In the case of People's Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India, what right do Indian citizens possess under the Indian Constitution according to the Supreme Court's decision?

Right to obtain information about political candidates

Right to participate in elections

What specific concern did the People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) raise regarding a 1951 law in the case against Union of India?

Lack of representation in the legislature

Exemption of political candidates from sharing non-mandatory information

Infringement of freedom of the press

Unfair treatment of minority political parties

According to the Supreme Court's decision in PUCL vs Union of India, what is the significance of disclosing candidate details to voters?

It ensures equal representation of all political parties

It guarantees anonymity for political candidates

It empowers voters to make informed decisions

It restricts the freedom of political campaigning

What was the primary constitutional challenge made by PUCL in the case of PUCL vs Union of India?

Violation of the right to protest

What authority was granted to the Central or State Governments under Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, as mentioned in the case of PUCL vs Union of India?

Authority to censor public communication

Authority to regulate telecommunication networks

Authority to intercept messages during public emergencies

Authority to impose sanctions on telecommunication providers

What was the main argument presented by the Petitioner in the case of PUCL vs Union of India regarding the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885?

The necessity of prior judicial approval for all phone tapping requests.

The potential negative impacts of striking down Section 5(2) on public interests and national security.

The need to notify individuals subject to phone tapping for transparency.

The proposal to consider the right to privacy as a fundamental right safeguarded by the Constitution.

What was the primary counterargument made by the Respondents in the case of PUCL vs Union of India regarding the amendment of Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885?

Phone tapping could only be authorized by specific government-appointed officers under strict conditions.

The necessity of introducing procedural safeguards to prevent arbitrary use of power.

The impracticality of notifying the party subject to phone tapping for operational effectiveness.

The potential negative impacts of striking down Section 5(2) on public interests and national security.

What safeguard against unreasonable actions did the Petitioner propose in the case of PUCL vs Union of India concerning phone tapping requests?

Conducting public hearings prior to authorizing any phone tapping.

Seeking approval from the Prime Minister for all phone tapping requests.

Implementing prior judicial approval, possibly granted ex parte.

Notifying the public about all instances of phone tapping.

What was the primary argument put forth by the Petitioner in the case of PUCL vs Union of India regarding the right to privacy?

The right to privacy should not be considered a fundamental right.

Section 5(2) of the Act should be upheld without any amendments.

The right to privacy should be safeguarded as a fundamental right by specific constitutional articles.

Procedural safeguards are unnecessary and could hinder state purposes.

How did the Respondents, representing the Union of India, counter the Petitioner's argument regarding the potential negative impacts of striking down Section 5(2)?

They emphasized the need for more arbitrary power use.

They highlighted the benefits of striking down Section 5(2).

They expressed concerns about jeopardizing public interests and national security.

They supported the Petitioner's argument for amending Section 5(2).

According to the case of PUCL vs Union of India, which legal provisions were highlighted to support the existence of the right to privacy in India?

Article 19(1)(a) and Article 19(2)

Article 21 and Article 19(1)(a)

What was the significance of the recommendations made by the Second Press Commission regarding phone tapping in the PUCL vs Union of India case?

They proposed the immediate prohibition of phone tapping in all circumstances.

They suggested that phone tapping should only be allowed for personal reasons.

They viewed phone tapping as a significant infringement on privacy and proposed limited permissible circumstances.

They recommended unrestricted access to phone conversations for law enforcement agencies.

What was the central issue addressed in the case of PUCL vs Union of India?

Violation of environmental regulations

Infringement of individuals' right to privacy

Corruption in government procurement

Unlawful detention of political activists

What action did the Supreme Court take regarding Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, in the case discussed?

Imposed stricter penalties for its violation

Established comprehensive guidelines for its use

Recommended its immediate repeal

PUCL vs Union of India Free MCQ Practice Test with Solutions

EduRev

All Courses

Open App

	Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams 207 docs\|219 tests

	Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams 207 docs\|219 tests

Important Questions for PUCL vs Union of India

Find all the important questions for PUCL vs Union of India at EduRev.Get fully prepared for PUCL vs Union of India with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the PUCL vs Union of India syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of PUCL vs Union of India resources.

PUCL vs Union of India MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the PUCL vs Union of India within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for PUCL vs Union of India Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace PUCL vs Union of India with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.

Education Revolution