Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India

Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India below.
Solutions of Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 1

According to the Indian Constitution, what does Article 14 primarily grant to every citizen?

Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 1
Article 14 of the Indian Constitution grants every citizen the Fundamental Right to Equality. This fundamental right ensures that every individual is treated equally before the law and is provided with equal protection of the law. It serves as a cornerstone in upholding justice and fairness within the Indian legal system.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 2

In the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India, what was the primary issue that the constitutional bench of five judges in the Supreme Court of India addressed?

Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 2
The primary issue addressed by the constitutional bench in the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India was the constitutionality of the practice of Talaq-e-biddat, particularly focusing on triple talaq. This practice was challenged by Shayara Bano as she argued that it violated the fundamental rights granted to Indian Muslim women under Article 14 and Article 15 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court, in a 3:2 majority decision, ultimately declared the practice of triple talaq unconstitutional, highlighting its infringement upon the fundamental rights of individuals.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 3

What legal concept did the Supreme Court emphasize in its analysis of Article 14 in the Shayara Bano v. Union of India case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 3
In its analysis of Article 14 in the Shayara Bano v. Union of India case, the Supreme Court emphasized the doctrine of intelligible classification as a crucial legal concept in ensuring equality before the law. The court highlighted the need for reasonable classification to prevent arbitrary actions that could violate Article 14. This doctrine aims to ensure that laws are not discriminatory and that individuals are treated equally under the law based on reasonable and clear criteria.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 4
What was one of the key arguments presented by the Respondents in the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India regarding the practice of Triple Talaq?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 4
One of the key arguments presented by the Respondents in the case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India was that personal laws, including the practice of Triple Talaq, are beyond the purview of state intervention as they are not explicitly covered under Article 13 of the Constitution. The Respondents emphasized that personal laws are part of the Concurrent List, indicating the framers' intent to exclude them from Article 13, which deals with laws inconsistent with or in derogation of fundamental rights.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 5
What was the key issue examined in the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 5
The key issue examined in the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case was the constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. This case specifically looked at whether Section 377 violated the right to equal protection under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. The judgment of this case played a significant role in decriminalizing same-sex relations between consenting adults and granting the LGBT community the legal right to choose same-sex partners.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 6
On what grounds was Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code deemed to be in violation, according to the judgment in the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 6
Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code was deemed to be in violation of several articles of the Indian Constitution, including Article 21, 14, 15, 19, and 25, according to the judgment in the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case. This ruling highlighted that the relevant segment of Section 377 was unconstitutional and infringed upon the right to equality under the law and the right to equality on the grounds of sex, as outlined in the Indian Constitution.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 7
What was the key issue examined in the case involving the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 7
The case scrutinized the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the IPC concerning its application to consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex in private. The pivotal question revolved around whether Section 377 infringed upon the right to equal protection guaranteed under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. This legal challenge sparked debates on the fundamental rights of individuals and the interpretation of equality before the law.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 8
In which year did the Delhi High Court declare Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as unconstitutional in the NAZ foundation v. N.C.T of Delhi case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 8
The Delhi High Court made a landmark ruling in 2009 by declaring Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as unconstitutional in the NAZ foundation v. N.C.T of Delhi case. This significant judgment marked a pivotal moment in the legal history of India concerning LGBTQ rights and the interpretation of individual freedoms within the constitutional framework.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 9
In the case discussed, what was the central issue regarding Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 9
The central issue in the case concerning Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was whether this section violated the right to equal protection under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. This constitutional provision ensures equality before the law and prohibits discrimination on arbitrary grounds. The case revolved around the constitutionality of Section 377 in relation to consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex in private. The court's decision on this matter had significant implications for the protection of individual rights and freedoms in India.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 10
Which constitutional provision guarantees the right to protection from discrimination on the grounds of sex in the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 10
Article 15 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to protection from discrimination on the grounds of sex. This provision is crucial in upholding gender equality and ensuring that individuals are not discriminated against based on their sex. By prohibiting discrimination on various grounds, including sex, Article 15 plays a key role in promoting equality and non-discrimination within the Indian legal framework. It underscores the constitutional commitment to providing equal opportunities and treatment to all individuals, regardless of their gender.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 11
Which legal concept did the judgment on Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code rely on?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 11
The judgment on Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code relied on the legal concept of Transformative Constitutionalism. This approach emphasizes the evolving nature of constitutional law to bring about social change and uphold the fundamental rights and values enshrined in the constitution. By applying principles of Transformative Constitutionalism, the court sought to reinterpret existing laws in a way that promotes equality, justice, and progressive realization of rights for all individuals, including the LGBT community.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 12
What was the main reason behind the Supreme Court's ruling to decriminalize Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 12
The Supreme Court's decision to decriminalize Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code was primarily based on the violation of Article 21 and Article 15 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to equality under the law and the right to equality on the grounds of sex. This landmark ruling granted the LGBT community the legal right to choose same-sex partners and emphasized the importance of equality and non-discrimination under the law.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 13
What was the significance of the five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court ruling to decriminalize Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 13
The significance of the five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court ruling to decriminalize Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code was that it granted the LGBT community the legal right to choose same-sex partners without the fear of criminal prosecution. This landmark decision marked a significant step towards equality and non-discrimination based on sexual orientation in India. It upheld the principles of individual autonomy, privacy, and the right to love and live freely, setting a precedent for LGBTQ rights and recognition in the country.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 14
According to the Supreme Court ruling with a 4:1 majority, what constitutional aspect deemed the exclusion of menstruating women from Sabarimala Temple as unconstitutional?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 14
The Supreme Court's decision, with a 4:1 majority, declared the exclusion of menstruating women from Sabarimala Temple as unconstitutional based on the fundamental right to equality and equal protection under the law. This ruling emphasized the importance of non-discrimination and the alignment of religious practices with principles of equality, as enshrined in Articles 14 and 15 of the Indian Constitution.
Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 15
Which constitutional article prohibits discrimination on various grounds and underscores the significance of equal treatment without bias?
Detailed Solution for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India - Question 15
Article 15 of the Indian Constitution prohibits discrimination on various grounds and stresses the importance of equal treatment without bias. This constitutional provision plays a crucial role in ensuring that individuals are treated equally and are not subjected to discrimination based on factors such as religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Important Cases on Article 14 of Constitution of India, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams