Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams - Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary]

Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] below.
Solutions of Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] questions in English are available as part of our Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] solutions in Hindi for Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Important Acts and Laws for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 1

What was the primary relief sought by Aruna Shanbaug in the Supreme Court case she filed in 2009?

Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 1
In the Supreme Court case filed by Aruna Shanbaug in 2009, the primary relief sought was related to euthanasia and the right to die with dignity. This case was significant in distinguishing between active and passive euthanasia and establishing guidelines for the latter under exceptional circumstances. It played a crucial role in shaping the legal discourse on end-of-life decisions in India.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 2

Who were the two justices who presided over the bench in the Supreme Court case involving Aruna Shanbaug in 2011?

Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 2
In the Supreme Court case involving Aruna Shanbaug in 2011, the bench was presided over by Justices Markandey Katju and Gyan Sudha Misra. These justices played a crucial role in the decision related to euthanasia and the right to die with dignity, establishing guidelines for passive euthanasia under exceptional circumstances.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 3

What was the tragic event that occurred to Aruna Shanbaug on November 27, 1973?

Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 3
Aruna Shanbaug was tragically strangled by a hospital cleaner on November 27, 1973, with a dog chain, causing severe injuries that led to her being in a 'Permanent Vegetative State' for years. This event sparked a legal and ethical debate around issues of euthanasia and patient rights.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 4
What legal action was taken in 2009 in relation to Aruna Shanbaug's case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 4
In 2009, a friend of Aruna Shanbaug filed a petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, drawing attention to her prolonged state of suffering and the ethical considerations surrounding her care. This legal action brought renewed focus on issues of patient rights, euthanasia, and end-of-life care in India.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 5
According to the findings of the court-appointed doctors regarding Aruna Shanbaug's case, what was the primary reason cited for not warranting euthanasia in her situation?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 5
The court-appointed doctors, after thorough assessment of Aruna Shanbaug's mental and physical condition, determined that euthanasia wasn't warranted primarily because despite her brain not being dead, she exhibited unique responses and understanding of situations. This finding, coupled with her body language not suggesting a desire to end her life, led to the conclusion that euthanasia was not the appropriate course of action in this case.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 6
What action did the Supreme Court take in response to the disagreements between KEM Hospital, Bombay Municipal Corporation, and the petition regarding Aruna Shanbaug's case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 6
In response to the disagreements between the involved parties, the Supreme Court took the initiative to appoint a team of three experienced doctors to thoroughly assess Aruna Shanbaug's mental and physical condition. This step was crucial in gaining clarity and making an informed decision based on expert medical opinions.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 7
In the case of Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India, what was one of the key legal questions raised regarding individuals in a vegetative state?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 7
One of the central legal questions raised in the case of Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India was whether it should be permissible to withdraw life-sustaining systems for a person in a vegetative state. This issue delves into the ethical and legal considerations surrounding end-of-life care for individuals in such conditions, touching upon broader debates about euthanasia and the rights of patients and their families.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 8
How does the Right to Die, as discussed in the Aruna Shanbaug case, relate to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 8
The discussion around the Right to Die in the context of Aruna Shanbaug's case explored whether this right aligns with Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. While Article 21 guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, the interpretation of this provision in relation to the Right to Die has been a subject of debate. Indian courts have typically approached this issue with caution, imposing restrictions and conditions on any consideration of the Right to Die, reflecting the complex legal and ethical landscape surrounding end-of-life decisions in the country.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 9
What was the primary argument made by Ms. Pinki Virani in the case Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 9
Ms. Pinki Virani argued that the Right to Life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution should extend to include the Right to Die with dignity, especially for individuals who are terminally ill or in a permanent vegetative state. This argument aimed to provide individuals with the choice to end their lives with dignity to alleviate prolonged suffering.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 10
In the case of Aruna Shanbaug v Union of India, what was one of the key points highlighted by Ms. Pinki Virani about Aruna Shanbaug's condition?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 10
In the case of Aruna Shanbaug v Union of India, Ms. Pinki Virani emphasized that Aruna Shanbaug, the victim, was devoid of consciousness, unable to eat independently, and had been bedridden for 36 years with no chance of recovery. This condition was crucial in the discussions surrounding the right to die with dignity and end-of-life care decisions.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 11
What was one of the key concerns raised by the respondent regarding the issue of euthanasia in the case of Aruna Shanbaug?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 11
One of the key concerns raised by the respondent in the case of Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India was the issue of consent. They questioned who could provide consent on behalf of Aruna, given her inability to communicate her wishes regarding the withdrawal of life support. This raised ethical and legal dilemmas around the decision-making process regarding euthanasia in such cases, highlighting the complexities involved in determining the patient's best interests when they are unable to express their own wishes.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 12
What pivotal decision was made in the Supreme Court's historic Gian Kaur case ruling?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 12
The Supreme Court's historic Gian Kaur case ruling rejected the inclusion of the right to die within Article 21's right to life in the Indian Constitution. This decision signifies a significant legal stance against incorporating the right to die as a fundamental aspect of the right to life. It underlines the Court's interpretation of fundamental rights in the context of end-of-life decisions and the sanctity of life.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 13
What fundamental principle does the recent judgment on passive euthanasia in India emphasize?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 13
The recent judgment on passive euthanasia in India emphasizes the importance of human control over technology, advocating for humans to govern and guide technology rather than being controlled by it. This principle underscores the significance of maintaining ethical frameworks and human agency in the face of technological advancements, especially in crucial matters such as end-of-life care and individual dignity.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 14
In the legal case of Aruna Shanbaug, what did the Supreme Court of India specifically allow regarding euthanasia?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 14
The Supreme Court of India, in the legal case of Aruna Shanbaug, specifically allowed passive euthanasia only in the "rarest of rare circumstances." This ruling marked a significant shift in Indian law towards addressing the prolonged suffering of patients by legalizing passive euthanasia in specific and exceptional situations.
Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 15
What process was established by the Supreme Court for making decisions regarding the withdrawal of life support in cases of euthanasia?
Detailed Solution for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] - Question 15
The Supreme Court established a specific process where a panel of medical professionals is involved in making decisions regarding the withdrawal of life support in euthanasia cases. This process ensures that medical expertise is central to the decision-making process, emphasizing the importance of considering medical perspectives and ethics in such critical and sensitive matters.
207 docs|219 tests
Information about Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary] solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Aruna Shanbaug vs Union of India [Aruna Shanbaug Case Summary], EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams