Directions: In question select the related number from the given alternatives.
17 : 37∷ 65 : ?
  • a)
    9
  • b)
    101
  • c)
    73
  • d)
    82
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Engineers Adda answered  •  58 minutes ago
The pattern here is:
42 + 1 = 17, 4 + 2 = 6;
62 + 1 = 37, 6 + 2 = 8;
82+ 1 = 65, 8 + 2 = 10
Thus,
102 + 1 = 101
Hence the required number is 101.

Which of the following statements are correct?
  • a)
    Solids, liquids and gases can diffuse into liquids
  • b)
    Solids, liquids and gases can diffuse into gases
  • c)
    Solids, liquids and gases can diffuse into solid
  • d)
    States of matter cannot diffuse into one another
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Engineers Adda answered  •  11 hours ago
  • Solids can diffuse into liquid, e.g. When a crystal of Copper Sulphate is dropped into a glass of water, it gets diffused.
  • Liquids can diffuse into liquids, e.g. when ink is dropped into water.
  • Gases can diffuse into liquids, e.g. oxygen dissolved in water to be used by aquatic animals.

Which one set of letters, when sequentially placed at the gaps in the given letter series, shall complete it?
_ cd _ cab _ baca _ cba _ ab
  • a)
    cabcb
  • b)
    abccb
  • c)
    bacbc
  • d)
    bcaba
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Engineers Adda answered  •  11 hours ago
As per the given question, the letter series follows the below pattern.
b c b
After completing the pattern, we will get complete letter series.
b c b / a c a / b c b / a c a / b cb / a c a / b

Amides can be converted to amines by the reaction named-
  • a)
    Perkin
  • b)
    Claisen
  • c)
    Hoffman
  • d)
    Clemmesen
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Knowledge Hub answered  •  11 hours ago
This reaction is called Hoffmann bromamide reaction. When an amide is treated with bromine in an aqueous or ethanolic solution of sodium hydroxide, degradation of amide takes place leading to the formation of primary amine. This reaction involves degradation of amide and is popularly known as Hoffmann bromamide degradation reaction.
Hence, the correct option is (c).

The following sentence has been broken into four parts with an error in one part. Identify that part and mark it as your answer. If there are no errors in any of the given parts, mark option 4 or ‘No error’ as your answer.
Q. I will not be (1)/ able to make it (2)/ to the function tomorrow.(3)/ No error(4).
  • a)
    will not be
  • b)
    able to make it
  • c)
    to the function tomorrow
  • d)
    No error
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Bank Exams India answered  •  14 hours ago
The sentence is predicting that the person concerned will not be able to attend a function the next day. Hence, it should be in the simple future tense.
As desired all the features are present in the given statement and it is grammatically correct too. 
The phrase 'to make it to ___' means to come somewhere. You use this to talk about attending events or meeting people.
Option 4 is correct as no further improvement to the sentence is required. 
Manjeet Kumar asked   •  16 hours ago

Directions (76-80): You have a passage with five questions following. 
Passage – I
As financial markets worldwide tumbled over concerns that Greece would default on its debt to the troika comprising the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund, the people of Greece were being presented with a Hobson’s choice by its government led by the leftist party platform, Syriza. In the midst of intense negotiations with representatives of the troika over rolling over debt payments, the Syriza government sought to extend the deadline for payments in order to allow it to put the conditionalities of the troika for a bailout extension to a referendum vote. Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras has denied that this referendum, scheduled for July 5, is on whether or not to continue within the eurozone; he says it is only on the acceptance of the troika’s demands. But with the troika unrelenting on the June 30 deadline for repayment of debts to the IMF, and Greece being in no position to pay, the referendum could more or less be on remaining in the eurozone. This presents a difficult choice for the people of Greece. After all, the Syriza was voted to power in January 2015 precisely on the promise of halting the programme of austerity imposed by creditors that has resulted in a drastic contraction of Greece’s economy and increase in unemployment. Yet, the mandate was also for negotiations to remain within the eurozone as Greek voters had realised that the Grexit would mean too much pain (at least in the near term) due to capital flight, a run on the banks and other troubles in returning to the drachma as currency. Over the past five months, Syriza representatives, true to their mandate, have sought to alter Greece’s terms of engagement with its creditors, seeking debt relief that would allow fiscal expansionary policies to spur the economy. Yet, the troika’s response has been to stonewall the proposals and instead push Greece to further the austerity measures it has pursued following the first major bailout in 2010 and another in 2012. The troika’s reasoning is simple: tolerating a Greek default would amount to sending signals to other creditor-nations about similar leniency. Instead, the troika has merely offered a five-month extension of Greece’s bailout programme with fresh funds but with persisting austerity conditions. With barely a concession to the Greek position, there remains a wide gap between the Greek people’s expectations and the EU recommendations. With Greece already having to impose capital controls and bank holidays to avoid further capital flight — measures that were supposed to be taken in the event of an exit from the EU — it begs the question whether the Grexit is inevitable.
 
Q. Choose an appropriate title for the passage.
... more

Fetching relevant content for you