Page 1
produce. It was seen as ‘wasteland’
that needed to be brought
under cultivation. By expanding
cultivation, the colonial government
would increase its revenue collection.
It could at the same time produce
more jute, cotton, wheat and
other agricultural produce that
were required in England. Hence,
Wasteland Rules were enacted in the
various parts of the country from the
mid-nineteenth century. By these
rules, uncultivated lands were taken
over from the pastoralists and given
to select individuals. These individuals
were encouraged to settle these lands.
These lands were actually grazing
tracts used regularly by pastoralists.
So expansion of cultivation meant the
decline of pastures and a problem for
pastoralists.
• Forest Act: By the mid-nineteenth
century, various Forest Acts were
being enacted in different provinces.
Through these Acts, some forests
which produced commercially valuable
timber like deodar or sal, were declared
‘Reserved’. No pastoralist was allowed
access to these forests. Other forests
were classified as ‘Protected’. In these,
some customary grazing rights of
pastoralists were granted but their
movements were severely restricted.
These Forest Acts changed the lives
of pastoralists. They were prevented
from entering many forests that had
earlier provided valuable forage for
their cattle. Even in the areas they
were allowed entry, their movements
were regulated.
• Criminal Tribes Act: The British
officials had no faith in nomadic people.
They distrusted mobile craftsmen and
traders who hawked their goods in
villages and pastoralists who changed
their places of residence every season.
The colonial government wanted
to rule over a settled population.
They wanted the rural people to
live in villages, in fixed places with
fixed rights on particular fields.
Such population was easy to identify
and control. Therefore, they passed
the Criminal Tribes Act in 1871
under which many communities of
craftsmen, traders and pastoralists
were classified as Criminal Tribes.
Once this Act came into force, these
communities were expected to live
only in notified village settlements.
They were not allowed to move out
without a permit.
• Grazing Tax: In order to expand
its revenue income, grazing tax was
introduced in most pastoral tracts of
India in the mid-nineteenth century.
Henceforth, pastoralists had to pay
tax on every animal they grazed on
the pastures. Not only this, they had
to seek a permit to enter a grazing
area to graze their cattle.
Grazing Tax proved to be an additional
burden on the poor pastoralists.
Q3. Give reasons to explain why the
Maasai community lost their grazing
lands.
Ans. The Maasai community is found in
East Africa, Southern Kenya and
Tanzania. This community has faced
the continuous loss of its grazing
lands. Let’s see why this happened:
(i) Before colonial times, Maasai land
stretched over a vast area from North
Kenya to the steppes of northern
Tanzania. In the late 19th century,
European imperial powers scrambled
for territorial possessions in Africa,
slicing up the region into different
colonies. In 1885, Maasai land was
cut into half with an international
boundary between British Kenya and
German Tanganyika. Subsequently,
the best grazing lands were gradually
taken over for White settlement and
the Maasai were pushed into a small
area in South Kenya and North
Tanzania.
Page 2
produce. It was seen as ‘wasteland’
that needed to be brought
under cultivation. By expanding
cultivation, the colonial government
would increase its revenue collection.
It could at the same time produce
more jute, cotton, wheat and
other agricultural produce that
were required in England. Hence,
Wasteland Rules were enacted in the
various parts of the country from the
mid-nineteenth century. By these
rules, uncultivated lands were taken
over from the pastoralists and given
to select individuals. These individuals
were encouraged to settle these lands.
These lands were actually grazing
tracts used regularly by pastoralists.
So expansion of cultivation meant the
decline of pastures and a problem for
pastoralists.
• Forest Act: By the mid-nineteenth
century, various Forest Acts were
being enacted in different provinces.
Through these Acts, some forests
which produced commercially valuable
timber like deodar or sal, were declared
‘Reserved’. No pastoralist was allowed
access to these forests. Other forests
were classified as ‘Protected’. In these,
some customary grazing rights of
pastoralists were granted but their
movements were severely restricted.
These Forest Acts changed the lives
of pastoralists. They were prevented
from entering many forests that had
earlier provided valuable forage for
their cattle. Even in the areas they
were allowed entry, their movements
were regulated.
• Criminal Tribes Act: The British
officials had no faith in nomadic people.
They distrusted mobile craftsmen and
traders who hawked their goods in
villages and pastoralists who changed
their places of residence every season.
The colonial government wanted
to rule over a settled population.
They wanted the rural people to
live in villages, in fixed places with
fixed rights on particular fields.
Such population was easy to identify
and control. Therefore, they passed
the Criminal Tribes Act in 1871
under which many communities of
craftsmen, traders and pastoralists
were classified as Criminal Tribes.
Once this Act came into force, these
communities were expected to live
only in notified village settlements.
They were not allowed to move out
without a permit.
• Grazing Tax: In order to expand
its revenue income, grazing tax was
introduced in most pastoral tracts of
India in the mid-nineteenth century.
Henceforth, pastoralists had to pay
tax on every animal they grazed on
the pastures. Not only this, they had
to seek a permit to enter a grazing
area to graze their cattle.
Grazing Tax proved to be an additional
burden on the poor pastoralists.
Q3. Give reasons to explain why the
Maasai community lost their grazing
lands.
Ans. The Maasai community is found in
East Africa, Southern Kenya and
Tanzania. This community has faced
the continuous loss of its grazing
lands. Let’s see why this happened:
(i) Before colonial times, Maasai land
stretched over a vast area from North
Kenya to the steppes of northern
Tanzania. In the late 19th century,
European imperial powers scrambled
for territorial possessions in Africa,
slicing up the region into different
colonies. In 1885, Maasai land was
cut into half with an international
boundary between British Kenya and
German Tanganyika. Subsequently,
the best grazing lands were gradually
taken over for White settlement and
the Maasai were pushed into a small
area in South Kenya and North
Tanzania.
(ii) From the late 19th century, the
British colonial government in East
Africa encouraged local peasants to
expand cultivation. As cultivation
expanded, pasture lands were turned
into cultivable fields.
(iii) Large areas of grazing land were also
turned into game reserves like the
Maasai Mara and Samburu National
Park in Kenya and Serengeti Park
in Tanzania. Pastoralists were not
allowed to enter these reserves. They
could neither hunt animals nor graze
their cattle herds in these areas. Very
often these reserves were in areas
that had traditionally been regular
grazing grounds for Maasai herds. The
Serengeti National Park, for instance,
was created over 14,760 km of Maasai
grazing land.
Q4. There are many similarities in the
way in which the modern world
forced changes in the lives of pastoral
communities in India and East Africa
Write about any two examples of
changes which were similar for Indian
pastoralists and the Maasai herders.
Ans. Both India and East Africa were under
the control of the British imperialistic
powers. Hence, both of them were
exploited in the same pattern. We can
give here two examples of changes
which were similar for the pastoral
communities of both the countries:
(i) The pastoral communities of both
the places gradually lost their grazing
lands because the colonial government
wanted to expand cultivation. In
India, the uncultivated land was
seen as wasteland that needed to
be brought under cultivation. Hence,
waste land rules were enacted in
various parts of the country. By these
rules uncultivated lands were taken
over and given to select individuals.
These individuals were encouraged to
settle these lands. In most areas, the
lands taken over were actually grazing
tracts used regularly by pastoralists.
Similarly in East Africa the grazing
lands of the Maasai were gradually
taken over by the British colonial
government to expand cultivation. As
cultivation expanded, Maasai pasture
lands were turned into cultivable fields.
(ii) Both Indian pastoralists and the
Maasai herders were nomadic and
viewed with suspicion by the British
colonial government. They were not
allowed to move out without a permit.
They were forced to live within the
confines of special reserves.
ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS SOLVED
I. Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)
1. Nomadic tribes need to move from one
place to another because of—
(a) seasonal changes
(b) their mobile nature
(c) their poor background
(d) all of the above
2. Dhangars are an important pastoral
community of which state?
(a) Himachal Pradesh
(b ) Maharashtra
(c) Jammu and Kashmir
(d) Rajasthan
3. The life of pastoralists greatly changed
under colonial rule. What is/are this/
these change/changes?
(a) Their grazing grounds shrank.
(b) Their movements were regulated.
(c) They had to pay increased revenue.
(d) All of the above
4. When was the Criminal Tribes Act
passed?
(a) In 1889 (b) In 1871
(c) In 1878 (d) In 1870
5. Why did the colonial government
introduce the Grazing Tax in the mid-
19th century?
Page 3
produce. It was seen as ‘wasteland’
that needed to be brought
under cultivation. By expanding
cultivation, the colonial government
would increase its revenue collection.
It could at the same time produce
more jute, cotton, wheat and
other agricultural produce that
were required in England. Hence,
Wasteland Rules were enacted in the
various parts of the country from the
mid-nineteenth century. By these
rules, uncultivated lands were taken
over from the pastoralists and given
to select individuals. These individuals
were encouraged to settle these lands.
These lands were actually grazing
tracts used regularly by pastoralists.
So expansion of cultivation meant the
decline of pastures and a problem for
pastoralists.
• Forest Act: By the mid-nineteenth
century, various Forest Acts were
being enacted in different provinces.
Through these Acts, some forests
which produced commercially valuable
timber like deodar or sal, were declared
‘Reserved’. No pastoralist was allowed
access to these forests. Other forests
were classified as ‘Protected’. In these,
some customary grazing rights of
pastoralists were granted but their
movements were severely restricted.
These Forest Acts changed the lives
of pastoralists. They were prevented
from entering many forests that had
earlier provided valuable forage for
their cattle. Even in the areas they
were allowed entry, their movements
were regulated.
• Criminal Tribes Act: The British
officials had no faith in nomadic people.
They distrusted mobile craftsmen and
traders who hawked their goods in
villages and pastoralists who changed
their places of residence every season.
The colonial government wanted
to rule over a settled population.
They wanted the rural people to
live in villages, in fixed places with
fixed rights on particular fields.
Such population was easy to identify
and control. Therefore, they passed
the Criminal Tribes Act in 1871
under which many communities of
craftsmen, traders and pastoralists
were classified as Criminal Tribes.
Once this Act came into force, these
communities were expected to live
only in notified village settlements.
They were not allowed to move out
without a permit.
• Grazing Tax: In order to expand
its revenue income, grazing tax was
introduced in most pastoral tracts of
India in the mid-nineteenth century.
Henceforth, pastoralists had to pay
tax on every animal they grazed on
the pastures. Not only this, they had
to seek a permit to enter a grazing
area to graze their cattle.
Grazing Tax proved to be an additional
burden on the poor pastoralists.
Q3. Give reasons to explain why the
Maasai community lost their grazing
lands.
Ans. The Maasai community is found in
East Africa, Southern Kenya and
Tanzania. This community has faced
the continuous loss of its grazing
lands. Let’s see why this happened:
(i) Before colonial times, Maasai land
stretched over a vast area from North
Kenya to the steppes of northern
Tanzania. In the late 19th century,
European imperial powers scrambled
for territorial possessions in Africa,
slicing up the region into different
colonies. In 1885, Maasai land was
cut into half with an international
boundary between British Kenya and
German Tanganyika. Subsequently,
the best grazing lands were gradually
taken over for White settlement and
the Maasai were pushed into a small
area in South Kenya and North
Tanzania.
(ii) From the late 19th century, the
British colonial government in East
Africa encouraged local peasants to
expand cultivation. As cultivation
expanded, pasture lands were turned
into cultivable fields.
(iii) Large areas of grazing land were also
turned into game reserves like the
Maasai Mara and Samburu National
Park in Kenya and Serengeti Park
in Tanzania. Pastoralists were not
allowed to enter these reserves. They
could neither hunt animals nor graze
their cattle herds in these areas. Very
often these reserves were in areas
that had traditionally been regular
grazing grounds for Maasai herds. The
Serengeti National Park, for instance,
was created over 14,760 km of Maasai
grazing land.
Q4. There are many similarities in the
way in which the modern world
forced changes in the lives of pastoral
communities in India and East Africa
Write about any two examples of
changes which were similar for Indian
pastoralists and the Maasai herders.
Ans. Both India and East Africa were under
the control of the British imperialistic
powers. Hence, both of them were
exploited in the same pattern. We can
give here two examples of changes
which were similar for the pastoral
communities of both the countries:
(i) The pastoral communities of both
the places gradually lost their grazing
lands because the colonial government
wanted to expand cultivation. In
India, the uncultivated land was
seen as wasteland that needed to
be brought under cultivation. Hence,
waste land rules were enacted in
various parts of the country. By these
rules uncultivated lands were taken
over and given to select individuals.
These individuals were encouraged to
settle these lands. In most areas, the
lands taken over were actually grazing
tracts used regularly by pastoralists.
Similarly in East Africa the grazing
lands of the Maasai were gradually
taken over by the British colonial
government to expand cultivation. As
cultivation expanded, Maasai pasture
lands were turned into cultivable fields.
(ii) Both Indian pastoralists and the
Maasai herders were nomadic and
viewed with suspicion by the British
colonial government. They were not
allowed to move out without a permit.
They were forced to live within the
confines of special reserves.
ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS SOLVED
I. Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)
1. Nomadic tribes need to move from one
place to another because of—
(a) seasonal changes
(b) their mobile nature
(c) their poor background
(d) all of the above
2. Dhangars are an important pastoral
community of which state?
(a) Himachal Pradesh
(b ) Maharashtra
(c) Jammu and Kashmir
(d) Rajasthan
3. The life of pastoralists greatly changed
under colonial rule. What is/are this/
these change/changes?
(a) Their grazing grounds shrank.
(b) Their movements were regulated.
(c) They had to pay increased revenue.
(d) All of the above
4. When was the Criminal Tribes Act
passed?
(a) In 1889 (b) In 1871
(c) In 1878 (d) In 1870
5. Why did the colonial government
introduce the Grazing Tax in the mid-
19th century?
(a) To expand its revenue.
(b) To ban cattle herder from entering
grazing tracts.
(c) Both (a) and (b).
(d) None of the above
6. How many people in Africa are
dependent on some form of pastoral
activity for their livelihood?
(a) Less than 22 million
(b) Over 22 million
(c) Over 12 million
(d) Less than 12 million
7. What percentage of the grazing lands
did Maasai lose when European
imperial powers divided Africa into
different colonies?
(a) 50% (b) 49%
(c) 80% (d) 60%
8. When did European imperial powers
divide Africa into different colonies?
(a) In 1805 (b) In 1882
(c) In 1885 (d) In 1815
9. Where is the Serengeti National Park
located?
(a) Kenya (b) Tanzania
(c) Sudan (d) Zimbabwe
10. The word ‘Maasai’ is derived from the
word ‘Maa’. ‘Maasai’ means—
(a) My People
(b) Mother and People
(c) Their People (d) Tribal People
11. Which of the following pastoral nomads
is not found in the mountains?
(a) Gaddi shepherds
(b) Raikas
(c) Gujjar Bakarwals
(d) Bhotiyas
12. The settlement of Maru Raikas is known
as—
(a) Dhandi (b) Mandi
(c) Mandap (d) Bugyal
13. Pushkar is a famous place in Rajasthan
where ............... is held every year.
(a) elephant fair (b) cattle fair
(c) buffalo fair (d) camel fair
14. The Maasai cattle herders live primarily
in—
(a) East Africa (b) West Africa
(c) South Africa (d) North Africa
15. The Maasai Mara is a National Park
in—
(a) Tanzania (b) Kenya
(c) Sudan (d) South Africa
16. Wasteland Rules were enacted by the
colonial officials in order to—
(a) harass the pastoralists of India
(b) uplift the condition of the Indian
pastoralists
(c) turn the uncultivated lands into
cultivable lands
(d) turn cultivable lands into forests
Ans. 1. (a) 2. (b) 3. (d)
4. (b) 5. (c) 6. (b)
7. (d) 8. (c) 9. (b)
10. (a) 11. (b) 12. (a)
13. (d) 14. (a) 15. (b)
16. (c)
II. Very Short Answer Type Questions
Q1. Who are nomadic pastoralists?
Ans. Nomadic pastoralists are people who
do not live in one place but move
with their herds of goats and sheep
from one area to another to earn their
living.
Q2. Who are the Gujjar Bakarwals?
Ans. The Gujjar Bakarwals belong to
Jammu and Kashmir. They are great
herders of goats and sheep.
Q3. What are Gujjar mandaps made of?
Ans. Gujjar mandaps are made of ringal
— a hill bamboo — and grass from the
buggal — a vast meadow in the high
mountains.
Q4. What are bhabars?
Ans. Bhabars are dry forested areas below
the foothills of Garhwal and Kumaun.
Q5. The life of pastoralists greatly change
under the colonial rule. Mention two
changes.
Ans. (i) Their grazing grounds shrank.
(ii) Their movements were regulated.
Q6. What different activities were
associated with Dhangars of
Maharashtra?
Page 4
produce. It was seen as ‘wasteland’
that needed to be brought
under cultivation. By expanding
cultivation, the colonial government
would increase its revenue collection.
It could at the same time produce
more jute, cotton, wheat and
other agricultural produce that
were required in England. Hence,
Wasteland Rules were enacted in the
various parts of the country from the
mid-nineteenth century. By these
rules, uncultivated lands were taken
over from the pastoralists and given
to select individuals. These individuals
were encouraged to settle these lands.
These lands were actually grazing
tracts used regularly by pastoralists.
So expansion of cultivation meant the
decline of pastures and a problem for
pastoralists.
• Forest Act: By the mid-nineteenth
century, various Forest Acts were
being enacted in different provinces.
Through these Acts, some forests
which produced commercially valuable
timber like deodar or sal, were declared
‘Reserved’. No pastoralist was allowed
access to these forests. Other forests
were classified as ‘Protected’. In these,
some customary grazing rights of
pastoralists were granted but their
movements were severely restricted.
These Forest Acts changed the lives
of pastoralists. They were prevented
from entering many forests that had
earlier provided valuable forage for
their cattle. Even in the areas they
were allowed entry, their movements
were regulated.
• Criminal Tribes Act: The British
officials had no faith in nomadic people.
They distrusted mobile craftsmen and
traders who hawked their goods in
villages and pastoralists who changed
their places of residence every season.
The colonial government wanted
to rule over a settled population.
They wanted the rural people to
live in villages, in fixed places with
fixed rights on particular fields.
Such population was easy to identify
and control. Therefore, they passed
the Criminal Tribes Act in 1871
under which many communities of
craftsmen, traders and pastoralists
were classified as Criminal Tribes.
Once this Act came into force, these
communities were expected to live
only in notified village settlements.
They were not allowed to move out
without a permit.
• Grazing Tax: In order to expand
its revenue income, grazing tax was
introduced in most pastoral tracts of
India in the mid-nineteenth century.
Henceforth, pastoralists had to pay
tax on every animal they grazed on
the pastures. Not only this, they had
to seek a permit to enter a grazing
area to graze their cattle.
Grazing Tax proved to be an additional
burden on the poor pastoralists.
Q3. Give reasons to explain why the
Maasai community lost their grazing
lands.
Ans. The Maasai community is found in
East Africa, Southern Kenya and
Tanzania. This community has faced
the continuous loss of its grazing
lands. Let’s see why this happened:
(i) Before colonial times, Maasai land
stretched over a vast area from North
Kenya to the steppes of northern
Tanzania. In the late 19th century,
European imperial powers scrambled
for territorial possessions in Africa,
slicing up the region into different
colonies. In 1885, Maasai land was
cut into half with an international
boundary between British Kenya and
German Tanganyika. Subsequently,
the best grazing lands were gradually
taken over for White settlement and
the Maasai were pushed into a small
area in South Kenya and North
Tanzania.
(ii) From the late 19th century, the
British colonial government in East
Africa encouraged local peasants to
expand cultivation. As cultivation
expanded, pasture lands were turned
into cultivable fields.
(iii) Large areas of grazing land were also
turned into game reserves like the
Maasai Mara and Samburu National
Park in Kenya and Serengeti Park
in Tanzania. Pastoralists were not
allowed to enter these reserves. They
could neither hunt animals nor graze
their cattle herds in these areas. Very
often these reserves were in areas
that had traditionally been regular
grazing grounds for Maasai herds. The
Serengeti National Park, for instance,
was created over 14,760 km of Maasai
grazing land.
Q4. There are many similarities in the
way in which the modern world
forced changes in the lives of pastoral
communities in India and East Africa
Write about any two examples of
changes which were similar for Indian
pastoralists and the Maasai herders.
Ans. Both India and East Africa were under
the control of the British imperialistic
powers. Hence, both of them were
exploited in the same pattern. We can
give here two examples of changes
which were similar for the pastoral
communities of both the countries:
(i) The pastoral communities of both
the places gradually lost their grazing
lands because the colonial government
wanted to expand cultivation. In
India, the uncultivated land was
seen as wasteland that needed to
be brought under cultivation. Hence,
waste land rules were enacted in
various parts of the country. By these
rules uncultivated lands were taken
over and given to select individuals.
These individuals were encouraged to
settle these lands. In most areas, the
lands taken over were actually grazing
tracts used regularly by pastoralists.
Similarly in East Africa the grazing
lands of the Maasai were gradually
taken over by the British colonial
government to expand cultivation. As
cultivation expanded, Maasai pasture
lands were turned into cultivable fields.
(ii) Both Indian pastoralists and the
Maasai herders were nomadic and
viewed with suspicion by the British
colonial government. They were not
allowed to move out without a permit.
They were forced to live within the
confines of special reserves.
ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS SOLVED
I. Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)
1. Nomadic tribes need to move from one
place to another because of—
(a) seasonal changes
(b) their mobile nature
(c) their poor background
(d) all of the above
2. Dhangars are an important pastoral
community of which state?
(a) Himachal Pradesh
(b ) Maharashtra
(c) Jammu and Kashmir
(d) Rajasthan
3. The life of pastoralists greatly changed
under colonial rule. What is/are this/
these change/changes?
(a) Their grazing grounds shrank.
(b) Their movements were regulated.
(c) They had to pay increased revenue.
(d) All of the above
4. When was the Criminal Tribes Act
passed?
(a) In 1889 (b) In 1871
(c) In 1878 (d) In 1870
5. Why did the colonial government
introduce the Grazing Tax in the mid-
19th century?
(a) To expand its revenue.
(b) To ban cattle herder from entering
grazing tracts.
(c) Both (a) and (b).
(d) None of the above
6. How many people in Africa are
dependent on some form of pastoral
activity for their livelihood?
(a) Less than 22 million
(b) Over 22 million
(c) Over 12 million
(d) Less than 12 million
7. What percentage of the grazing lands
did Maasai lose when European
imperial powers divided Africa into
different colonies?
(a) 50% (b) 49%
(c) 80% (d) 60%
8. When did European imperial powers
divide Africa into different colonies?
(a) In 1805 (b) In 1882
(c) In 1885 (d) In 1815
9. Where is the Serengeti National Park
located?
(a) Kenya (b) Tanzania
(c) Sudan (d) Zimbabwe
10. The word ‘Maasai’ is derived from the
word ‘Maa’. ‘Maasai’ means—
(a) My People
(b) Mother and People
(c) Their People (d) Tribal People
11. Which of the following pastoral nomads
is not found in the mountains?
(a) Gaddi shepherds
(b) Raikas
(c) Gujjar Bakarwals
(d) Bhotiyas
12. The settlement of Maru Raikas is known
as—
(a) Dhandi (b) Mandi
(c) Mandap (d) Bugyal
13. Pushkar is a famous place in Rajasthan
where ............... is held every year.
(a) elephant fair (b) cattle fair
(c) buffalo fair (d) camel fair
14. The Maasai cattle herders live primarily
in—
(a) East Africa (b) West Africa
(c) South Africa (d) North Africa
15. The Maasai Mara is a National Park
in—
(a) Tanzania (b) Kenya
(c) Sudan (d) South Africa
16. Wasteland Rules were enacted by the
colonial officials in order to—
(a) harass the pastoralists of India
(b) uplift the condition of the Indian
pastoralists
(c) turn the uncultivated lands into
cultivable lands
(d) turn cultivable lands into forests
Ans. 1. (a) 2. (b) 3. (d)
4. (b) 5. (c) 6. (b)
7. (d) 8. (c) 9. (b)
10. (a) 11. (b) 12. (a)
13. (d) 14. (a) 15. (b)
16. (c)
II. Very Short Answer Type Questions
Q1. Who are nomadic pastoralists?
Ans. Nomadic pastoralists are people who
do not live in one place but move
with their herds of goats and sheep
from one area to another to earn their
living.
Q2. Who are the Gujjar Bakarwals?
Ans. The Gujjar Bakarwals belong to
Jammu and Kashmir. They are great
herders of goats and sheep.
Q3. What are Gujjar mandaps made of?
Ans. Gujjar mandaps are made of ringal
— a hill bamboo — and grass from the
buggal — a vast meadow in the high
mountains.
Q4. What are bhabars?
Ans. Bhabars are dry forested areas below
the foothills of Garhwal and Kumaun.
Q5. The life of pastoralists greatly change
under the colonial rule. Mention two
changes.
Ans. (i) Their grazing grounds shrank.
(ii) Their movements were regulated.
Q6. What different activities were
associated with Dhangars of
Maharashtra?
Ans. Most of them were shepherds, some
were blanket weavers, and still others
were buffalo herders.
Q7. Where did the Kurumas and Kurub
as live? What did they rear?
Ans. The Kurumas and Kurubas lived
in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.
They reared sheep and goats and sold
woven blankets.
Q8. Name the pastoralists who lived in the
plateaus of India.
Ans. Dhangars, Gollas, Kurumas and
Kurubas.
Q9. Where were Banjaras to be found in
India?
Ans. Banjaras were to be found in the
villages of Uttar Pradesh, Punjab,
Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and
Maharashtra.
Q10. Where did the Raikas live?
Ans. The Raikas lived in the deserts of
Rajasthan.
Q11. What did the different groups of
Raikas rear?
Ans. One group of Raikas, known as the
Maru or desert Raikas, herded camels
and another group reared sheep and
goats.
Q12. What was the settlement of Maru
Raikas called?
Ans. The settlement of Maru Raikas was
called a dhandi.
Q13. What are customary rights?
Ans. Customary rights are those rights
that people are used to by custom and
tradition.
Q14. How did the colonial officials view the
uncultivated land?
Ans. The colonial officials viewed all
uncultivated land as unproductive,
which produced neither revenue nor
agricultural produce. It was seen as
wasteland that needed to be brought
under cultivation.
Q15. What happened after the Wasteland
Rules were enacted?
Ans. The grazing lands of postoralists
were taken over and given to the
select individuals to turn them into
cultivated fields.
Q16. Which forests were declared ‘reserved’
under the various Forest Acts?
Ans. The forests which produced
commercially valuable timber like
deodar or sal were declared ‘reserved’
forests.
Q17. Which Act did the colonial government
in India pass in 1871? What was its
main provision?
Ans. In 1871, the colonial government in
India passed the Criminal Tribes Act.
By this Act, many communities of
craftsmen, traders and pastoralists
were classified as Criminal Tribes and
were ordered to live only in notified
village settlements.
Q18. Why did the colonial government
introduce the Grazing Tax in the mid-
19th century? Give two reasons.
Ans. (i) To expand its revenue.
(ii) To ban cattle-herders from entering
grazing tracts.
Q19. Name the pastoral communities who
live in Africa.
Ans. Bedouins, Berbers, Maasai, Somali,
Boran and Turkana.
Q20. Where do the Maasai cattle herders
live?
Ans. They live primarily in East Africa — in
Southern Kenya and Tanzania.
Q21. How many people in Africa are
dependent on some form of pastoral
activity for their livelihood?
Ans. Over 22 million Africans depend on
some form of pastoral activity for their
livelihood.
Q22. What per cent of their grazing land did
Maasai lose when European imperial
powers divided Africa into different
colonies?
Ans. They lost about 60 per cent of their
grazing lands.
Q23. What was the status of the Maasai
pastoralists in pre-colonial times?
Ans. They had dominated their agricultural
neighbours both economically and
politically.
Read More