Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

10 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain

Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain | 10 questions in 10 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 1

What was the main focus of the case involving election disputes between Prime Minister and the validity of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act in the case of Indira Nehru Gandhi v Raj Narain?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 1
The case of Indira Nehru Gandhi v Raj Narain primarily centered around the validity of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act. This amendment was a significant aspect of the case as it was challenged in relation to election disputes involving the Prime Minister. The 39th Amendment Act, passed during that time, had implications on the electoral process and raised crucial legal questions regarding its constitutionality and application in the context of the disputes being addressed in the case.
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 2

What was the primary issue in the case of Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 2
The primary issue in the case of Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain revolved around the validity of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975. This amendment was enacted to validate the election of the Prime Minister, which had been invalidated by the Allahabad High Court. The contention was that this amendment not only overturned the High Court's decision but also affected the entire election process and related laws.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 3

What was the key purpose of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 3
The primary objective of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975, was to validate retrospectively the election of the Prime Minister, which had been set aside by the Allahabad High Court. This amendment aimed to address the legal challenges to the Prime Minister's election by withdrawing the jurisdiction of all courts over election disputes involving the Prime Minister.
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 4
What impact did the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act have on the judiciary's jurisdiction?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 4
The 39th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975, had the effect of restricting the judiciary's authority by withdrawing its jurisdiction over election disputes involving the Prime Minister. This limitation was a response to the High Court's decision invalidating the Prime Minister's election, and the amendment aimed to prevent similar challenges in the future.
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 5
What legal issue arose due to the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 5
The legal issue that arose from the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act was the retroactive validation of the Prime Minister's election results. This raised questions about the scope and implications of retrospective validation in the context of election disputes and the judiciary's role in overseeing such matters.
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 6
What was the primary reason for the invalidation of a specific clause in the case of Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 6
The clause was invalidated in the case due to its contradiction with Article 14 (Right to Equality). This decision was crucial in upholding the foundational principles of equality and fairness within the constitutional framework.
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 7
What was the core contention regarding the impact of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 7
The core contention regarding the impact of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act was that it violated the constitutional separation of powers by effectively nullifying not only the High Court's judgment but also the election and related laws. This raised concerns about the balance of power between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government.
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 8
Why was the exclusion of Judicial Review in election disputes deemed unconstitutional in the Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 8
The exclusion of Judicial Review in election disputes was considered unconstitutional because it undermined the basic structure of the Constitution. This exclusion was seen as arbitrary and in contradiction with essential democratic principles.
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 9
Which additional basic features were identified by the Supreme Court in the Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 9
In the case, the Supreme Court identified additional basic features including the Rule of Law and Judicial Review. These features play a crucial role in ensuring the functioning and balance of powers within the democratic system.
Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 10
Why was Clause (4) of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975, deemed entirely unconstitutional and void in the Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain - Question 10
Clause (4) of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975, was deemed entirely unconstitutional and void because it excluded judicial review in election disputes, which was considered detrimental to the basic features of the Constitution. This exclusion posed a threat to the democratic principles and the rule of law.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams