What was the central issue in the case of Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka that led to her petitioning the Supreme Court under Article 32?

Admission denial based on non-payment of fees

Discrepancies in the admission process for out-of-state students

Violation of the right to education as outlined in the Constitution

Unequal treatment of Karnataka and non-Karnataka students

In the context of Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, which constitutional rights were highlighted by the Supreme Court as being interrelated and crucial for the illiterate majority?

Right to equality and right to freedom of speech

Right to education and right to live with dignity

Right to property and right to privacy

Right to religious freedom and right to cultural preservation

What was the conclusion reached by the Court in Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka regarding the notification issued by the Karnataka Government?

The notification was within the legal authority of the Karnataka Government

The notification was in violation of the students' rights to equality

The notification infringed upon the right to life and dignity

The notification exceeded the legal authority of the Karnataka Government

How did private institutions react to the judgment in Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka?

They complied with the court's decision without objection

They challenged the constitutionality of the judgment

They advocated for more autonomy in their admission processes

They expressed concerns about potential negative implications for their operations

What did the Supreme Court emphasize in the case of M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors following the Unni Krishnan decision?

The precedence of rights under Part III over moral claims in Part IV

The independence of provisions in Part III and Part IV of the Constitution

The exclusive importance of rights expressly mentioned in Part III

The complementary nature of provisions in Part III and Part IV

What was the significance of the ruling in the Unni Krishnan case according to subsequent judgments?

It established new fundamental rights explicitly mentioned in Part III

It highlighted the need for a separate constitutional bench for education rights

It declared Article 45 as a fundamental right without explicit mention in Part III

It emphasized the precedence of moral claims in Part IV over rights in Part III

How did the Supreme Court view the relationship between provisions in Part III and Part IV of the Constitution in the context of fundamental rights?

Part III provisions take precedence over Part IV moral claims

Part IV moral claims are subordinate to Part III provisions

Both sets of provisions are considered equally important and interdependent

Part III provisions are legally binding, while Part IV provisions are aspirational

In the context of constitutional rights, what did the ruling in M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors underscore about the nature of fundamental rights?

Fundamental rights are solely restricted to those explicitly mentioned in Part III

Fundamental rights can be expanded beyond explicit mention in Part III

Fundamental rights are subject to the discretion of the State governments

Fundamental rights are exclusively defined by the moral claims in Part IV

According to the Indian Constitution, which of the following is recognized as a fundamental right for citizens?

Right to pursue a degree in any field of choice

Right to establish and manage an educational institution

Right to receive fair treatment in student admissions

Right to vote in national elections

According to the petitioners in the Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh case, why did they argue that the state has a responsibility to provide education to all citizens?

Due to the state's financial surplus

Regardless of their social or financial status

To promote privatization of education

In alignment with Article 19(1)(g)

What was the significance of referencing the Mohini Jain case in the arguments presented by the petitioners in the Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh case?

To emphasize the importance of vocational training

To highlight the role of the judiciary in education policies

To support the expansion of the interpretation of the right to education

To advocate for increased government intervention in education

How did the petitioners view the establishment of an educational institution in the context of the Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh case?

Analogous to launching a business venture

A responsibility of the central government

A violation of educational ethics

What autonomy did the petitioners believe schools should have regarding funding and fee structures in the Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh case?

Dependence on government subsidies

Setting fees independently from students

Mandatory fee waivers for all students

Restriction on receiving external funding

What was the central argument presented by the respondents in the Unni Krishnan Case regarding the state's responsibility for education?

Providing education only to children aged 14 and below

Extending free and mandatory education to all age groups

Offering tertiary education at no cost

Reducing the costs associated with primary education

What major concern did the respondents raise regarding the extension of the state's educational responsibilities to higher education levels?

Accessibility of educational institutions

Higher costs compared to primary education

Curriculum development challenges

How did the respondents justify their position on limiting the state's educational obligations to children aged 14 and below?

By citing international treaties

By emphasizing economic constraints

By referencing historical precedents

By invoking constitutional provisions

According to the Supreme Court's rulings in the case of Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh, which of the following statements is true regarding the right to education?

The right to professional degree education is a fundamental right under Article 21.

Children under 14 have a justiciable right to education under Article 21.

The state's obligation to provide higher education progressively is outlined in Article 45.

The right to education beyond the age of fourteen is linked to the state's economic capacity as per Article 41.

How did the Supreme Court interpret the right to education for children under 14 years of age in the Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh case?

It was considered a non-justiciable right.

It was deemed enforceable after 44 years of the Constitution's enactment.

It was established as a fundamental right under Article 21.

It was linked to the state's economic capacity and development.

Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh Free MCQ Practice Test with Solutions

EduRev

All Courses

Open App

	Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams 207 docs\|219 tests

	Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams 207 docs\|219 tests

Important Questions for Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Find all the important questions for Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh resources.

Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.

Education Revolution