CLAT  >  Mock Test Series for CLAT  >  Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 Download as PDF

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2


Test Description

50 Questions MCQ Test Mock Test Series for CLAT | Test: Legal Aptitude- 2

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 for CLAT 2022 is part of Mock Test Series for CLAT preparation. The Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 questions and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus.The Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 MCQs are made for CLAT 2022 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 below.
Solutions of Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 questions in English are available as part of our Mock Test Series for CLAT for CLAT & Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 solutions in Hindi for Mock Test Series for CLAT course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 | 50 questions in 40 minutes | Mock test for CLAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Mock Test Series for CLAT for CLAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you?
Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 1

Questions 1 to 3 on same principle

Principle: Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits "extortion".

Q. 

Facts: A threatens to publish a defamatory libel concerning Z unless Z gives him money

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 2

Principle: Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits "extortion".

Q. 

Facts: A, by putting Z in fear of grievous hurt, dishonestly induces Z to sign or affix his seal to a blank paper and deliver it to A. Z signs and delivers the paper to A.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 3

Principle: Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits "extortion"

Q. 

Facts: A threatens Z that he will keep Z's child in wrongful confinement; unless Z will sign and deliver to A a promissory note binding Z to pay certain monies to A. Z signs and delivers the note.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 4

Questions 4 to 7 on same principle

Principle: In all robbery there is either theft or extortion

When theft is robbery: Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carrying away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

When extortion is robbery: Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the

Explanation: The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

Q. 

Facts: A holds Z down, and fraudulently takes Z's money and jewels from Z's clothes, without Z's consent.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 5

Principle: In all robbery there is either theft or extortion

When theft is robbery: Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carrying away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

When extortion is robbery: Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the

Explanation: The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

Q. 

Facts: A meets Z on the high roads, show a pistol, and demands Z's purse. Z, in consequence, surrenders his purse.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 6

Principle: In all robbery there is either theft or extortion

When theft is robbery: Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carrying away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

When extortion is robbery: Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the

Explanation: The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

Q. 

Facts: A meets Z and Z's child on the high road. A takes the child, and threatens to fling it down a precipice, unless Z delivers his purse. Z, in consequence, delivers his purse.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 7

Principle: In all robbery there is either theft or extortion

When theft is robbery: Theft is "robbery" if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carrying away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

When extortion is robbery: Extortion is "robbery" if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the

Explanation: The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

Q. 

Facts: A obtains property from Z by saying--"Your child is in the hands of my gang, and will be put to death unless you send us ten thousand rupees".

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 8

Assertion: A person is not guilty of Dacoity unless he has committed, attempted to commit or aided in committing Robbery.

Reason: when two persons conjointly commit Robbery, then every person so committing Robbery is said to commit Dacoity

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 9

Assertion (A): X, because of unsound state of mind and not knowing the nature of the act, attacks Y, who in self defense and in order to ward off the attack, hits him thereby injuring him. Y has not committed an offence.

Reason (R): Y had a right of private defense against X under Section 98 of the Indian Penal Code.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 10

X, a person signs his own name to a bill of exchange, intending that it may be believed that he bill was drawn by another person of the same name.

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 10 Singing bill on his own name , He is showing unreal or fake sales and hence, avoiding tax payment for the so called "sold products". i.e. forgery.
Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 11

Principle: The communication of a proposal is complete when it becomes to the knowledge of the person to whom it is made.

Facts: A proposes by letter to sell a house to B at a certain price. The communication of proposal is complete when

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 12

Principle: "Fraud" means and includes any of the following acts committed by a party to a contract, or with his connivance, or by his agents, with intent to deceive another party thereto his agent, or to induce him to enter into the contract;

(1) the suggestion as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true;

(2) the active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact;

(3) a promise made without any intention of performing it;

(4) any other act fitted to deceive;

(5) any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent.

Q. 

Facts: A sells by auction to B, a horse which A knows to be unsound. A says nothing to B about the horse unsoundness.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 13

Principle: Agreement void where both parties are under mistake as to matter of fact

Q.

Facts: A agrees to sell to B a specific cargo of goods supposed to be on its way from England to Bombay. It turns out that before the day of the bargain the ship conveying the cargo had been cast away and the goods lost. Neither party was aware of these facts.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 14

Principle: (Same for question no. 14 and 15)

The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless -It is forbidden by law; or is of such nature that, if permitted it would defeat the provisions of any law or is fraudulent; of involves or implies, injury to the person or property of another; or the Court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy.

In each of these cases, the consideration or object of an agreement is said to be unlawful. Every agreement of which the object or consideration is unlawful is void.

Q. 

Facts: A promises to obtain for B an employment in the public service and B promises to pay Rs. 1000 to A.

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 14 The agreement is void because to get into Public Service you have to give exams and get selected on the basis of merit. No one can get you Public service for money so the answer is B as the consideration is opposed to public policy 
Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 15

The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless -It is forbidden by law; or is of such nature that, if permitted it would defeat the provisions of any law or is fraudulent; of involves or implies, injury to the person or property of another; or the Court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy.

In each of these cases, the consideration or object of an agreement is said to be unlawful. Every agreement of which the object or consideration is unlawful is void.

Q. 

Facts: A promises B to drop prosecution which he has instituted against B for robbery and B promises to restore the value of the things taken.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 16

A voidable contract is one which is:

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 17

“A” promise to give money or money’s worth upon the determination or ascertainment of an uncertain event is called

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 17 Wager is something like gambling where u put money for things u r not sure about like on horses running in a race.
Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 18

PRINCIPLE: Vicarious liability is the liability of the Master or Principal for the tort committed by his servant or agent, provided the tort is committed in the course of employment. The Master or Principal is not liable for private wrongs of the servant /agent.

FACTS: X hands over some cash money at his house to Y, who is X’s neighbour and is also cashier in a bank, to be deposited in A’s account in the bank. Instead of depositing the money, Y misappropriates it.

Q.

Which of the following statements depict correct legal position in this given legal situation?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 19

PRINCIPLE: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented.

FACTS: R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organized by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses.

Q.

Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 20

PRINCIPLE: Damage without the violation of a legal right is not actionable in a court of law. If the interference with the rights of another person is not unlawful or unauthorized, but a necessary consequence of the exercise of defendant’s own lawful rights, no action should lie.

FACTS: There was an established school (ES) in a particular locality. Subsequently, a new school (NS) was set up in the same locality which charged lower fees, on account of which people started patronizing the new school. Because of the competition, ES had to reduce its fees. ES filed a case against NS saying that NS had caused it financial loss and, thus, claimed compensation.

Q.

Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 21

PRINCIPLE: Whenever there is an invasion of a legal right, the person in whom the right is vested, is entitled to bring an action though he has suffered no actual loss or harm, and may recover damages (compensation).

FACTS: ‘A’ was a qualified voter for the Lok Sabha election. However, a returning officer wrongfully refused to take A’s vote. In spite of such wrongful refusal, the candidate, for whom ‘A’ wanted to vote, won the election. But, ‘A’ brought an action for damages.

Q.

Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 22

PRINCIPLE: In a civil action for defamation, truth of the defamatory matter is an absolute defence. However, the burden of proving truth is on the defendant; and he is liable if he does not successfully discharge this burden.

FACTS: D, who was the editor of a local weekly, published a series of articles mentioning that P, who was a government servant, issued false certificates, accepted bribe, adopted corrupt and illegal means to mint money and was a “mischief monger”. P brought a civil action against D, who could not prove the facts published by him. Under the circumstances, which of the following derivations is CORRECT?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 23

PRINCIPLE: A gift comprising existing property is valid and a gift comprising future property is void

FACTS: X has a house which is owned by him. He contracted to purchase a plot of land adjacent to the said house but the sale (of the plot of land) in his favour is yet to be completed. He makes a gift of both the properties (house and land) to Y. Under the afore-mentioned circumstances, which of the following derivations is CORRECT?

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 23 Applying the principle since the house is owned by him he can gift it to anyone but since the sale of plot of land is yet to be done in favour of x it cannot be gifted
Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 24

Assertion: No action lies for mere damage caused by some act which does not violate a legal right

Reason: An action lies for interference with another legal right even where it causes no actual damage

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 25

Two or more person can be made joint tortfeasors, if they have:

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 25

The correct option is C.
Joint or common action- In the law of torts two or more persons are said to be joint tortfeasors if they act jointly in the tort or a same suit of action is followed if one defendant has incited another to commit the tort.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 26

A building was erected by the defendant, which caused diminution of light to two ground floor windows of the plaintiff house. Subsequently electric lights were always needed in the place. An action for damages can be brought on the ground

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 27

The government of India act 1935 abolishes the concept of

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 28

Right to vote is a

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 29

In which case it was held that preamble is not a part of constitution of India?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 30

Whether the preamble can be amended?

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 30

Option (a) is Correct
Yes,preamble can be amended.it was amended in 42nd amendment which added the terms socialist,secular and integrity to the preamble.but the basic structure of preamble should not be changed.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 31

The constitution names our country as

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 32

Who among the following is known as father of Indian constitution?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 33

Assertion (A): equality before law is not applicable to the president of India

Reason (R): The president of India enjoys special privileges under the constitution of India

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 33 A is the correct option because equality before law is given in the Constitution, the president is given some privileges , one of which is that equality before law is not applicable to him/ her. This is because the President represents the whole country.
Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 34

Assertion (A): The right to move the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the fundamental rights is guaranteed as a fundamental right

Reason (R): Supreme Court of India has been appointed as the guardian of the Constitution.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 35

Assertion (A): The Supreme Court of India enjoys the power of Judicial Review

Reason (R): The Supreme Court of India is obliged to enforce the laws enacted by the Parliament without going into their constitutionality.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 36

Who is Amicus Curiae

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 37

Adverse possession means

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 38

How the citizenship of India can be terminated?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 39

Fundamental rights are available against the

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 40

Can a person waive his fundamental right?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 41

What is the maximum time limit for filing of a complaint before the consumer disputes redressal forum from the date when the cause of action arises?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 42

Which of the following is the oldest High Court in India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 42 The Calcutta High Court is the oldest High Court in India. It has jurisdiction over the state of West Bengal and the Union Territory of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 43

Who was the first woman judge to be appointed to the Supreme Court of India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 43

The correct option is B.
 The first female justice in the court was Fatima Beevi appointed on 6 October 1989.

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 44

Who was the first woman judge to be appointed Chief Justice of a High Court?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 45

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court allow Passive Euthanasia under exceptional circumstances?

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 46

First committee on Backward castes

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 47

Babri masjid demolition case related to

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 48

Reservation of seats for Backward castes

Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 49

When were the first general elections took place in…

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 49 The rest of the India voted only in February–March 1952 for the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections. Polling was held between 25 October 1951 and 27 March 1952. The very first votes of the election were cast in the tehsil (district) of Chini in Himachal Pradesh.
Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 50

The first hour of every sitting of the parliament is known as………………..

Detailed Solution for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 - Question 50 Generally, the first hour of a sitting of Lok Sabha (11 am to 12 noon) is devoted to Questions and that hour is called the Question Hour.
1 videos|6 docs|67 tests
Use Code STAYHOME200 and get INR 200 additional OFF
Use Coupon Code
Information about Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Legal Aptitude- 2, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice