All Exams  >   UPPSC (UP)  >   6 Months Preparation Course for UPPSC  >   MCQ Questions

Independence and After MCQs for UPPSC (UP) Exam

It covers all Important Questions with answers on Independence and After for the UPPSC (UP) exam. The questions are based on important topics. Details about the questions:
  • Topic: Independence and After
  • Type of Questions: MCQs with solutions
  • Number of Questions: 50
  • You can attempt them on EduRev to score high in UPPSC (UP) exam.

Consider the following statements. 
1. 53 political parties were participating in the first general elections for the Lok Sabha seats 
2. More than a thousand candidates were participating in the elections 
Which of these statements are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both of them
  • d)
    Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Meera Singh answered
 
  • 53 political parties were participating in the first general elections for the Lok Sabha seats. 
  • These included the 14 national parties, according to the report by the Election Commission of India. Besides, there were independents. There were a total number of 1,874 candidates, including 533 independents.
 
 
 

Constitution of India bill envisaged for all citizens of India:
1. Freedom of expression
2. Right to inviolability of one's home
3. Equality before the law
Choose from the following options
  • a)
    1 and 2 Only
  • b)
    2 and 3 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Anjali Rao answered
  • In the modern sense, there appeared the Constitution of India Bill, also known as the Home Rule Bill in 1895, which envisaged basic human rights such as freedom of expression, equality before the law, right to the inviolability of one's home, right to property, etc., for all citizens of India.
  • Although there is no conclusive evidence to prove the Home Rule Bill's authorship, Annie Besant believed that Tilak inspired the Bill.

Statement 1: The Jain Commission report was related to the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi.
Statement 2: The report's findings led to the withdrawal of Congress support from I.K. Gujral's government.
  • a)
    Both statements are true
  • b)
    Only statement 1 is true
  • c)
    Only statement 2 is true
  • d)
    Neither statement is true
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Avi Sengupta answered
Explanation:

Statement 1: The Jain Commission report was indeed related to the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. The commission was set up to investigate the conspiracy behind the assassination and to identify those responsible for the tragic event.

Statement 2: The findings of the Jain Commission report did lead to the withdrawal of Congress support from I.K. Gujral's government. The Congress party decided to withdraw its support as the report implicated the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party, which was a part of the ruling coalition led by Gujral.
Therefore, both statements are true as the Jain Commission report was linked to Rajiv Gandhi's assassination, and its findings resulted in the Congress party withdrawing its support from I.K. Gujral's government.

Consider the following statements about the first general elections.
1. In the house of the people, 50% of the seats were reserved for the candidates belonging to the scheduled castes
2. Around 20% of the seats were reserved for the candidates belonging to the scheduled tribes
Which of these statements are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both of them
  • d)
    Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Bhavana Sen answered
The correct answer is option 'D', neither of them.

Explanation:
1. In the house of the people, 50% of the seats were reserved for the candidates belonging to the scheduled castes: This statement is incorrect. In the first general elections held in India in 1951-52, there were no reserved seats for candidates belonging to the scheduled castes. The reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes was introduced later through constitutional amendments.

2. Around 20% of the seats were reserved for the candidates belonging to the scheduled tribes: This statement is also incorrect. In the first general elections, there were no reserved seats for candidates belonging to the scheduled tribes. The reservation of seats for scheduled tribes was introduced later through constitutional amendments.

Reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes:
The reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes was introduced to ensure representation and political empowerment of these marginalized communities. The Constitution of India, through various amendments, provided for the reservation of seats in both the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the State Legislative Assemblies.

Reservation in the Lok Sabha:
Currently, the reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in the Lok Sabha is based on their proportion to the total population. As per the Constitution, 84 seats (out of 543) are reserved for scheduled castes and 47 seats (out of 543) are reserved for scheduled tribes. These reserved seats are distributed among different states and union territories based on their population.

Reservation in the State Legislative Assemblies:
Similar to the reservation in the Lok Sabha, the Constitution also provides for the reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in the State Legislative Assemblies. The number of reserved seats varies from state to state based on the proportion of the population of these communities.

Conclusion:
In summary, neither of the statements given in the question is correct. The reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies was introduced through constitutional amendments after the first general elections.

Consider the following statements. 
1. The British government appointed the boundary Commission under the chairmanship of Sir Radcliff
2. The boundary commission consisted of two Muslims and two non-Muslim judges in each case
Which of these statements are not correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both of them
  • d)
    Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Kiran Sharma answered
Understanding the Boundary Commission
The Boundary Commission was a pivotal moment during the partition of India in 1947, tasked with demarcating the borders between India and Pakistan. Let's analyze the statements regarding the Commission.
Statement 1: The British government appointed the Boundary Commission under the chairmanship of Sir Radcliffe.
- This statement is correct.
- Sir Cyril Radcliffe was indeed appointed by the British government to chair the Boundary Commission.
- His role was critical in determining the borders based on religious demographics, land use, and other factors.
Statement 2: The Boundary Commission consisted of two Muslims and two non-Muslim judges in each case.
- This statement is correct.
- The Commission included members from various communities to ensure representation.
- However, the actual composition was predominantly British judges, with Radcliffe himself being the sole British member overseeing the entire process.
Conclusion
- Since both statements are accurate, the correct answer to the question is option 'D': Neither of them is incorrect.
- The Boundary Commission's decisions had lasting impacts on the subcontinent, leading to significant demographic and political changes.
In summary, both statements about the Boundary Commission are correct, confirming that option 'D' is the right choice.

Which of the following statements correct the linguistic province's Commission appointed by the constituent assembly in 1948?
1. It opposed the demands of the linguistic reorganization of the provinces
2. Consequently the constituent assembly decided to include the linguistic principle in the constitution
Choose from the following options.
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both of them
  • d)
    Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Sanjay Rana answered
  • Due to continuous demands, the Constituent Assembly, in June 1948, appointed the Linguistic Provinces Commission, headed by Justice S.K. Dhar, to enquire into the need of linguistic provinces.
  • The Dhar Commission, however, opposed such a move in the interest of national integration. Consequently, the Constituent Assembly decided not to include the linguistic principle in the constitution.

Consider the following statements.
1. The Congress took up the demand for a constituent assembly as a part of its official policy in 1934 after accepting the Simon Commission's recommendations
2. At the Bombay session of the Congress in 1936, it was declared that "no constitution imposed by an outside authority and no constitution which curtails the sovereignty of the people" would be acceptable to the Congress
Which of these statements is/are correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both of them
  • d)
    Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Akshita Joshi answered
The correct answer is option 'D', neither of them. Let's analyze each statement separately.

Statement 1: The Congress took up the demand for a constituent assembly as a part of its official policy in 1934 after accepting the Simon Commission's recommendations.

The Simon Commission was a British Commission formed in 1927 to discuss constitutional reforms in India. However, the Indian National Congress did not fully accept the recommendations of the Simon Commission. The Congress rejected the idea of separate electorates and demanded a dominion status for India. Therefore, it did not take up the demand for a constituent assembly as a part of its official policy in 1934. Hence, statement 1 is incorrect.

Statement 2: At the Bombay session of the Congress in 1936, it was declared that "no constitution imposed by an outside authority and no constitution which curtails the sovereignty of the people" would be acceptable to the Congress.

The Bombay session of the Congress in 1936 did pass a resolution declaring that "no constitution imposed by an outside authority and no constitution which curtails the sovereignty of the people" would be acceptable to the Congress. This resolution reflected the Congress's demand for complete independence and the right to draft its own constitution without any interference from the British government. Therefore, statement 2 is correct.

In conclusion, only statement 2 is correct while statement 1 is incorrect. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D', neither of them.

Who among the following was not a part of Lal Bahadur Shastri's cabinet?
  • a)
    Indira Gandhi
  • b)
    Morarji Desai
  • c)
    L.K. Jha
  • d)
    I.G. Patel
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Sneha Kumar answered
Explanation:

Lal Bahadur Shastri's Cabinet:
- Lal Bahadur Shastri served as the Prime Minister of India from 1964 to 1966.
- He had a talented team of ministers in his cabinet to assist him in governing the country.
- Some notable members of his cabinet included Indira Gandhi, Morarji Desai, L.K. Jha, and others.

Members of Lal Bahadur Shastri's Cabinet:
- Indira Gandhi: She was the Minister of Information and Broadcasting in Shastri's cabinet.
- Morarji Desai: He served as the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance in Shastri's cabinet.
- L.K. Jha: He was a prominent diplomat who served as the Ambassador of India to the United States and the United Nations. He also held various positions in the Government of India.
- I.G. Patel: He was not a part of Lal Bahadur Shastri's cabinet.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question is option 'D', I.G. Patel, as he was not a part of Lal Bahadur Shastri's cabinet.

Arrange the following events in chronological order:
  1. Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi
  2. Introduction of the National Education Policy
  3. Opening of the Babri Mosque gates
  4. IPKF deployment in Sri Lanka
  • a)
    2, 3, 4, 1
  • b)
    3, 4, 2, 1
  • c)
    4, 3, 2, 1
  • d)
    1, 2, 3, 4
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Valor Academy answered
  • The opening of the Babri Mosque gates happened in 1986.
  • The IPKF deployment in Sri Lanka began in 1987.
  • The introduction of the National Education Policy occurred in 1986.
  • The assassination of Rajiv Gandhi took place in 1991.
Thus, the correct sequence is  Option B  3, 4, 2, 1.

What major event occurred in retaliation to the Babri Masjid demolition during Narasimha Rao's tenure?
  • a)
    Gujarat Riots
  • b)
    Bombay Bomb Blasts
  • c)
    Kargil War
  • d)
    Operation Blue Star
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Lohit Matani answered
Following the Babri Masjid demolition, retaliatory bomb blasts occurred in Bombay in 1993, which were seen as a response to the demolition and subsequent riots.

Consider the following statements about the Indian Independence Act
1. Each dominion was to have a governor-general to be responsible for the effective operation of the Act
2. Till a new constitution was adopted by each dominion, the two dominions' governments were to be carried on following the Indian Independence Act.
Which of these statements are not correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both of them
  • d)
    Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Ayush Desai answered
Understanding the Indian Independence Act
The Indian Independence Act of 1947 was a pivotal legislation that marked the end of British rule in India and the establishment of two independent dominions: India and Pakistan. Let's analyze the statements provided:
Statement 1: Governor-General's Role
- The Act indeed stipulated that each dominion would have a Governor-General.
- The Governor-General was responsible for overseeing the effective operation of the Act during the transition period.
Statement 2: Government Operations Until New Constitutions
- The statement asserts that governments in both dominions would operate under the Act until new constitutions were adopted.
- However, this statement is misleading. While the governments were expected to function according to the Indian Independence Act, they were also empowered to adopt their own constitutional frameworks, which means they could deviate from the Act's provisions once they chose to establish a new constitution.
Conclusion on the Correctness of Statements
- Since Statement 2 is not entirely accurate regarding the operational authority of the dominions, it is deemed incorrect.
- Therefore, the answer to the question, which asks for the statement that is not correct, is option 'B' (2 Only).
Key Takeaways:
- Governor-General's Role: Each dominion had a Governor-General for overseeing the Act.
- Government Operations: While the Act guided initial governance, new constitutions allowed for flexibility in governance structures.
This explanation clarifies why Statement 2 is the only incorrect assertion, confirming the answer as option 'B'.

Consider the following statements about the Mountbatten plan.
1. Two boundary commissions, one in respect of each province, were constituted to demarcate the boundaries of the new provinces
2. The referendum in NWFP decided in favour of Pakistan, the provincial Congress refrained from the referendum
Which of these statements are not correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both of them
  • d)
    Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Sneha Bajaj answered
The correct answer is option 'D', neither of them. Both statements are correct.

1. Two boundary commissions, one in respect of each province, were constituted to demarcate the boundaries of the new provinces:
- The Mountbatten Plan, also known as the Indian Independence Act, was implemented on August 15, 1947, and it resulted in the partition of India and the creation of two separate nations: India and Pakistan.
- As part of the plan, two boundary commissions were constituted, one for Punjab and one for Bengal, to demarcate the boundaries of the new provinces.
- The Radcliffe Commission was appointed to demarcate the boundary between India and Pakistan. Sir Cyril Radcliffe, a British lawyer, was the chairman of the commission.
- The boundary commission's task was to divide the provinces of Punjab and Bengal along religious lines, taking into consideration the demographic distribution of Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs.
- The Radcliffe Line, drawn by the commission, divided the Punjab and Bengal regions into two parts, with one part going to India and the other to Pakistan.

2. The referendum in NWFP decided in favor of Pakistan, the provincial Congress refrained from the referendum:
- NWFP (North-West Frontier Province) was a province in British India, which is now known as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Pakistan.
- In NWFP, a referendum was conducted in 1947 to determine whether the province should join India or Pakistan.
- The referendum was held to take into account the preferences of the people of NWFP, who were primarily Pathans or Pashtuns.
- The majority of the people in NWFP voted in favor of joining Pakistan in the referendum.
- The provincial Congress, which was predominantly Hindu and Sikh, refrained from participating in the referendum due to political and communal tensions.
- As a result, NWFP became part of Pakistan after the partition.

Therefore, both statements are correct. The Mountbatten Plan did involve the constitution of boundary commissions to demarcate the boundaries of the new provinces, and the referendum in NWFP did result in the province joining Pakistan, with the provincial Congress abstaining from the referendum.

Which among the following are correct regarding the first Council of Ministers of independent India?
1. Jagjivan Ram as minister of labour
2. John Mathai is the minister of Food and Agriculture
3. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad as minister of education
Choose from the following options.
  • a)
    1 and 2 Only
  • b)
    2 and 3 Only
  • c)
    1 and 3 Only
  • d)
    All of them
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Akanksha Saha answered
Explanation:

Jagjivan Ram as minister of labour:
- Jagjivan Ram was indeed appointed as the first Minister of Labour in independent India.
- He played a crucial role in shaping labor policies and ensuring the welfare of workers in the country.

Maulana Abul Kalam Azad as minister of education:
- Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was appointed as the first Minister of Education in independent India.
- He was a prominent leader in the Indian freedom struggle and played a key role in shaping the education system of the newly independent nation.

John Mathai is the minister of Food and Agriculture:
- John Mathai was not a part of the first Council of Ministers of independent India.
- He did serve as India's first Railway Minister and later as the Finance Minister, but he was not the Minister of Food and Agriculture in the initial council.
Therefore, the correct options regarding the first Council of Ministers of independent India are 1 and 3 only, with Jagjivan Ram as the Minister of Labour and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad as the Minister of Education.

Arrange the events chronologically.
1. Formation of the Praja Socialist party
2. Formation of the Swatantra party
3. Formation of the socialist party
4. Formation of the Bhartiya Jan Sangh
Choose from the following options.
  • a)
    1-2-3-4
  • b)
    4-3-2-1
  • c)
    2-1-3-4
  • d)
    3-4-1-2
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Sanjay Rana answered
  • The socialist party was formed in 1934 as Congress socialist party. Bharatiya Jan Sangh was founded on October 21, 1951.
  • Praja socialist party was founded in September 1952 by merging the Praja socialist party and KMPP. The Swatantra Party was founded in August 1959.

Consider the following statements.
1. For Britain, the Dominion status offered a chance to keep India in the Commonwealth
2. Mountbatten's formula was to divide India but retain minimum Unity for the benefits of Britain
Which of these statements are not correct?
  • a)
    1 Only
  • b)
    2 Only
  • c)
    Both of them
  • d)
    Neither of them
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Neha Verma answered
  • For Britain, the dominion status offered a chance to keep India in the Commonwealth, even if temporarily, considering the economic strength, defence potential and greater value of trade and investment in India.
  • Mountbatten's formula was to divide India but retain maximum Unity.

Chapter doubts & questions for Independence and After - 6 Months Preparation Course for UPPSC 2026 is part of UPPSC (UP) exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the UPPSC (UP) exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for UPPSC (UP) 2026 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.

Chapter doubts & questions of Independence and After - 6 Months Preparation Course for UPPSC in English & Hindi are available as part of UPPSC (UP) exam. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPPSC (UP) Exam by signing up for free.

Top Courses UPPSC (UP)