Consider the following statements.1. There was low participation of Mu...
- The massive participation of Muslims in the Non-Cooperation Movement was a significant achievement, and the statement that there was low participation is incorrect.
- Gandhi threatened to launch civil disobedience from Bardoli in 1922, not Ahmedabad, making the second statement incorrect as well.
Therefore, neither of the statements is correct.
Consider the following statements.1. There was low participation of Mu...
Analysis of the Statements
When evaluating the two statements regarding the Non-Cooperation Movement and Gandhi's actions, it's essential to understand the historical context.
Statement 1: Low Participation of Muslims in the Non-Cooperation Movement
- While it is true that the Non-Cooperation Movement, launched in 1920, saw significant participation from various communities, the Muslim participation varied.
- Many Muslims, influenced by the Khilafat Movement, initially joined the Non-Cooperation Movement. However, after the Chauri Chaura incident in 1922, the enthusiasm waned, leading to a decline in active participation.
- Therefore, while there was a notable Muslim presence, the statement oversimplifies the complexities of their involvement.
Statement 2: Gandhi's Threat at the Ahmedabad Session
- Gandhi did express strong sentiments about political prisoners and press controls, but there is no record of him threatening to launch the Civil Disobedience Movement during the Ahmedabad session specifically.
- His call for civil disobedience was broader and evolved later, particularly after the failure of the Non-Cooperation Movement.
Conclusion
- Both statements contain inaccuracies regarding the historical events they describe.
- The claim of low Muslim participation is misleading, and Gandhi's threat during the Ahmedabad session lacks precise documentation.
Thus, the correct answer is option 'D': Neither of the statements is correct.