Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India

Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India below.
Solutions of Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India questions in English are available as part of our Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India solutions in Hindi for Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 1

What was the primary argument presented by the petitioners in the case of S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India regarding the constitutionality of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?

Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 1
The petitioners in the case argued that the sedition law suppresses dissent and violates the right to freedom of speech guaranteed by the Indian Constitution. They contended that the law inhibits legitimate criticism of the government, which is crucial for a well-functioning democracy. This assertion highlights the importance of freedom of speech in a democratic society, allowing individuals to express their opinions and hold the government accountable.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 2

When did the Supreme Court deliver its judgment in the case of S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India, which challenged the constitutionality of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?

Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 2
The Supreme Court delivered its judgment in the case of S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India, which questioned the constitutionality of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), on May 11, 2022. This decision marked a crucial point in the legal proceedings surrounding the challenge to the sedition law in India, emphasizing the significance of the judiciary in interpreting and upholding constitutional rights.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 3

What was the primary concern raised in the S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India case?

Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 3
The primary concern raised in the S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India case revolved around the constitutionality of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, known as the law of sedition. This case questioned whether this law violates the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression as outlined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 4
What was a key aspect discussed regarding the law of sedition in the context of the S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 4
An important aspect discussed in the S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India case was the relevance of the law of sedition, a provision rooted in the colonial era. The debate centered on whether this antiquated law aligns with modern principles and values or if it is out of sync with contemporary societal norms.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 5
What fundamental right does the petitioner in the case of S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India argue is violated by the sedition law under Section 124A?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 5
The petitioner in the case of S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India argues that the sedition law under Section 124A violates the fundamental right to free speech and expression. This right is a cornerstone of democracy, allowing individuals to express their opinions and ideas freely without fear of censorship or retaliation. Freedom of speech and expression is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, emphasizing its importance in a democratic society.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 6
Why does the petitioner emphasize the urgent need to abolish the sedition law in the case of S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 6
The petitioner emphasizes the urgent need to abolish the sedition law in the case of S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India because it gives excessive powers to the government, putting citizens' fundamental rights at risk. By allowing for arbitrary use of power and often being misused to curtail legitimate criticism, this law poses a significant threat to democratic values and freedoms. Abolishing this law is seen as crucial to safeguarding the rights and liberties of individuals in a democratic society.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 7
What is the primary argument presented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta in support of the law of sedition?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 7
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta supports the law of sedition by emphasizing its crucial role in preserving national security, sovereignty, and public order. This argument underscores the importance of maintaining stability and protecting the nation against activities that could threaten its integrity.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 8
According to the respondent in S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India, how does the law of sedition relate to the freedom of speech and expression as outlined in the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 8
The respondent in S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India argued that the law of sedition aligns with democratic principles by imposing reasonable restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression as outlined in Article 19(2) of the Constitution. This position highlights the balance between upholding democratic values and ensuring that speech does not incite disaffection against the government or challenge governance authority.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 9
What was the primary reason behind the Supreme Court of India's decision to temporarily put the Sedition law on hold?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 9
The Supreme Court of India decided to temporarily put the Sedition law on hold to align the law with democratic principles and prevent its misuse. This decision aimed to address the widespread misuse of the law, which was curbing free speech and expression by limiting criticism and dissent. By placing the law in abeyance, the Court emphasized the need to ensure that any restrictions on freedom of speech comply with constitutional standards and uphold democratic values.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 10
What is the primary reason behind the Court's decision to temporarily put the Sedition law on hold and review Section 124A?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 10
The Court's decision to suspend the Sedition law temporarily and review Section 124A primarily stems from concerns over the widespread misuse of the law. This misuse has led to restrictions on free speech and expression, which goes against democratic principles. By putting the law on hold, the Court aims to address these concerns and ensure that any limitations on freedom of speech align with constitutional standards.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 11
What is the main impact of the Court's decision to place the Sedition law on hold on existing and new sedition cases?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 11
The Court's decision to temporarily suspend the Sedition law has a significant impact on existing cases, including appeals and trials. During this period, these cases are affected by the decision, indicating a pause or change in the legal proceedings related to sedition charges. This move aims to reevaluate the application of the law and ensure that it aligns with democratic principles while safeguarding freedom of speech and expression.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 12
What did the Court emphasize regarding the Sedition law in relation to democratic principles and freedom of speech?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 12
The Court emphasized the necessity of aligning the Sedition law with democratic principles and ensuring that any limitations on freedom of speech comply with constitutional standards. This underscores the importance of striking a balance between national security and civil liberties while upholding democratic values.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 13
What has been the public reaction to the Supreme Court's decision regarding the Sedition law?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 13
The Supreme Court's decision regarding the Sedition law has garnered praise from petitioners, citizens, and human rights groups as a significant step towards safeguarding fundamental rights and democracy. This positive reception highlights the perceived importance of the Court's stance in balancing national security concerns with upholding democratic values and citizens' rights.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 14
What is the main directive given by the Supreme Court concerning the initiation of new First Information Reports (FIRs) under Section 124A?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 14
The Supreme Court directive instructs both the Central and state governments to refrain from initiating new First Information Reports (FIRs), ongoing investigations, or enforcing coercive measures under Section 124A during the ongoing reconsideration period. This measure aims to maintain a status quo during the evaluation phase, ensuring fairness and preventing any potential misuse of the provision.
Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 15
What is the primary purpose of the interim order provided by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India concerning Section 124A?
Detailed Solution for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India - Question 15
The primary purpose of the interim order issued by the Supreme Court of India in the case of S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India concerning Section 124A is to prevent the misuse or misapplications of the provision. This directive aims to ensure that both the Central and state governments refrain from initiating new FIRs, ongoing investigations, or enforcing coercive measures under Section 124A during the reconsideration period. It serves as a safeguard against potential abuses of power and upholds the principles of justice and fairness in legal proceedings.
99 docs|98 tests
Information about Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: S.G. Vombatkere vs Union of India, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams