Short Notes: Gyroscope | Short Notes for Mechanical Engineering PDF Download

 Page 1


Gyroscope 
A gyroscope has three axes. First, a spin axis, which defines the gyroscope strength 
or moment. Let us call the other two the primary axis and the secondary axis.
These three axis are orthogonal to each other. •
• The spin axis rotates around the vertical line. The primary axis rotates the 
whole gyroscope in the plane of the page, and the secondary axis rotates the 
gyroscope up-and-over into the page.
• The spin axis is the source of the gyroscopic effect.
• The primary axis is conceptually the input or driving axis, and the secondary 
the output. Then if the gyroscope is spun on its spin axis, and a torque is 
applied to the primary axis, the secondary axis will precess.
• The primary axis appears infinitely stiff to the applied torque and does not 
give under it. This is the generally recognized characteristic of gyroscopic 
behavior.
• When a mass'm' moves in a straight line at velocity V it exhibits linear 
momentum (m.v). It is trivial to predict that if it is constrained to travel in a 
radius 'r' it will produce an angular momentum (m.v.r).
• However with the angular momentum, an effect that could not have been 
predicted turns up - gyroscopic behavior.
Page 2


Gyroscope 
A gyroscope has three axes. First, a spin axis, which defines the gyroscope strength 
or moment. Let us call the other two the primary axis and the secondary axis.
These three axis are orthogonal to each other. •
• The spin axis rotates around the vertical line. The primary axis rotates the 
whole gyroscope in the plane of the page, and the secondary axis rotates the 
gyroscope up-and-over into the page.
• The spin axis is the source of the gyroscopic effect.
• The primary axis is conceptually the input or driving axis, and the secondary 
the output. Then if the gyroscope is spun on its spin axis, and a torque is 
applied to the primary axis, the secondary axis will precess.
• The primary axis appears infinitely stiff to the applied torque and does not 
give under it. This is the generally recognized characteristic of gyroscopic 
behavior.
• When a mass'm' moves in a straight line at velocity V it exhibits linear 
momentum (m.v). It is trivial to predict that if it is constrained to travel in a 
radius 'r' it will produce an angular momentum (m.v.r).
• However with the angular momentum, an effect that could not have been 
predicted turns up - gyroscopic behavior.
• The fact that in the larger world the two effects occur together and in simple 
proportion to each other does not mean that this is always the case - 
gyroscopic behaviour occurs without angular momentum in electron 
behaviour, even though the terms 'spin' and 'spin angular momentum’ are still 
used for historical reasons, even though there is no direct evidence that the 
electron’s mass or charge spins on its own axis. It may simply be that rotating 
an object exposes the gyroscopic moments of the elementary particles that 
make it up, possibly through the asymmetric relativistic effects created by the 
centripetal acceleration; some major experimental work is required in this 
area.
• Angular momentum has the form "kilogram-meters2 per second".
• Gyroscopic moment has the form "Newton-meters per Hertz", or torque 
required to produce a precession rate of one Hertz.
• Both have the dimensions ’L2M/T’, which means only that they are related by a 
simple scalar number.
B asic gyroscope eq u atio n s
The strength of a gyroscopic effect is termed the gyroscopic moment. I use the 
symbol 'G', in units "Newton-meters/Hertz".
A higher moment requires more torque to precess at the same frequency, or for the 
same torque precesses at a lower rate where a gyroscope receives torque on the 
primary axis and precession on the secondary, no work is being done.
The torque *TP ’ on the primary axis has no precession associated with it, while the 
precession rate Vs’ on the secondary axis is:
V s = Tp / G
and has no torque associated with it. Since the rate of doing work on each axis is 
the torque times the precession on that axis, it follows that in this simple case no 
energy is involved.
Gyroscopes do not differentiate between primary and secondary axes - this is a 
purely artificial definition of my own.
A torque on the secondary axis creates precession on the primary axis. 
Simultaneous torque on both axis will result in simultaneous precession. In this 
case each axes will have both torque (creating precession on the other axis) and 
precession (created by torque on the other axis).
Then the rate of doing work ’Pp ’ on the primary axis is:
Pp = TP .vP / G
and on the secondary:
Ps = Ts-Vs / G
Now by applying the conservation of energy:
Pp = - Ps
i.e. the work done on one axis must appear on the other.
First apply a forcing torque to the primary axis; at this stage in the argument 
imagine that the primary axis presents no stiffness against the forcing torque.
The secondary axis would precess at an infinite frequency, but for a limiting 
mechanism that comes into play; just as torque creates precession, so precession 
creates torque.
Page 3


Gyroscope 
A gyroscope has three axes. First, a spin axis, which defines the gyroscope strength 
or moment. Let us call the other two the primary axis and the secondary axis.
These three axis are orthogonal to each other. •
• The spin axis rotates around the vertical line. The primary axis rotates the 
whole gyroscope in the plane of the page, and the secondary axis rotates the 
gyroscope up-and-over into the page.
• The spin axis is the source of the gyroscopic effect.
• The primary axis is conceptually the input or driving axis, and the secondary 
the output. Then if the gyroscope is spun on its spin axis, and a torque is 
applied to the primary axis, the secondary axis will precess.
• The primary axis appears infinitely stiff to the applied torque and does not 
give under it. This is the generally recognized characteristic of gyroscopic 
behavior.
• When a mass'm' moves in a straight line at velocity V it exhibits linear 
momentum (m.v). It is trivial to predict that if it is constrained to travel in a 
radius 'r' it will produce an angular momentum (m.v.r).
• However with the angular momentum, an effect that could not have been 
predicted turns up - gyroscopic behavior.
• The fact that in the larger world the two effects occur together and in simple 
proportion to each other does not mean that this is always the case - 
gyroscopic behaviour occurs without angular momentum in electron 
behaviour, even though the terms 'spin' and 'spin angular momentum’ are still 
used for historical reasons, even though there is no direct evidence that the 
electron’s mass or charge spins on its own axis. It may simply be that rotating 
an object exposes the gyroscopic moments of the elementary particles that 
make it up, possibly through the asymmetric relativistic effects created by the 
centripetal acceleration; some major experimental work is required in this 
area.
• Angular momentum has the form "kilogram-meters2 per second".
• Gyroscopic moment has the form "Newton-meters per Hertz", or torque 
required to produce a precession rate of one Hertz.
• Both have the dimensions ’L2M/T’, which means only that they are related by a 
simple scalar number.
B asic gyroscope eq u atio n s
The strength of a gyroscopic effect is termed the gyroscopic moment. I use the 
symbol 'G', in units "Newton-meters/Hertz".
A higher moment requires more torque to precess at the same frequency, or for the 
same torque precesses at a lower rate where a gyroscope receives torque on the 
primary axis and precession on the secondary, no work is being done.
The torque *TP ’ on the primary axis has no precession associated with it, while the 
precession rate Vs’ on the secondary axis is:
V s = Tp / G
and has no torque associated with it. Since the rate of doing work on each axis is 
the torque times the precession on that axis, it follows that in this simple case no 
energy is involved.
Gyroscopes do not differentiate between primary and secondary axes - this is a 
purely artificial definition of my own.
A torque on the secondary axis creates precession on the primary axis. 
Simultaneous torque on both axis will result in simultaneous precession. In this 
case each axes will have both torque (creating precession on the other axis) and 
precession (created by torque on the other axis).
Then the rate of doing work ’Pp ’ on the primary axis is:
Pp = TP .vP / G
and on the secondary:
Ps = Ts-Vs / G
Now by applying the conservation of energy:
Pp = - Ps
i.e. the work done on one axis must appear on the other.
First apply a forcing torque to the primary axis; at this stage in the argument 
imagine that the primary axis presents no stiffness against the forcing torque.
The secondary axis would precess at an infinite frequency, but for a limiting 
mechanism that comes into play; just as torque creates precession, so precession 
creates torque.
So as the secondary axis precesses it creates a reverse torque TP F on the primary
axis:
Tpp = -Vs-G
The precession rate always runs at that point where TP F is exactly equal and 
opposite to TP . At this point:
TP F = -Vs-G 
= - (TP / G).G 
= -T P
The reverse torque generated by the precession exactly opposes the applied torque 
so that the net torque is zero. If it was more the work would be done by the 
gyroscope. If it was less the primary axis would give way under the applied torque 
and work would be done with no outlet for it. Both conditions violate conservation 
of energy principles.
If the secondary axis is locked against rotation and the primary axis is driven, no 
opposing torque will appear on the primary axis, it is free to rotate without 
hindrance.
No work is transferred through the gyroscope; there is motion without torque on the 
primary axis.
The secondary axis has no motion; it is locked but instead experiences a torque 
t sf:
TsF = Vp.G