Page 1
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
CHAPTER 9 - VAT Concept and i ts appli cati on i n GST
9.1 Background of Vat
Vat in core concept in GST.
CHAPTER 9
VAT Concept and its application in GST
Concept of Vat (Value Added Tax) was first proposed in 1918 by German Industrialist Dr. Wilhelm von
Siemens.
France was the first country to introduce VAT on 10th April 1954. European countries introduced Vat on
goods and services, after 1977 when European Union made adopting VAT regime as condition precedent to
joining European Union. Vat Rate in Europe varies between 19% to 25%.
China introduced Vat in 1984 and fu l fledged Vat was implemented in China in 1994. The rate is about 17%.
In Japan, there is 'consumption tax' of 5% [4% national levy and 1% regional levy].
About 130 countries have introduced Vat. USA has not introduced Vat since in USA, income tax is major
revenue at Central level and there is retail tax at State level.
Concept of VAT was developed to avoid cascading effect of taxes. VAT was found to be a very good and
transparent tax co lection system, which reduces tax evasion, ensures better tax compliance and increases tax
revenue.
Modvat (modified value added tax) was introduced in India in 1986 (Modvat was re-named as Cenvat w.e.f.
1-4-2000) at Central level. The system was termed as Modvat, as it was restricted upto manufacturing stage
and credit of only excise duty paid on manufacturing products (and corresponding CVD paid on imported
goods) was available.
System of VAT was introduced in service tax w.e.f. 16-8-2002.
Credit of excise duty and service tax was made inter-changeable w.e.f. 10-9-2004. Thus, partial integration of
goods and service tax has been achieved at Union level.
Cenvat was not extended to sales tax, as sales tax is under jurisdiction of State Governments.
However, State Governments have introduced sales tax VAT after 2005.
9.2 Basic Concept of VAT
Genera ly, any tax is related to se ling price of product or value of services. In modern production technology,
raw material passes through various stages and processes ti l it reaches the ultimate stage. Output of the first
manufacturer becomes input for second manufacturer, who carries out further processing and supply it to third
manufacturer. This process continues ti l a final product emerges. This product then goes to
distributor/wholesaler, who se ls it to retailer and then it reaches the ultimate consumer.
For example, steel ingots are made in a steel mi l by 'A'. These are ro led into plates by a re-ro ling unit 'B',
while third manufacturer say 'C' makes furniture from these plates. He sales it to 'D' who is final consumer. Of
Page 2
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
CHAPTER 9 - VAT Concept and i ts appli cati on i n GST
9.1 Background of Vat
Vat in core concept in GST.
CHAPTER 9
VAT Concept and its application in GST
Concept of Vat (Value Added Tax) was first proposed in 1918 by German Industrialist Dr. Wilhelm von
Siemens.
France was the first country to introduce VAT on 10th April 1954. European countries introduced Vat on
goods and services, after 1977 when European Union made adopting VAT regime as condition precedent to
joining European Union. Vat Rate in Europe varies between 19% to 25%.
China introduced Vat in 1984 and fu l fledged Vat was implemented in China in 1994. The rate is about 17%.
In Japan, there is 'consumption tax' of 5% [4% national levy and 1% regional levy].
About 130 countries have introduced Vat. USA has not introduced Vat since in USA, income tax is major
revenue at Central level and there is retail tax at State level.
Concept of VAT was developed to avoid cascading effect of taxes. VAT was found to be a very good and
transparent tax co lection system, which reduces tax evasion, ensures better tax compliance and increases tax
revenue.
Modvat (modified value added tax) was introduced in India in 1986 (Modvat was re-named as Cenvat w.e.f.
1-4-2000) at Central level. The system was termed as Modvat, as it was restricted upto manufacturing stage
and credit of only excise duty paid on manufacturing products (and corresponding CVD paid on imported
goods) was available.
System of VAT was introduced in service tax w.e.f. 16-8-2002.
Credit of excise duty and service tax was made inter-changeable w.e.f. 10-9-2004. Thus, partial integration of
goods and service tax has been achieved at Union level.
Cenvat was not extended to sales tax, as sales tax is under jurisdiction of State Governments.
However, State Governments have introduced sales tax VAT after 2005.
9.2 Basic Concept of VAT
Genera ly, any tax is related to se ling price of product or value of services. In modern production technology,
raw material passes through various stages and processes ti l it reaches the ultimate stage. Output of the first
manufacturer becomes input for second manufacturer, who carries out further processing and supply it to third
manufacturer. This process continues ti l a final product emerges. This product then goes to
distributor/wholesaler, who se ls it to retailer and then it reaches the ultimate consumer.
For example, steel ingots are made in a steel mi l by 'A'. These are ro led into plates by a re-ro ling unit 'B',
while third manufacturer say 'C' makes furniture from these plates. He sales it to 'D' who is final consumer. Of
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
tax on a product is 10% of se ling price, the transaction would go as fo lows.
Details A B C D
Purchase - 110 165 220
Value Added 100 40 35 30
Sub-Total 100 150 200 250
Add tax 10% 10 15 20 25
Total 110 165 220 275
The value added by B is only Rs 40 while he is paying tax on Rs 100 on which A has already paid the tax. He
is also paying tax on Rs 10 which is actua ly tax paid by A. Similarly, C is paying tax on material on which A
and B have already paid the tax. Thus, tax is paid again and again on the material which has already suffered
tax. There is also tax on tax.
Similar situation arises when one service provider uses another service as his input service.
This is ca led cascading effect or 'snow ba ling effect' of taxes. 'Snow ba li ng' means suppose a sma l ice ba l
starts ro ling from top of Himalaya, it accumulates ice as it ro ls down and become very big piece by the time it
reaches bottom of hi l.
This has the fo lowing disadvantages—
(a) Computation of exact tax content di fficult
(b) Varying Tax Burden as tax burden depends on number of stages through which a product passes. If
same product passes through 5 stages, tax burden will be less. If same product passes through 10
stages, tax burden will be more.
(c) Discourages Anci larisation and growth of sma l scale industries, since manufacturer tends to
manufacture himself instead of buying the parts from outside. This increases cost of production.
(d) Concessions on basis of end use is not possible. For example, Government wants to exempt product
of D as it is for flood relief or for common man's consumption. Now, even if Government gives tax
exemption to D, the product or service does not become tax free as relief of taxes earlier paid by A,
B and C cannot be given.
(e) India is member of World Trade Organisation (WTO). As per WTO, there should be free and fair
competition. Hence, no country can give export incentives, but exported product or service can be
made tax free. In aforesaid example, if D is exporting his product or his service, such exports cannot
be made tax free, since Government does not know how much tax was paid earlier and cannot give
relief. Thus, exports cannot be made tax free.
9.2-1 VAT to avoid the cascading effect
VAT was developed to avoid cascading effect of taxes. The basic principle is that at every stage, tax should
be paid only on value added at that stage and not on entire sale price.
'Value added' is the di fference between sale price and cost of material and other inputs on which tax has been
paid.
In the aforesaid example, 'value added' by B is only Rs 40 (150–110), In VAT, the idea is that B will pay tax
on only Rs 40 i.e. value added by him.
Then, it would make no di fference whether a product passes through 5 or 10 stages or even 100 stages, as at
Page 3
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
CHAPTER 9 - VAT Concept and i ts appli cati on i n GST
9.1 Background of Vat
Vat in core concept in GST.
CHAPTER 9
VAT Concept and its application in GST
Concept of Vat (Value Added Tax) was first proposed in 1918 by German Industrialist Dr. Wilhelm von
Siemens.
France was the first country to introduce VAT on 10th April 1954. European countries introduced Vat on
goods and services, after 1977 when European Union made adopting VAT regime as condition precedent to
joining European Union. Vat Rate in Europe varies between 19% to 25%.
China introduced Vat in 1984 and fu l fledged Vat was implemented in China in 1994. The rate is about 17%.
In Japan, there is 'consumption tax' of 5% [4% national levy and 1% regional levy].
About 130 countries have introduced Vat. USA has not introduced Vat since in USA, income tax is major
revenue at Central level and there is retail tax at State level.
Concept of VAT was developed to avoid cascading effect of taxes. VAT was found to be a very good and
transparent tax co lection system, which reduces tax evasion, ensures better tax compliance and increases tax
revenue.
Modvat (modified value added tax) was introduced in India in 1986 (Modvat was re-named as Cenvat w.e.f.
1-4-2000) at Central level. The system was termed as Modvat, as it was restricted upto manufacturing stage
and credit of only excise duty paid on manufacturing products (and corresponding CVD paid on imported
goods) was available.
System of VAT was introduced in service tax w.e.f. 16-8-2002.
Credit of excise duty and service tax was made inter-changeable w.e.f. 10-9-2004. Thus, partial integration of
goods and service tax has been achieved at Union level.
Cenvat was not extended to sales tax, as sales tax is under jurisdiction of State Governments.
However, State Governments have introduced sales tax VAT after 2005.
9.2 Basic Concept of VAT
Genera ly, any tax is related to se ling price of product or value of services. In modern production technology,
raw material passes through various stages and processes ti l it reaches the ultimate stage. Output of the first
manufacturer becomes input for second manufacturer, who carries out further processing and supply it to third
manufacturer. This process continues ti l a final product emerges. This product then goes to
distributor/wholesaler, who se ls it to retailer and then it reaches the ultimate consumer.
For example, steel ingots are made in a steel mi l by 'A'. These are ro led into plates by a re-ro ling unit 'B',
while third manufacturer say 'C' makes furniture from these plates. He sales it to 'D' who is final consumer. Of
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
tax on a product is 10% of se ling price, the transaction would go as fo lows.
Details A B C D
Purchase - 110 165 220
Value Added 100 40 35 30
Sub-Total 100 150 200 250
Add tax 10% 10 15 20 25
Total 110 165 220 275
The value added by B is only Rs 40 while he is paying tax on Rs 100 on which A has already paid the tax. He
is also paying tax on Rs 10 which is actua ly tax paid by A. Similarly, C is paying tax on material on which A
and B have already paid the tax. Thus, tax is paid again and again on the material which has already suffered
tax. There is also tax on tax.
Similar situation arises when one service provider uses another service as his input service.
This is ca led cascading effect or 'snow ba ling effect' of taxes. 'Snow ba li ng' means suppose a sma l ice ba l
starts ro ling from top of Himalaya, it accumulates ice as it ro ls down and become very big piece by the time it
reaches bottom of hi l.
This has the fo lowing disadvantages—
(a) Computation of exact tax content di fficult
(b) Varying Tax Burden as tax burden depends on number of stages through which a product passes. If
same product passes through 5 stages, tax burden will be less. If same product passes through 10
stages, tax burden will be more.
(c) Discourages Anci larisation and growth of sma l scale industries, since manufacturer tends to
manufacture himself instead of buying the parts from outside. This increases cost of production.
(d) Concessions on basis of end use is not possible. For example, Government wants to exempt product
of D as it is for flood relief or for common man's consumption. Now, even if Government gives tax
exemption to D, the product or service does not become tax free as relief of taxes earlier paid by A,
B and C cannot be given.
(e) India is member of World Trade Organisation (WTO). As per WTO, there should be free and fair
competition. Hence, no country can give export incentives, but exported product or service can be
made tax free. In aforesaid example, if D is exporting his product or his service, such exports cannot
be made tax free, since Government does not know how much tax was paid earlier and cannot give
relief. Thus, exports cannot be made tax free.
9.2-1 VAT to avoid the cascading effect
VAT was developed to avoid cascading effect of taxes. The basic principle is that at every stage, tax should
be paid only on value added at that stage and not on entire sale price.
'Value added' is the di fference between sale price and cost of material and other inputs on which tax has been
paid.
In the aforesaid example, 'value added' by B is only Rs 40 (150–110), In VAT, the idea is that B will pay tax
on only Rs 40 i.e. value added by him.
Then, it would make no di fference whether a product passes through 5 or 10 stages or even 100 stages, as at
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
every stage, tax will be paid only on 'value added' by him to the product and not on total se ling price.
9.2-2 Meaning of 'Value added'
In the above i lustration, the 'value' of inputs is Rs 110, while 'value' of output is Rs 150. Thus, the
manufacturer has made 'value addition' of Rs 40 to the product.
Simply put, 'value added' is the gross di fference between se ling price and the purchase price in case of traded
goods, and gross di fference between se ling price of final product and purchase price of inputs, in case of
manufactured goods.
9.2-3 Input Tax credit system to implement concept of VAT
VAT (Value Added Tax) removes the cascading effect of taxes by 'input tax credit' system. Under this system,
input tax credit is given at each stage of tax paid at earlier stage. For example, B will get input tax credit of tax
paid by A, C will get credit of tax paid by B and so on. Thus, aforesaid example will be re-worked as follows
in Vat.
Details A B C D
Purchase - 100 140 175
Value Added 100 40 35 30
Sub-Total 100 140 175 205
Add tax 10% 10 14 17.50 20.50
Total 110 154 192.50 225.50
Note - 'B' is purchasing goods from 'A'. His purchase price is Rs 100 as he is entitled to input tax credit of Rs
10 i.e. tax paid on purchases. His invoice shows tax paid as Rs 14. However, since he has got input tax credit
of Rs 10, effectively he is paying only Rs 4 as tax, which is 10% of Rs 40, i.e. 10% of 'value added' by him.
Similarly, you will find that C is actua ly paying tax of Rs 3.50 (17.50 - 14) which is 10% of Rs 35 and D is
actua ly paying tax of Rs 3 on his 'value added' of Rs 30.
If you see the invoice of D, it shows tax of Rs 20.50, which is the total tax on that Government paid as fo lows
- Rs 10 by A, Rs 4 by B, Rs 3.50 by C and Rs 3 by D.
Thus, if D is granted exemption of Rs 20.50, the product can be made tax free, which was not possible earlier.
Exemption to D from total tax can be granted by any of the fo lowing ways—
(a) A low him not to charge Vat on his sale and to take input tax credit of his inputs and utilize it for
payment of taxes on his other sales (thus, indirect refund of input taxes)
(b) A low him to charge Vat (sales tax) on his sales and grant him rebate of that tax on his sales
(c) A low him not to charge Vat on his sale and grant him rebate of taxes paid by him on his inputs [If
majority of his final products or output services are exempt from tax]
'D' can opt for any one of the benefits which suits him.
9.3 Vat is consumption based tax
You will find that actua ly tax is co lected by Government only at final stage i.e. consumption stage. Ti l then,
the credit is passed on to next buyer. Thus, effectively Government does not get any tax revenue.
In the aforesaid example, if 'D' does not make any further sale, he cannot pass on the input tax credit to any
subsequent buyer or customer. Hence, that tax goes entirely to Government.
Hence, Vat is termed as 'consumption based tax'.
Page 4
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
CHAPTER 9 - VAT Concept and i ts appli cati on i n GST
9.1 Background of Vat
Vat in core concept in GST.
CHAPTER 9
VAT Concept and its application in GST
Concept of Vat (Value Added Tax) was first proposed in 1918 by German Industrialist Dr. Wilhelm von
Siemens.
France was the first country to introduce VAT on 10th April 1954. European countries introduced Vat on
goods and services, after 1977 when European Union made adopting VAT regime as condition precedent to
joining European Union. Vat Rate in Europe varies between 19% to 25%.
China introduced Vat in 1984 and fu l fledged Vat was implemented in China in 1994. The rate is about 17%.
In Japan, there is 'consumption tax' of 5% [4% national levy and 1% regional levy].
About 130 countries have introduced Vat. USA has not introduced Vat since in USA, income tax is major
revenue at Central level and there is retail tax at State level.
Concept of VAT was developed to avoid cascading effect of taxes. VAT was found to be a very good and
transparent tax co lection system, which reduces tax evasion, ensures better tax compliance and increases tax
revenue.
Modvat (modified value added tax) was introduced in India in 1986 (Modvat was re-named as Cenvat w.e.f.
1-4-2000) at Central level. The system was termed as Modvat, as it was restricted upto manufacturing stage
and credit of only excise duty paid on manufacturing products (and corresponding CVD paid on imported
goods) was available.
System of VAT was introduced in service tax w.e.f. 16-8-2002.
Credit of excise duty and service tax was made inter-changeable w.e.f. 10-9-2004. Thus, partial integration of
goods and service tax has been achieved at Union level.
Cenvat was not extended to sales tax, as sales tax is under jurisdiction of State Governments.
However, State Governments have introduced sales tax VAT after 2005.
9.2 Basic Concept of VAT
Genera ly, any tax is related to se ling price of product or value of services. In modern production technology,
raw material passes through various stages and processes ti l it reaches the ultimate stage. Output of the first
manufacturer becomes input for second manufacturer, who carries out further processing and supply it to third
manufacturer. This process continues ti l a final product emerges. This product then goes to
distributor/wholesaler, who se ls it to retailer and then it reaches the ultimate consumer.
For example, steel ingots are made in a steel mi l by 'A'. These are ro led into plates by a re-ro ling unit 'B',
while third manufacturer say 'C' makes furniture from these plates. He sales it to 'D' who is final consumer. Of
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
tax on a product is 10% of se ling price, the transaction would go as fo lows.
Details A B C D
Purchase - 110 165 220
Value Added 100 40 35 30
Sub-Total 100 150 200 250
Add tax 10% 10 15 20 25
Total 110 165 220 275
The value added by B is only Rs 40 while he is paying tax on Rs 100 on which A has already paid the tax. He
is also paying tax on Rs 10 which is actua ly tax paid by A. Similarly, C is paying tax on material on which A
and B have already paid the tax. Thus, tax is paid again and again on the material which has already suffered
tax. There is also tax on tax.
Similar situation arises when one service provider uses another service as his input service.
This is ca led cascading effect or 'snow ba ling effect' of taxes. 'Snow ba li ng' means suppose a sma l ice ba l
starts ro ling from top of Himalaya, it accumulates ice as it ro ls down and become very big piece by the time it
reaches bottom of hi l.
This has the fo lowing disadvantages—
(a) Computation of exact tax content di fficult
(b) Varying Tax Burden as tax burden depends on number of stages through which a product passes. If
same product passes through 5 stages, tax burden will be less. If same product passes through 10
stages, tax burden will be more.
(c) Discourages Anci larisation and growth of sma l scale industries, since manufacturer tends to
manufacture himself instead of buying the parts from outside. This increases cost of production.
(d) Concessions on basis of end use is not possible. For example, Government wants to exempt product
of D as it is for flood relief or for common man's consumption. Now, even if Government gives tax
exemption to D, the product or service does not become tax free as relief of taxes earlier paid by A,
B and C cannot be given.
(e) India is member of World Trade Organisation (WTO). As per WTO, there should be free and fair
competition. Hence, no country can give export incentives, but exported product or service can be
made tax free. In aforesaid example, if D is exporting his product or his service, such exports cannot
be made tax free, since Government does not know how much tax was paid earlier and cannot give
relief. Thus, exports cannot be made tax free.
9.2-1 VAT to avoid the cascading effect
VAT was developed to avoid cascading effect of taxes. The basic principle is that at every stage, tax should
be paid only on value added at that stage and not on entire sale price.
'Value added' is the di fference between sale price and cost of material and other inputs on which tax has been
paid.
In the aforesaid example, 'value added' by B is only Rs 40 (150–110), In VAT, the idea is that B will pay tax
on only Rs 40 i.e. value added by him.
Then, it would make no di fference whether a product passes through 5 or 10 stages or even 100 stages, as at
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
every stage, tax will be paid only on 'value added' by him to the product and not on total se ling price.
9.2-2 Meaning of 'Value added'
In the above i lustration, the 'value' of inputs is Rs 110, while 'value' of output is Rs 150. Thus, the
manufacturer has made 'value addition' of Rs 40 to the product.
Simply put, 'value added' is the gross di fference between se ling price and the purchase price in case of traded
goods, and gross di fference between se ling price of final product and purchase price of inputs, in case of
manufactured goods.
9.2-3 Input Tax credit system to implement concept of VAT
VAT (Value Added Tax) removes the cascading effect of taxes by 'input tax credit' system. Under this system,
input tax credit is given at each stage of tax paid at earlier stage. For example, B will get input tax credit of tax
paid by A, C will get credit of tax paid by B and so on. Thus, aforesaid example will be re-worked as follows
in Vat.
Details A B C D
Purchase - 100 140 175
Value Added 100 40 35 30
Sub-Total 100 140 175 205
Add tax 10% 10 14 17.50 20.50
Total 110 154 192.50 225.50
Note - 'B' is purchasing goods from 'A'. His purchase price is Rs 100 as he is entitled to input tax credit of Rs
10 i.e. tax paid on purchases. His invoice shows tax paid as Rs 14. However, since he has got input tax credit
of Rs 10, effectively he is paying only Rs 4 as tax, which is 10% of Rs 40, i.e. 10% of 'value added' by him.
Similarly, you will find that C is actua ly paying tax of Rs 3.50 (17.50 - 14) which is 10% of Rs 35 and D is
actua ly paying tax of Rs 3 on his 'value added' of Rs 30.
If you see the invoice of D, it shows tax of Rs 20.50, which is the total tax on that Government paid as fo lows
- Rs 10 by A, Rs 4 by B, Rs 3.50 by C and Rs 3 by D.
Thus, if D is granted exemption of Rs 20.50, the product can be made tax free, which was not possible earlier.
Exemption to D from total tax can be granted by any of the fo lowing ways—
(a) A low him not to charge Vat on his sale and to take input tax credit of his inputs and utilize it for
payment of taxes on his other sales (thus, indirect refund of input taxes)
(b) A low him to charge Vat (sales tax) on his sales and grant him rebate of that tax on his sales
(c) A low him not to charge Vat on his sale and grant him rebate of taxes paid by him on his inputs [If
majority of his final products or output services are exempt from tax]
'D' can opt for any one of the benefits which suits him.
9.3 Vat is consumption based tax
You will find that actua ly tax is co lected by Government only at final stage i.e. consumption stage. Ti l then,
the credit is passed on to next buyer. Thus, effectively Government does not get any tax revenue.
In the aforesaid example, if 'D' does not make any further sale, he cannot pass on the input tax credit to any
subsequent buyer or customer. Hence, that tax goes entirely to Government.
Hence, Vat is termed as 'consumption based tax'.
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
In case of inter-state transactions, if goods are manufactured in 'X' State, sent to 'Y' State and sold in 'Y'
State, the tax revenue will be co lected only by 'Y' State and no revenue will accrue to 'X' State Government.
This does not make di fference in respect of Central Taxes like excise duty and service tax (later it will be
CGST and IGST) as wherever tax is paid, revenue goes to Central Government. However, this makes huge
di fference in respect of State Vat and SGST
9.3-1 Nature of Vat/GST
International VAT/GST guidelines issued by OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development) state as follows [quoted with approval in Coca Cola India v. CCE (2009) 22 STT 130 (Bom
HC DB) and ABB Ltd. v. CCE (2009) 21 STT 77 = 15 STR 23 (CESTAT 3 member bench)]
'Value added tax systems are designed to tax final consumption and as such, in most cases, it is only
consumers who should actua ly bear the tax burden. Indeed, the tax is levied, ultimately, on consumption and
not on intermediate transactions between firms, as tax charged on these purchases is, in principle, fully
deductible. This feature gives the tax its main characteristic of neutrality in the value chain and towards
international chain. - - Value added taxes are taxes on consumption, paid, ultimately by final consumers- - In
principle, business should not bear the burden of tax since there are mechanisms in place that a low for a
refund of the tax levied on intermediate transactions between firms'.
9.3-2 Advantages of VAT/GST
It can be seen that a l earlier disadvantages have gone in Vat system. Advantages of VAT are as follows :
(a) End use based exemptions or concessions can be given as tax as shown in invoice is the total tax
borne by that commodity. Concessions can be given to goods used by poor people. Government
has flexibility in applying varying tax rates to di fferent commodities.
(b) Exports can be freed from domestic taxes, which is permissible under WTO.
(c) Vat provides an instrument of taxing consumption of goods and services.
(d) Interference in market forces is minimum.
(e) Aids tax enforcement by providing audit trail through di fferent stages of production and trade.
(f) Vat acts as a self-policing mechanism. For example, B will get credit only if A issues invoice showing
tax. Hence, B insists on tax invoice from A. Thus, B acts as police for A, C acts as police for B and
so on. This increases tax compliance. It also indirectly increases income tax revenue.
(g) Tax evasion is reduced. Even if tax is evaded at one stage, the transaction gets caught in next stage
of production or distribution and then Government gets its revenue.
(h) Simplicity with minimum distortion in tax structure - as there are few variations in tax rates and
exemptions from taxation are very few.
(i) Transparent - The invoice shows total tax borne by that commodity. There are no hidden taxes.
(j) Certainty in taxation due to simple tax structure and minimum variations.
9.3-3 Disadvantages of Vat
Though Vat system has many advantages, the system is not free of pitfa ls and di fficulties.
(a) Heavy compliance cost - detailed accounting and paper work is required as is not as simple as a
single point sales tax.
(b) Hindrance in inter-state movement of goods - Each State wants to keep record of goods coming in
and going out of State, for which check posts are required. This delays movement and increases
corruption. Rea ly, a l the goods will be tax paid during inter-statement of goods as IGST will have to
Page 5
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
CHAPTER 9 - VAT Concept and i ts appli cati on i n GST
9.1 Background of Vat
Vat in core concept in GST.
CHAPTER 9
VAT Concept and its application in GST
Concept of Vat (Value Added Tax) was first proposed in 1918 by German Industrialist Dr. Wilhelm von
Siemens.
France was the first country to introduce VAT on 10th April 1954. European countries introduced Vat on
goods and services, after 1977 when European Union made adopting VAT regime as condition precedent to
joining European Union. Vat Rate in Europe varies between 19% to 25%.
China introduced Vat in 1984 and fu l fledged Vat was implemented in China in 1994. The rate is about 17%.
In Japan, there is 'consumption tax' of 5% [4% national levy and 1% regional levy].
About 130 countries have introduced Vat. USA has not introduced Vat since in USA, income tax is major
revenue at Central level and there is retail tax at State level.
Concept of VAT was developed to avoid cascading effect of taxes. VAT was found to be a very good and
transparent tax co lection system, which reduces tax evasion, ensures better tax compliance and increases tax
revenue.
Modvat (modified value added tax) was introduced in India in 1986 (Modvat was re-named as Cenvat w.e.f.
1-4-2000) at Central level. The system was termed as Modvat, as it was restricted upto manufacturing stage
and credit of only excise duty paid on manufacturing products (and corresponding CVD paid on imported
goods) was available.
System of VAT was introduced in service tax w.e.f. 16-8-2002.
Credit of excise duty and service tax was made inter-changeable w.e.f. 10-9-2004. Thus, partial integration of
goods and service tax has been achieved at Union level.
Cenvat was not extended to sales tax, as sales tax is under jurisdiction of State Governments.
However, State Governments have introduced sales tax VAT after 2005.
9.2 Basic Concept of VAT
Genera ly, any tax is related to se ling price of product or value of services. In modern production technology,
raw material passes through various stages and processes ti l it reaches the ultimate stage. Output of the first
manufacturer becomes input for second manufacturer, who carries out further processing and supply it to third
manufacturer. This process continues ti l a final product emerges. This product then goes to
distributor/wholesaler, who se ls it to retailer and then it reaches the ultimate consumer.
For example, steel ingots are made in a steel mi l by 'A'. These are ro led into plates by a re-ro ling unit 'B',
while third manufacturer say 'C' makes furniture from these plates. He sales it to 'D' who is final consumer. Of
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
tax on a product is 10% of se ling price, the transaction would go as fo lows.
Details A B C D
Purchase - 110 165 220
Value Added 100 40 35 30
Sub-Total 100 150 200 250
Add tax 10% 10 15 20 25
Total 110 165 220 275
The value added by B is only Rs 40 while he is paying tax on Rs 100 on which A has already paid the tax. He
is also paying tax on Rs 10 which is actua ly tax paid by A. Similarly, C is paying tax on material on which A
and B have already paid the tax. Thus, tax is paid again and again on the material which has already suffered
tax. There is also tax on tax.
Similar situation arises when one service provider uses another service as his input service.
This is ca led cascading effect or 'snow ba ling effect' of taxes. 'Snow ba li ng' means suppose a sma l ice ba l
starts ro ling from top of Himalaya, it accumulates ice as it ro ls down and become very big piece by the time it
reaches bottom of hi l.
This has the fo lowing disadvantages—
(a) Computation of exact tax content di fficult
(b) Varying Tax Burden as tax burden depends on number of stages through which a product passes. If
same product passes through 5 stages, tax burden will be less. If same product passes through 10
stages, tax burden will be more.
(c) Discourages Anci larisation and growth of sma l scale industries, since manufacturer tends to
manufacture himself instead of buying the parts from outside. This increases cost of production.
(d) Concessions on basis of end use is not possible. For example, Government wants to exempt product
of D as it is for flood relief or for common man's consumption. Now, even if Government gives tax
exemption to D, the product or service does not become tax free as relief of taxes earlier paid by A,
B and C cannot be given.
(e) India is member of World Trade Organisation (WTO). As per WTO, there should be free and fair
competition. Hence, no country can give export incentives, but exported product or service can be
made tax free. In aforesaid example, if D is exporting his product or his service, such exports cannot
be made tax free, since Government does not know how much tax was paid earlier and cannot give
relief. Thus, exports cannot be made tax free.
9.2-1 VAT to avoid the cascading effect
VAT was developed to avoid cascading effect of taxes. The basic principle is that at every stage, tax should
be paid only on value added at that stage and not on entire sale price.
'Value added' is the di fference between sale price and cost of material and other inputs on which tax has been
paid.
In the aforesaid example, 'value added' by B is only Rs 40 (150–110), In VAT, the idea is that B will pay tax
on only Rs 40 i.e. value added by him.
Then, it would make no di fference whether a product passes through 5 or 10 stages or even 100 stages, as at
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
every stage, tax will be paid only on 'value added' by him to the product and not on total se ling price.
9.2-2 Meaning of 'Value added'
In the above i lustration, the 'value' of inputs is Rs 110, while 'value' of output is Rs 150. Thus, the
manufacturer has made 'value addition' of Rs 40 to the product.
Simply put, 'value added' is the gross di fference between se ling price and the purchase price in case of traded
goods, and gross di fference between se ling price of final product and purchase price of inputs, in case of
manufactured goods.
9.2-3 Input Tax credit system to implement concept of VAT
VAT (Value Added Tax) removes the cascading effect of taxes by 'input tax credit' system. Under this system,
input tax credit is given at each stage of tax paid at earlier stage. For example, B will get input tax credit of tax
paid by A, C will get credit of tax paid by B and so on. Thus, aforesaid example will be re-worked as follows
in Vat.
Details A B C D
Purchase - 100 140 175
Value Added 100 40 35 30
Sub-Total 100 140 175 205
Add tax 10% 10 14 17.50 20.50
Total 110 154 192.50 225.50
Note - 'B' is purchasing goods from 'A'. His purchase price is Rs 100 as he is entitled to input tax credit of Rs
10 i.e. tax paid on purchases. His invoice shows tax paid as Rs 14. However, since he has got input tax credit
of Rs 10, effectively he is paying only Rs 4 as tax, which is 10% of Rs 40, i.e. 10% of 'value added' by him.
Similarly, you will find that C is actua ly paying tax of Rs 3.50 (17.50 - 14) which is 10% of Rs 35 and D is
actua ly paying tax of Rs 3 on his 'value added' of Rs 30.
If you see the invoice of D, it shows tax of Rs 20.50, which is the total tax on that Government paid as fo lows
- Rs 10 by A, Rs 4 by B, Rs 3.50 by C and Rs 3 by D.
Thus, if D is granted exemption of Rs 20.50, the product can be made tax free, which was not possible earlier.
Exemption to D from total tax can be granted by any of the fo lowing ways—
(a) A low him not to charge Vat on his sale and to take input tax credit of his inputs and utilize it for
payment of taxes on his other sales (thus, indirect refund of input taxes)
(b) A low him to charge Vat (sales tax) on his sales and grant him rebate of that tax on his sales
(c) A low him not to charge Vat on his sale and grant him rebate of taxes paid by him on his inputs [If
majority of his final products or output services are exempt from tax]
'D' can opt for any one of the benefits which suits him.
9.3 Vat is consumption based tax
You will find that actua ly tax is co lected by Government only at final stage i.e. consumption stage. Ti l then,
the credit is passed on to next buyer. Thus, effectively Government does not get any tax revenue.
In the aforesaid example, if 'D' does not make any further sale, he cannot pass on the input tax credit to any
subsequent buyer or customer. Hence, that tax goes entirely to Government.
Hence, Vat is termed as 'consumption based tax'.
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
In case of inter-state transactions, if goods are manufactured in 'X' State, sent to 'Y' State and sold in 'Y'
State, the tax revenue will be co lected only by 'Y' State and no revenue will accrue to 'X' State Government.
This does not make di fference in respect of Central Taxes like excise duty and service tax (later it will be
CGST and IGST) as wherever tax is paid, revenue goes to Central Government. However, this makes huge
di fference in respect of State Vat and SGST
9.3-1 Nature of Vat/GST
International VAT/GST guidelines issued by OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development) state as follows [quoted with approval in Coca Cola India v. CCE (2009) 22 STT 130 (Bom
HC DB) and ABB Ltd. v. CCE (2009) 21 STT 77 = 15 STR 23 (CESTAT 3 member bench)]
'Value added tax systems are designed to tax final consumption and as such, in most cases, it is only
consumers who should actua ly bear the tax burden. Indeed, the tax is levied, ultimately, on consumption and
not on intermediate transactions between firms, as tax charged on these purchases is, in principle, fully
deductible. This feature gives the tax its main characteristic of neutrality in the value chain and towards
international chain. - - Value added taxes are taxes on consumption, paid, ultimately by final consumers- - In
principle, business should not bear the burden of tax since there are mechanisms in place that a low for a
refund of the tax levied on intermediate transactions between firms'.
9.3-2 Advantages of VAT/GST
It can be seen that a l earlier disadvantages have gone in Vat system. Advantages of VAT are as follows :
(a) End use based exemptions or concessions can be given as tax as shown in invoice is the total tax
borne by that commodity. Concessions can be given to goods used by poor people. Government
has flexibility in applying varying tax rates to di fferent commodities.
(b) Exports can be freed from domestic taxes, which is permissible under WTO.
(c) Vat provides an instrument of taxing consumption of goods and services.
(d) Interference in market forces is minimum.
(e) Aids tax enforcement by providing audit trail through di fferent stages of production and trade.
(f) Vat acts as a self-policing mechanism. For example, B will get credit only if A issues invoice showing
tax. Hence, B insists on tax invoice from A. Thus, B acts as police for A, C acts as police for B and
so on. This increases tax compliance. It also indirectly increases income tax revenue.
(g) Tax evasion is reduced. Even if tax is evaded at one stage, the transaction gets caught in next stage
of production or distribution and then Government gets its revenue.
(h) Simplicity with minimum distortion in tax structure - as there are few variations in tax rates and
exemptions from taxation are very few.
(i) Transparent - The invoice shows total tax borne by that commodity. There are no hidden taxes.
(j) Certainty in taxation due to simple tax structure and minimum variations.
9.3-3 Disadvantages of Vat
Though Vat system has many advantages, the system is not free of pitfa ls and di fficulties.
(a) Heavy compliance cost - detailed accounting and paper work is required as is not as simple as a
single point sales tax.
(b) Hindrance in inter-state movement of goods - Each State wants to keep record of goods coming in
and going out of State, for which check posts are required. This delays movement and increases
corruption. Rea ly, a l the goods will be tax paid during inter-statement of goods as IGST will have to
CA DHRUV AGRAWAL – National Chairman Taxation Committee-All India Confederation of Small & Micro Industries Association
be paid on a l such goods. There is no need for physical barriers for movement of goods from one
State to other. The inter-state check posts can be abolished, if there is strong political will to do so.
(c) State where goods are produced do not get any tax revenue as a l revenue goes to State where
goods are consumed as Vat works on destination principle. For example, major quantity of wheat
produced in Punjab goes outside the State. Similar situation exists in case of minerals in Jharkhand,
software in Karnataka or manufactured products in industria ly advanced States. Of course the
States get indirect benefits like growth of employment, improved economy etc. but no direct benefit
of Vat/sales tax.
(d) Tax evasion through bogus i nvoices. Since input tax credit is on the basis of invoice, the invoice is
like currency note to the se ler. Printing invoice is much easier than printing currency notes. Under
GST, the input tax credit will be on basis of electronic returns. Hence, chances of evasion on
account of bogus i nvoices is much less.
9.3-4 'Missing Trader' or 'hawala' in GST
'Missing Trader' is a trader who makes a sale or provides service, co lects tax and then disappears. The
customer avails input tax credit of such taxes (which are not actua ly paid by the se ling dealer). This is 'hawala
trade'.
Another type of fraud is termed as 'carousel fraud'. 'Carousel' means 'merry-go-around' or' roundabout'
(Concise Oxford Dictionary). This is 'missing trader fraud' of sophisticated type. It is much more involved and
di fficult to trace.
One dealer 'A' se ls goods to 'B' and charges Vat. 'B' avails credit of tax shown by 'A' in his Invoice. 'B' se ls
the goods to 'C' and charges Vat. 'B' has to pay only di fferential amount as tax. 'C' avails credit of tax shown
by 'B' in his Invoice. 'C' se ls goods to 'D' by charging Vat. Since 'C' has availed credit of Vat paid by 'B', he
has to pay only di fferential amount, which is sma l. 'D' exports the goods and claims refund of input tax i.e.
entire tax shown by 'C' in his Invoice.
This is a legitimate transaction. The missing link is that 'A' actua ly does not deposit tax to Government. 'A'
either has his own Vat registration number or he hijacks other's Vat number. He co lects tax and then
disappears. Thus, 'D' gets ref und of tax which is actua ly not paid by 'A'. By the time Government traces the
transaction to 'A', he i.e. 'A' has disappeared.
The same goods are used again and again for 'imports' and 'exports'. That is why the fraud is termed as
'carousel' fraud. The high value goods like microchips and mobile phones are genera ly used for such deals.
UK is said to be main victim of such fraud. It is reported that UK has lost 12.6 Billion Euro in such frauds. It
is said that fraudsters prefer UK since it has weak and time consuming legal system!
9.3-5 Case of innocent dealer
Suppose in above example, 'D' is i nnocent. He is not aware that 'A' has not paid the tax. He has actua ly
purchased and exported the goods. In such case, can Government disa low refund to 'D'?
If 'D' is innocent, he cannot be penalised by default of 'A'.
One such case has been decided by Court of Justice of European Comm unities. It is highest Court of
European Union. In Optigen Ltd v. Commissioners of Customs and Excise 2006 EUECJ C-354/03
(decided on 12-1-2006), it has been held that Government cannot refuse refund in such cases.
9.3-6 Invoice matching in GST
In Mahalakshmi Cotton Ginning Pressing and Oil Industries v. State of Maharashtra (2012) 35 STT
589 = 21 Latest Case528 = 51 VST 1 (Bom HC DB), the Maharashtra Vat Act provided that set off (input
Read More