Card: 2 / 46 |
To define exceptional circumstances under which an individual can escape liability for a crime. |
Card: 3 / 46 |
Fill in the blank: The Indian Penal Code acknowledges certain defenses under Chapter IV, titled "___". |
Card: 5 / 46 |
True or False: The prosecution is required to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt under the Indian Evidence Act. |
Card: 7 / 46 |
According to Section 105 of the Indian Evidence Act, who bears the burden of proof in cases involving general exceptions? |
Card: 9 / 46 |
What significant change did Section 105 of the Indian Evidence Act introduce regarding the burden of proof? |
Card: 10 / 46 |
It shifted the burden onto the claimant to prove the existence of a general exception in crimes. |
Card: 11 / 46 |
True or False: Before the Indian Evidence Act, the prosecution had to demonstrate that the case fell under an exception. |
Card: 12 / 46 |
False - Before the Indian Evidence Act, the prosecution had to demonstrate that the case did not fall under any exception. |
Card: 14 / 46 |
To define exceptional circumstances under which an individual can escape liability and to simplify the construction of the Code by eliminating repetition of criminal exceptions. |
Card: 17 / 46 |
Fill in the blank: An act is excusable under Section 76 if done under a ___ of fact. |
Card: 19 / 46 |
True or False: A person of unsound mind can be held criminally liable for their actions. |
Card: 20 / 46 |
False. A person of unsound mind is not held liable if they cannot understand the nature of their actions. |
Card: 22 / 46 |
An accident committed while performing a lawful act is not an offense if done without criminal intention or knowledge. |
Card: 23 / 46 |
Fill in the blank: Section 82 states that nothing is considered an offense if committed by a child below ___ years of age. |
Card: 25 / 46 |
True or False: According to Section 83, a child above seven years of age can always be held liable for their actions. |
Card: 26 / 46 |
False. A child above seven but below twelve can be excused if they lack sufficient maturity to understand their actions. |
Card: 29 / 46 |
Fill in the blank: Under Section 84, an act committed by a person of unsound mind is not considered an offense if they are incapable of understanding the ___ of the act. |
Card: 32 / 46 |
It illustrates that a person acting in good faith, under a mistake of fact, may not be held liable for their actions. |
Card: 33 / 46 |
An act committed by a person due to involuntary intoxication is considered ___ under Section 85 of the IPC. |
Card: 35 / 46 |
True or False: Under Section 86 of the IPC, a person is always liable for acts committed while intoxicated, regardless of whether the intoxication was voluntary or involuntary. |
Card: 37 / 46 |
Involuntary intoxication occurs when a person is intoxicated without their ___ or ___ of the substance. |
Card: 39 / 46 |
What distinguishes the treatment of individuals under Section 86 when they commit an act while intoxicated? |
Card: 40 / 46 |
They are treated as if they had the same knowledge they would have had if not intoxicated, unless the intoxication was involuntary. |
Card: 41 / 46 |
Fill in the blank: A justified act is typically considered ___, but the circumstances surrounding its execution render it acceptable. |
Card: 43 / 46 |
True or False: The case law associated with Section 86 indicates that voluntary intoxication does not affect liability for violent acts. |
Card: 45 / 46 |
Under Section 85, if a person injures someone while unknowingly intoxicated, they are ___ for the offense. |