Card: 1 / 44 |
True or False: A person who aids in a crime can escape punishment if the main act is not completed. |
Card: 2 / 44 |
False. Even if the main act is not carried out, those who abet can still be held legally responsible. |
Card: 5 / 44 |
The focus of the article is on understanding abetment as per Section ___ of the IPC. |
Card: 7 / 44 |
Fill in the blank: Sections ___ to ___ of the IPC detail the specific circumstances under which a person can be charged with abetment. |
Card: 9 / 44 |
True or False: Abetment is only punishable if the crime is successfully completed. |
Card: 10 / 44 |
False. Abetment can be punished regardless of whether the crime was completed. |
Card: 11 / 44 |
What are the main consequences for those found guilty of abetment under the IPC? |
Card: 13 / 44 |
Fill in the blank: Understanding abetment is crucial because it carries significant ___ implications. |
Card: 15 / 44 |
What is the legal significance of 'mens rea' in determining criminal liability? |
Card: 16 / 44 |
Mens rea refers to the mental state or intention behind a person's actions, which is crucial in establishing criminal liability. A person can only be held accountable for an offense if it is proven that they acted with a criminal intent. |
Card: 17 / 44 |
True or False: Preparation for a crime is punishable under the Indian Penal Code. |
Card: 18 / 44 |
False. Preparation is not punishable because proving the specific intent behind the preparations is difficult. |
Card: 20 / 44 |
Abetment can occur at the stages of intention, preparation, attempt, and commission of a crime. |
Card: 21 / 44 |
Fill in the blank: An attempt to commit a crime is punishable under Section ___ of the Indian Penal Code. |
Card: 23 / 44 |
Explain the concept of locus poenitentiae in the context of criminal preparation. |
Card: 24 / 44 |
Locus poenitentiae refers to the opportunity for an individual to withdraw from a criminal act before its completion, which is significant because it highlights that preparation alone does not constitute a punishable offense. |
Card: 25 / 44 |
True or False: A crime is considered committed only when the attempt to carry it out is unsuccessful. |
Card: 26 / 44 |
False. A crime is considered committed when the attempt to carry it out is successful. |
Card: 28 / 44 |
An attempt involves taking substantial steps towards committing a crime, while preparation involves arrangements made prior to execution. The key difference lies in the actions taken towards the crime's completion. |
Card: 29 / 44 |
Fill in the blank: Criminal liability arises at the stage of ___ because this is when the act poses a tangible danger. |
Card: 33 / 44 |
True or False: A person can be held liable for abetment even if the principal offender does not commit the offense. |
Card: 34 / 44 |
True. A person can be held liable for abetment even if the principal offender does not commit the offense, as long as there was intent to instigate or assist. |
Card: 35 / 44 |
To establish abetment, one must show that the abettor ___ another to commit an offense. |
Card: 38 / 44 |
Mens rea, or criminal intent, is essential for establishing abetment, requiring that both the abettor and the principal offender possess the intent to commit the crime. |
Card: 39 / 44 |
Fill in the blank: The act of encouraging or assisting someone to commit a crime is known as ___. |
Card: 41 / 44 |
True or False: The case of Malan v. State of Maharashtra (1957) did not provide any clarification on the essentials of abetment. |
Card: 44 / 44 |
Active involvement refers to being directly engaged in the commission of the offense, which contributes to establishing liability for abetment. |