Page 1
1.51
THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
LEARNING OUTCOMES
UNIT II: THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF
DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
At the end of this unit, you will be able to:
? Define Keynes’ concept of equilibrium aggregate income
? Describe the components of aggregate expenditure in two, three and four
sector economy models
? Explain national income determination in two, three and four sector economy
models
? Illustrate the functioning of multiplier, and
? Outline the changes in equilibrium aggregate income on account of changes in
its determinants
Determination of National
Income
The Keynesian Theory of
Determination of National
Income
The Two-Sector Model
for National Income
Determination
The
Investment
Multiplier
Determination of
Equilibrium Income :
Three Sector Model
Determination of
Equilibrium
Income : Four
Sector Model
UNIT OVERVIEW
Page 2
1.51
THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
LEARNING OUTCOMES
UNIT II: THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF
DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
At the end of this unit, you will be able to:
? Define Keynes’ concept of equilibrium aggregate income
? Describe the components of aggregate expenditure in two, three and four
sector economy models
? Explain national income determination in two, three and four sector economy
models
? Illustrate the functioning of multiplier, and
? Outline the changes in equilibrium aggregate income on account of changes in
its determinants
Determination of National
Income
The Keynesian Theory of
Determination of National
Income
The Two-Sector Model
for National Income
Determination
The
Investment
Multiplier
Determination of
Equilibrium Income :
Three Sector Model
Determination of
Equilibrium
Income : Four
Sector Model
UNIT OVERVIEW
1.52 ECONOMICS FOR FINANCE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit on National Income Accounting, we have come across terms
such as consumption, investment and total output of final goods and services
(GDP). These macroeconomic variables were used in the accounting sense,
representing actual values of these items in a certain year. These actual or
accounting values are ‘ex post’ (realized) measures of these items. Thus,
aggregate consumption (C) denotes what people have actually consumed and
GDP is what is actually produced. These variables can also be defined in ‘ex-ante’
(anticipated) terms or in terms of what is intended or planned. In the theoretical
model of the economy which we plan to discuss in this unit, the ‘ex ante’ values of
these variables are our primary concern. Therefore, the term ‘consumption’ would
indicate what people in an economy plan to consume and ‘investment‘would
denote planned investment. If we want to predict what the equilibrium value of
output or GDP is, we need to know what quantities of final goods people plan to
demand and supply.
In this unit, we shall focus on two issues namely, the factors that determine the
level of national income and the determination of equilibrium aggregate income
and output in an economy. A comprehensive theory to explain these phenomena
was first put forward by the British economist John Maynard Keynes in his
masterpiece ‘The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money’ published in
1936. Before the ‘General Theory’ by Keynes, economists could not explain how
economic depressions happen, or what to do about them. The classical
economists maintained that the economy is self-regulating and is always capable
of automatically achieving equilibrium at the ‘natural level’ of real GDP or output,
which is the level of real GDP that is obtained when the economy's resources are
fully employed. While circumstances arise from time to time that cause the
economy to fall below or to exceed the natural level of real GDP, wage and price
flexibility will bring the economy back to the natural level of real GDP. If an excess
in the labour force (unemployment) or products exist, the wage or price of these
will adjust to absorb the excess. According to them, there will be no involuntary
unemployment.
Keynes’ theory of determination of equilibrium real GDP, employment and prices
focuses on the relationship between aggregate income and aggregate
expenditure. There is a difference between equilibrium income (the level toward
which the economy gravitates in the short run) and potential income (the level of
income that the economy is technically capable of producing, without generating
Page 3
1.51
THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
LEARNING OUTCOMES
UNIT II: THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF
DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
At the end of this unit, you will be able to:
? Define Keynes’ concept of equilibrium aggregate income
? Describe the components of aggregate expenditure in two, three and four
sector economy models
? Explain national income determination in two, three and four sector economy
models
? Illustrate the functioning of multiplier, and
? Outline the changes in equilibrium aggregate income on account of changes in
its determinants
Determination of National
Income
The Keynesian Theory of
Determination of National
Income
The Two-Sector Model
for National Income
Determination
The
Investment
Multiplier
Determination of
Equilibrium Income :
Three Sector Model
Determination of
Equilibrium
Income : Four
Sector Model
UNIT OVERVIEW
1.52 ECONOMICS FOR FINANCE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit on National Income Accounting, we have come across terms
such as consumption, investment and total output of final goods and services
(GDP). These macroeconomic variables were used in the accounting sense,
representing actual values of these items in a certain year. These actual or
accounting values are ‘ex post’ (realized) measures of these items. Thus,
aggregate consumption (C) denotes what people have actually consumed and
GDP is what is actually produced. These variables can also be defined in ‘ex-ante’
(anticipated) terms or in terms of what is intended or planned. In the theoretical
model of the economy which we plan to discuss in this unit, the ‘ex ante’ values of
these variables are our primary concern. Therefore, the term ‘consumption’ would
indicate what people in an economy plan to consume and ‘investment‘would
denote planned investment. If we want to predict what the equilibrium value of
output or GDP is, we need to know what quantities of final goods people plan to
demand and supply.
In this unit, we shall focus on two issues namely, the factors that determine the
level of national income and the determination of equilibrium aggregate income
and output in an economy. A comprehensive theory to explain these phenomena
was first put forward by the British economist John Maynard Keynes in his
masterpiece ‘The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money’ published in
1936. Before the ‘General Theory’ by Keynes, economists could not explain how
economic depressions happen, or what to do about them. The classical
economists maintained that the economy is self-regulating and is always capable
of automatically achieving equilibrium at the ‘natural level’ of real GDP or output,
which is the level of real GDP that is obtained when the economy's resources are
fully employed. While circumstances arise from time to time that cause the
economy to fall below or to exceed the natural level of real GDP, wage and price
flexibility will bring the economy back to the natural level of real GDP. If an excess
in the labour force (unemployment) or products exist, the wage or price of these
will adjust to absorb the excess. According to them, there will be no involuntary
unemployment.
Keynes’ theory of determination of equilibrium real GDP, employment and prices
focuses on the relationship between aggregate income and aggregate
expenditure. There is a difference between equilibrium income (the level toward
which the economy gravitates in the short run) and potential income (the level of
income that the economy is technically capable of producing, without generating
1.53
THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
accelerating inflation).Keynes argued that markets would not automatically lead
to full-employment equilibrium and the resulting natural level of real GDP. The
economy could settle in equilibrium at any level of unemployment. Keynesians
believe that prices and wages are not so flexible; they are sticky, especially
downward. The stickiness of prices and wages in the downward direction prevents
the economy's resources from being fully employed and thereby prevents the
economy from returning to the natural level of real GDP. Therefore, output will
remain at less than the full employment level as long as there is insufficient
spending in the economy. This was precisely what was happening during the
great depression.
The Keynesian theory of income determination is presented in three models:
(i) The two-sector model consisting of the household and the business sectors,
(ii) The three-sector model consisting of household, business and government
sectors, and
(iii) The four-sector model consisting of household, business, government and
foreign sectors
Before we attempt to explain the determination of income in each of the above
models, it is pertinent that we understand the concept of circular flow in an
economy which explains the functioning of an economy.
2.2 CIRCULAR FLOW IN A SIMPLE TWO-SECTOR
MODEL
Concept of circular flow
The circular flow of income is a process where the national income and expenditure
of an economy flow in a circular manner continuously through time. Savings,
expenditures, exports and imports are various components of circular flow of income
which are shown in the figure in the form of currents and cross currents in such a
manner that national income equals national expenditure.
Initially, we consider a hypothetical simple two-sector economy. Even though an
economy of this kind does not exist in reality, it provides a simple and convenient
basis for understanding the Keynesian theory of income determination. The
simple two sector economy model assumes that there are only two sectors in the
economy viz., households and firms, with only consumption and investment
outlays. Households own all factors of production and they sell their factor
Page 4
1.51
THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
LEARNING OUTCOMES
UNIT II: THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF
DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
At the end of this unit, you will be able to:
? Define Keynes’ concept of equilibrium aggregate income
? Describe the components of aggregate expenditure in two, three and four
sector economy models
? Explain national income determination in two, three and four sector economy
models
? Illustrate the functioning of multiplier, and
? Outline the changes in equilibrium aggregate income on account of changes in
its determinants
Determination of National
Income
The Keynesian Theory of
Determination of National
Income
The Two-Sector Model
for National Income
Determination
The
Investment
Multiplier
Determination of
Equilibrium Income :
Three Sector Model
Determination of
Equilibrium
Income : Four
Sector Model
UNIT OVERVIEW
1.52 ECONOMICS FOR FINANCE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit on National Income Accounting, we have come across terms
such as consumption, investment and total output of final goods and services
(GDP). These macroeconomic variables were used in the accounting sense,
representing actual values of these items in a certain year. These actual or
accounting values are ‘ex post’ (realized) measures of these items. Thus,
aggregate consumption (C) denotes what people have actually consumed and
GDP is what is actually produced. These variables can also be defined in ‘ex-ante’
(anticipated) terms or in terms of what is intended or planned. In the theoretical
model of the economy which we plan to discuss in this unit, the ‘ex ante’ values of
these variables are our primary concern. Therefore, the term ‘consumption’ would
indicate what people in an economy plan to consume and ‘investment‘would
denote planned investment. If we want to predict what the equilibrium value of
output or GDP is, we need to know what quantities of final goods people plan to
demand and supply.
In this unit, we shall focus on two issues namely, the factors that determine the
level of national income and the determination of equilibrium aggregate income
and output in an economy. A comprehensive theory to explain these phenomena
was first put forward by the British economist John Maynard Keynes in his
masterpiece ‘The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money’ published in
1936. Before the ‘General Theory’ by Keynes, economists could not explain how
economic depressions happen, or what to do about them. The classical
economists maintained that the economy is self-regulating and is always capable
of automatically achieving equilibrium at the ‘natural level’ of real GDP or output,
which is the level of real GDP that is obtained when the economy's resources are
fully employed. While circumstances arise from time to time that cause the
economy to fall below or to exceed the natural level of real GDP, wage and price
flexibility will bring the economy back to the natural level of real GDP. If an excess
in the labour force (unemployment) or products exist, the wage or price of these
will adjust to absorb the excess. According to them, there will be no involuntary
unemployment.
Keynes’ theory of determination of equilibrium real GDP, employment and prices
focuses on the relationship between aggregate income and aggregate
expenditure. There is a difference between equilibrium income (the level toward
which the economy gravitates in the short run) and potential income (the level of
income that the economy is technically capable of producing, without generating
1.53
THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
accelerating inflation).Keynes argued that markets would not automatically lead
to full-employment equilibrium and the resulting natural level of real GDP. The
economy could settle in equilibrium at any level of unemployment. Keynesians
believe that prices and wages are not so flexible; they are sticky, especially
downward. The stickiness of prices and wages in the downward direction prevents
the economy's resources from being fully employed and thereby prevents the
economy from returning to the natural level of real GDP. Therefore, output will
remain at less than the full employment level as long as there is insufficient
spending in the economy. This was precisely what was happening during the
great depression.
The Keynesian theory of income determination is presented in three models:
(i) The two-sector model consisting of the household and the business sectors,
(ii) The three-sector model consisting of household, business and government
sectors, and
(iii) The four-sector model consisting of household, business, government and
foreign sectors
Before we attempt to explain the determination of income in each of the above
models, it is pertinent that we understand the concept of circular flow in an
economy which explains the functioning of an economy.
2.2 CIRCULAR FLOW IN A SIMPLE TWO-SECTOR
MODEL
Concept of circular flow
The circular flow of income is a process where the national income and expenditure
of an economy flow in a circular manner continuously through time. Savings,
expenditures, exports and imports are various components of circular flow of income
which are shown in the figure in the form of currents and cross currents in such a
manner that national income equals national expenditure.
Initially, we consider a hypothetical simple two-sector economy. Even though an
economy of this kind does not exist in reality, it provides a simple and convenient
basis for understanding the Keynesian theory of income determination. The
simple two sector economy model assumes that there are only two sectors in the
economy viz., households and firms, with only consumption and investment
outlays. Households own all factors of production and they sell their factor
1.54 ECONOMICS FOR FINANCE
services to earn factor incomes which are entirely spent to consume all final
goods and services produced by business firms. The business firms are assumed
to hire factors of production from the households; they produce and sell goods
and services to the households and they do not save. There are no corporations,
corporate savings or retained earnings. The total income produced, Y, accrues to
the households and equals their disposable personal income Y
d
i.e., Y = Yd.
All prices (including factor prices), supply of capital and technology remain
constant. The government sector does not exist and therefore, there are no taxes,
government expenditure or transfer payments. The economy is a closed economy,
i.e., foreign trade does not exist; there are no exports and imports and external
inflows and outflows. All investment outlay is autonomous (not determined either
by the level of income or the rate of interest); all investment is net and, therefore,
national income equals the net national product.
In the figure 1.2.1, the circular flow of income and expenditure which presents the
working of the two- sector economy is illustrated in a simple manner.
Figure 1.2.1
Circular Flow in a Two Sector Economy
The circular broken lines with arrows show factor and product flows and present
‘real flows’ and the continuous line with arrows show ‘money flows’ which are
generated by real flows. These two circular flows-real flows and money flows-are
Page 5
1.51
THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
LEARNING OUTCOMES
UNIT II: THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF
DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
At the end of this unit, you will be able to:
? Define Keynes’ concept of equilibrium aggregate income
? Describe the components of aggregate expenditure in two, three and four
sector economy models
? Explain national income determination in two, three and four sector economy
models
? Illustrate the functioning of multiplier, and
? Outline the changes in equilibrium aggregate income on account of changes in
its determinants
Determination of National
Income
The Keynesian Theory of
Determination of National
Income
The Two-Sector Model
for National Income
Determination
The
Investment
Multiplier
Determination of
Equilibrium Income :
Three Sector Model
Determination of
Equilibrium
Income : Four
Sector Model
UNIT OVERVIEW
1.52 ECONOMICS FOR FINANCE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit on National Income Accounting, we have come across terms
such as consumption, investment and total output of final goods and services
(GDP). These macroeconomic variables were used in the accounting sense,
representing actual values of these items in a certain year. These actual or
accounting values are ‘ex post’ (realized) measures of these items. Thus,
aggregate consumption (C) denotes what people have actually consumed and
GDP is what is actually produced. These variables can also be defined in ‘ex-ante’
(anticipated) terms or in terms of what is intended or planned. In the theoretical
model of the economy which we plan to discuss in this unit, the ‘ex ante’ values of
these variables are our primary concern. Therefore, the term ‘consumption’ would
indicate what people in an economy plan to consume and ‘investment‘would
denote planned investment. If we want to predict what the equilibrium value of
output or GDP is, we need to know what quantities of final goods people plan to
demand and supply.
In this unit, we shall focus on two issues namely, the factors that determine the
level of national income and the determination of equilibrium aggregate income
and output in an economy. A comprehensive theory to explain these phenomena
was first put forward by the British economist John Maynard Keynes in his
masterpiece ‘The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money’ published in
1936. Before the ‘General Theory’ by Keynes, economists could not explain how
economic depressions happen, or what to do about them. The classical
economists maintained that the economy is self-regulating and is always capable
of automatically achieving equilibrium at the ‘natural level’ of real GDP or output,
which is the level of real GDP that is obtained when the economy's resources are
fully employed. While circumstances arise from time to time that cause the
economy to fall below or to exceed the natural level of real GDP, wage and price
flexibility will bring the economy back to the natural level of real GDP. If an excess
in the labour force (unemployment) or products exist, the wage or price of these
will adjust to absorb the excess. According to them, there will be no involuntary
unemployment.
Keynes’ theory of determination of equilibrium real GDP, employment and prices
focuses on the relationship between aggregate income and aggregate
expenditure. There is a difference between equilibrium income (the level toward
which the economy gravitates in the short run) and potential income (the level of
income that the economy is technically capable of producing, without generating
1.53
THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
accelerating inflation).Keynes argued that markets would not automatically lead
to full-employment equilibrium and the resulting natural level of real GDP. The
economy could settle in equilibrium at any level of unemployment. Keynesians
believe that prices and wages are not so flexible; they are sticky, especially
downward. The stickiness of prices and wages in the downward direction prevents
the economy's resources from being fully employed and thereby prevents the
economy from returning to the natural level of real GDP. Therefore, output will
remain at less than the full employment level as long as there is insufficient
spending in the economy. This was precisely what was happening during the
great depression.
The Keynesian theory of income determination is presented in three models:
(i) The two-sector model consisting of the household and the business sectors,
(ii) The three-sector model consisting of household, business and government
sectors, and
(iii) The four-sector model consisting of household, business, government and
foreign sectors
Before we attempt to explain the determination of income in each of the above
models, it is pertinent that we understand the concept of circular flow in an
economy which explains the functioning of an economy.
2.2 CIRCULAR FLOW IN A SIMPLE TWO-SECTOR
MODEL
Concept of circular flow
The circular flow of income is a process where the national income and expenditure
of an economy flow in a circular manner continuously through time. Savings,
expenditures, exports and imports are various components of circular flow of income
which are shown in the figure in the form of currents and cross currents in such a
manner that national income equals national expenditure.
Initially, we consider a hypothetical simple two-sector economy. Even though an
economy of this kind does not exist in reality, it provides a simple and convenient
basis for understanding the Keynesian theory of income determination. The
simple two sector economy model assumes that there are only two sectors in the
economy viz., households and firms, with only consumption and investment
outlays. Households own all factors of production and they sell their factor
1.54 ECONOMICS FOR FINANCE
services to earn factor incomes which are entirely spent to consume all final
goods and services produced by business firms. The business firms are assumed
to hire factors of production from the households; they produce and sell goods
and services to the households and they do not save. There are no corporations,
corporate savings or retained earnings. The total income produced, Y, accrues to
the households and equals their disposable personal income Y
d
i.e., Y = Yd.
All prices (including factor prices), supply of capital and technology remain
constant. The government sector does not exist and therefore, there are no taxes,
government expenditure or transfer payments. The economy is a closed economy,
i.e., foreign trade does not exist; there are no exports and imports and external
inflows and outflows. All investment outlay is autonomous (not determined either
by the level of income or the rate of interest); all investment is net and, therefore,
national income equals the net national product.
In the figure 1.2.1, the circular flow of income and expenditure which presents the
working of the two- sector economy is illustrated in a simple manner.
Figure 1.2.1
Circular Flow in a Two Sector Economy
The circular broken lines with arrows show factor and product flows and present
‘real flows’ and the continuous line with arrows show ‘money flows’ which are
generated by real flows. These two circular flows-real flows and money flows-are
1.55
THE KEYNESIAN THEORY OF DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
in opposite directions and the value of real flows equal the money flows because
the factor payments are equal to household incomes. There are no injections into
or leakages from the system. Since the whole of household income is spent on
goods and services produced by firms, household expenditures equal the total
receipts of firms which equal the value of output.
Factor Payments = Household Income = Household Expenditure = Total Receipts
of Firms = Value of Output.
Before we go into the discussion on the equilibrium aggregate income and
changes in it, we shall first try to understand the meaning of the term
‘equilibrium’ (defined as a state in which there is no tendency to change; or a
position of rest). Equilibrium output occurs when the desired amount of output
demanded by all the agents in the economy exactly equals the amount produced
in a given time period. Logically, an economy can be said to be in equilibrium
when the production plans of the firms and the expenditure plans of the
households match.
Having understood the working of the two-sector model and the meaning of
equilibrium output, we shall now have the formal presentation of the theory of
income determination in a two-sector model which is the simplest representation of
the key principles of Keynesian economics.In the theoretical model of the economy,
the ex ante values of different variables should be our primary concern.Before we
discuss the Keynesian theory of income determination, let us look at the basic
concepts, definitions and functions used in his theory of income determination.
2.3 BASIC CONCEPTS AND FUNCTIONS
2.3.1 Aggregate Demand Function
Aggregate demand (AD) is what economists call total planned expenditure. In a
simple two-sector economy, the ex ante aggregate demand (AD) for final goods
or aggregate expenditure consists of only two components:
(i) Ex ante aggregate demand for consumer goods (C), and
(ii) Ex ante aggregate demand for investment goods (I)
AD = C + I (2. 1)
Of the two components, consumption expenditure accounts for the highest
proportion of the GDP. In a simple economy, the variable I is assumed to be
Read More