1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? |
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. Which of the following is the synonym of the word “coalesce”?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. Which of the following is the synonym of the word “intractable”?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. Which of the following Acronyms are not used in the above passage?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. Choose an appropriate title for the passage?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. Which of the following is not true according to the passage?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. In the above passage, the author is not talking about?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. Which among the following describes the meaning of the phrase “shenanigans of North Korea”?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. Which of the following is true according to the passage?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. Which of the following is the synonym of the word “disarmament”?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.
The 2015 Review of the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will take place in New York from April 27 to May 22 and the process is expected to be stormy and contentious. The event marks some significant anniversaries of conflict: the 100th — of the use of chemical weapons in Ypres, Belgium; the 70th — of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and the 20th — of the indefinite extension of the NPT. A new set of geopolitical drivers will work the agendas of nuclear and non-nuclear members of the Treaty.
Coming into force in 1970, the Treaty has been subjected to numerous pulls and pressures which have left the dream of nuclear disarmament unattained and the purpose of preventing proliferation defeated. The last review, in 2010, followed the complete failure of the 2005 Review conference, as a consequence of serious disagreements which had emerged over a decade. The desire of non-nuclear states to see better progress on disarmament by the Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) will figure as before. The discourse on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons has given a new shape to the NPT debate.
The NWS have not been enthused by either of these two concepts. Relations among the NWS after Russian actions in Ukraine will have a substantial impact on the conference. Moscow’s rhetoric and responses have led to a rethink on the role and relevance of nuclear deterrence, even among the non-nuclear states of eastern Europe. As if this is not enough, the situation in West Asia will loom large since it involves the uncertainties of Iran, Israel, Syria and the Islamic State (IS) in particular and the rest of the Arab world in general. In comparison, the nuclear shenanigans of North Korea which were once viewed as a major global danger, would remain a marginal issue.
The NPT Review Conference in 2010 built a hard-fought consensus based on more than 60 action points spread over three broad areas. These three “pillars” were nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy. West Asia figured large, which primarily meant finding a way to a nuclear-free zone, which in turn meant addressing the issue of Israel’s nuclear weapons. This has now been much muddied by Iran’s own nuclear programme which in turn could now be resolved if the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and China, facilitated by the European Union) and Iran comes to fruition. Three preparatory committee (Prepcom) meetings have been held so far to prepare an agenda or work plan for the 2015 Review Conference next week. Reconciling the wide range of views of 190-member states has never been easy. Consequently, various consensus drafts have been attempted and what emerges as the agreed agenda for the conference remains to be seen. The three pillars are in themselves complex and intractable as examined hereon.
Nuclear disarmament is possibly the easiest issue on the table, more so because there is no solution possible or even conceivable. As a result, a formulaic approach is likely to get used in which non-nuclear weapon states deplore the NWS’s lack of progress on reducing their arsenals and making good on promises made in the past. On their part, the NWS will reaffirm their commitment to disarmament, but point to the strategic security scenario to justify the incremental and slow progress so far. This will be contested strongly at the conference. The discourse on the humanitarian dangers, from the use, deliberate or accidental, of nuclear weapons either by states or non-state actors, has gathered strength. This requires, from the NWS, greater transparency and tangible steps on nuclear security. U.S. President Barack Obama has led the initiative on nuclear security through international conferences, which have yielded more statements of intentions than specific actions. This will coalesce the non-nuclear states into a large bloc demanding tangible action from the NWS. They would seek time bound progress on the long promised consultative process among the NWS.
Q. Which of the following is not the synonym of the word “contentious”?
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
Directions: In the following passage, some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph meaningful.
A friend in need is a friend indeed. A man who stands (11) is friend in (12) is a true friend. Selfless love is the base of true friendship. True friends share each other’s joy and sorrow, pain and pleasure. They do not fall (13) in adversity. They have full confidence in each other. They never (14) each other. (15) makes friends, adversity tries them. A selfless friend is (16); a selfish friend is a curse. The first is an angel and the second is a devil. One makes your career while the other (17) it.
True friendship means great self-sacrifice on the part of both. A true friend (18) pleasure and convenience. He goes out of his way and faces difficulties in his way with joy and even with pride. Joy and sorrow, success and failure, good fortune and misfortune, are equally (19) by a pair of true friends. They (20) the burden of life equally for they feel that they sail in the same boat and that they have to sink and swim together.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
Your bonus will dependent the quality of your work.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
He did not ask for a raise since he had fear to lose his job.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
The organizers agreed to shift the conference at some place convenience to all participants.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
As compared to last year there has been a sharp rise in interest rates.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
In the 1970s banks required to submit their detailed plans of expansion to RBI.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
He advised his son not doing anything which is against his conscience.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
Even after talking the matter for hours we could not arrive at a decision.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
Every employee is entitled to those benefits from the late regulations.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
Recently there has been suddenly increased the price of oil.
DIRECTIONS : Which of the phrases (a), (b), (c) and (d) given below each sentence should replace the phrase printed in bold in the sentence to make it grammatically correct? If the sentence is correct as it is given and no correction is required, mark (e) as the answer.
That company is our rival since it provides similar services to ours in a lowest rate.
Directions : The circle-graph given here shows the spending of a country on various sports during a particular year. Study the graph carefully and answer the questions given below it.
Q. What percent of total spending is spent on Tennis?
Percentage of money spend on Tennis = [(45 /360)] X 100% = 12 ½
Directions : The circle-graph given here shows the spending of a country on various sports during a particular year. Study the graph carefully and answer the questions given below it.
Q. How much percent more is spent on Hockey than that on Golf?
Let the total spending on sports be Rs. x. Then,
Amount spent on Golf = Rs [(36x/ 360 )] = Rs. x/ 10
Amount spent on Hockey = Rs [ ( 63x/360)]= Rs. 7x /40
Difference = Rs. [(7x /40) – (x/10)] = Rs 3x/40
Required percentage = Rs. [ (3x/40)/ x /10) * 100] % = 75%
Directions : The circle-graph given here shows the spending of a country on various sports during a particular year. Study the graph carefully and answer the questions given below it.
Q. If the total amount spent on sports during the year be Rs. 1,80,00,000 , the amount spent on Basketball exceeds on Tennis by:
Amount spent on Basketball exceeds that on Tennis by:
Rs. [ (50 - 45)/ 360) * 1,80,00,000]= Rs. 2,50,000.
Directions : The circle-graph given here shows the spending of a country on various sports during a particular year. Study the graph carefully and answer the questions given below it.
Q. How much percent less is spent on Football than that on Cricket?
Let the total spending on sports be Rs. x. Then,
Amount spent on Cricket = Rs [( 81/360) * x ) = Rs. 9x/40
Amount spent on Football = Rs [( 54/360) *x] = Rs. 3x/20
Difference = Rs. [ ( 9x /40) – ( 3x/20) ] = Rs. 3x/40
Required percentage = Rs. [ (3x/40/ 9x/40) * 100)] % = 33 1/3 %
Direction: Study the table carefully to answer the questions that follow:
Number of Employees (in Thousands) working in six different companies in six years
Q. What was the respective ratio between the employees working in company R in year 2005 and employees working in company L in year 2004?
Required ratio = 4.5/2.4 = 15 : 8
Direction: Study the table carefully to answer the questions that follow:
Number of Employees (in Thousands) working in six different companies in six years
Q. What was the total number of employees working in company M and P together in year 2008 and employees working in company L and R together in year 2005?
Total number of employees
= (5.7 + 4.8 + 3.4 + 4.5) × 1000 = 18.4 × 1000 = 18400
Direction: Study the table carefully to answer the questions that follow:
Number of Employees (in Thousands) working in six different companies in six years
Q. In which company was the total number of employees working in year 2007 the second highest?
K = 6.3, L = 4.7, M = 5.5, N = 5.3, P = 5.6 , R = 2.9
Required company = P
Direction: Study the table carefully to answer the questions that follow:
Number of Employees (in Thousands) working in six different companies in six years
Q. Number of employees working in company K in year 2009 was what percentage of all the employees working in company N in all the years together?
Required per cent = [7.2/(3.9+4.1+3.4+5.3+6.7+9.6)]*100
= (7.2*100)/33 % = 21.82% = 21% (Approx.)
Direction: Study the table carefully to answer the questions that follow:
Number of Employees (in Thousands) working in six different companies in six years
Q. What was the average number of employees working in year 2007 in all the companies together?
Required average
=[(6.3+4.7+5.5+5.3+5.6+2.9)/6]*1000
= (30.3*1000)/6 = 30300/6 = 5050
Aarush, Birju and Carol can do a piece of work in 10, 20 and 30 days, respectively. They all begin together. Aarush work continuously till it is finished, Carol leaves the work 2 days before its completion and Birju leaves the work 1 day before its completion. In what appx. time is the work finished?
A person was appointed for a 50 days job on a condition that he will be paid Rs. 12 for every working day but he will be fined Rs. 6 for every day he remains absent. After the completion of the work, he got Rs. 510. For how many days, he worked?
A tap having diameter ‘d’ can empty a tank in 80 min. How long another tap having diameter ‘2d’ take to empty the same tank?
A cistern has three pipes X, Y and Z. Pipes X and Y can fill it in 3 and 4 h, respectively, while pipe Z can empty the completely filled cistern in 1 h. If the pipes are opened in order at 1:00 pm, 2:00 pm and 3:00 pm, respectively, at what time will the cistern be empty?
Taps A, B and C are attached with a tank and velocities of water coming through them are 45 L/h, 52 L/h and 47 L/h, respectively. A and B are inlets and C is outlet. If all the taps are opened simultaneously, tank is filled in 1 day. What is the capacity of the tank?
Direction: In the following questions, there are two equations (I) and (II) solve the equations and answer according to following codes:
I. 2x2– 13x + 21 = 0
II. 2y2 – 7y + 3 = 0
I. 12 x2– 6x – 7x + 21 = 0
x = 3, 7/2
II. 2y2 - 7y + 3 = 0
y = 3, 1/2
Direction: In the following questions, there are two equations (I) and (II) solve the equations and answer according to following codes:
I. x2– 12x + 35 = 0
II. 6y2+ 11y +3 = 0
I. x2 - 12x + 35 = 0
x = 7 or 5
II. 6y2 + 11y + 3 = 0
y = -1/3, -3/2
x > y
Direction: In the following questions, there are two equations (I) and (II) solve the equations and answer according to following codes:
I. 2x2 – 17 x +21 = 0
II. y2– 15y + 56 = 0
I. 2x2 – 17 x + 21= 0
or, 2x2 – 14 x – 3 x + 21 = 0
x = 7 or 3/2
II. y2 – 15 y + 56 = 0
y2 – 8y – 7y + 56 = 0
y(y – 8) – 7 (y – 8) = 0
(y – 8) (y – 7)
y = 8, 7
x ≤ y
Direction: In the following questions, there are two equations (I) and (II) solve the equations and answer according to following codes:
I. x2 + 2x – 8 = 0
II. 2y2 – 15y + 28 = 0
I. x2 + 2x – 8 = 0
x2+ 4 x – 2 – 8 = 0
x = – 4 or +2
II. 2 y2 – 15 y + 28 = 0
y = 7/2, 4
x < y
Direction: In the following questions, there are two equations (I) and (II) solve the equations and answer according to following codes:
I. x = √(1/9)
II. 9y2 – 6y + 1 = 0
I. x = 1/3
II. 9y2- 6y + 1 = 0
(3y - 1)2= 0
y = 1/3
x = y
50, 60, 75, 97.5, ?, 184.275, 267.19875
6 bells commence tolling together and toll of intervals are 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 s, respectively. In 1 h, how many times, do they toll together?
A container of milk was 4/5 full. When 12 bottles of milk were taken out and 8 bottles of milk were poured into it, it was 3/4 full. How many bottles of milk can be container contain?
A man divides his total route of journey into three equal parts and decides to travel the three parts with speed of 15 km/h, 10 km/h and 5 km/h, respectively. Find his average speed of during journey.
The average speed during the whole journey is
The population of a city is 250000. It is increasing at the rate of 2% every year. The growth in the population after 2 yr is?
What approximate value should come in the place of the question mark(?) in the following questions? ( Note that you are not expected to calculate the exact value).
125.009 + 69.999 + 104.989 = ?
What approximate value should come in the place of the question mark(?) in the following questions? ( Note that you are not expected to calculate the exact value).
127.007 × 7.998 + 6.05 × 4.001 = ?
What approximate value should come in the place of the question mark(?) in the following questions? ( Note that you are not expected to calculate the exact value).
36.98276421 × 21.00002 = ?
What approximate value should come in the place of the question mark(?) in the following questions? ( Note that you are not expected to calculate the exact value).
1559.999÷ 24.001 + 11.005 × 6.999 = ?
What approximate value should come in the place of the question mark(?) in the following questions? ( Note that you are not expected to calculate the exact value).
6.39 × 128.948 + 5.215 ÷ 12.189 + 25.056
An amount of money grows up to Rs. 3136000 in 2 years, and up to Rs. 3512320 in 3 years, on compound interest. What is the rate of interest per annum ?
C. I for third year is 3512320 - 3136000 = 376320
Which is S. I for Rs. 3136000 in one year.
r = (376320 * 100)/ (3136000 * 1) = 12% pa
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below:
There are eight persons A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H who live in an eight-storey building. The ground floor is numbered one and the topmost floor is numbered eight. Each of them is preparing for different competitive exam viz. IAS, SSC, Bank, GATE, PCS, RRB, CAT and NET but not necessarily in the same order.
There is only one floor between the A and the one who is preparing for NET exam. The one who prepares for NET does not live on first floor. D lives just below B. The one who is preparing for IAS exam live on even-numbered floor and just above the floor on which the person who is preparing for PCS exam lives. The one who is preparing for RRB exam lives on an even-numbered floor but not on the 8th floor. Neither D nor H lives on the 1st floor. Only one person lives between the one who is preparing for CAT and D. A lives on an odd-numbered floor and E lives just above A. B lives on the fourth floor. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for RRB and A. F lives just below the one who is preparing for PCS. D is preparing for neither PCS nor NET. The one who prepares for Bank exam does not live on an odd-numbered floor. G does not prepare for SSC. There are two floors between the H and the one on which E lives. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for GATE and the one who is preparing for Bank.
Q. Who among the following is preparing for SSC?
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below:
There are eight persons A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H who live in an eight-storey building. The ground floor is numbered one and the topmost floor is numbered eight. Each of them is preparing for different competitive exam viz. IAS, SSC, Bank, GATE, PCS, RRB, CAT and NET but not necessarily in the same order.
There is only one floor between the A and the one who is preparing for NET exam. The one who prepares for NET does not live on first floor. D lives just below B. The one who is preparing for IAS exam live on even-numbered floor and just above the floor on which the person who is preparing for PCS exam lives. The one who is preparing for RRB exam lives on an even-numbered floor but not on the 8th floor. Neither D nor H lives on the 1st floor. Only one person lives between the one who is preparing for CAT and D. A lives on an odd-numbered floor and E lives just above A. B lives on the fourth floor. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for RRB and A. F lives just below the one who is preparing for PCS. D is preparing for neither PCS nor NET. The one who prepares for Bank exam does not live on an odd-numbered floor. G does not prepare for SSC. There are two floors between the H and the one on which E lives. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for GATE and the one who is preparing for Bank.
Q. How many persons are there between E and B?
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below:
There are eight persons A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H who live in an eight-storey building. The ground floor is numbered one and the topmost floor is numbered eight. Each of them is preparing for different competitive exam viz. IAS, SSC, Bank, GATE, PCS, RRB, CAT and NET but not necessarily in the same order.
There is only one floor between the A and the one who is preparing for NET exam. The one who prepares for NET does not live on first floor. D lives just below B. The one who is preparing for IAS exam live on even-numbered floor and just above the floor on which the person who is preparing for PCS exam lives. The one who is preparing for RRB exam lives on an even-numbered floor but not on the 8th floor. Neither D nor H lives on the 1st floor. Only one person lives between the one who is preparing for CAT and D. A lives on an odd-numbered floor and E lives just above A. B lives on the fourth floor. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for RRB and A. F lives just below the one who is preparing for PCS. D is preparing for neither PCS nor NET. The one who prepares for Bank exam does not live on an odd-numbered floor. G does not prepare for SSC. There are two floors between the H and the one on which E lives. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for GATE and the one who is preparing for Bank.
