Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors

Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 1

What event led to the Travancore Devaswom Board issuing notifications in 1955 and 1956 regarding entry restrictions at the Sabarimala Temple?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 1
The Travancore Devaswom Board issued notifications in 1955 and 1956 to restrict entry for Ayyappans not following vows and women between ages ten and fifty-five due to violations of the temple's sacred rules. These restrictions were implemented to uphold the traditional practices and sanctity of the Sabarimala pilgrimage, ensuring that pilgrims adhere to the prescribed rituals and customs associated with Lord Ayyappa's worship at the temple.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 2

What was the key proclamation made in the Notification dated 21 October 1955 by the Travancore Devaswom Board?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 2
The Notification dated 21 October 1955 by the Travancore Devaswom Board specifically stated that individuals not observing vows, particularly Ayyappans, were prohibited from entering the temple. This directive aimed to uphold the sanctity and traditions associated with temple visits.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 3

Which judicial body was involved in the ruling that Section 377 IPC is no longer considered a crime in India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 3
The Supreme Court of India, comprising a panel of esteemed judges including Former Chief Justice of India Justice Dipak Mishra, Justice A.M Khanwilkar, Justice RF Naraiaman, Justice D Y Chandrachud, and Justice Indu Malhotra, played a crucial role in the landmark judgment that decriminalized Section 377 IPC in India. This decision marked a significant milestone in the realm of constitutional law and human rights in the country.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 4
What was the main issue concerning the entry of women at the Sabrimala Temple, as highlighted in the case of Indian Young Lawyers Association v. The State of Kerala & Ors?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 4
The main issue concerning the entry of women at the Sabrimala Temple, as highlighted in the case, revolved around the complete exclusion of women aged 10 to 50 from the temple premises and worship due to biological reasons specific to women. This exclusion was deeply rooted in religious customs, leading to a legal debate on whether it violated women's rights under Article 25 of the Indian Constitution.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 5
Which legal provisions were called into question regarding the exclusion of women from the Sabrimala Temple in the case of Indian Young Lawyers Association v. The State of Kerala & Ors?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 5
The legal provisions that were called into question regarding the exclusion of women from the Sabrimala Temple included Section 3 of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Act, 1965, along with Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965. These provisions were scrutinized to determine if they infringed upon the fundamental rights of women under Article 25(1) and Article 15(1) of the Indian Constitution.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 6
Why does the Sabarimala Temple in Kerala restrict the entry of women aged 10-50?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 6
The Sabarimala Temple in Kerala restricts the entry of women aged 10-50 due to the belief that the deity Lord Ayyappa is a perennial celibate. This restriction is based on religious traditions and customs surrounding the temple. Lord Ayyappa is considered a celibate deity, and the practice of restricting women of menstruating age from entering the temple premises is rooted in this belief.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 7
In 2006, what controversy arose regarding the Sabarimala Temple involving Jayamala, a Kannada actor?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 7
In 2006, a controversy emerged when Jayamala, a Kannada actor, claimed to have entered the Sabarimala Temple sanctum and touched the idol, which led to allegations of temple desecration. This incident sparked a government probe and raised questions about the temple's customs and practices regarding the entry of women into the temple premises.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 8
Why are women traditionally unable to complete a 41-day Vruthum at the Sabarimala Temple?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 8
Women are traditionally unable to complete a 41-day Vruthum at the Sabarimala Temple due to the custom that prohibits women from entering the temple during their menstrual periods. This restriction is based on cultural beliefs and practices surrounding purity and religious observance.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 9
How did Karl Marx perceive the role of religion in society?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 9
Karl Marx viewed religion as a coping mechanism that distracts people from societal issues. According to Marx, religion serves as an opiate of the masses, providing an illusion of happiness and distracting individuals from recognizing and addressing the underlying economic and social inequalities in society.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 10
How did Karl Marx perceive the role of religion in society?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 10
Karl Marx viewed religion as a coping mechanism that distracts people from societal issues. According to Marx, religion serves as an opiate of the masses, providing a false sense of comfort and diverting attention away from the real problems that exist within society. This perspective aligns with Marx's broader critique of religion as a tool used by the ruling class to maintain social control and preserve the status quo.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 11
What is the primary focus of Constitutional Morality in guiding state actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 11
Constitutional Morality guides state actions to align with the principles of the Constitution, emphasizing the rule of law and non-arbitrariness. It serves as a framework for ensuring that governmental decisions and interventions respect the fundamental rights and values enshrined in the Constitution. By adhering to Constitutional Morality, the state upholds the democratic principles and safeguards the rights of individuals within society.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 12
In the Sabrimala Review Bench Case, what was a key question raised before the Supreme Court regarding Article 25 and Article 26 of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 12
One of the key questions raised before the Supreme Court in the Sabrimala Review Bench Case was regarding the inclusion of 'constitutional morality' under Article 25 and Article 26 of the Indian Constitution. This aspect is crucial in guiding actions to align with the principles of the Constitution, emphasizing the rule of law and non-arbitrariness.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 13
What significant issue was considered in the Sabrimala Review Bench Case concerning the interpretation of Article 25(2)(b) of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 13
An important issue considered in the Sabrimala Review Bench Case was the interpretation of the term "Sections of Hindus" in Article 25(2)(b) of the Indian Constitution. This issue raised questions about whether a person outside a specific religious denomination can challenge its practices through a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), highlighting the complexities involved in legal interpretations and religious freedoms.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 14
What was a crucial aspect examined in the Sabrimala case before the Supreme Court?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 14
One of the critical aspects examined in the Sabrimala case before the Supreme Court was the analysis of the scope and definition of 'morality' under Article 25 and Article 26 of the Indian Constitution. This analysis included exploring the concept of 'constitutional morality,' which played a significant role in the discussions and judgments related to the case.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 15
What issue was a significant consideration in the interpretation of the term "Sections of Hindus" in the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors - Question 15
A significant issue for consideration in the interpretation of the term "Sections of Hindus" in Article 25(2)(b) of the Indian Constitution was whether a person outside a specific religious denomination could challenge its practices through a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). This raised questions about the rights and boundaries of individuals regarding religious practices and the extent to which such practices could be subject to legal scrutiny and challenge.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Indian Young Lawyers Association V. The State of Kerala & Ors, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams