become national legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he wondered if Mr. Trump's strategy was to goad people into burning flags in order to "marginalize" the protests against him.

But he also called Mr. Trump's proposal "beyond the pale."

"To me it is deeply troubling that the person who is going to become the most powerful government official in the United States doesn't understand the first thing about the First Amendment - which is you can't punish people for expressing dissent - and also doesn't seem to understand that citizenship is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away, period, under any circumstances," he said.

Q. United States established a new vetting measure to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America. In pursuance of the same an executive order is signed to remove Americans of Iranian, Syrian, Yemeni and Libyan Origin. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning and precedents cited in the passage above, will the order stand the scrutiny of law:

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 26

Refer to the lines "The obstacles include ... through a landmark 1967 case". Option d is a twisted option as The First Amendment right is not the same as an amendment to the Constitution. Hence, option (c) is the best answer.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 27

Nuisance (from archaic nocence, through Fr. noisance, nuisance, from Lat. nocere, "to hurt") is a common law tort. It means that which causes offence, annoyance, trouble or injury. A nuisance can be either public (also "common") or private. A public nuisance was defined by English scholar Sir J. F. Stephen as, "an act not warranted by law, or an omission to discharge a legal duty, which act or omission obstructs or causes inconvenience or damage to the public in the exercise of rights common to all Her Majesty's subjects".

Private nuisance is the interference with the right of specific people. Nuisance is one of the oldest causes of action known to the common law, with cases framed in nuisance going back almost to the beginning of recorded time. Under the common law, persons in possession of real property (land owners, lease holders etc.) are entitled to the quiet enjoyment of their lands. However this doesn't include visitors or those who aren't considered to have an interest in the land. If a neighbour interferes with that quiet enjoyment, either by creating smells, sounds, pollution or any other hazard that extends past the boundaries of the property, the affected party may make a claim in nuisance.

The boundaries of the tort are potentially unclear, due to the public/private nuisance divide, and existence of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher. Writers such as John Murphy at Lancaster University have popularised the idea that Rylands forms a separate, though related, tort. This is still an issue for debate, and is rejected by others (the primary distinction in Rylands concerns 'escapes onto land', and so it may be argued that the only difference is the nature of the nuisance, not the nature of the civil wrong.) In summation, Nuisance means an unlawful interference with a person's enjoyment of property. Property rights in the land is necessary for an action in Private nuisance.

Private nuisance is an obstruction to the right of private parties. Public nuisance is an obstruction to the right of public in general.

Q. A large tower was constructed in the Docklands area of East London which goes by the name of One Canada Square. Residents in the area experienced interference with the television signals due to the construction of One Canada Square. Some of the claimants were homeowners whilst others were family members, lodgers and others without a proprietary interest in the property affected. Decide, whether interference with one's television reception amounted to actionable nuisance?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 27

Correct Answer is (a)

Interference with one's television reception through the construction of a neighboring structure could not and does not amount to an actionable nuisance.

This is not by virtue of anything peculiar to television.

It applies equally to interference with the passage of light or air or radio signals or to the obstruction of a view.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 28

Nuisance (from archaic nocence, through Fr. noisance, nuisance, from Lat. nocere, "to hurt") is a common law tort. It means that which causes offence, annoyance, trouble or injury. A nuisance can be either public (also "common") or private. A public nuisance was defined by English scholar Sir J. F. Stephen as, "an act not warranted by law, or an omission to discharge a legal duty, which act or omission obstructs or causes inconvenience or damage to the public in the exercise of rights common to all Her Majesty's subjects".

Private nuisance is the interference with the right of specific people. Nuisance is one of the oldest causes of action known to the common law, with cases framed in nuisance going back almost to the beginning of recorded time. Under the common law, persons in possession of real property (land owners, lease holders etc.) are entitled to the quiet enjoyment of their lands. However this doesn't include visitors or those who aren't considered to have an interest in the land. If a neighbour interferes with that quiet enjoyment, either by creating smells, sounds, pollution or any other hazard that extends past the boundaries of the property, the affected party may make a claim in nuisance.

The boundaries of the tort are potentially unclear, due to the public/private nuisance divide, and existence of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher. Writers such as John Murphy at Lancaster University have popularised the idea that Rylands forms a separate, though related, tort. This is still an issue for debate, and is rejected by others (the primary distinction in Rylands concerns 'escapes onto land', and so it may be argued that the only difference is the nature of the nuisance, not the nature of the civil wrong.) In summation, Nuisance means an unlawful interference with a person's enjoyment of property. Property rights in the land is necessary for an action in Private nuisance.

Private nuisance is an obstruction to the right of private parties. Public nuisance is an obstruction to the right of public in general.