Q. Who among the following lives on the topmost floor?
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below:
There are eight persons A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H who live in an eight-storey building. The ground floor is numbered one and the topmost floor is numbered eight. Each of them is preparing for different competitive exam viz. IAS, SSC, Bank, GATE, PCS, RRB, CAT and NET but not necessarily in the same order.
There is only one floor between the A and the one who is preparing for NET exam. The one who prepares for NET does not live on first floor. D lives just below B. The one who is preparing for IAS exam live on even-numbered floor and just above the floor on which the person who is preparing for PCS exam lives. The one who is preparing for RRB exam lives on an even-numbered floor but not on the 8th floor. Neither D nor H lives on the 1st floor. Only one person lives between the one who is preparing for CAT and D. A lives on an odd-numbered floor and E lives just above A. B lives on the fourth floor. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for RRB and A. F lives just below the one who is preparing for PCS. D is preparing for neither PCS nor NET. The one who prepares for Bank exam does not live on an odd-numbered floor. G does not prepare for SSC. There are two floors between the H and the one on which E lives. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for GATE and the one who is preparing for Bank.
Q. Which of the following combinations is/are true?
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below:
There are eight persons A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H who live in an eight-storey building. The ground floor is numbered one and the topmost floor is numbered eight. Each of them is preparing for different competitive exam viz. IAS, SSC, Bank, GATE, PCS, RRB, CAT and NET but not necessarily in the same order.
There is only one floor between the A and the one who is preparing for NET exam. The one who prepares for NET does not live on first floor. D lives just below B. The one who is preparing for IAS exam live on even-numbered floor and just above the floor on which the person who is preparing for PCS exam lives. The one who is preparing for RRB exam lives on an even-numbered floor but not on the 8th floor. Neither D nor H lives on the 1st floor. Only one person lives between the one who is preparing for CAT and D. A lives on an odd-numbered floor and E lives just above A. B lives on the fourth floor. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for RRB and A. F lives just below the one who is preparing for PCS. D is preparing for neither PCS nor NET. The one who prepares for Bank exam does not live on an odd-numbered floor. G does not prepare for SSC. There are two floors between the H and the one on which E lives. Only two persons live between the one who is preparing for GATE and the one who is preparing for Bank.
Q. A is preparing for which of the following exam?
Directions : In each question below is given a group of letters followed by four combinations of digits/symbols numbered (a), (b), (c) and (d). You have to find out which of combinations correctly represents the group of letters based on the following coding system and mark the number of that combination as the answer. If none of the four combinations correctly represents the group of letters, mark (e), i.e. ‘None of these’, as the answer.
Conditions:-
(1) If the first letter is a consonants and the last letter is vowel their codes are to be interchanged.
(2) If the both first and last letters is vowel both are to be coded as 0.
(3) If the both first and last letter is consonants, then their code are to be coded as first letter code.
(4) If the first letter is vowel and last letter is consonants then both are to be coded as the code for the last letter code.
Q. KUNLEQ
Since the first and last both letter are consonants, So both are coded as first letter code i.e. #$87%#
Directions : In each question below is given a group of letters followed by four combinations of digits/symbols numbered (a), (b), (c) and (d). You have to find out which of combinations correctly represents the group of letters based on the following coding system and mark the number of that combination as the answer. If none of the four combinations correctly represents the group of letters, mark (e), i.e. ‘None of these’, as the answer.
Conditions:-
(1) If the first letter is a consonants and the last letter is vowel their codes are to be interchanged.
(2) If the both first and last letters is vowel both are to be coded as 0.
(3) If the both first and last letter is consonants, then their code are to be coded as first letter code.
(4) If the first letter is vowel and last letter is consonants then both are to be coded as the code for the last letter code.
Q. IKGFEM
Since first letter is vowel and last letter is consonants, so both are to be coded as last letter code i.e. → 4#2@%4
Directions : In each question below is given a group of letters followed by four combinations of digits/symbols numbered (a), (b), (c) and (d). You have to find out which of combinations correctly represents the group of letters based on the following coding system and mark the number of that combination as the answer. If none of the four combinations correctly represents the group of letters, mark (e), i.e. ‘None of these’, as the answer.
