Page 1
Property Law
Learning Outcomes :
Students will be able to
• Understand the meaning of the ter m proper ty and transfer of proper ty
• Understand the types of proper ty under the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882 and Sale of goods
Act 1932
• Distinguish between the types of proper ty and its transfer
• Describe the Doctrine of Election and Doctrine of Lis pendense
• Elaborate the process of transfer of proper ty
• Explain the differ ent modes in which an immovable proper ty can be transfer r ed
I. INTRODUCTION
Befor e the advent of the British kingdom, each community in India was gover ned by its r espective
customar y law in matters r elating to transfer of proper ty . W ith the establishment of the for mal litigation
system and in absence of any legislation in this ar ea, to begin with, the English judges applied the
common law of England and the rules of equity , justice and good conscience with r espect to disputes
r elating to transfer of prope r ty . The unsuitability of these provisions to the Indian conditions; the
r esulting conflict and the nee d for clarity of rules r elating to this impor tant branch of law necessitated
the ena ctment of legislation . Drafted in 1870, the T ransfer of P roper ty Act saw the light of the day
in 1882 and provided the basic principles for transfer of both movable and immovable proper ties.
Based primari ly on the English law of ‘Real P roper ty ’, it attempted to mould these principles to suit
the Indian conditions , mor eover , a separate enactment titled the ‘Sale of Goods Act, 1930’ was
passed to deal with transfer of movable proper ty by sale. The T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 contains
the general principles of transfer of proper ty and detailed rules with r espect to specific transfer of
immovable proper ty by sale, e xchange, mor tgage, lease and gift.
II. TYPES OF PROPERTY
The word property has not been defined in the Act, but it has a ver y wide meaning and includes
proper ties of all descriptions . It includes movable prope r ties such as cases, books, etc., and includes
immovable proper ties also such as lands or houses. It also includes intangible proper ties such as
ownership, tenancy , copyrights, etc.
As per Section 3, the immov able proper ty does not include standing timber , growing crop and grass.
Standing timbers: standin g timbers ar e tr ees fit for use for building or r epairing houses. The word
standing timber includes Babool T r ee, Shisham, P eepal, Banyan, T eak, Bamboo , etc. The fruit-bearing
tr ees like Man go , Jackfruit, Jamun, etc., ar e not standin g timber , and they ar e immovable proper ties
(Fatimabibi v. Arrfana Begum , AIR 1980 All 394).
CHAPTER
3(C)
Page 2
Property Law
Learning Outcomes :
Students will be able to
• Understand the meaning of the ter m proper ty and transfer of proper ty
• Understand the types of proper ty under the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882 and Sale of goods
Act 1932
• Distinguish between the types of proper ty and its transfer
• Describe the Doctrine of Election and Doctrine of Lis pendense
• Elaborate the process of transfer of proper ty
• Explain the differ ent modes in which an immovable proper ty can be transfer r ed
I. INTRODUCTION
Befor e the advent of the British kingdom, each community in India was gover ned by its r espective
customar y law in matters r elating to transfer of proper ty . W ith the establishment of the for mal litigation
system and in absence of any legislation in this ar ea, to begin with, the English judges applied the
common law of England and the rules of equity , justice and good conscience with r espect to disputes
r elating to transfer of prope r ty . The unsuitability of these provisions to the Indian conditions; the
r esulting conflict and the nee d for clarity of rules r elating to this impor tant branch of law necessitated
the ena ctment of legislation . Drafted in 1870, the T ransfer of P roper ty Act saw the light of the day
in 1882 and provided the basic principles for transfer of both movable and immovable proper ties.
Based primari ly on the English law of ‘Real P roper ty ’, it attempted to mould these principles to suit
the Indian conditions , mor eover , a separate enactment titled the ‘Sale of Goods Act, 1930’ was
passed to deal with transfer of movable proper ty by sale. The T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 contains
the general principles of transfer of proper ty and detailed rules with r espect to specific transfer of
immovable proper ty by sale, e xchange, mor tgage, lease and gift.
II. TYPES OF PROPERTY
The word property has not been defined in the Act, but it has a ver y wide meaning and includes
proper ties of all descriptions . It includes movable prope r ties such as cases, books, etc., and includes
immovable proper ties also such as lands or houses. It also includes intangible proper ties such as
ownership, tenancy , copyrights, etc.
As per Section 3, the immov able proper ty does not include standing timber , growing crop and grass.
Standing timbers: standin g timbers ar e tr ees fit for use for building or r epairing houses. The word
standing timber includes Babool T r ee, Shisham, P eepal, Banyan, T eak, Bamboo , etc. The fruit-bearing
tr ees like Man go , Jackfruit, Jamun, etc., ar e not standin g timber , and they ar e immovable proper ties
(Fatimabibi v. Arrfana Begum , AIR 1980 All 394).
CHAPTER
3(C)
Growing Crop: It includes all vegetable growths which have no e xistence apar t from their produce
such as pan leave, sugar cane etc
Grass: Grass is a movable proper ty , but if it is right to cut grass it would be an inter est in land and
hence for ms immovable proper ty .
Whether tr ees can be r egarde d as movable or immovable depends upon the cir cumstances of the case.
If the intention is that tr ees should continue to have the benefit of fur ther sustenance or nutriment by
the soil (land) , e.g., enjoinin g their fruits, then such tr ee is immovable proper ty . But if the intention
is to cut them down sooner or later for the purpose utilizing the wood for building or other industrial
purposes, they would be timber and accordingly be r egarded as movable proper ty (Shantabai v.
State of Bombay , AIR 1958 SC 532)
As per Section 3(25), Gener al Clauses Act, 1897 Immovable proper ty shall include land, benefits to
arise out of land and things attached to the ear th, or per manently fastened to anything attached to
the ear th.
In the case of Sukry Kurdepa v. Goondakull (1872) cour t has e xplained that movability may
be defined to be a capacity in~ a thing of suffering alteration. On the other hand, if a thing cannot
change its place without injur y to the quality it is immovable.
In Marshall v. Green (33 L T 404), ther e was a sale of tr ees wher e they wer e cut and taken away .
The Cour t held that the sale was not that of immovable proper ty .
Section 2(c) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 defines proper ty as:
“P roper ty ” means proper ty of any kind, whether movable or immovable, tangible or intangible,
and includes any right or inter est in such proper ty .
Section 2 (11) of the Sale of Good Act, 1930 defines proper ty as:
“P roper ty ” means the general proper ty in goods, and not mer ely a special proper ty .
Basis Movable Property Immovable Property
(a) Movement of
proper ty
The movable proper ty can
easily be transpor ted from
one place to another , without
changing its shape, capacity ,
quantity or quality .
The immovable proper ty cannot
easily be transpor ted from one place
to another .
(b) T ransfer Mer e deliver y with intention to
transfer the movable proper ty
completes the transfer
Mer e deliver y does not sufficient for
a valid transfer . The proper ty must
be r egister ed in the name of the
transfer ee
(c) Registration Registration of movable
proper ty is optional under the
Registration Act 1908
Registration of immovable proper ty
is compulsor y/ mandator y under the
Registration Act 1908, subject to
the condition that its value e xceeds
Rs.100
(d) L egal provision T ransfer of movable proper ty
is r egulated by Sales of goods
Act 1932
T ransfer of immovable proper ty is
r egulated by T ransfer of P roper ty Act
1882
Page 3
Property Law
Learning Outcomes :
Students will be able to
• Understand the meaning of the ter m proper ty and transfer of proper ty
• Understand the types of proper ty under the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882 and Sale of goods
Act 1932
• Distinguish between the types of proper ty and its transfer
• Describe the Doctrine of Election and Doctrine of Lis pendense
• Elaborate the process of transfer of proper ty
• Explain the differ ent modes in which an immovable proper ty can be transfer r ed
I. INTRODUCTION
Befor e the advent of the British kingdom, each community in India was gover ned by its r espective
customar y law in matters r elating to transfer of proper ty . W ith the establishment of the for mal litigation
system and in absence of any legislation in this ar ea, to begin with, the English judges applied the
common law of England and the rules of equity , justice and good conscience with r espect to disputes
r elating to transfer of prope r ty . The unsuitability of these provisions to the Indian conditions; the
r esulting conflict and the nee d for clarity of rules r elating to this impor tant branch of law necessitated
the ena ctment of legislation . Drafted in 1870, the T ransfer of P roper ty Act saw the light of the day
in 1882 and provided the basic principles for transfer of both movable and immovable proper ties.
Based primari ly on the English law of ‘Real P roper ty ’, it attempted to mould these principles to suit
the Indian conditions , mor eover , a separate enactment titled the ‘Sale of Goods Act, 1930’ was
passed to deal with transfer of movable proper ty by sale. The T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 contains
the general principles of transfer of proper ty and detailed rules with r espect to specific transfer of
immovable proper ty by sale, e xchange, mor tgage, lease and gift.
II. TYPES OF PROPERTY
The word property has not been defined in the Act, but it has a ver y wide meaning and includes
proper ties of all descriptions . It includes movable prope r ties such as cases, books, etc., and includes
immovable proper ties also such as lands or houses. It also includes intangible proper ties such as
ownership, tenancy , copyrights, etc.
As per Section 3, the immov able proper ty does not include standing timber , growing crop and grass.
Standing timbers: standin g timbers ar e tr ees fit for use for building or r epairing houses. The word
standing timber includes Babool T r ee, Shisham, P eepal, Banyan, T eak, Bamboo , etc. The fruit-bearing
tr ees like Man go , Jackfruit, Jamun, etc., ar e not standin g timber , and they ar e immovable proper ties
(Fatimabibi v. Arrfana Begum , AIR 1980 All 394).
CHAPTER
3(C)
Growing Crop: It includes all vegetable growths which have no e xistence apar t from their produce
such as pan leave, sugar cane etc
Grass: Grass is a movable proper ty , but if it is right to cut grass it would be an inter est in land and
hence for ms immovable proper ty .
Whether tr ees can be r egarde d as movable or immovable depends upon the cir cumstances of the case.
If the intention is that tr ees should continue to have the benefit of fur ther sustenance or nutriment by
the soil (land) , e.g., enjoinin g their fruits, then such tr ee is immovable proper ty . But if the intention
is to cut them down sooner or later for the purpose utilizing the wood for building or other industrial
purposes, they would be timber and accordingly be r egarded as movable proper ty (Shantabai v.
State of Bombay , AIR 1958 SC 532)
As per Section 3(25), Gener al Clauses Act, 1897 Immovable proper ty shall include land, benefits to
arise out of land and things attached to the ear th, or per manently fastened to anything attached to
the ear th.
In the case of Sukry Kurdepa v. Goondakull (1872) cour t has e xplained that movability may
be defined to be a capacity in~ a thing of suffering alteration. On the other hand, if a thing cannot
change its place without injur y to the quality it is immovable.
In Marshall v. Green (33 L T 404), ther e was a sale of tr ees wher e they wer e cut and taken away .
The Cour t held that the sale was not that of immovable proper ty .
Section 2(c) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 defines proper ty as:
“P roper ty ” means proper ty of any kind, whether movable or immovable, tangible or intangible,
and includes any right or inter est in such proper ty .
Section 2 (11) of the Sale of Good Act, 1930 defines proper ty as:
“P roper ty ” means the general proper ty in goods, and not mer ely a special proper ty .
Basis Movable Property Immovable Property
(a) Movement of
proper ty
The movable proper ty can
easily be transpor ted from
one place to another , without
changing its shape, capacity ,
quantity or quality .
The immovable proper ty cannot
easily be transpor ted from one place
to another .
(b) T ransfer Mer e deliver y with intention to
transfer the movable proper ty
completes the transfer
Mer e deliver y does not sufficient for
a valid transfer . The proper ty must
be r egister ed in the name of the
transfer ee
(c) Registration Registration of movable
proper ty is optional under the
Registration Act 1908
Registration of immovable proper ty
is compulsor y/ mandator y under the
Registration Act 1908, subject to
the condition that its value e xceeds
Rs.100
(d) L egal provision T ransfer of movable proper ty
is r egulated by Sales of goods
Act 1932
T ransfer of immovable proper ty is
r egulated by T ransfer of P roper ty Act
1882
74
III. TRANSFER
T ransfer of proper ty is an act of conveying proper ty from one person to another , in the pr esent
or futur e. Matters r elating to the proper ty ar e gover ned by the T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 in
India. The object of the T ransfer of P roper ty Act is to r egulate the transfer of proper ty between living
persons. It shall also ser ve as the code of contract law gover ning immovable proper ty .
The T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 provides clarity on the subject: it is a systematic and unifor m law
on the transfer of immovable proper ty in India.
The transfer of proper ty may also take place by inherita nce and succession. The laws r elating to such
transfer ar e gover ned by the r espective r eligious laws or practices, as the case may be.
Who can transfer property?
Any person who is competent to contract (person above 18 years of age, having a sound mind and
not disqualified by any law in for ce) and authorized to dispose of proper ty viz., owner of the proper ty
or any person authorized to sell the proper ty , can make a transfer . The person who transfers the
proper ty is called the transferor and the person to whom the transfer is made is called the transfer ee.
According to section 8 of the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882 (The Act), by transfer ring proper ty , the
transferor transfers all rights in a proper ty .
Essentials of a valid transfer
With regard to the law of property, a transfer is a process of conveying the rights and
liabilities with respect to a property by one person to another. It is therefore with the
formation of an agreement culminating into a contract that the transfer of property takes
place.
(T ransfer may be by agr eement between par ties i.e. by contract- e xplained in upcoming chapter of
contracts- transfer by will or succession - her e in this chapter we ar e dealing with transfer by agr eement
between par ties)
The following ar e the essentials for a valid transfer of proper ty :
• In a transfer of proper ty , the transfer should be between two or mor e living persons.
• The proper ty that is going to be transfer r ed shoul d be fr ee from encumbrances (hindrances of
any for m) and be of a transferable natur e.
• The transfer should not be: - for an unlawful object or an unlawful consideration (for a detailed
understanding, r efer the chapter on Contracts);
- involving a person legally disqualified to be a transferor or transfer ee.
• The transferor who transfers the proper ty must:
- be competent to make the transfer;
- be entitled to the transferable proper ty ;
- be authorized to dispose off the proper ty if the proper ty is not his own proper ty .
• The transfer should be made according to the appropriate mode of transfer . Necessar y for malities
like r egistration, attestation, etc. should be complied with.
• In the case of a conditional transfer , wher e an inter est is cr eated on the fulfillment of a condition,
the condition should not be illegal, immoral, impossible or opposed to public policy .
Page 4
Property Law
Learning Outcomes :
Students will be able to
• Understand the meaning of the ter m proper ty and transfer of proper ty
• Understand the types of proper ty under the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882 and Sale of goods
Act 1932
• Distinguish between the types of proper ty and its transfer
• Describe the Doctrine of Election and Doctrine of Lis pendense
• Elaborate the process of transfer of proper ty
• Explain the differ ent modes in which an immovable proper ty can be transfer r ed
I. INTRODUCTION
Befor e the advent of the British kingdom, each community in India was gover ned by its r espective
customar y law in matters r elating to transfer of proper ty . W ith the establishment of the for mal litigation
system and in absence of any legislation in this ar ea, to begin with, the English judges applied the
common law of England and the rules of equity , justice and good conscience with r espect to disputes
r elating to transfer of prope r ty . The unsuitability of these provisions to the Indian conditions; the
r esulting conflict and the nee d for clarity of rules r elating to this impor tant branch of law necessitated
the ena ctment of legislation . Drafted in 1870, the T ransfer of P roper ty Act saw the light of the day
in 1882 and provided the basic principles for transfer of both movable and immovable proper ties.
Based primari ly on the English law of ‘Real P roper ty ’, it attempted to mould these principles to suit
the Indian conditions , mor eover , a separate enactment titled the ‘Sale of Goods Act, 1930’ was
passed to deal with transfer of movable proper ty by sale. The T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 contains
the general principles of transfer of proper ty and detailed rules with r espect to specific transfer of
immovable proper ty by sale, e xchange, mor tgage, lease and gift.
II. TYPES OF PROPERTY
The word property has not been defined in the Act, but it has a ver y wide meaning and includes
proper ties of all descriptions . It includes movable prope r ties such as cases, books, etc., and includes
immovable proper ties also such as lands or houses. It also includes intangible proper ties such as
ownership, tenancy , copyrights, etc.
As per Section 3, the immov able proper ty does not include standing timber , growing crop and grass.
Standing timbers: standin g timbers ar e tr ees fit for use for building or r epairing houses. The word
standing timber includes Babool T r ee, Shisham, P eepal, Banyan, T eak, Bamboo , etc. The fruit-bearing
tr ees like Man go , Jackfruit, Jamun, etc., ar e not standin g timber , and they ar e immovable proper ties
(Fatimabibi v. Arrfana Begum , AIR 1980 All 394).
CHAPTER
3(C)
Growing Crop: It includes all vegetable growths which have no e xistence apar t from their produce
such as pan leave, sugar cane etc
Grass: Grass is a movable proper ty , but if it is right to cut grass it would be an inter est in land and
hence for ms immovable proper ty .
Whether tr ees can be r egarde d as movable or immovable depends upon the cir cumstances of the case.
If the intention is that tr ees should continue to have the benefit of fur ther sustenance or nutriment by
the soil (land) , e.g., enjoinin g their fruits, then such tr ee is immovable proper ty . But if the intention
is to cut them down sooner or later for the purpose utilizing the wood for building or other industrial
purposes, they would be timber and accordingly be r egarded as movable proper ty (Shantabai v.
State of Bombay , AIR 1958 SC 532)
As per Section 3(25), Gener al Clauses Act, 1897 Immovable proper ty shall include land, benefits to
arise out of land and things attached to the ear th, or per manently fastened to anything attached to
the ear th.
In the case of Sukry Kurdepa v. Goondakull (1872) cour t has e xplained that movability may
be defined to be a capacity in~ a thing of suffering alteration. On the other hand, if a thing cannot
change its place without injur y to the quality it is immovable.
In Marshall v. Green (33 L T 404), ther e was a sale of tr ees wher e they wer e cut and taken away .
The Cour t held that the sale was not that of immovable proper ty .
Section 2(c) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 defines proper ty as:
“P roper ty ” means proper ty of any kind, whether movable or immovable, tangible or intangible,
and includes any right or inter est in such proper ty .
Section 2 (11) of the Sale of Good Act, 1930 defines proper ty as:
“P roper ty ” means the general proper ty in goods, and not mer ely a special proper ty .
Basis Movable Property Immovable Property
(a) Movement of
proper ty
The movable proper ty can
easily be transpor ted from
one place to another , without
changing its shape, capacity ,
quantity or quality .
The immovable proper ty cannot
easily be transpor ted from one place
to another .
(b) T ransfer Mer e deliver y with intention to
transfer the movable proper ty
completes the transfer
Mer e deliver y does not sufficient for
a valid transfer . The proper ty must
be r egister ed in the name of the
transfer ee
(c) Registration Registration of movable
proper ty is optional under the
Registration Act 1908
Registration of immovable proper ty
is compulsor y/ mandator y under the
Registration Act 1908, subject to
the condition that its value e xceeds
Rs.100
(d) L egal provision T ransfer of movable proper ty
is r egulated by Sales of goods
Act 1932
T ransfer of immovable proper ty is
r egulated by T ransfer of P roper ty Act
1882
74
III. TRANSFER
T ransfer of proper ty is an act of conveying proper ty from one person to another , in the pr esent
or futur e. Matters r elating to the proper ty ar e gover ned by the T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 in
India. The object of the T ransfer of P roper ty Act is to r egulate the transfer of proper ty between living
persons. It shall also ser ve as the code of contract law gover ning immovable proper ty .
The T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 provides clarity on the subject: it is a systematic and unifor m law
on the transfer of immovable proper ty in India.
The transfer of proper ty may also take place by inherita nce and succession. The laws r elating to such
transfer ar e gover ned by the r espective r eligious laws or practices, as the case may be.
Who can transfer property?
Any person who is competent to contract (person above 18 years of age, having a sound mind and
not disqualified by any law in for ce) and authorized to dispose of proper ty viz., owner of the proper ty
or any person authorized to sell the proper ty , can make a transfer . The person who transfers the
proper ty is called the transferor and the person to whom the transfer is made is called the transfer ee.
According to section 8 of the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882 (The Act), by transfer ring proper ty , the
transferor transfers all rights in a proper ty .
Essentials of a valid transfer
With regard to the law of property, a transfer is a process of conveying the rights and
liabilities with respect to a property by one person to another. It is therefore with the
formation of an agreement culminating into a contract that the transfer of property takes
place.
(T ransfer may be by agr eement between par ties i.e. by contract- e xplained in upcoming chapter of
contracts- transfer by will or succession - her e in this chapter we ar e dealing with transfer by agr eement
between par ties)
The following ar e the essentials for a valid transfer of proper ty :
• In a transfer of proper ty , the transfer should be between two or mor e living persons.
• The proper ty that is going to be transfer r ed shoul d be fr ee from encumbrances (hindrances of
any for m) and be of a transferable natur e.
• The transfer should not be: - for an unlawful object or an unlawful consideration (for a detailed
understanding, r efer the chapter on Contracts);
- involving a person legally disqualified to be a transferor or transfer ee.
• The transferor who transfers the proper ty must:
- be competent to make the transfer;
- be entitled to the transferable proper ty ;
- be authorized to dispose off the proper ty if the proper ty is not his own proper ty .
• The transfer should be made according to the appropriate mode of transfer . Necessar y for malities
like r egistration, attestation, etc. should be complied with.
• In the case of a conditional transfer , wher e an inter est is cr eated on the fulfillment of a condition,
the condition should not be illegal, immoral, impossible or opposed to public policy .
75
How can property be transferred?
1. Mode of transfer:
The mode of transfer of proper ty varies according to the value of the proper ty . If the value of the
proper ty is mor e than Rs. 100/-, then transfer has to be made only by a r egister ed instrument.
If the proper ty is tangible wher e the value of the proper ty is less than Rs. 100/-, then transfer
has to be made only by deliver y , wher eas for intangible proper ty , transfer has to be made only
by r egister ed instrument. (A r egister ed instrument contains the r ecords of the owner of the
proper ty - for e xample: shar es, bonds, etc.)
2. Attestation:
A r egister ed instrumen t must be attested at least by two witnesses to the transfer . The definition
of attestation is given in section 3 of the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882. A ttestation means
affixing the signatur e to the instrument for the transfer of proper ty . The witnesses should mark
their signatur e too on the instrument with the intention to attest. The intention behind including
this provision was to ensur e that transfer was done with the fr ee will of the e xecutant.
3. Registration:
Registration of the instrument is an essential legal for mality . During r egistration, the par ties
to the transfer must be pr esent to affix their signatur es to the document and complete the
transaction with r egard to immovable proper ty . While doing so , the document for transfer must
mention clearly the rights, obligations and liabilities of the par ties to the transfer .
Registration shall take place by finally affixing a seal of the Registrar ’s office which shall be
subsequently included in the official r ecords.
Indian Registration Act is an act to consolidate the enactments r elating to the r egistration of
documents. Registration means r ecording of the contents of the document. Section 17 of the
Indian Registration Act 1908, deals with the documents that ar e compulsor y to be r egister ed.
4. Mutation:
Once a proper ty has been transfer r ed by way of r elinquishment, sale, or gift deed in the “ name”
of the r ecipien t. It is also impor tant to have the transfer r ecorded in the municipal r ecords by
way of mutation.
5. Payment of fee:
Stamp duty on transfer is payable as per applicable state laws.
In Madam Pillai V. Badar Kali (45 Mad 612 (FB), the plaintiff being the first wife made a claim
for maintenan ce to her husband. The husband orally transfer r ed his lands of the value of Rs. 100/-
to the plaintiff . L ater , he e xecuted an instrument of sale in favour of the defendant for the same
proper ty . The plaintiff initia ted a suit stating that the transfer was initially made in her favour and
the subsequent sale to the defendant was not valid. The defendant stated that the transfer in favour
of the plaintiff failed for want of a r egister ed instrument. The Cour t held that - the plaintiff acquir ed
a title by way of oral transfer and she is entitled to the proper ty though the instrument of sale was
not r egister ed.
IV. DOCTRINE OF ELECTION
According to the principle of Doctrine of Election [Section 35 of the TP A], if a person to the transfer
gets two selections (a benefit and a burden), then he has to accept both the benefit and the burden
Page 5
Property Law
Learning Outcomes :
Students will be able to
• Understand the meaning of the ter m proper ty and transfer of proper ty
• Understand the types of proper ty under the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882 and Sale of goods
Act 1932
• Distinguish between the types of proper ty and its transfer
• Describe the Doctrine of Election and Doctrine of Lis pendense
• Elaborate the process of transfer of proper ty
• Explain the differ ent modes in which an immovable proper ty can be transfer r ed
I. INTRODUCTION
Befor e the advent of the British kingdom, each community in India was gover ned by its r espective
customar y law in matters r elating to transfer of proper ty . W ith the establishment of the for mal litigation
system and in absence of any legislation in this ar ea, to begin with, the English judges applied the
common law of England and the rules of equity , justice and good conscience with r espect to disputes
r elating to transfer of prope r ty . The unsuitability of these provisions to the Indian conditions; the
r esulting conflict and the nee d for clarity of rules r elating to this impor tant branch of law necessitated
the ena ctment of legislation . Drafted in 1870, the T ransfer of P roper ty Act saw the light of the day
in 1882 and provided the basic principles for transfer of both movable and immovable proper ties.
Based primari ly on the English law of ‘Real P roper ty ’, it attempted to mould these principles to suit
the Indian conditions , mor eover , a separate enactment titled the ‘Sale of Goods Act, 1930’ was
passed to deal with transfer of movable proper ty by sale. The T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 contains
the general principles of transfer of proper ty and detailed rules with r espect to specific transfer of
immovable proper ty by sale, e xchange, mor tgage, lease and gift.
II. TYPES OF PROPERTY
The word property has not been defined in the Act, but it has a ver y wide meaning and includes
proper ties of all descriptions . It includes movable prope r ties such as cases, books, etc., and includes
immovable proper ties also such as lands or houses. It also includes intangible proper ties such as
ownership, tenancy , copyrights, etc.
As per Section 3, the immov able proper ty does not include standing timber , growing crop and grass.
Standing timbers: standin g timbers ar e tr ees fit for use for building or r epairing houses. The word
standing timber includes Babool T r ee, Shisham, P eepal, Banyan, T eak, Bamboo , etc. The fruit-bearing
tr ees like Man go , Jackfruit, Jamun, etc., ar e not standin g timber , and they ar e immovable proper ties
(Fatimabibi v. Arrfana Begum , AIR 1980 All 394).
CHAPTER
3(C)
Growing Crop: It includes all vegetable growths which have no e xistence apar t from their produce
such as pan leave, sugar cane etc
Grass: Grass is a movable proper ty , but if it is right to cut grass it would be an inter est in land and
hence for ms immovable proper ty .
Whether tr ees can be r egarde d as movable or immovable depends upon the cir cumstances of the case.
If the intention is that tr ees should continue to have the benefit of fur ther sustenance or nutriment by
the soil (land) , e.g., enjoinin g their fruits, then such tr ee is immovable proper ty . But if the intention
is to cut them down sooner or later for the purpose utilizing the wood for building or other industrial
purposes, they would be timber and accordingly be r egarded as movable proper ty (Shantabai v.
State of Bombay , AIR 1958 SC 532)
As per Section 3(25), Gener al Clauses Act, 1897 Immovable proper ty shall include land, benefits to
arise out of land and things attached to the ear th, or per manently fastened to anything attached to
the ear th.
In the case of Sukry Kurdepa v. Goondakull (1872) cour t has e xplained that movability may
be defined to be a capacity in~ a thing of suffering alteration. On the other hand, if a thing cannot
change its place without injur y to the quality it is immovable.
In Marshall v. Green (33 L T 404), ther e was a sale of tr ees wher e they wer e cut and taken away .
The Cour t held that the sale was not that of immovable proper ty .
Section 2(c) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 defines proper ty as:
“P roper ty ” means proper ty of any kind, whether movable or immovable, tangible or intangible,
and includes any right or inter est in such proper ty .
Section 2 (11) of the Sale of Good Act, 1930 defines proper ty as:
“P roper ty ” means the general proper ty in goods, and not mer ely a special proper ty .
Basis Movable Property Immovable Property
(a) Movement of
proper ty
The movable proper ty can
easily be transpor ted from
one place to another , without
changing its shape, capacity ,
quantity or quality .
The immovable proper ty cannot
easily be transpor ted from one place
to another .
(b) T ransfer Mer e deliver y with intention to
transfer the movable proper ty
completes the transfer
Mer e deliver y does not sufficient for
a valid transfer . The proper ty must
be r egister ed in the name of the
transfer ee
(c) Registration Registration of movable
proper ty is optional under the
Registration Act 1908
Registration of immovable proper ty
is compulsor y/ mandator y under the
Registration Act 1908, subject to
the condition that its value e xceeds
Rs.100
(d) L egal provision T ransfer of movable proper ty
is r egulated by Sales of goods
Act 1932
T ransfer of immovable proper ty is
r egulated by T ransfer of P roper ty Act
1882
74
III. TRANSFER
T ransfer of proper ty is an act of conveying proper ty from one person to another , in the pr esent
or futur e. Matters r elating to the proper ty ar e gover ned by the T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 in
India. The object of the T ransfer of P roper ty Act is to r egulate the transfer of proper ty between living
persons. It shall also ser ve as the code of contract law gover ning immovable proper ty .
The T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 provides clarity on the subject: it is a systematic and unifor m law
on the transfer of immovable proper ty in India.
The transfer of proper ty may also take place by inherita nce and succession. The laws r elating to such
transfer ar e gover ned by the r espective r eligious laws or practices, as the case may be.
Who can transfer property?
Any person who is competent to contract (person above 18 years of age, having a sound mind and
not disqualified by any law in for ce) and authorized to dispose of proper ty viz., owner of the proper ty
or any person authorized to sell the proper ty , can make a transfer . The person who transfers the
proper ty is called the transferor and the person to whom the transfer is made is called the transfer ee.
According to section 8 of the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882 (The Act), by transfer ring proper ty , the
transferor transfers all rights in a proper ty .
Essentials of a valid transfer
With regard to the law of property, a transfer is a process of conveying the rights and
liabilities with respect to a property by one person to another. It is therefore with the
formation of an agreement culminating into a contract that the transfer of property takes
place.
(T ransfer may be by agr eement between par ties i.e. by contract- e xplained in upcoming chapter of
contracts- transfer by will or succession - her e in this chapter we ar e dealing with transfer by agr eement
between par ties)
The following ar e the essentials for a valid transfer of proper ty :
• In a transfer of proper ty , the transfer should be between two or mor e living persons.
• The proper ty that is going to be transfer r ed shoul d be fr ee from encumbrances (hindrances of
any for m) and be of a transferable natur e.
• The transfer should not be: - for an unlawful object or an unlawful consideration (for a detailed
understanding, r efer the chapter on Contracts);
- involving a person legally disqualified to be a transferor or transfer ee.
• The transferor who transfers the proper ty must:
- be competent to make the transfer;
- be entitled to the transferable proper ty ;
- be authorized to dispose off the proper ty if the proper ty is not his own proper ty .
• The transfer should be made according to the appropriate mode of transfer . Necessar y for malities
like r egistration, attestation, etc. should be complied with.
• In the case of a conditional transfer , wher e an inter est is cr eated on the fulfillment of a condition,
the condition should not be illegal, immoral, impossible or opposed to public policy .
75
How can property be transferred?
1. Mode of transfer:
The mode of transfer of proper ty varies according to the value of the proper ty . If the value of the
proper ty is mor e than Rs. 100/-, then transfer has to be made only by a r egister ed instrument.
If the proper ty is tangible wher e the value of the proper ty is less than Rs. 100/-, then transfer
has to be made only by deliver y , wher eas for intangible proper ty , transfer has to be made only
by r egister ed instrument. (A r egister ed instrument contains the r ecords of the owner of the
proper ty - for e xample: shar es, bonds, etc.)
2. Attestation:
A r egister ed instrumen t must be attested at least by two witnesses to the transfer . The definition
of attestation is given in section 3 of the T ransfer of P roper ty Act 1882. A ttestation means
affixing the signatur e to the instrument for the transfer of proper ty . The witnesses should mark
their signatur e too on the instrument with the intention to attest. The intention behind including
this provision was to ensur e that transfer was done with the fr ee will of the e xecutant.
3. Registration:
Registration of the instrument is an essential legal for mality . During r egistration, the par ties
to the transfer must be pr esent to affix their signatur es to the document and complete the
transaction with r egard to immovable proper ty . While doing so , the document for transfer must
mention clearly the rights, obligations and liabilities of the par ties to the transfer .
Registration shall take place by finally affixing a seal of the Registrar ’s office which shall be
subsequently included in the official r ecords.
Indian Registration Act is an act to consolidate the enactments r elating to the r egistration of
documents. Registration means r ecording of the contents of the document. Section 17 of the
Indian Registration Act 1908, deals with the documents that ar e compulsor y to be r egister ed.
4. Mutation:
Once a proper ty has been transfer r ed by way of r elinquishment, sale, or gift deed in the “ name”
of the r ecipien t. It is also impor tant to have the transfer r ecorded in the municipal r ecords by
way of mutation.
5. Payment of fee:
Stamp duty on transfer is payable as per applicable state laws.
In Madam Pillai V. Badar Kali (45 Mad 612 (FB), the plaintiff being the first wife made a claim
for maintenan ce to her husband. The husband orally transfer r ed his lands of the value of Rs. 100/-
to the plaintiff . L ater , he e xecuted an instrument of sale in favour of the defendant for the same
proper ty . The plaintiff initia ted a suit stating that the transfer was initially made in her favour and
the subsequent sale to the defendant was not valid. The defendant stated that the transfer in favour
of the plaintiff failed for want of a r egister ed instrument. The Cour t held that - the plaintiff acquir ed
a title by way of oral transfer and she is entitled to the proper ty though the instrument of sale was
not r egister ed.
IV. DOCTRINE OF ELECTION
According to the principle of Doctrine of Election [Section 35 of the TP A], if a person to the transfer
gets two selections (a benefit and a burden), then he has to accept both the benefit and the burden
76
or none . He cannot accept the benefit and r eject the burden in a single transaction. In other words,
while claiming advantage of an instrument, the burden of the instrument should also be accepted.
Illustration: A sells his garden as well as his house through one instrument to B. Wher eas, B wants
to r etain only the house and wants to cancel the transfer r egarding the garden. According to the
Doctrine of Election, B has to r etain the garden if he wants to r etain the house, or cancel the whole
transaction. B cannot r etain the house and cancel the transfer r egarding the garden.
The doctrine of election is based on the principle of equity that one cannot take what is beneficial to
him and disapprove that which is against him under the same instrument. The L atin maxim “quod
approbo non r eprobo ” means that ‘ no one can approbate and r eprobate.’ In other words, a person
cannot accept a thing and r eject another in the same instrument. This maxim is one of the underlying
principles of doctrine of election. In simple words, wher e a person takes some benefit under a deed
or instrument, he must also bear its burden.
“quod approbo non r eprobo ” - Approbate and r eproba te means to approve and disapprove. This
principle is based on the maxim ‘quod approbo non r eprobo ’ which translates to ‘that which I
approve, I cannot disapprove’ . Ther efor e, an individ ual has to either accept the whole contract,
order etc. or r eject the whole thing.
The principle of the doctrine of election was e xplained by the House of Lords in the leading case
of Cooper vs. Cooper . In Cooper v . Cooper , Lord Hather e xplained the prin ciple underlying the
doctrine of election in the following words, “ …. ther e is an obligation on him who takes a benefit
under a will or other instrument to give full effect to that instrument under which he takes a benefit
; and if it be found that instrument purpor ts to deal with something which it was beyond the power
of the donor or settlor to dispose of , but to which effect can be given by the concur r ence of him
who r eceives a benefit under the same instrument, the law will impose on him who takes the benefit
the obligation of car r ying the instrument into full and complete for ce and effect .” Section 35 of
the T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882 embodied the doctrine of election. The Cour t also held that the
doctrine of election applied on ever y instrument and all types of proper ty .
V. DOCTRINE OF LIS PENDENS
Doctrine of lis pendens is embodied in Section 52 of the T ransfer of P roper ty Act, 1882. Lis pendens
literally means a pending suit.
The doctrine states that a proper ty under a pending suit should not be transfer r ed to a third-par ty
during a pending suit in such a way it affects the rights of any par ty concer ned with the proper ty . That
means, no new inter est should be cr eated by way of transfer of a proper ty during the pendency of a
suit r elating to it.
The Doctrine of lis pendens emerged from the L atin maxim ‘ut lite pendent nihil innoveteur ’ meaning
‘ nothing new should be introduced in a pending litigation ’.
The objective of the doctrine of lis pendens is to subjugate all par ties to a pending litigation of a
proper ty , to the authoritativ e decision of the Cour t. The doctrine r eflects the control which a cour t
acquir es over proper ty involved in a pending suit until its final judgment.
When a suit or litigation is pending on an immovable proper ty , then that immovable proper ty cannot
be transfer r ed.
T o constitute lis pendens , the following conditions should be satisfied:
• A suit or proceeding involving the immovable proper ty should be pending;
• The right to the immovable proper ty must be in question in the suit or proceeding;
Read More