Q. Murugan incorporated a company named Murugan Metal Mart (MMM). MMM generates a great amount of metal waste during the course of repairing and maintenance of plant and machinery. MMM dumps the metal waste in a nearby place assuming nobody will notice. Dumping however backfires sometimes.For example once MMM tried dumping the waste on the road adjacent to the business premise it ended up blocking it partly causing difficulty to vehicle users and passersby. Can the road users in general sue MMM for the private nuisance?

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 28

Correct Answer is (c)

Road users have no locus claiming breach of the enjoyment/obstruction of the road in the suit for Private nuisance. Principle states “Private nuisance is an obstruction to the right of private parties”. In the given facts road users are not private parties.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 29

Nuisance (from archaic nocence, through Fr. noisance, nuisance, from Lat. nocere, "to hurt") is a common law tort. It means that which causes offence, annoyance, trouble or injury. A nuisance can be either public (also "common") or private. A public nuisance was defined by English scholar Sir J. F. Stephen as, "an act not warranted by law, or an omission to discharge a legal duty, which act or omission obstructs or causes inconvenience or damage to the public in the exercise of rights common to all Her Majesty's subjects".

Private nuisance is the interference with the right of specific people. Nuisance is one of the oldest causes of action known to the common law, with cases framed in nuisance going back almost to the beginning of recorded time. Under the common law, persons in possession of real property (land owners, lease holders etc.) are entitled to the quiet enjoyment of their lands. However this doesn't include visitors or those who aren't considered to have an interest in the land. If a neighbour interferes with that quiet enjoyment, either by creating smells, sounds, pollution or any other hazard that extends past the boundaries of the property, the affected party may make a claim in nuisance.

The boundaries of the tort are potentially unclear, due to the public/private nuisance divide, and existence of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher. Writers such as John Murphy at Lancaster University have popularised the idea that Rylands forms a separate, though related, tort. This is still an issue for debate, and is rejected by others (the primary distinction in Rylands concerns 'escapes onto land', and so it may be argued that the only difference is the nature of the nuisance, not the nature of the civil wrong.) In summation, Nuisance means an unlawful interference with a person's enjoyment of property. Property rights in the land is necessary for an action in Private nuisance.

Private nuisance is an obstruction to the right of private parties. Public nuisance is an obstruction to the right of public in general.

Q. If MMM is liable then on being sued by sole road user, then the suit will lie under

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 29

The question asks you to apply the idea of the passage to a given situation with the given principle of law. You have to assimilate the inference and look at the facts of the case and evaluate the answer choices.

Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 30

Nuisance (from archaic nocence, through Fr. noisance, nuisance, from Lat. nocere, "to hurt") is a common law tort. It means that which causes offence, annoyance, trouble or injury. A nuisance can be either public (also "common") or private. A public nuisance was defined by English scholar Sir J. F. Stephen as, "an act not warranted by law, or an omission to discharge a legal duty, which act or omission obstructs or causes inconvenience or damage to the public in the exercise of rights common to all Her Majesty's subjects".

Private nuisance is the interference with the right of specific people. Nuisance is one of the oldest causes of action known to the common law, with cases framed in nuisance going back almost to the beginning of recorded time. Under the common law, persons in possession of real property (land owners, lease holders etc.) are entitled to the quiet enjoyment of their lands. However this doesn't include visitors or those who aren't considered to have an interest in the land. If a neighbour interferes with that quiet enjoyment, either by creating smells, sounds, pollution or any other hazard that extends past the boundaries of the property, the affected party may make a claim in nuisance.

The boundaries of the tort are potentially unclear, due to the public/private nuisance divide, and existence of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher. Writers such as John Murphy at Lancaster University have popularised the idea that Rylands forms a separate, though related, tort. This is still an issue for debate, and is rejected by others (the primary distinction in Rylands concerns 'escapes onto land', and so it may be argued that the only difference is the nature of the nuisance, not the nature of the civil wrong.) In summation, Nuisance means an unlawful interference with a person's enjoyment of property. Property rights in the land is necessary for an action in Private nuisance.

Private nuisance is an obstruction to the right of private parties. Public nuisance is an obstruction to the right of public in general.

Q. Ms.Malone lived in a house belonging to her husband's employer. Ms.Malone's husband was a tenant, and she had a license to live at the property. Whilst using the lavatory, the toilet cistern was dislodged by vibrations caused by the next-door neighbour's electricity generator, which fell on her causing her injuries. She sued her neighbour for nuisance.Decide.

Detailed Solution for Languages: Mock Test - 9 - Question 30

Refer to the first paragraph's first line. It clearly mentions option d as the reason.

View more questions
77 videos|83 docs|135 tests
Information about Languages: Mock Test - 9 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Languages: Mock Test - 9 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Languages: Mock Test - 9, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
Download as PDF