Conditions:-
(1) If the first letter is a consonants and the last letter is vowel their codes are to be interchanged.
(2) If the both first and last letters is vowel both are to be coded as 0.
(3) If the both first and last letter is consonants, then their code are to be coded as first letter code.
(4) If the first letter is vowel and last letter is consonants then both are to be coded as the code for the last letter code.
Q. JNLEQU
Since first letter is consonant and last letter is vowel, so their codes are interchanged i.e. $87%61
Directions : In each question below is given a group of letters followed by four combinations of digits/symbols numbered (a), (b), (c) and (d). You have to find out which of combinations correctly represents the group of letters based on the following coding system and mark the number of that combination as the answer. If none of the four combinations correctly represents the group of letters, mark (e), i.e. ‘None of these’, as the answer.
Conditions:-
(1) If the first letter is a consonants and the last letter is vowel their codes are to be interchanged.
(2) If the both first and last letters is vowel both are to be coded as 0.
(3) If the both first and last letter is consonants, then their code are to be coded as first letter code.
(4) If the first letter is vowel and last letter is consonants then both are to be coded as the code for the last letter code.
Q. EIBQKU
Since both first and last letter are vowel both are to be coded as 0 i.e. 0956#0
Directions : In each question below is given a group of letters followed by four combinations of digits/symbols numbered (a), (b), (c) and (d). You have to find out which of combinations correctly represents the group of letters based on the following coding system and mark the number of that combination as the answer. If none of the four combinations correctly represents the group of letters, mark (e), i.e. ‘None of these’, as the answer.
Conditions:-
(1) If the first letter is a consonants and the last letter is vowel their codes are to be interchanged.
(2) If the both first and last letters is vowel both are to be coded as 0.
(3) If the both first and last letter is consonants, then their code are to be coded as first letter code.
(4) If the first letter is vowel and last letter is consonants then both are to be coded as the code for the last letter code.
Q. BGKEQI
Since first letter is consonant and last letter is vowel, so their code are interchanged i.e. 92#%65
Directions: In the following questions, the symbols @, ©, %, $ and * are used the following meaning as illustrated below:
‘A © B’ means ‘A is smaller than B’
‘A @ B’ means ‘A is either smaller than or equal to B’
‘A % B’ means ‘A is greater than B’
‘A $ B’ means ‘A is either greater than or equal to B’
‘A * B’ means ‘A is equal to B’
Now in each of these questions assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given below them is/are definitely true? Give answer
Q. Statements: P @ R, T $ V, R % S, T @ S
Conclusions: I. R % V II. P % V
P ≤ R > S ≥ T ≥ V
Conclusions:
I. R % V ( True)
II. P % V( Not True)
Directions: In the following questions, the symbols @, ©, %, $ and * are used the following meaning as illustrated below:
‘A © B’ means ‘A is smaller than B’
‘A @ B’ means ‘A is either smaller than or equal to B’
‘A % B’ means ‘A is greater than B’
‘A $ B’ means ‘A is either greater than or equal to B’
‘A * B’ means ‘A is equal to B’
Now in each of these questions assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given below them is/are definitely true? Give answer
Q. Statements: C $ D, D % E, F @ E, H © C
Conclusions: I. H © F II. H * F
H < C ≥ D > E ≥ F
Conclusions:
I. H © F( Not True)
II. H * F( Not True)
Directions: In the following questions, the symbols @, ©, %, $ and * are used the following meaning as illustrated below:
‘A © B’ means ‘A is smaller than B’
‘A @ B’ means ‘A is either smaller than or equal to B’
‘A % B’ means ‘A is greater than B’
‘A $ B’ means ‘A is either greater than or equal to B’
‘A * B’ means ‘A is equal to B’
Now in each of these questions assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given below them is/are definitely true? Give answer
Q. Statements: M @ N, N © O, O * P, P % R
Conclusions: I. R % M II. P % M
M ≤ N < O = P > R
Conclusions:
I. R % M( Not True)
II. P % M( True)
Directions: In the following questions, the symbols @, ©, %, $ and * are used the following meaning as illustrated below:
‘A © B’ means ‘A is smaller than B’
‘A @ B’ means ‘A is either smaller than or equal to B’
‘A % B’ means ‘A is greater than B’
‘A $ B’ means ‘A is either greater than or equal to B’
‘A * B’ means ‘A is equal to B’
Now in each of these questions assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given below them is/are definitely true? Give answer
Q. Statements: T $ U, X @ W, U % X, Y % W
Conclusions: I. T $ X II. Y % U
T ≥ U > X ≤ W < Y
Conclusions:
I. T $ X( Not True)
II. Y % U( Not True)
Directions: In the following questions, the symbols @, ©, %, $ and * are used the following meaning as illustrated below:
‘A © B’ means ‘A is smaller than B’
‘A @ B’ means ‘A is either smaller than or equal to B’
‘A % B’ means ‘A is greater than B’
‘A $ B’ means ‘A is either greater than or equal to B’
‘A * B’ means ‘A is equal to B’
Now in each of these questions assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given below them is/are definitely true? Give answer
Q. Statements: R $ T, S * T, S % U, W @ U
Conclusions: I. U © T II. W © R
R ≥ T= S > U ≥ W
Conclusions:
I. U © T ( True)
II. W © R( True)
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below:
Eight students P, Q, R, S, W, X, Y and Z will have to submit the project in the months of March and July but not necessarily in the same order. In each month, they will submit the project on dates 13th, 17th, 19th and 21st of the given month. Only one student will submit the project on these given dates.
P will submit the project on 17th of any of the given month. Three students will submit the project between P and Z. Only one student will submit the project between Z and Q. Two students will submit the project between Q and Y. S will submit the project immediately before the W. Three students will submit the project between S and R. X will not submit the project on 13th July.
Q. Who among following will submit the project on 13th July?
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below:
Eight students P, Q, R, S, W, X, Y and Z will have to submit the project in the months of March and July but not necessarily in the same order. In each month, they will submit the project on dates 13th, 17th, 19th and 21st of the given month. Only one student will submit the project on these given dates.
P will submit the project on 17th of any of the given month. Three students will submit the project between P and Z. Only one student will submit the project between Z and Q. Two students will submit the project between Q and Y. S will submit the project immediately before the W. Three students will submit the project between S and R. X will not submit the project on 13th July.
Q. How many student/s will submit the project between Y and Q?
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below:
Eight students P, Q, R, S, W, X, Y and Z will have to submit the project in the months of March and July but not necessarily in the same order. In each month, they will submit the project on dates 13th, 17th, 19th and 21st of the given month. Only one student will submit the project on these given dates.
P will submit the project on 17th of any of the given month. Three students will submit the project between P and Z. Only one student will submit the project between Z and Q. Two students will submit the project between Q and Y. S will submit the project immediately before the W. Three students will submit the project between S and R. X will not submit the project on 13th July.
Q. Who among following will submit the project on 13th March?
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below:
Eight students P, Q, R, S, W, X, Y and Z will have to submit the project in the months of March and July but not necessarily in the same order. In each month, they will submit the project on dates 13th, 17th, 19th and 21st of the given month. Only one student will submit the project on these given dates.
P will submit the project on 17th of any of the given month. Three students will submit the project between P and Z. Only one student will submit the project between Z and Q. Two students will submit the project between Q and Y. S will submit the project immediately before the W. Three students will submit the project between S and R. X will not submit the project on 13th July.
Q. If X is related to S and Z is related to Q, in the same way S is related to?
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the question given below:
Eight students P, Q, R, S, W, X, Y and Z will have to submit the project in the months of March and July but not necessarily in the same order. In each month, they will submit the project on dates 13th, 17th, 19th and 21st of the given month. Only one student will submit the project on these given dates.
P will submit the project on 17th of any of the given month. Three students will submit the project between P and Z. Only one student will submit the project between Z and Q. Two students will submit the project between Q and Y. S will submit the project immediately before the W. Three students will submit the project between S and R. X will not submit the project on 13th July.
Q. P will submit the project on which of the following dates?
Directions : In the questions below are given one conclusions followed by five set of statements. You have to choose the correct set of statements that logically satisfies given conclusions either definitely or possibly. Assume the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts.
