Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India

Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India below.
Solutions of Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 1

What is the foundational right granted to every citizen by Article 14 of the Indian Constitution?

Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 1
Article 14 of the Indian Constitution grants every citizen the Fundamental Right to Equality. This right ensures that individuals are treated equally before the law and provides for equal protection of the law. It is a fundamental principle that forms the basis of a just and fair society where discrimination is prohibited, and everyone is entitled to the same legal rights and protections.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 2

How did the Supreme Court of India rule in the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India regarding the practice of triple talaq?

Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 2
The Supreme Court of India, in a 3:2 majority decision, declared the practice of triple talaq unconstitutional. This ruling was based on the grounds of violating fundamental rights, particularly those granted to Indian Muslim women under Article 14 and Article 15 of the Constitution.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 3

What legal concept did the Supreme Court emphasize in its analysis of Article 14 in the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 3
In its analysis of Article 14, the Supreme Court emphasized the legal concepts of equality before the law and the equal protection of the law. This principle ensures fairness and equal treatment under the law, highlighting the importance of non-arbitrary actions and reasonable classification in legal proceedings.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 4
What was one of the key arguments presented by the respondents in the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India regarding the practice of triple talaq?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 4
One of the key arguments presented by the respondents in the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India was that personal laws, including the practice of triple talaq, were not explicitly covered under Article 13 but were part of the Concurrent List. This argument suggested that the framers of the Constitution intended to exclude personal laws from the scope of Article 13, which deals with laws inconsistent with or in derogation of fundamental rights.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 5
In the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India, what was the primary issue that the constitutional bench of five judges in the Supreme Court of India had to address?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 5
In the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India, the primary issue that the constitutional bench had to address was whether the practice of Talaq-e-biddat, specifically triple talaq, violated the fundamental rights granted to Indian Muslim women under Article 14 and Article 15 of the Constitution. Triple talaq allowed Muslim men to instantly divorce their wives by uttering "talaq" thrice, leading to concerns about gender equality and the rights of Muslim women in India.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 6
What did the Supreme Court's 3:2 majority decision regarding the practice of triple talaq entail?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 6
The Supreme Court's 3:2 majority decision declared the practice of triple talaq unconstitutional, citing its violation of fundamental rights. This decision marked a significant legal precedent in addressing the issue of triple talaq and upholding the rights of individuals involved in such practices.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 7
According to the case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, which constitutional right was deemed to be violated by Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 7
In the case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code violated the right to equality on the grounds of sex. This decision was a significant step towards recognizing and upholding the rights of individuals belonging to the LGBTQ community. It emphasized the importance of equality and non-discrimination based on sexual orientation, ensuring that all individuals are treated fairly and equally under the law.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 8
What was the key question examined in the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 8
The key question examined in the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case was whether Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code violated the right to equal protection under the law. This pivotal question focused on the constitutional validity of Section 377 and its application to consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex in private. The court's ruling on this issue had far-reaching implications for the LGBTQ community in India, affirming the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 9
What was the outcome of the 2016 Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case in the Indian Supreme Court?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 9
In the 2016 Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case, a five-Judge bench of the Indian Supreme Court declared Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional. This landmark decision decriminalized consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex in private, marking a significant step towards equal protection under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 10
Which key question was central to the examination of the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code in the cases mentioned?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 10
The key question examined in these cases was whether Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code violated the right to equal protection under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. This provision ensures equality before the law and prohibits discrimination on various grounds. The cases challenged the constitutionality of Section 377 concerning consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex in private, addressing fundamental issues of equality and individual rights.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 11
Which specific provision of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to protection from discrimination on the grounds of sex, as relevant in the case concerning Section 377?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 11
The provision in the Indian Constitution that specifically guarantees the right to protection from discrimination on the grounds of sex is Article 15. This article plays a crucial role in safeguarding individuals from discrimination based on their sex, ensuring equal treatment and opportunities for all members of society.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 12
What legal concept was at the center of the Supreme Court's decision to decriminalize Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 12
The Supreme Court's decision to decriminalize Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code was based on the principles of Transformative Constitutionalism. This legal concept emphasizes the evolving nature of constitutional norms and values, allowing for reinterpretation and adaptation of laws to reflect societal progress and changing perspectives. Transformative Constitutionalism played a crucial role in recognizing the rights of the LGBT community and ensuring equality before the law.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 13
According to the Supreme Court's ruling on the exclusion of menstruating women from Sabarimala Temple, which constitutional principles were highlighted as fundamental and non-negotiable?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 13
The Supreme Court's decision emphasized the fundamental principles of equality and non-discrimination as enshrined in the Indian Constitution. This ruling underscored the importance of upholding these values to ensure fair and just treatment for all individuals, regardless of gender or any other characteristic. Discrimination based on menstruation was deemed unconstitutional, highlighting the broader commitment to equality under the law.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 14
Which constitutional article prohibits discrimination on various grounds and stresses the significance of providing equal treatment without bias?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 14
Article 15 of the Indian Constitution plays a crucial role in prohibiting discrimination on various grounds and emphasizing the importance of equal treatment without bias. This constitutional provision serves to protect individuals from being subjected to unfair treatment based on factors such as religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. By highlighting the principles of equality and non-discrimination, Article 15 reinforces the fundamental rights guaranteed to all citizens and promotes a more inclusive and just society.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 15
What did the Supreme Court clarify regarding reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in promotions in the M. Nagaraj case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 15
In the M. Nagaraj case, the Supreme Court clarified that the state is not obligated to provide reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in promotions. However, if such reservations are implemented, relevant data must be furnished. This ruling highlighted the discretionary nature of providing reservations in promotions for SCs and STs.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams