What was the key legal argument made by Maneka Gandhi in the case of Maneka Gandhi v Union of India?

Violation of her freedom of religion

Violation of her right to property

Violation of her rights under Articles 21, 19(1)(a), and 19(1)(g)

Violation of her right to privacy

What was the significance of Justice Fazal Ali's dissenting opinion in A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras for the case of Maneka Gandhi v Union of India?

It emphasized the importance of property rights

It led to a narrower interpretation of Article 21

It paved the way for a broader interpretation of Article 21

It focused on the rights of the accused in criminal cases

What key aspect was highlighted in the case of Maneka Gandhi v Union of India regarding the expansion of fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution?

The absolute prioritization of state interests

A decrease in the significance of natural justice

The need for a balanced approach between state interests and individual liberties

Limiting the scope of legal procedures for fairness

What fundamental rights did Maneka Gandhi argue were violated due to the confiscation of her passport in her writ petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution?

Right to Education and Right to Property

Right to Equality, Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression, Right to Life and Liberty

Right to Vote and Right to Information

Right to Religion and Right to Assembly

How are Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Indian constitution suggested to be interpreted based on the arguments provided?

They are unrelated and should be interpreted in isolation.

They embody principles of natural justice explicitly.

They are interconnected and should be read together.

They are outdated and should be disregarded.

According to the arguments presented, what did the respondent assert about the term 'law' under Article 21?

It must align with fundamental principles of natural justice.

It is subject to the test of reasonableness.

It should not be interpreted ambiguously as part of the constitution.

It must directly infringe upon Articles 14 and 19 to be declared invalid.

How did the landmark judgment of 25th January 1978 impact the interpretation of the Constitution of India?

It emphasized that laws must adhere to Articles 14, 19, and 21.

It restricted the scope of 'personal liberty' under Article 21.

It abolished the right to travel abroad under Article 21.

It introduced new articles to the Constitution of India.

What recommendation did the court make regarding the government's decisions in relation to Section 10(5) of the Passport Act 1967?

The government should limit the use of Section 10(5) without providing reasons.

The government should not provide any reasons for decisions.

The government should not challenge administrative orders.

The government should provide reasons for decisions and limit the use of Section 10(5) of the 1967 Act.

How did the court reinterpret the phrase 'procedure established by law' in Article 21?

Emphasizing the need for strict adherence to existing laws

Highlighting the importance of procedural fairness and the absence of arbitrariness

Advocating for a lenient interpretation of legal procedures

Stating that any procedure, regardless of fairness, is valid

What was the key emphasis of the court in the Maneka Gandhi v Union of India case regarding laws and their validity?

Laws must be constantly updated by the legislature

Laws must be just, reasonable, and fair

Laws must serve the interests of the government

Laws must prioritize economic considerations

What was the significance of the Maneka Gandhi case in relation to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution?

It enforced stricter penalties for violating traffic regulations.

It expanded the scope of Article 21 to include economic and social rights.

It limited the rights of individuals to travel abroad.

It focused on environmental conservation laws.

Why did Justice Iyer emphasize the right to travel abroad in one of the judgments?

To promote tourism in the country.

To restrict the movement of citizens for security reasons.

To highlight the convenience and importance of freedom associated with travel.

To discourage international relations.

How did the Maneka Gandhi judgment impact the exercise of powers under Section 10(3)(c) and 10(5) of the Act, as emphasized by the court?

Authorities were encouraged to exercise powers liberally without restrictions.

The court mandated the complete abolition of powers under Section 10(3)(c) and 10(5) of the Act.

Authorities were advised to exercise powers sparingly and in a well-considered manner.

The court ruled that Section 10(3)(c) and 10(5) of the Act were unconstitutional.

Which fundamental rights are closely interconnected and must collectively be satisfied for a law or procedure to be considered valid, as highlighted in the Maneka Gandhi judgment?

Article 12, 16, and 18 of the Constitution

Article 21, 23, and 25 of the Constitution

Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution

Article 32, 36, and 38 of the Constitution

Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India Free MCQ Practice Test with Solutions

EduRev

All Courses

Open App

	Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams 207 docs\|219 tests

	Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams 207 docs\|219 tests

Important Questions for Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India

Find all the important questions for Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India resources.

Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Case Brief: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.

Education Revolution