Q.Conclusions: No time is diagram.
Directions : In the questions below are given one conclusions followed by five set of statements. You have to choose the correct set of statements that logically satisfies given conclusions either definitely or possibly. Assume the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts.
Q. Conclusions: Some money are not finds.
If in the number 3856490271, positions of the first and the second digits are interchanged, positions of the third and fourth digits are interchanged and so on till the positions of 9th and 10th digits are interchanged, then which digit will be fifth from the left end ?
In a certain code MODE is written as #8%6 and DEAF is written as %67$. How if FOAM is written in that code ?
FOAM= $87#
If the digits of the number 783219 are arranged in ascending order within the number, how many digits will be as far away from the beginning of the number as they are in the number before applied the above mention operation?
Directions: These questions are based on the following set of numbers.
437 592 472 791 817
If ‘1’ is subtracted from the middle digit of each number and then the numbers are arranged in ascending order from left to right, then which of the following number is second from right?
781 is second from right.
437 592 472 791 817
427 582 462 781 807
427 462 582 781 807
Directions: These questions are based on the following set of numbers.
437 592 472 791 817
If in each number, the first and the third digits are interchanged then which number will be the largest?
largest number is= 437
437 592 472 791 817
734 295 274 197 718
Directions: These questions are based on the following set of numbers.
437 592 472 791 817
If the first and the second digits in each number are interchanged, then which number will be the second smallest?
2nd smallest is= 437
437 592 472 791 817
347 952 742 971 187
Directions: These questions are based on the following set of numbers.
437 592 472 791 817
If all the numbers are arranged in ascending order from left to right then what will be the difference between the third digit of second highest number and second digit of third highest number?
437 592 472 791 817
437 472 592 791 817
Third digit of second highest number= 1,
Second digit of third highest number= 9
Diff=9-1=8
Directions: These questions are based on the following set of numbers.
437 592 472 791 817
If in each number first digit is replaced by the third digit, second digit is replaced by the first digit and third digit is replaced by the second digit, then which number will be the smallest?
437 592 472 791 817
743 259 247 179 781
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below.
In a certain code
‘all candidates must qualify’ is written as ‘na li ja pa’,
‘qualify in all subjects’ is written as ‘ta ja li ra’ and
‘candidate read all subjects’ is written as ‘sa li na ra’
Q. What does ‘li’ stand for?
Candidates= na
Must= pa
Subject=ra
In=ta
All=li
Qualify=ja
Read=sa
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below.
In a certain code
‘all candidates must qualify’ is written as ‘na li ja pa’,
‘qualify in all subjects’ is written as ‘ta ja li ra’ and
‘candidate read all subjects’ is written as ‘sa li na ra’
Q.Which word will be coded as ‘ja na’?
Candidates= na
Must= pa
Subject=ra
In=ta
All=li
Qualify=ja
Read=sa
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below.
In a certain code
‘all candidates must qualify’ is written as ‘na li ja pa’,
‘qualify in all subjects’ is written as ‘ta ja li ra’ and
‘candidate read all subjects’ is written as ‘sa li na ra’
Q.How will ‘all subjects’ be coded?
Candidates= na
Must= pa
Subject=ra
In=ta
All=li
Qualify=ja
Read=sa
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below.
In a certain code
‘all candidates must qualify’ is written as ‘na li ja pa’,
‘qualify in all subjects’ is written as ‘ta ja li ra’ and
‘candidate read all subjects’ is written as ‘sa li na ra’
Q.What will be the code for ‘must’?
Candidates= na
Must= pa
Subject=ra
In=ta
All=li
Qualify=ja
Read=sa
Directions : Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given below.
In a certain code
‘all candidates must qualify’ is written as ‘na li ja pa’,
‘qualify in all subjects’ is written as ‘ta ja li ra’ and
‘candidate read all subjects’ is written as ‘sa li na ra’
Q.How could be ‘candidate should read all subjects’ coded as ?
Candidates= na
Must= pa
Subject=ra
In=ta
All=li
Qualify=ja
Read=sa
5 docs|130 tests
|
Use Code STAYHOME200 and get INR 200 additional OFF
|
Use Coupon Code |
5 docs|130 tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|