Page 1
4.68
ADVANCED ACCOUNTING
?
LEARNING OUTCOMES
UNIT 4: ACCOUNTING STANDARD 18 RELATED PARTY
DISCLOSURES
After studying this unit, you will be able to comprehend the –
? Need for disclosure of related party relationship;
? How to identify the related party relationships;
? Which parties are not treated as related party;
? Exemption from Related Party Disclosure in certain situations;
? Disclosure requirements under AS-18.
4.1 INTRODUCTION
AS 18 prescribes the requirements for disclosure of related party relationship and
transactions between the reporting enterprise and its related parties. The
requirements of the standard apply to the financial statements of each reporting
enterprise as also to consolidated financial statements presented by a holding
company.
4.2 RELATED PARTY ISSUE – WHY DISCLOSURE IS
NEEDED?
Related party relationships are a normal feature of commerce and business.
There is a general presumption that transactions reflected in financial statements
are consummated on an arm’s -length basis between independent parties. However,
that presumption may not be valid when related party relationships exist because
related parties may enter into transactions which unrelated parties would not enter
into.
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Page 2
4.68
ADVANCED ACCOUNTING
?
LEARNING OUTCOMES
UNIT 4: ACCOUNTING STANDARD 18 RELATED PARTY
DISCLOSURES
After studying this unit, you will be able to comprehend the –
? Need for disclosure of related party relationship;
? How to identify the related party relationships;
? Which parties are not treated as related party;
? Exemption from Related Party Disclosure in certain situations;
? Disclosure requirements under AS-18.
4.1 INTRODUCTION
AS 18 prescribes the requirements for disclosure of related party relationship and
transactions between the reporting enterprise and its related parties. The
requirements of the standard apply to the financial statements of each reporting
enterprise as also to consolidated financial statements presented by a holding
company.
4.2 RELATED PARTY ISSUE – WHY DISCLOSURE IS
NEEDED?
Related party relationships are a normal feature of commerce and business.
There is a general presumption that transactions reflected in financial statements
are consummated on an arm’s -length basis between independent parties. However,
that presumption may not be valid when related party relationships exist because
related parties may enter into transactions which unrelated parties would not enter
into.
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
PRESENTATION & DISCLOSURES BASED
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
v
4.69
Also, transactions between related parties may not be effected at the same terms
and conditions as between unrelated parties. Sometimes, no price is charged in
related party transactions, for example, free provision of management services and
the extension of free credit on a debt.
Also, sometimes the operating results and financial position of an enterprise may
be affected by a related party relationship even if related party transactions do not
occur. The mere existence of the relationship may be sufficient to affect the
transactions of the reporting enterprise with other parties. For example, a
subsidiary may terminate relations with a trading partner on acquisition by the
holding company of a fellow subsidiary engaged in the same trade as the former
partner. Alternatively, one party may refrain from acting because of the control or
significant influence of another - for example, a subsidiary may be instructed by its
holding company not to engage in research and development.
Likewise, in certain cases transactions would not have taken place if the related party
relationship had not existed. For example, a company that sold a large proportion
of its production to its holding company at cost might not have found an alternative
customer if the holding company had not purchased the goods.
In view of the aforesaid, the resulting accounting measures may not represent what
they usually would be expected to represent. Thus, a related party relationship
could have an effect on the financial position and operating results of the reporting
enterprise.
4.3 RELATED PARTY RELATIONSHIPS, AS
CONTEMPLATED UNDER AS-18
Related Party - As per AS-18, parties are considered to be related if at any time
during the reporting period one party has the ability to control the other party or
exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and/or
operating decisions.
It is worthwhile to note that AS-18 provides a definitive list of related party
relationships to which AS-18 applies. Accordingly, AS 18 deals only with the
following five types of related party relationships described in (a) to (e) below:
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Page 3
4.68
ADVANCED ACCOUNTING
?
LEARNING OUTCOMES
UNIT 4: ACCOUNTING STANDARD 18 RELATED PARTY
DISCLOSURES
After studying this unit, you will be able to comprehend the –
? Need for disclosure of related party relationship;
? How to identify the related party relationships;
? Which parties are not treated as related party;
? Exemption from Related Party Disclosure in certain situations;
? Disclosure requirements under AS-18.
4.1 INTRODUCTION
AS 18 prescribes the requirements for disclosure of related party relationship and
transactions between the reporting enterprise and its related parties. The
requirements of the standard apply to the financial statements of each reporting
enterprise as also to consolidated financial statements presented by a holding
company.
4.2 RELATED PARTY ISSUE – WHY DISCLOSURE IS
NEEDED?
Related party relationships are a normal feature of commerce and business.
There is a general presumption that transactions reflected in financial statements
are consummated on an arm’s -length basis between independent parties. However,
that presumption may not be valid when related party relationships exist because
related parties may enter into transactions which unrelated parties would not enter
into.
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
PRESENTATION & DISCLOSURES BASED
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
v
4.69
Also, transactions between related parties may not be effected at the same terms
and conditions as between unrelated parties. Sometimes, no price is charged in
related party transactions, for example, free provision of management services and
the extension of free credit on a debt.
Also, sometimes the operating results and financial position of an enterprise may
be affected by a related party relationship even if related party transactions do not
occur. The mere existence of the relationship may be sufficient to affect the
transactions of the reporting enterprise with other parties. For example, a
subsidiary may terminate relations with a trading partner on acquisition by the
holding company of a fellow subsidiary engaged in the same trade as the former
partner. Alternatively, one party may refrain from acting because of the control or
significant influence of another - for example, a subsidiary may be instructed by its
holding company not to engage in research and development.
Likewise, in certain cases transactions would not have taken place if the related party
relationship had not existed. For example, a company that sold a large proportion
of its production to its holding company at cost might not have found an alternative
customer if the holding company had not purchased the goods.
In view of the aforesaid, the resulting accounting measures may not represent what
they usually would be expected to represent. Thus, a related party relationship
could have an effect on the financial position and operating results of the reporting
enterprise.
4.3 RELATED PARTY RELATIONSHIPS, AS
CONTEMPLATED UNDER AS-18
Related Party - As per AS-18, parties are considered to be related if at any time
during the reporting period one party has the ability to control the other party or
exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and/or
operating decisions.
It is worthwhile to note that AS-18 provides a definitive list of related party
relationships to which AS-18 applies. Accordingly, AS 18 deals only with the
following five types of related party relationships described in (a) to (e) below:
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
4.70
ADVANCED ACCOUNTING
(a) Enterprises that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries,
control, or are controlled by, or are under common control with, the reporting
enterprise (this includes holding companies, subsidiaries and fellow
subsidiaries).
Note: This is the case when there is a parent-subsidiary relationship
(including relationship among fellow subsidiaries), as illustrated later in
this chapter. For meaning of the term control, refer to subsequent
discussion under this chapter.
(b) Associates and joint ventures of the reporting enterprise and the investing
party or venturer in respect of which the reporting enterprise is an associate
or a joint venture.
(c) Individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest in the voting power of
the reporting enterprise that gives them control or significant influence over
the enterprise, and relatives of any such individual.
(d) Key management personnel and relatives of such personnel; and
(e) Enterprises over which any person described in (c) or (d) is able to exercise
significant influence. This includes enterprises owned by directors or major
shareholders of the reporting enterprise and enterprises that have a member
of key management in common with the reporting enterprise.
4.4 WHO ARE NOT DEEMED TO BE RELATED
PARTIES UNDER AS-18?
In the context of AS 18, the following are deemed not to be related parties:
(a) Two companies are not related parties simply because they have a director in
common (unless the director is able to affect the policies of both companies
in their mutual dealings). Accordingly, if the common director is able to
influence the policies of both the companies in their mutual dealings –
then related party relationship exists.
(b) A single customer, supplier, franchiser, distributor, or general agent with
whom an enterprise transacts a significant volume of business merely by
virtue of the resulting economic dependence; and
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Page 4
4.68
ADVANCED ACCOUNTING
?
LEARNING OUTCOMES
UNIT 4: ACCOUNTING STANDARD 18 RELATED PARTY
DISCLOSURES
After studying this unit, you will be able to comprehend the –
? Need for disclosure of related party relationship;
? How to identify the related party relationships;
? Which parties are not treated as related party;
? Exemption from Related Party Disclosure in certain situations;
? Disclosure requirements under AS-18.
4.1 INTRODUCTION
AS 18 prescribes the requirements for disclosure of related party relationship and
transactions between the reporting enterprise and its related parties. The
requirements of the standard apply to the financial statements of each reporting
enterprise as also to consolidated financial statements presented by a holding
company.
4.2 RELATED PARTY ISSUE – WHY DISCLOSURE IS
NEEDED?
Related party relationships are a normal feature of commerce and business.
There is a general presumption that transactions reflected in financial statements
are consummated on an arm’s -length basis between independent parties. However,
that presumption may not be valid when related party relationships exist because
related parties may enter into transactions which unrelated parties would not enter
into.
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
PRESENTATION & DISCLOSURES BASED
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
v
4.69
Also, transactions between related parties may not be effected at the same terms
and conditions as between unrelated parties. Sometimes, no price is charged in
related party transactions, for example, free provision of management services and
the extension of free credit on a debt.
Also, sometimes the operating results and financial position of an enterprise may
be affected by a related party relationship even if related party transactions do not
occur. The mere existence of the relationship may be sufficient to affect the
transactions of the reporting enterprise with other parties. For example, a
subsidiary may terminate relations with a trading partner on acquisition by the
holding company of a fellow subsidiary engaged in the same trade as the former
partner. Alternatively, one party may refrain from acting because of the control or
significant influence of another - for example, a subsidiary may be instructed by its
holding company not to engage in research and development.
Likewise, in certain cases transactions would not have taken place if the related party
relationship had not existed. For example, a company that sold a large proportion
of its production to its holding company at cost might not have found an alternative
customer if the holding company had not purchased the goods.
In view of the aforesaid, the resulting accounting measures may not represent what
they usually would be expected to represent. Thus, a related party relationship
could have an effect on the financial position and operating results of the reporting
enterprise.
4.3 RELATED PARTY RELATIONSHIPS, AS
CONTEMPLATED UNDER AS-18
Related Party - As per AS-18, parties are considered to be related if at any time
during the reporting period one party has the ability to control the other party or
exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and/or
operating decisions.
It is worthwhile to note that AS-18 provides a definitive list of related party
relationships to which AS-18 applies. Accordingly, AS 18 deals only with the
following five types of related party relationships described in (a) to (e) below:
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
4.70
ADVANCED ACCOUNTING
(a) Enterprises that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries,
control, or are controlled by, or are under common control with, the reporting
enterprise (this includes holding companies, subsidiaries and fellow
subsidiaries).
Note: This is the case when there is a parent-subsidiary relationship
(including relationship among fellow subsidiaries), as illustrated later in
this chapter. For meaning of the term control, refer to subsequent
discussion under this chapter.
(b) Associates and joint ventures of the reporting enterprise and the investing
party or venturer in respect of which the reporting enterprise is an associate
or a joint venture.
(c) Individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest in the voting power of
the reporting enterprise that gives them control or significant influence over
the enterprise, and relatives of any such individual.
(d) Key management personnel and relatives of such personnel; and
(e) Enterprises over which any person described in (c) or (d) is able to exercise
significant influence. This includes enterprises owned by directors or major
shareholders of the reporting enterprise and enterprises that have a member
of key management in common with the reporting enterprise.
4.4 WHO ARE NOT DEEMED TO BE RELATED
PARTIES UNDER AS-18?
In the context of AS 18, the following are deemed not to be related parties:
(a) Two companies are not related parties simply because they have a director in
common (unless the director is able to affect the policies of both companies
in their mutual dealings). Accordingly, if the common director is able to
influence the policies of both the companies in their mutual dealings –
then related party relationship exists.
(b) A single customer, supplier, franchiser, distributor, or general agent with
whom an enterprise transacts a significant volume of business merely by
virtue of the resulting economic dependence; and
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
PRESENTATION & DISCLOSURES BASED
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
v
4.71
(c) The parties listed below, in the course of their normal dealings with an
enterprise by virtue only of those dealings (although they may circumscribe
the freedom of action of the enterprise or participate in its decision-making
process):
(i) Providers of finance
(ii) Trade unions
(iii) Public utilities
(iv) Government departments and government agencies including
government sponsored bodies
4.5 EXEMPTION FROM RELATED PARTY
DISCLOSURE IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS
1. Conflict with the reporting enterprise’s duties of confidentia lity: Related
party disclosure requirements as laid down in AS 18 do not apply in
circumstances where providing such disclosures would conflict with the
reporting enterprise’s duties of confidentiality as specifically required in
terms of a statute or by any regulator or similar competent authority.
Put differently, in cases where a statute or a regulator or a similar competent
authority governing an enterprise prohibit the enterprise to disclose certain
information which is required to be disclosed as per this Standard, disclosure
of such information is not warranted. For example, banks are obliged by law
to maintain confidentiality in respect of their customers’ transactions and this
Standard would not override the obligation to preserve the confidentiality of
customers’ dealings.
2. Consolidated financial statements: No disclosure is required in
consolidated financial statements in respect of intra-group transactions -
since disclosure of transactions between members of a group is unnecessary
in consolidated financial statements. This is mainly because consolidated
financial statements present information about the holding and its
subsidiaries as a single reporting enterprise.
3. State-controlled enterprises: No disclosure is required in the financial
statements of state-controlled enterprises as regards related party
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Read More