Mathematics Exam  >  Mathematics Notes  >  Mathematics for IIT JAM, GATE, CSIR NET, UGC NET  >  Lebesgue Measure and Lebesgue Integral - Real Analysis, CSIR-NET Mathematical Sciences

Lebesgue Measure and Lebesgue Integral - Real Analysis, CSIR-NET Mathematical Sciences | Mathematics for IIT JAM, GATE, CSIR NET, UGC NET PDF Download

Download, print and study this document offline
Please wait while the PDF view is loading
 Page 1


Chapter 1
Lebesgue Measure and Integration
We will give a brief review, without proofs, of Lebesgue measure and inte-
gration on subsets of R
d
. Details and proofs can be found in texts on real
analysis, such as [Fol99], [WZ77], [SS05], or [Heil18]. While some proofs are
quite easy, other proofs are surprisingly di?cult, and there are many coun-
terintuitive issues related to Lebesgue measure and integration.
1.1 Exterior Lebesgue Measure
For compactness of notation, we will refer to rectangular parallelepipeds in
R
d
whose sides are parallel to the coordinate axes simply as “boxes.”
De?nition 1.1.1. (a) A box inR
d
is a set of the form
Q = [a
1
,b
1
]×···×[a
d
,b
d
] =
d
Y
i=1
[a
i
,b
i
].
The volume of this box is
vol(Q) = (b
1
-a
1
)···(b
d
-a
d
) =
d
Y
i=1
(b
i
-a
i
).
(b) Theexterior Lebesgue measure orouter Lebesgue measure ofasetE?R
d
is
|E|
e
= inf
n
X
k
vol(Q
k
)
o
,
wherethein?mumistakenoverall ?nite or countable collectionsofboxes
Q
k
such that E ?
S
k
Q
k
. ?
Page 2


Chapter 1
Lebesgue Measure and Integration
We will give a brief review, without proofs, of Lebesgue measure and inte-
gration on subsets of R
d
. Details and proofs can be found in texts on real
analysis, such as [Fol99], [WZ77], [SS05], or [Heil18]. While some proofs are
quite easy, other proofs are surprisingly di?cult, and there are many coun-
terintuitive issues related to Lebesgue measure and integration.
1.1 Exterior Lebesgue Measure
For compactness of notation, we will refer to rectangular parallelepipeds in
R
d
whose sides are parallel to the coordinate axes simply as “boxes.”
De?nition 1.1.1. (a) A box inR
d
is a set of the form
Q = [a
1
,b
1
]×···×[a
d
,b
d
] =
d
Y
i=1
[a
i
,b
i
].
The volume of this box is
vol(Q) = (b
1
-a
1
)···(b
d
-a
d
) =
d
Y
i=1
(b
i
-a
i
).
(b) Theexterior Lebesgue measure orouter Lebesgue measure ofasetE?R
d
is
|E|
e
= inf
n
X
k
vol(Q
k
)
o
,
wherethein?mumistakenoverall ?nite or countable collectionsofboxes
Q
k
such that E ?
S
k
Q
k
. ?
Thus, every subset ofR
d
has a uniquely de?ned exterior measure that lies
in the range 0=|E|
e
=8. Here are some of the basic properties of exterior
measure.
Theorem 1.1.2. (a) If Q is a box in R
d
, then |Q|
e
= vol(Q).
(b) Monotonicity: If E ?F ?R
d
, then |E|
e
=|F|
e
.
(c) Countable subadditivity: If E
k
?R
d
for k?N, then
¯
¯
¯
8
S
k=1
E
k
¯
¯
¯
e
=
8
X
k=1
|E
k
|
e
.
(d) Translation invariance: If E ? R
d
and h ? R
d
, then |E +h|
e
= |E|
e
,
where E +h ={t+h :t?E}.
(e) Regularity: If E ? R
d
and e > 0, then there exists an open set U ? E
such that |U|
e
=|E|
e
+e, and hence
|E|
e
= inf
©
|U|
e
:U open, U ?E
ª
. ?
1.2 Lebesgue Measure
De?nition 1.2.1. A set E ?R
d
is Lebesgue measurable, or simply measur-
able, if
?e> 0, ? open U ?E such that|U\E|
e
=e. (1.1)
If E is Lebesgue measurable, then its Lebesgue measure is its exterior
Lebesgue measure and is denoted by|E| =|E|
e
. ?
Note that equation (1.1) does not follow from Theorem 1.1.2(e). One con-
sequence of the Axiom of Choice is that there exist subsets of R
d
that are
not measurable.
Thefollowingresultsummarizessomeofthepropertiesofmeasurablesets.
Theorem 1.2.2. (a) The class of measurable subsets of R
d
is a s-algebra,
meaning that:
i.Ø and R
d
are measurable,
ii. if E
1
,E
2
,... are measurable, then ?E
k
is measurable,
iii. if E is measurable, then R
d
\E is measurable.
(b) Every open and every closed subset of R
d
is measurable.
(c) Every subset E of R
d
with |E|
e
= 0 is measurable. ?
Sincemeasurabilityispreservedundercomplementsandcountableunions,
it is also preserved under countable intersections.
We give some equivalent formulations of measurability.
Page 3


Chapter 1
Lebesgue Measure and Integration
We will give a brief review, without proofs, of Lebesgue measure and inte-
gration on subsets of R
d
. Details and proofs can be found in texts on real
analysis, such as [Fol99], [WZ77], [SS05], or [Heil18]. While some proofs are
quite easy, other proofs are surprisingly di?cult, and there are many coun-
terintuitive issues related to Lebesgue measure and integration.
1.1 Exterior Lebesgue Measure
For compactness of notation, we will refer to rectangular parallelepipeds in
R
d
whose sides are parallel to the coordinate axes simply as “boxes.”
De?nition 1.1.1. (a) A box inR
d
is a set of the form
Q = [a
1
,b
1
]×···×[a
d
,b
d
] =
d
Y
i=1
[a
i
,b
i
].
The volume of this box is
vol(Q) = (b
1
-a
1
)···(b
d
-a
d
) =
d
Y
i=1
(b
i
-a
i
).
(b) Theexterior Lebesgue measure orouter Lebesgue measure ofasetE?R
d
is
|E|
e
= inf
n
X
k
vol(Q
k
)
o
,
wherethein?mumistakenoverall ?nite or countable collectionsofboxes
Q
k
such that E ?
S
k
Q
k
. ?
Thus, every subset ofR
d
has a uniquely de?ned exterior measure that lies
in the range 0=|E|
e
=8. Here are some of the basic properties of exterior
measure.
Theorem 1.1.2. (a) If Q is a box in R
d
, then |Q|
e
= vol(Q).
(b) Monotonicity: If E ?F ?R
d
, then |E|
e
=|F|
e
.
(c) Countable subadditivity: If E
k
?R
d
for k?N, then
¯
¯
¯
8
S
k=1
E
k
¯
¯
¯
e
=
8
X
k=1
|E
k
|
e
.
(d) Translation invariance: If E ? R
d
and h ? R
d
, then |E +h|
e
= |E|
e
,
where E +h ={t+h :t?E}.
(e) Regularity: If E ? R
d
and e > 0, then there exists an open set U ? E
such that |U|
e
=|E|
e
+e, and hence
|E|
e
= inf
©
|U|
e
:U open, U ?E
ª
. ?
1.2 Lebesgue Measure
De?nition 1.2.1. A set E ?R
d
is Lebesgue measurable, or simply measur-
able, if
?e> 0, ? open U ?E such that|U\E|
e
=e. (1.1)
If E is Lebesgue measurable, then its Lebesgue measure is its exterior
Lebesgue measure and is denoted by|E| =|E|
e
. ?
Note that equation (1.1) does not follow from Theorem 1.1.2(e). One con-
sequence of the Axiom of Choice is that there exist subsets of R
d
that are
not measurable.
Thefollowingresultsummarizessomeofthepropertiesofmeasurablesets.
Theorem 1.2.2. (a) The class of measurable subsets of R
d
is a s-algebra,
meaning that:
i.Ø and R
d
are measurable,
ii. if E
1
,E
2
,... are measurable, then ?E
k
is measurable,
iii. if E is measurable, then R
d
\E is measurable.
(b) Every open and every closed subset of R
d
is measurable.
(c) Every subset E of R
d
with |E|
e
= 0 is measurable. ?
Sincemeasurabilityispreservedundercomplementsandcountableunions,
it is also preserved under countable intersections.
We give some equivalent formulations of measurability.
1.2 Lebesgue Measure
De?nition 1.2.3. (a) A set H ? R
d
is a G
d
-set if there exist ?nitely or
countably many open sets U
k
such that H =nU
k
.
(b) A setH ?R
d
is anF
s
-set if there exist ?nitely or countably many closed
sets F
k
such that H =?F
k
. ?
Theorem 1.2.4. Let E ? R
d
be given. Then the following statements are
equivalent.
(a)E is measurable.
(b) For every e> 0, there exists a closed set F ?E such that |E\F|
e
=e.
(c)E =H\Z where H is a G
d
-set and |Z| = 0.
(d)E =H?Z where H is an F
s
-set and |Z| = 0. ?
Next we list some properties of Lebesgue measure.
Theorem 1.2.5. Let E and E
k
for k?N be measurable subsets of R
d
.
(a) Countable additivity: If E
1
, E
2
,... are disjoint measurable subsets ofR
d
,
then
¯
¯
¯
8
S
k=1
E
k
¯
¯
¯ =
8
X
k=1
|E
k
|.
(b) If E
1
?E
2
and |E
1
|<8, then |E
2
\E
1
| =|E
2
|-|E
1
|.
(c) Continuity from below: If E
1
?E
2
?··· , then
¯
¯
?E
k
¯
¯
= lim
k?8
|E
k
|.
(d) Continuity from above: If E
1
? E
2
? ··· and |E
1
| < 8, then
¯
¯
nE
k
¯
¯
=
lim
k?8
|E
k
|.
(e) Translation invariance: If h ? R
d
, then |E +h| = |E|, where E +h =
{x+h :x?E}.
(f) Linear changes of variable: If T: R
d
? R
d
is linear, then T(E) is mea-
surable and |T(E)| =|det(T)||E|.
(g) Cartesianproducts: IfE?R
m
andF ?R
n
are measurable, thenE×F ?
R
m+n
is measurable and |E ×F| = |E||F| (using the convention that
0·8 = 0). ?
We end this section with some terminology.
De?nition 1.2.6. A property that holds except possibly on a set of measure
zero is said to hold almost everywhere, abbreviated a.e. ?
For example, if C is the classical Cantor middle-thirds set, then |C| = 0.
Hence, the characteristic function
?
C
of C satis?es
?
C
(t) = 0 except for
thosetthatbelongtothezeromeasuresetC.Thereforewesaythat
?
C
(t) = 0
for almost every t, or
?
C
= 0 a.e. for short.
The essential supremum of a function is an example of a quantity that is
de?ned in terms of a property that holds almost everywhere.
Page 4


Chapter 1
Lebesgue Measure and Integration
We will give a brief review, without proofs, of Lebesgue measure and inte-
gration on subsets of R
d
. Details and proofs can be found in texts on real
analysis, such as [Fol99], [WZ77], [SS05], or [Heil18]. While some proofs are
quite easy, other proofs are surprisingly di?cult, and there are many coun-
terintuitive issues related to Lebesgue measure and integration.
1.1 Exterior Lebesgue Measure
For compactness of notation, we will refer to rectangular parallelepipeds in
R
d
whose sides are parallel to the coordinate axes simply as “boxes.”
De?nition 1.1.1. (a) A box inR
d
is a set of the form
Q = [a
1
,b
1
]×···×[a
d
,b
d
] =
d
Y
i=1
[a
i
,b
i
].
The volume of this box is
vol(Q) = (b
1
-a
1
)···(b
d
-a
d
) =
d
Y
i=1
(b
i
-a
i
).
(b) Theexterior Lebesgue measure orouter Lebesgue measure ofasetE?R
d
is
|E|
e
= inf
n
X
k
vol(Q
k
)
o
,
wherethein?mumistakenoverall ?nite or countable collectionsofboxes
Q
k
such that E ?
S
k
Q
k
. ?
Thus, every subset ofR
d
has a uniquely de?ned exterior measure that lies
in the range 0=|E|
e
=8. Here are some of the basic properties of exterior
measure.
Theorem 1.1.2. (a) If Q is a box in R
d
, then |Q|
e
= vol(Q).
(b) Monotonicity: If E ?F ?R
d
, then |E|
e
=|F|
e
.
(c) Countable subadditivity: If E
k
?R
d
for k?N, then
¯
¯
¯
8
S
k=1
E
k
¯
¯
¯
e
=
8
X
k=1
|E
k
|
e
.
(d) Translation invariance: If E ? R
d
and h ? R
d
, then |E +h|
e
= |E|
e
,
where E +h ={t+h :t?E}.
(e) Regularity: If E ? R
d
and e > 0, then there exists an open set U ? E
such that |U|
e
=|E|
e
+e, and hence
|E|
e
= inf
©
|U|
e
:U open, U ?E
ª
. ?
1.2 Lebesgue Measure
De?nition 1.2.1. A set E ?R
d
is Lebesgue measurable, or simply measur-
able, if
?e> 0, ? open U ?E such that|U\E|
e
=e. (1.1)
If E is Lebesgue measurable, then its Lebesgue measure is its exterior
Lebesgue measure and is denoted by|E| =|E|
e
. ?
Note that equation (1.1) does not follow from Theorem 1.1.2(e). One con-
sequence of the Axiom of Choice is that there exist subsets of R
d
that are
not measurable.
Thefollowingresultsummarizessomeofthepropertiesofmeasurablesets.
Theorem 1.2.2. (a) The class of measurable subsets of R
d
is a s-algebra,
meaning that:
i.Ø and R
d
are measurable,
ii. if E
1
,E
2
,... are measurable, then ?E
k
is measurable,
iii. if E is measurable, then R
d
\E is measurable.
(b) Every open and every closed subset of R
d
is measurable.
(c) Every subset E of R
d
with |E|
e
= 0 is measurable. ?
Sincemeasurabilityispreservedundercomplementsandcountableunions,
it is also preserved under countable intersections.
We give some equivalent formulations of measurability.
1.2 Lebesgue Measure
De?nition 1.2.3. (a) A set H ? R
d
is a G
d
-set if there exist ?nitely or
countably many open sets U
k
such that H =nU
k
.
(b) A setH ?R
d
is anF
s
-set if there exist ?nitely or countably many closed
sets F
k
such that H =?F
k
. ?
Theorem 1.2.4. Let E ? R
d
be given. Then the following statements are
equivalent.
(a)E is measurable.
(b) For every e> 0, there exists a closed set F ?E such that |E\F|
e
=e.
(c)E =H\Z where H is a G
d
-set and |Z| = 0.
(d)E =H?Z where H is an F
s
-set and |Z| = 0. ?
Next we list some properties of Lebesgue measure.
Theorem 1.2.5. Let E and E
k
for k?N be measurable subsets of R
d
.
(a) Countable additivity: If E
1
, E
2
,... are disjoint measurable subsets ofR
d
,
then
¯
¯
¯
8
S
k=1
E
k
¯
¯
¯ =
8
X
k=1
|E
k
|.
(b) If E
1
?E
2
and |E
1
|<8, then |E
2
\E
1
| =|E
2
|-|E
1
|.
(c) Continuity from below: If E
1
?E
2
?··· , then
¯
¯
?E
k
¯
¯
= lim
k?8
|E
k
|.
(d) Continuity from above: If E
1
? E
2
? ··· and |E
1
| < 8, then
¯
¯
nE
k
¯
¯
=
lim
k?8
|E
k
|.
(e) Translation invariance: If h ? R
d
, then |E +h| = |E|, where E +h =
{x+h :x?E}.
(f) Linear changes of variable: If T: R
d
? R
d
is linear, then T(E) is mea-
surable and |T(E)| =|det(T)||E|.
(g) Cartesianproducts: IfE?R
m
andF ?R
n
are measurable, thenE×F ?
R
m+n
is measurable and |E ×F| = |E||F| (using the convention that
0·8 = 0). ?
We end this section with some terminology.
De?nition 1.2.6. A property that holds except possibly on a set of measure
zero is said to hold almost everywhere, abbreviated a.e. ?
For example, if C is the classical Cantor middle-thirds set, then |C| = 0.
Hence, the characteristic function
?
C
of C satis?es
?
C
(t) = 0 except for
thosetthatbelongtothezeromeasuresetC.Thereforewesaythat
?
C
(t) = 0
for almost every t, or
?
C
= 0 a.e. for short.
The essential supremum of a function is an example of a quantity that is
de?ned in terms of a property that holds almost everywhere.
De?nition 1.2.7(Essential Supremum). The essential supremum of a
function f: E?R is
esssup
t?E
f(t) = inf{M :f =M a.e.}.
We say that f is essentially bounded if esssup
t?E
|f(t)|<8. ?
1.3 Measurable Functions
Now we de?ne the class of measurable functions on subsets ofR
d
.
De?nition 1.3.1(Real-Valued Measurable Functions). Fix a measur-
ablesetE ?R
d
,andletf: E ?Rbegiven.Thenf isa Lebesgue measurable
function, or simply a measurable function, if f
-1
(a,8) ={t?E :f(t)>a}
is a measurable subset ofR
d
for each a?R. ?
Inparticular,everycontinuousfunctionf:R
d
?Rismeasurable,because
theinverseimageofanopensetunderacontinuousfunctionisopen.However,
a measurable function need not be continuous.
Measurability is preserved under most of the usual operations, including
addition, multiplication, and limits. Some care does need to be taken with
compositions, but if we compose a measurable function with a continuous
function in the correct order, then measurability will be assured.
Theorem 1.3.2. Let E?R
d
be measurable.
(a) If f: E?R is measurable and g =f a.e., then g is measurable.
(b) If f, g: E?R are measurable, then so is f +g.
(c) If f: E ? R is measurable and ?: R ? R is continuous, then ??f is
measurable. Consequently, |f|, f
2
, f
+
, f
-
, and |f|
p
for p > 0 are all
measurable.
(d) If f, g: E?R are measurable, then so is fg.
(e) If f
n
: E ? R are measurable for n ? N, then so are supf
n
, inff
n
,
limsupf
n
, and liminff
n
.
(f) If f
n
: E ?R are measurable for n?N and f(t) = lim
n?8
f
n
(t) exists
for a.e. t, then f is measurable. ?
De?nition 1.3.3(Complex-Valued Measurable Functions). Given a
measurable domain E ? R
d
and a complex-valued function f: E ? C,
write f in real and imaginary parts as f = f
r
+if
i
. Then we say that f
is measurable if both f
r
and f
i
are measurable. ?
Egoro?’s Theorem says that pointwise convergence of measurable func-
tions is uniform convergence on “most” of the set.
Page 5


Chapter 1
Lebesgue Measure and Integration
We will give a brief review, without proofs, of Lebesgue measure and inte-
gration on subsets of R
d
. Details and proofs can be found in texts on real
analysis, such as [Fol99], [WZ77], [SS05], or [Heil18]. While some proofs are
quite easy, other proofs are surprisingly di?cult, and there are many coun-
terintuitive issues related to Lebesgue measure and integration.
1.1 Exterior Lebesgue Measure
For compactness of notation, we will refer to rectangular parallelepipeds in
R
d
whose sides are parallel to the coordinate axes simply as “boxes.”
De?nition 1.1.1. (a) A box inR
d
is a set of the form
Q = [a
1
,b
1
]×···×[a
d
,b
d
] =
d
Y
i=1
[a
i
,b
i
].
The volume of this box is
vol(Q) = (b
1
-a
1
)···(b
d
-a
d
) =
d
Y
i=1
(b
i
-a
i
).
(b) Theexterior Lebesgue measure orouter Lebesgue measure ofasetE?R
d
is
|E|
e
= inf
n
X
k
vol(Q
k
)
o
,
wherethein?mumistakenoverall ?nite or countable collectionsofboxes
Q
k
such that E ?
S
k
Q
k
. ?
Thus, every subset ofR
d
has a uniquely de?ned exterior measure that lies
in the range 0=|E|
e
=8. Here are some of the basic properties of exterior
measure.
Theorem 1.1.2. (a) If Q is a box in R
d
, then |Q|
e
= vol(Q).
(b) Monotonicity: If E ?F ?R
d
, then |E|
e
=|F|
e
.
(c) Countable subadditivity: If E
k
?R
d
for k?N, then
¯
¯
¯
8
S
k=1
E
k
¯
¯
¯
e
=
8
X
k=1
|E
k
|
e
.
(d) Translation invariance: If E ? R
d
and h ? R
d
, then |E +h|
e
= |E|
e
,
where E +h ={t+h :t?E}.
(e) Regularity: If E ? R
d
and e > 0, then there exists an open set U ? E
such that |U|
e
=|E|
e
+e, and hence
|E|
e
= inf
©
|U|
e
:U open, U ?E
ª
. ?
1.2 Lebesgue Measure
De?nition 1.2.1. A set E ?R
d
is Lebesgue measurable, or simply measur-
able, if
?e> 0, ? open U ?E such that|U\E|
e
=e. (1.1)
If E is Lebesgue measurable, then its Lebesgue measure is its exterior
Lebesgue measure and is denoted by|E| =|E|
e
. ?
Note that equation (1.1) does not follow from Theorem 1.1.2(e). One con-
sequence of the Axiom of Choice is that there exist subsets of R
d
that are
not measurable.
Thefollowingresultsummarizessomeofthepropertiesofmeasurablesets.
Theorem 1.2.2. (a) The class of measurable subsets of R
d
is a s-algebra,
meaning that:
i.Ø and R
d
are measurable,
ii. if E
1
,E
2
,... are measurable, then ?E
k
is measurable,
iii. if E is measurable, then R
d
\E is measurable.
(b) Every open and every closed subset of R
d
is measurable.
(c) Every subset E of R
d
with |E|
e
= 0 is measurable. ?
Sincemeasurabilityispreservedundercomplementsandcountableunions,
it is also preserved under countable intersections.
We give some equivalent formulations of measurability.
1.2 Lebesgue Measure
De?nition 1.2.3. (a) A set H ? R
d
is a G
d
-set if there exist ?nitely or
countably many open sets U
k
such that H =nU
k
.
(b) A setH ?R
d
is anF
s
-set if there exist ?nitely or countably many closed
sets F
k
such that H =?F
k
. ?
Theorem 1.2.4. Let E ? R
d
be given. Then the following statements are
equivalent.
(a)E is measurable.
(b) For every e> 0, there exists a closed set F ?E such that |E\F|
e
=e.
(c)E =H\Z where H is a G
d
-set and |Z| = 0.
(d)E =H?Z where H is an F
s
-set and |Z| = 0. ?
Next we list some properties of Lebesgue measure.
Theorem 1.2.5. Let E and E
k
for k?N be measurable subsets of R
d
.
(a) Countable additivity: If E
1
, E
2
,... are disjoint measurable subsets ofR
d
,
then
¯
¯
¯
8
S
k=1
E
k
¯
¯
¯ =
8
X
k=1
|E
k
|.
(b) If E
1
?E
2
and |E
1
|<8, then |E
2
\E
1
| =|E
2
|-|E
1
|.
(c) Continuity from below: If E
1
?E
2
?··· , then
¯
¯
?E
k
¯
¯
= lim
k?8
|E
k
|.
(d) Continuity from above: If E
1
? E
2
? ··· and |E
1
| < 8, then
¯
¯
nE
k
¯
¯
=
lim
k?8
|E
k
|.
(e) Translation invariance: If h ? R
d
, then |E +h| = |E|, where E +h =
{x+h :x?E}.
(f) Linear changes of variable: If T: R
d
? R
d
is linear, then T(E) is mea-
surable and |T(E)| =|det(T)||E|.
(g) Cartesianproducts: IfE?R
m
andF ?R
n
are measurable, thenE×F ?
R
m+n
is measurable and |E ×F| = |E||F| (using the convention that
0·8 = 0). ?
We end this section with some terminology.
De?nition 1.2.6. A property that holds except possibly on a set of measure
zero is said to hold almost everywhere, abbreviated a.e. ?
For example, if C is the classical Cantor middle-thirds set, then |C| = 0.
Hence, the characteristic function
?
C
of C satis?es
?
C
(t) = 0 except for
thosetthatbelongtothezeromeasuresetC.Thereforewesaythat
?
C
(t) = 0
for almost every t, or
?
C
= 0 a.e. for short.
The essential supremum of a function is an example of a quantity that is
de?ned in terms of a property that holds almost everywhere.
De?nition 1.2.7(Essential Supremum). The essential supremum of a
function f: E?R is
esssup
t?E
f(t) = inf{M :f =M a.e.}.
We say that f is essentially bounded if esssup
t?E
|f(t)|<8. ?
1.3 Measurable Functions
Now we de?ne the class of measurable functions on subsets ofR
d
.
De?nition 1.3.1(Real-Valued Measurable Functions). Fix a measur-
ablesetE ?R
d
,andletf: E ?Rbegiven.Thenf isa Lebesgue measurable
function, or simply a measurable function, if f
-1
(a,8) ={t?E :f(t)>a}
is a measurable subset ofR
d
for each a?R. ?
Inparticular,everycontinuousfunctionf:R
d
?Rismeasurable,because
theinverseimageofanopensetunderacontinuousfunctionisopen.However,
a measurable function need not be continuous.
Measurability is preserved under most of the usual operations, including
addition, multiplication, and limits. Some care does need to be taken with
compositions, but if we compose a measurable function with a continuous
function in the correct order, then measurability will be assured.
Theorem 1.3.2. Let E?R
d
be measurable.
(a) If f: E?R is measurable and g =f a.e., then g is measurable.
(b) If f, g: E?R are measurable, then so is f +g.
(c) If f: E ? R is measurable and ?: R ? R is continuous, then ??f is
measurable. Consequently, |f|, f
2
, f
+
, f
-
, and |f|
p
for p > 0 are all
measurable.
(d) If f, g: E?R are measurable, then so is fg.
(e) If f
n
: E ? R are measurable for n ? N, then so are supf
n
, inff
n
,
limsupf
n
, and liminff
n
.
(f) If f
n
: E ?R are measurable for n?N and f(t) = lim
n?8
f
n
(t) exists
for a.e. t, then f is measurable. ?
De?nition 1.3.3(Complex-Valued Measurable Functions). Given a
measurable domain E ? R
d
and a complex-valued function f: E ? C,
write f in real and imaginary parts as f = f
r
+if
i
. Then we say that f
is measurable if both f
r
and f
i
are measurable. ?
Egoro?’s Theorem says that pointwise convergence of measurable func-
tions is uniform convergence on “most” of the set.
Theorem 1.3.4(Egoro?’s Theorem). Let E ? R
d
be measurable with
|E| < 8. If f
n
, f: E ? C are measurable functions and f
n
(t) ? f(t) for
a.e. t ? E, then for every e > 0 there exists a measurable set A ? E such
that |A|<e and f
n
converges uniformly to f on E\A, i.e.,
lim
n?8
µ
sup
t/ ?A
|f(t)-f
n
(t)|
¶
= 0. ?
1.4 The Lebesgue Integral
To de?ne the Lebesgue integral of a measurable function, we ?rst begin with
“simple functions” and then extend to nonnegative functions, real-valued
functions, and complex-valued functions.
De?nition 1.4.1. Let E ?R
d
be measurable.
(a) A simple function on E is a measurable function f: E ? F that takes
only ?nitely many distinct values. That is, f: E?F is simple if
f =
N
X
k=1
a
k
?
E
k
, (1.2)
where N > 0, a
k
?F, and the E
k
are measurable subsets of E.
(b) If a
1
,...,a
N
?F are the distinct values assumed by a simple function f
and we set E
k
= {t ? E : f(t) = a
k
}, then f has the form given in
equation (1.2) and the setsE
1
,...,E
N
form a partition ofE. We call this
the standard representation of f.
(c) If f is a nonnegative simple function on E with standard representation
f =
P
N
k=1
a
k
?
E
k
, then the Lebesgue integral of f over E is
Z
E
f =
Z
E
f(t)dt =
N
X
k=1
a
k
|E
k
|.
(d) Iff: E? [0,8) is a measurable function, then the Lebesgue integral off
over E is
Z
E
f =
Z
E
f(t)dt = sup
½Z
E
f : 0=f=f, f simple
¾
.
If A is a measurable subset of E, then we write
R
A
f =
R
E
f
?
A
. ?
Followingaresomeofthebasicpropertiesofintegralsofnonnegativefunc-
tions.
Read More
556 videos|198 docs

