Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals

Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals below.
Solutions of Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals questions in English are available as part of our Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals solutions in Hindi for Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 1

What historical legal test highlighted that individuals lacking understanding similar to that of an infant or a wild beast should not be convicted?

Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 1
The "wild beast" test, developed in the 18th century, emphasized that individuals lacking understanding akin to that of an infant or a wild beast should not be convicted. This test was significant in recognizing the accountability of individuals deemed insane in legal systems.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 2

Which legal concept sets a precedent for the insanity defense by emphasizing the defendant's state of mind at the time of the crime?

Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 2
The McNaughten Rules, established in 1843, set a significant precedent for the insanity defense by emphasizing the defendant's state of mind at the time of the crime. These rules have influenced legal proceedings concerning the assessment of an individual's mental state during criminal acts.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 3

What is the historical test that significantly influenced insanity defense laws, including Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?

Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 3
The Mc Naughten rule is the historical test that had a significant impact on insanity defense laws, including Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This rule, established as a legal precedent, plays a pivotal role in determining the mental state of individuals accused of crimes. It outlines the criteria for determining whether a person, due to mental unsoundness, is incapable of understanding the nature of their actions or discerning right from wrong.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 4
Which legal concept provides protection for individuals deemed unsound of mind, stating that no offense is committed if the person is incapable of understanding the nature of their actions or discerning right from wrong due to mental unsoundness?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 4
Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is the legal provision that offers protection for individuals considered unsound of mind. According to this section, if a person, due to mental unsoundness, is unable to comprehend the nature of their actions or differentiate between right and wrong, no offense is deemed to have been committed. This legal principle emphasizes the importance of considering mental capacity in criminal proceedings.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 5
Which key principle of criminal jurisprudence is emphasized by Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 5
Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) underscores the principle that an act is not considered criminal without a guilty intent. This legal provision recognizes that individuals with mental illness may lack the necessary mental capacity to form the intent required for criminal liability. By highlighting the significance of guilty intent in criminal actions, Section 84 aims to ensure a fair and just legal system that considers the mental state of the accused.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 6
What does the Mc Naghten Rule primarily focus on in determining legal insanity?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 6
The Mc Naghten Rule centers on whether a defendant did not comprehend their actions or failed to distinguish right from wrong due to a mental disease. This test is crucial in assessing an individual's mental state at the time of the crime, emphasizing the understanding of their actions and moral judgment capacity.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 7
Which insanity test focuses on whether a defendant's actions were uncontrollable due to a mental disease?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 7
The Irresistible Impulse Test specifically examines whether a defendant's actions were uncontrollable due to a mental disease. This test delves into the aspect of volitional control, assessing if the individual could refrain from committing the criminal act due to their mental state.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 8
What does the concept of temporary insanity typically involve in legal terms?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 8
In legal terms, temporary insanity can result in the individual being found guilty of a crime but excused from punishment due to their mental illness. This defense, known as 'not guilty by reason of insanity,' acknowledges that the individual committed the act but was not in a state of mind to be held fully accountable. It serves to address cases where the person's mental state at the time of the offense affected their understanding of the consequences of their actions.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 9
How is permanent insanity distinguished from temporary insanity?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 9
Permanent insanity is differentiated from temporary insanity by historical records and events that illustrate the individual's continuous incapacity to grasp the gravity of any situation. Unlike temporary insanity, which may involve intermittent periods of mental illness, permanent insanity indicates a consistent state of mental incapacity that is enduring and demonstrated through a history of ongoing challenges in comprehending reality.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 10
Which of the following mental illnesses is commonly associated with temporary insanity?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 10
Temporary insanity often encompasses mental illnesses like depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, eating disorders, and addictive behaviors. Bipolar disorder, characterized by mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs, is one such condition that can lead to periods of temporary insanity. Individuals experiencing bipolar disorder may undergo episodes of impaired judgment and impulsive behavior, affecting their ability to comprehend reality during specific periods.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 11
What is a crucial effect of employing the insanity defense in terms of criminal liability?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 11
A significant effect of using the insanity defense in criminal cases is the creation of a legal presumption of guilt. By invoking this defense, the accused admits to committing the crime while asserting an inability to discern between right and wrong due to their mental state. This presumption plays a pivotal role in shaping the legal proceedings and outcomes associated with such cases.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 12
What potential risk is associated with individuals misusing the insanity defense in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 12
There is a risk of the insanity defense being misused in legal proceedings, as individuals may attempt to exploit this defense to avoid conviction or punishment. The ultimate judgment on the validity of the insanity defense lies with the presiding judge, making it a subjective decision. This subjectivity opens up the possibility of individuals manipulating or misusing the defense for their own benefit.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 13
What is a significant challenge associated with utilizing the insanity defense in legal cases?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 13
Demonstrating insanity as a defense in legal cases can pose significant challenges due to the high financial costs involved in the process. Both the prosecution and defense often need to hire specialists to support their arguments, leading to substantial expenses. However, successful pleas of insanity are relatively rare. This financial burden can make it challenging for individuals to effectively utilize the insanity defense in court.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 14
In some jurisdictions, what challenge may defendants face when seeking to utilize the insanity defense?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 14
In jurisdictions where the insanity defense is not universally accepted, defendants seeking to utilize this defense may face the challenge of having to transfer their cases to jurisdictions where this plea is still valid. This process can add complexity and additional legal hurdles to the proceedings, potentially impacting the outcome of the case.
Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 15
What was the legal outcome for CD after being found not guilty by reason of insanity in 1976?
Detailed Solution for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals - Question 15
Following the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity in 1976, CD was released to outpatient treatment and ongoing psychiatric care. This decision reflects the judicial system's approach to balancing justice with mental health considerations, ensuring appropriate treatment and supervision for individuals with mental health disorders involved in criminal cases.
93 docs|98 tests
Information about Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Defence of Insanity: Loophole for Criminals, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Up next

Download as PDF

Up next

Download the FREE EduRev App
Track your progress, build streaks, highlight & save important lessons and more!