FAQs on Lebesgue Measure and Lebesgue Integral - Real Analysis, CSIR-NET Mathematical Sciences - Mathematics for IIT JAM, GATE, CSIR NET, UGC NET

1. What is Lebesgue measure?
Ans. Lebesgue measure is a mathematical concept that extends the notion of length, area, and volume to more general sets in Euclidean space. It is named after the French mathematician Henri Lebesgue and provides a way to assign a non-negative real number to each set in a way that is consistent with our intuitive understanding of size. The Lebesgue measure has many important properties and is widely used in various areas of mathematics.
2. What is Lebesgue integral?
Ans. The Lebesgue integral is a mathematical tool that extends the concept of integration from functions defined on intervals to more general classes of functions. It was introduced by Henri Lebesgue as a way to overcome the limitations of the Riemann integral. The Lebesgue integral allows for a more flexible and powerful approach to integration, enabling the integration of a wider range of functions and providing more robust convergence properties.
3. What are the main differences between the Lebesgue measure and the Riemann integral?
Ans. The main differences between the Lebesgue measure and the Riemann integral are as follows: - The Lebesgue measure assigns a size to sets in a more general way, whereas the Riemann integral deals with the integration of functions defined on intervals. - The Lebesgue measure is defined for a wider class of sets, including non-measurable sets, while the Riemann integral requires the function to be defined on a closed and bounded interval. - The Lebesgue integral is more flexible and can handle functions that are not Riemann integrable, such as functions with discontinuities or unbounded functions. - The Lebesgue integral has better convergence properties, allowing for the interchange of limits and integrals in a wider range of cases.
4. What are some applications of Lebesgue measure and Lebesgue integral?
Ans. The Lebesgue measure and Lebesgue integral have numerous applications in various areas of mathematics, including: - Probability theory: The Lebesgue integral is used to define probability measures and to analyze random variables. - Functional analysis: The Lebesgue integral is used to define and study a wide range of function spaces, such as Lp spaces. - Fourier analysis: The Lebesgue integral is used to define the Fourier transform and to analyze the properties of Fourier series. - Measure theory: The Lebesgue measure is a fundamental concept in measure theory and is used to study measure spaces and integration theory. - Stochastic processes: The Lebesgue integral is used to define and analyze stochastic processes, such as Brownian motion.
5. What are some key properties of the Lebesgue measure?
Ans. Some key properties of the Lebesgue measure include: - Translation invariance: The Lebesgue measure is invariant under translations, meaning that the measure of a translated set is the same as the measure of the original set. - Countable additivity: The Lebesgue measure is countably additive, meaning that the measure of a countable union of disjoint sets is equal to the sum of their individual measures. - Monotonicity: If A and B are sets with A ⊆ B, then the measure of A is less than or equal to the measure of B. - Regularity: The Lebesgue measure is regular, meaning that every measurable set can be approximated from within by open sets and from outside by closed sets. - σ-finiteness: The Lebesgue measure is σ-finite, meaning that any set of finite measure can be expressed as a countable union of sets with finite measure.
Explore Courses for Mathematics exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Semester Notes

,

UGC NET

,

CSIR NET

,

GATE

,

CSIR NET

,

ppt

,

UGC NET

,

Viva Questions

,

mock tests for examination

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

study material

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Extra Questions

,

CSIR-NET Mathematical Sciences | Mathematics for IIT JAM

,

Exam

,

CSIR-NET Mathematical Sciences | Mathematics for IIT JAM

,

Sample Paper

,

practice quizzes

,

Lebesgue Measure and Lebesgue Integral - Real Analysis

,

GATE

,

Lebesgue Measure and Lebesgue Integral - Real Analysis

,

Free

,

Lebesgue Measure and Lebesgue Integral - Real Analysis

,

GATE

,

CSIR-NET Mathematical Sciences | Mathematics for IIT JAM

,

pdf

,

past year papers

,

video lectures

,

Objective type Questions

,

Important questions

,

Summary

,

CSIR NET

,

UGC NET

,

MCQs

;